RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Osteoporotic fractures are a major contributor to late life morbidity and mortality, and impose a substantial societal cost, yet osteoporosis remains substantially underdiagnosed and undertreated. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to assess the pooled diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of computed tomography (CT) images for diagnosing osteoporosis in patients who meet WHO dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) osteoporosis criteria using specific Hounsfield unit (HU) values as a threshold. METHODS: Systematic literature searches in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Google Scholar were performed from the earliest available date through 1 July 2018, restricted to publications in English. Participants in all studies underwent CT scans that included the lumbar and/or thoracic spine for different indications and HU measurements were used to identify osteoporosis. DXA scans served as the reference standard. RESULTS: Ten eligible studies were identified. The mean area under the hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for diagnosis osteoporosis was 0.84 (95% CI: 0.81, 0.87). The pooled diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of CT images to identify osteoporosis were 0.83 (95% CI: 0.73, 0.90) and 0.74 (95% CI: 0.69, 0.79). The positive likelihood ratio (LR+), negative likelihood ratio (LR-), and diagnostic odds ratio were 3.4 (95% CI: 2.7, 4.5), 0.21 (95% CI: 0.12, 0.36), and 16.4 (95% CI: 7.8, 34.3), respectively. The bias-adjusted sensitivity and specificity of CT were 0.73 and 0.71. Meta-regression demonstrated that country of study, DXA criteria and scanner manufacturer were significant factors associated with the sensitivity of CT in detecting osteoporosis while scanner manufacturer was the only factor associated with specificity of CT. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis showed reasonable pooled sensitivity and specificity for using threshold values measured on CT scans to identify osteoporosis opportunistically.
Asunto(s)
Densidad Ósea , Osteoporosis , Absorciometría de Fotón , Humanos , Vértebras Lumbares/diagnóstico por imagen , Osteoporosis/diagnóstico por imagen , Osteoporosis/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos XRESUMEN
Completing a doctoral program is a daunting journey for any individual. Working full-time and juggling personal demands make the journey more complex. This monograph explores the unique motivations women who travel this path possess, identifies barriers in completion of a doctoral program for women, and tells the story of one group of women who developed a working model for a supportive writing group. As numbers of female health professions students and education leaders increase, institutions must identify mechanisms for support of women interested in pursuing an academic doctoral degree, preparing academic institutions for future diversity changes in health care.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Few studies have examined the differential impact of sublobar resection (SL) and lobectomy (L) on quality of life (QoL) during the first postoperative year. METHODS: We used a prospective cohort of Stage IA lung cancer patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) from the Initiative for Early Lung Cancer Research on Treatment. QoL was measured before surgery, and within 4, 6, and 12 months post-surgery using three validated instruments: SF-12 [physical (PCS) and mental health (MCS)], FACT-LCS (lung-cancer-symptoms), and the PHQ-4 (anxiety and depression subscales). Locally weighted smoothing curve (LOWESS) was fitted to identify the best interval knot for the change in the QoL trend post-surgery. After adjusting for demographic and clinical variables, an adjusted piecewise linear mixed effects model was developed to estimate differences in baseline and 12-month scores, and rates of change for each QoL measure. RESULTS: SL resection was performed in 127 (63.2%) and L in 74 (36.8%) patients. LOWESS plots suggested that the shift of QoL (interval knot) was at 2 months post-surgery. Decreases in PCS scores were less severe for SL than L patients 2 months post-surgery (-0.18 vs. -2.30, P=0.02); while subsequent improvements were observed for both groups (SL: +0.29 vs. L: +0.74, P=0.06). SL patients reported significantly better scores a year post-surgery compared to baseline (P=0.003), while L patients did not. Anxiety decreased at similar rates for both SL and L patients within 2 months post-surgery (P=0.18), then stabilized for the remaining months. MCS and depression scores remained stable in both groups throughout. QoL scores were lower for women than for men, but only significantly worse for the lung-cancer-symptoms (P=0.003) and anxiety (P=0.04). CONCLUSIONS: SL patients fared better in physical health and lung cancer symptoms than L patients. The first two postoperative months showed the most significant change which suggests targeting postoperative intervention during that time.
RESUMEN
How prevalent is dyslexia? A definitive answer to this question has been elusive because of the continuous distribution of reading performance and predictors of dyslexia and because of the heterogeneous nature of samples of poor readers. Samples of poor readers are a mixture of individuals whose reading is consistent with or expected based on their performance in other academic areas and in language, and individuals with dyslexia whose reading is not consistent with or expected based on their other performances. In the present article, we replicate and extend a new approach for determining the prevalence of dyslexia. Using model-based meta-analysis and simulation, three main results were found. First, the prevalence of dyslexia is better represented as a distribution that varies as a function of severity as opposed to any single-point estimate. Second, samples of poor readers will contain more expected poor readers than unexpected or dyslexic readers. Third, individuals with dyslexia can be found across the reading spectrum as opposed to only at the lower tail of reading performance. These results have implications for screening and identification, and for recruiting participants for scientific studies of dyslexia.
Asunto(s)
Rendimiento Académico/estadística & datos numéricos , Comprensión , Dislexia/diagnóstico , Dislexia/epidemiología , Pruebas del Lenguaje/estadística & datos numéricos , Modelos Psicológicos , Modelos Estadísticos , Teorema de Bayes , Niño , Comprensión/fisiología , Simulación por Computador , Dislexia/etiología , Dislexia/fisiopatología , Humanos , Metaanálisis como Asunto , PrevalenciaRESUMEN
Public health and health service interventions are typically complex: they are multifaceted, with impacts at multiple levels and on multiple stakeholders. Systematic reviews evaluating the effects of complex health interventions can be challenging to conduct. This paper is part of a special series of papers considering these challenges particularly in the context of WHO guideline development. We outline established and innovative methods for synthesising quantitative evidence within a systematic review of a complex intervention, including considerations of the complexity of the system into which the intervention is introduced. We describe methods in three broad areas: non-quantitative approaches, including tabulation, narrative and graphical approaches; standard meta-analysis methods, including meta-regression to investigate study-level moderators of effect; and advanced synthesis methods, in which models allow exploration of intervention components, investigation of both moderators and mediators, examination of mechanisms, and exploration of complexities of the system. We offer guidance on the choice of approach that might be taken by people collating evidence in support of guideline development, and emphasise that the appropriate methods will depend on the purpose of the synthesis, the similarity of the studies included in the review, the level of detail available from the studies, the nature of the results reported in the studies, the expertise of the synthesis team and the resources available.
RESUMEN
This review summarizes the literature on QoL in early stage lung cancer patients who underwent surgery. PubMed and PsycINFO were searched. Twelve articles from 10 distinct studies were identified for a total of 992 patients. Five QoL measures were used. One study reported only on pre-surgical QoL, six only on post-surgical QoL and three studies reported on both pre- and post-surgical QoL. Timing for the administration of post-surgical QoL surveys varied. The literature on QoL in Stage I non-small-cell lung cancer patients is very sparse. Additional research is needed to explore the impact of different surgical approaches on QoL.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Pulmonares/patología , Neoplasias Pulmonares/cirugía , Calidad de Vida , Humanos , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: To maximize the benefits of computed tomographic screening for lung cancer, optimal treatment for small, early lung cancers is needed. Limiting the extent of surgery spares lung tissue, preserves pulmonary function, and decreases operative time, complications, and morbidities. It also increases the likelihood of resecting future new primary lung cancers. The goal is to assess alternative treatments in a timely manner. METHODS: The focus sessions with patients and physicians separately highlighted the need to consider their perceptions. Literature reviews and analyses of treatment results using large databases were performed to formulate critical questions about long-term treatment outcomes, recurrence, and quality of life of alternative treatments. Based on these analyses, the investigators developed a prospective multi-institutional cohort study, the Initiative for Early Lung Cancer Research for Treatment, to compare treatments for stage I NSCLC. HIPAA compliant institutional review board approval was obtained and we performed a feasibility study of the first 206 surgical patients. RESULTS: Lobectomy was performed in 89 (43.2%) patients, and sublobar resection was performed in 117 (56.7%) patients. Mediastinal lymph node resection was performed in 173 (84.0%) patients, 8 had N1 and 3 N2 lymph node metastases. Patients stated that both the surgeon's opinion (93%) and the patient's own opinion (93%) were extremely important, followed by the patients' view that the chosen procedure would provide the best quality of life (90%). CONCLUSIONS: It was feasible to obtain pre- and postsurgical information from patients and surgeons. We anticipate statistically meaningful results about treatment alternatives in 3 to 5 years.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/cirugía , Implementación de Plan de Salud , Neoplasias Pulmonares/cirugía , Escisión del Ganglio Linfático/métodos , Neumonectomía/métodos , Radiocirugia/métodos , Proyectos de Investigación , Anciano , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/patología , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patología , Masculino , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Estudios Prospectivos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Determine the frequency of moderate-to-severe hepatic steatosis (HS) in asymptomatic participants in a low-dose CT (LDCT) screening program for lung cancer, to identify risk factors, and develop recommendations. METHODS: Baseline LDCT scans of the chest of 170 participants in an IRB-approved study between August 2011 and April 2016 were reviewed. Demographic variables, comorbidities, and liver function tests were documented. Hepatic and splenic attenuation values hounsfield unit (HU) were measured. Regression analyses were performed. RESULTS: Average liver attenuation was 57.6HU (standard deviation (SD) 9.3) and average liver/spleen (L/S) ratio was 1.3 (SD 0.3). Liver attenuation was <40HU for 9 (5.3%), liver/spleen (L/S) ratio <0.8 for 6 (3.5%), and either <40HU or L/S ratio <0.8 for 9 (5.3%). Male sex (p=0.004), diabetes (p=0.0005), emphysema (p=0.03), and high BMI (p=0.0006) were significant predictors of HS. Aspartate aminotransferase (p=0.0018) and alanine aminotransferase (p=0.012) were negatively correlated with liver attenuation. Reduced serum levels of alpha-1-antitrypsin may be a common factor of emphysema and HS. CONCLUSION: LDCT can detect HS in asymptomatic participants with frequencies similar to previous reports. If liver attenuation is below 40HU and/or L/S ratio below 0.8, further evaluation of HS to the primary care physician or liver specialist is recommended.
Asunto(s)
Hígado Graso/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Pulmonares/diagnóstico por imagen , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Alanina Transaminasa/sangre , Aspartato Aminotransferasas/sangre , Femenino , Humanos , Pruebas de Función Hepática , Neoplasias Pulmonares/sangre , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Interpretación de Imagen Radiográfica Asistida por Computador , Factores de Riesgo , Sensibilidad y EspecificidadRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To examine rural men's use and perceptions of mobile and wireless devices to self-monitor eating and physical activity (mHealth). DESIGN AND SAMPLE: Men in this 3-week pilot study used FitBit One® to log daily food intake and monitor activity. A companion application (app) allowed activity monitoring of fellow participants. Health-related text messages were received 1-3 times daily. A purposive sample of 12 rural men (ages 40-67) was recruited by community leaders. MEASURES: (1) baseline heart rate, blood pressure, and BMI, (2) FitBit One® usage, (3) investigator-generated surveys on acceptability of mHealth, and (4) focus group on experience with mHealth. RESULTS: Men were overweight (n = 3) or obese (n = 9) and 9 of 12 were hypertensive. Nine of twelve wore FitBit One® all 21 days. Eleven of 12 men logged food, with 9 of 12 doing this at least 15 of 21 days. Self-monitoring and daily text messaging increased awareness of energy intake and output. Companion app's food log needed targeting for rural foods. Rotating seasons (occupational, religious, recreational) and weak cellular signals created contextual barriers to self-monitoring eating and activity. CONCLUSIONS: FitBit One® and text messaging were perceived as useful among the rural men, while the companion apps require adaptation to reflect dietary norms.
Asunto(s)
Ingestión de Alimentos , Ejercicio Físico , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud , Población Rural , Autocuidado , Telemedicina , Adulto , Anciano , Estudios de Factibilidad , Grupos Focales , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Aplicaciones Móviles , Monitoreo Ambulatorio/instrumentación , Proyectos Piloto , Población Rural/estadística & datos numéricos , Envío de Mensajes de TextoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To conduct a model-driven meta-analysis of correlational research on psychological and motivational predictors of diabetes outcomes, with adherence factors as mediators. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search of published and unpublished studies located a sample of 775 individual correlational or predictive studies reported across 739 research reports. RESULTS: Results varied according to the outcome variable included in the regression models. Depression had a larger negative effect on adherence to physical activity than on dietary adherence. Coping and self-efficacy were strongly related to dietary adherence, which was strongly related to improved glycemic control. Medication adherence was related to glycosylated hemoglobin, whereas medications and self-monitoring were related to fasting blood glucose. Adding appointment keeping to the models did not significantly alter the results. CONCLUSION: Self-efficacy was the most consistent predictor of all adherence behaviors and dietary adherence was the most significant predictor of HbA1c. Physical activity was the most predictive factor of BMI and glucose self-monitoring the most predictive of FBG. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Metabolic control is a primary goal in T2DM, so the best pathway to attaining that goal appears to be an emphasis on self-efficacy and dietary adherence.
Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/psicología , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/terapia , Ejercicio Físico/psicología , Cooperación del Paciente/psicología , Estrés Psicológico/psicología , Glucemia/análisis , Automonitorización de la Glucosa Sanguínea , Depresión/psicología , Hemoglobina Glucada/análisis , Humanos , Autocuidado/psicología , AutoeficaciaRESUMEN
Cancer-related fatigue is one of the most common and distressing side effects experienced by patients with cancer. Increased activity and exercise have been shown to significantly impact cancer-related fatigue and are beneficial during and after treatment. This article describes the development and implementation of a 12-week evidence-based exercise and education program for cancer survivors in a community medical center. Participants consistently reported significant improvements in fatigue, depression, sleep disturbances, pain, and quality of life. The improvements were independent of the type of cancer, extent of disease, or treatment status. Additional benefits described by participants were support, a sense of belonging, and being understood.
Asunto(s)
Enfermería Basada en la Evidencia , Ejercicio Físico , Neoplasias/psicología , Neoplasias/rehabilitación , Educación del Paciente como Asunto/organización & administración , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Educación Continua en Enfermería , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Desarrollo de ProgramaRESUMEN
One of the most frequently cited reasons for conducting a meta-analysis is the increase in statistical power that it affords a reviewer. This article demonstrates that fixed-effects meta-analysis increases statistical power by reducing the standard error of the weighted average effect size (T.) and, in so doing, shrinks the confidence interval around T.. Small confidence intervals make it more likely for reviewers to detect nonzero population effects, thereby increasing statistical power. Smaller confidence intervals also represent increased precision of the estimated population effect size. Computational examples are provided for 3 effect-size indices: d (standardized mean difference), Pearson's r, and odds ratios. Random-effects meta-analyses also may show increased statistical power and a smaller standard error of the weighted average effect size. However, the authors demonstrate that increasing the number of studies in a random-effects meta-analysis does not always increase statistical power.