[Exposures to fruit plants in Germany from 2010-2019 : Analysis of the Erfurt joint poison information center database]. / Expositionen mit Fruchtpflanzen in Deutschland im Zeitraum 2010­2019 : Auswertung der Datenbank des Gemeinsamen Giftinformationszentrums Erfurt (GGIZ).

BACKGROUND: Inquiries about fruit plants are a frequent reason for consultation with poison information centers, although it should be emphasized that there are no large systematic studies on toxicity based on exposure data. The aim of this work is to determine the risk of poisoning by fruit plants in Germany. METHODS: Retrospective study of data from the Erfurt Joint Poison Information Center on poisoning inquiries regarding fruit plants (2010-2019) with a detailed presentation of interim results, a tabular handout, plant photos as identification aids, and trend analyses. RESULTS: From 16,088 plant exposures with 16,700 plants, 214 different fruit plant species were identified. Forty-five fruit plant species (21%) turned out to be relevant (≥ 30 inquiries) and of these, 6 (2.8%) turned out to be highly relevant (≥ 300 inquiries). All relevant plants were assigned a defined risk category (RC): RC 0 (2; 4.4%), RC 1 (26; 57.8%), RC 2 (12; 26.7%), and RC 3 (5; 11.1%). Regarding the inquiries, 6% (459/7607) were related to RC 0; 47.9% (3645/7607) to RC 1; 39.3% to RC 2 (2986/7607); and 6.8% (517/7607) to RC 3. Of the inquiries, 69.5% (5284/7607) were related to young children (1 to < 6 years). Exposure outcomes for all age groups were asymptomatic in 82%, mild in 14.7%, moderate in 3%, and severe in 0.3%, with severe poisoning caused by seven plant species. Interventions were initiated in 66.8% (5079) of the inquiries. Inquiries were most frequently related to Taxus baccata, Ligustrum vulgare, Physalis alkekengi, Prunus laurocerasus, Convallaria majalis, Mahonia spec., Sambucus spec., Lonicera spec., Sorbus aucuparia, Thuja spec., Hedera helix, and Cotoneaster spec. DISCUSSION: Poisoning by fruit plants in Germany is rare. However, there is a great need for information and education.

Poisoning by Plants.

BACKGROUND: Questions on poisoning by plants are a common reason for inquiries to poison information centers (PIC). Over the years 2011-2020, plant poisoning was the subject of 15% of all inquiries to the joint poison information center in Erfurt, Germany (Gemeinsames Giftinformationszentrum Erfurt, GGIZ) that concerned poisoning in children (2.3% in adults). In this patient collective, plant poisoning occupied third place after medical drugs (32%) and chemical substances (24%), and was a more common subject of inquiry than mushroom poisoning (1.5%). METHODS: This review is based on pertinent publications retrieved by a selective literature search in PubMed/TOXLINE on plant poisoning and on 12 epidemiologically and toxicologically relevant domestic species of poisonous plants in risk categories 2 and 3 (up to 2021). RESULTS: Medical personnel should have basic toxicological knowledge of the following highly poisonous plants: wolfsbane (aconitum), belladonna, angel's trumpet, cowbane (cicuta virosa), autumn crocus, hemlock, jimson weed, henbane, castor bean (ricinus), false hellebore, foxglove (digitalis), and European yew. The intoxication is evaluated on the basis of a structured history (the "w" questions) and the clinical manifestations (e.g., toxidromes). Special analysis is generally not readily available and often expensive and time-consuming. In case of poisoning, a poison information center should be contacted for plant identification, risk assessment, and treatment recommendations. Specimens of plant components and vomit should be obtained, if possible, for further testing. Measures for the elimination of the poisonous substance may be indicated after a risk-benefit analysis. Specific antidotes are available for only a few types of plant poisoning, e.g., physostigmine for tropane alkaloid poisoning or digitalis antibodies for foxglove poisoning. The treatment is usually symptomatic and only rarely evidence-based. Individualized medical surveillance is recommended after the ingestion of large or unknown quantities of poisonous plant components. CONCLUSION: The clinician should be able to recognize dangerous domestic species of poisonous plants, take appropriate initial measures, and avoid overdiagnosis and overtreatment. To improve patient care, systematic epidemiological and clinical studies are needed.

[Poisoning by chemical substances and products]. / Vergiftungen durch chemische Stoffe und Produkte.

Exposure to chemical substances results in a multitude of poisonings or suspected poisonings every year. Poison centres (PCs) advise the public and medical staff on these issues and register cases in their databases. Additionally, the Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR) maintains a case database with notifications reported by attending physicians within the framework of the Chemicals Act.This article describes important poisons from the field of chemicals and products and gives an example of poisoning risk management for a new product group. For this purpose, exemplary case information published in the annual reports of different PCs and the cases notified to the BfR were examined.An overview is provided on the product groups leading most frequently to poisonings and requests to the PCs. The spectrum of poisonings registered by the BfR and PCs differs clearly between reporting persons, route of exposure and severity. Substance groups with a relatively high risk compared to other chemical substances and products are highly concentrated detergents, acids and alkalis as well as carbon monoxide.PCs and the BfR databases contain valuable information to estimate the frequency and severity of various poisonings. By merging these data in a national poisoning register, new risks would be discovered more quickly in the future and a national overview of poisoning events would be gained.

[Poisonous plants-a new approach for assessing the risk of poisoning in small children]. / Risiko Pflanze ­ Ein neuer Ansatz zur Einschätzung des Vergiftungsrisikos für Kleinkinder.

BACKGROUND: Plant poisoning in small children (from 0.5 to <6 years of age) is the third most frequent cause for phone contact with a poison center. For prevention of poisonings, a list of poisonous plants that should not be planted close to playgrounds or other places frequently visited by children was published in 2000 by the Bundesanzeiger. This list has been reevaluated and updated by the "Toxicity of Plants" working group of the Committee of the Assessment of Intoxications at the Federal Institute of Risk Assessment (BfR). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Relevant plants were taken from a recent publication. A literature search was conducted in PubMed concerning all plant poisonings in children and the toxic ingredients of plants. Also, monographs and the database POISINDEX were integrated in the evaluation. A classification was made for plants that after oral, dermal, or ocular contact of small quantities could cause severe, moderate, mild, or no intoxications in small children. RESULTS: Based on data of exposure and potentially toxic ingredients of the involved plants, a risk assessment was executed, which diverges from other publications because it concerns the actual basic risk of an intoxication. In total, 251 plants were reevaluated. For 11 plants, there was a high risk, for 32 a moderate, for 115 a mild, and for 93 plants no risk of intoxication could be determined. CONCLUSION: The new assessment of evaluating a toxicity risk for small children on the basis of exposure data and including the toxicity of ingredients allows for a more realistic assessment of the risk of poisoning with outdoor plants. In this way, infant exposure carrying a high risk of intoxication can be identified.

[Poison centres in Germany-history, function, and relevance]. / Giftinformationszentren in Deutschland ­ Historie, Arbeitsweise und Bedeutung.

In 1963 first poison control centres (PCCs) were created in the former Federal Republic of Germany (FRG) as well as in the German Democratic Republic (GDR). In the 1980s, the GDR centralized the toxicological information service in only one centre, whereas the federal structure of the FRG resulted in a foundation of 19 centres. Today only eight German PCCs are established under the responsibility of the German states. Most of them are part of or closely related to university hospitals. In this article, the history, function and relevance of German PCCs are presented.The centres advise on about 255,000 human exposures per annum in a 24/7 service. They provide a very special service in therapeutic emergency management, which is used to a large extent in childhood poisoning. The scientific contributions of German PCCs are well represented at international congresses and two German standard textbooks about the treatment of poisonings in children and adults are published. The worthiness of PCCs in appropriate healthcare and their monetary benefit are as yet unrecognized, although the profit has already been demonstrated through a first systematic assessment in 1991. From public data sources, no sufficient data can be collected for early risk detection in Germany. However, appropriate data could be generated by PCCs and the Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR), but the precondition is the need for better technical equipment and manpower.The existing German political mandate to set up a national monitoring system for poisoning will be ground-breaking for nationwide scientific evaluation and the treatment of cases of human poisoning in the future.

[Accidental intoxication by outdoor and garden plants : Data from two German poison centres]. / Akzidentelle Vergiftungen mit Gartenpflanzen und Pflanzen in der freien Natur : Daten aus zwei deutschen Giftinformationszentren.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Accidental exposure of children to plants occurs often and results in numerous calls to poison centres. The aim of this study was to identify outdoor plants that led to moderate or severe poisoning after accidental exposure and to identify patterns of paediatric plant exposures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Human exposure data on accidental exposures provided by two German poison centres were retrospectively evaluated regarding the number and the routes of exposure. Special attention was turned to the kind and severity of symptoms. Based on these data a modified Litovitz factor was calculated. RESULTS: Out of 42,344 confirmed exposures to 227 plant species, 39,346 (93%) were asymptomatic, 2415 (5.7%) experienced minor, 580 (1.3%) moderate and 3 (0.007%) severe symptoms. Twenty-six plant genera were responsible for 70% of all exposures. Only eight of these plants (Arum spec., Laburnum anagyroides, Narcissus spec., Phaseolus vulgaris/coccineus, Prunus laurocerasus, Sambucus spec., Taxus baccata, Thuja spec.) led to at least moderate symptoms. Accidental exposure of children aged 0.5-5 years was mainly by oral ingestion (98%) and involved mostly fruits (60%). CONCLUSIONS: Exposure data collected by poison centres are very useful for hazard identification of outdoor plants. The data give a comprehensive overview of observed symptoms, which offers valuable instruments for use in clinical practice.

Comparison of the Poisoning Severity Score and National Poison Data System schemes for the severity assessment of animal poisonings: a pilot study.

CONTEXT: To date, there are no publicly available schemes designed and evaluated specifically for severity assessment of animal poisonings. This poses challenges for the evaluation and comparison of animal poisoning exposure data. OBJECTIVE: Our objective for this pilot study was to evaluate agreement between raters using the Poisoning Severity Score (PSS) and National Poison Data System (NPDS) medical outcome scheme for severity assessment of canine exposures reported to a multistate poison center (PC) and to identify issues regarding their use for severity assessment of animal poisonings. Agreement between both schemes was also assessed. METHODS: The first 196 canine exposures reported to a multistate PC between 1 January and 31 August 2016 were selected and initial inquiry data from exposures was scored by four independent raters. Interrater agreement and agreement between the severity systems was calculated using weighted kappa (Κ) (Light's kappa). Reported clinical effects were also described. RESULTS: Interrater agreement for both the PSS (Κ 0.31; 95% CI 0.19, 0.43) and NPDS schemes (Κ 0.34; 95% CI 0.22, 0.44) was low. Agreement between the schemes was slight (Κ 0.05; 95% CI -0.08, 0.16) for pooled results from all four raters. For the PSS, 71.7% (n = 281) of ratings were minor, 23.0% (n = 90) moderate, and 5.4% (n = 21) severe. For the NPDS, 69.6% (n = 273) of ratings were minor, 27.0% (n = 106) moderate, and 3.3% (n = 13) severe. The top three reported clinical effects included vomiting (n = 86, 29.9%) drowsiness/lethargy (n = 38, 13.2%), and diarrhea (n = 24, 8.3%). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: This study shows considerable variability between raters using either the PSS or NPDS schemes for canine exposures severity assessment. The subjective nature of the schemes, the influence of intra- and interrater variation, and predominance of minor cases on the study findings should be taken into account when interpreting this data. Further evaluation of these schemes is warranted and could help inform their future use for animal poisoning severity assessment.