RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Despite global support, there remain gaps in the integration of early palliative care into cancer care. The methods of implementation whereby evidence of benefits of palliative care is translated into practice deserve attention. AIM: To identify implementation frameworks utilised in integrated palliative care in hospital-based oncology services and to describe the associated enablers and barriers to service integration. DESIGN: Systematic review with a narrative synthesis including qualitative, mixed methods, pre-post and quasi experimental designs following the guidance by the Centre for Reviews and Dissemination (PROSPERO registration CRD42021252092). DATA SOURCES: Six databases searched in 2021: EMBASE, EMCARE, APA PsycINFO, CINAHL, Cochrane Library and Ovid MEDLINE searched in 2023. Included were qualitative or quantitative studies, in English language, involving adults >18 years, and implementing hospital-based palliative care into cancer care. Critical appraisal tools were used to assess the quality and rigour. RESULTS: Seven of the 16 studies explicitly cited the use of frameworks including those based on RE-AIM, Medical Research Council evaluation of complex interventions and WHO constructs of health service evaluation. Enablers included an existing supportive culture, clear introduction to the programme across services, adequate funding, human resources and identification of advocates. Barriers included a lack of communication with the patients, caregivers, physicians and palliative care team about programme goals, stigma around the term 'palliative', a lack of robust training, or awareness of guidelines and undefined staff roles. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation science frameworks provide a method to underpin programme development and evaluation as palliative care is integrated within the oncology setting.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to evaluate clinical factors relevant to suicide prevention (including treatment) in cases of bipolar suicide with available therapeutic histories. METHOD: Victorian Coroner's Office data enabled identification of suicides that occurred between March 1993 and December 2001. Cases involving sufficient clinical notes to enable diagnosis of DSM-IV bipolar disorder and review of treatment were de-identified and assessed by an expert clinical panel. RESULTS: From 3752 suicides, 35 eligible bipolar subjects (22 men, 13 women) aged 40.3 +/- 1.8 years were identified. Duration of illness was 11.9 +/- 1.1 years. A total of 86% had made at least one previous suicide attempt, and 83% were in the depressed phase of illness. A total of 63% manifested psychosis at some time during lifetime illness. Fourteen per cent were inpatients, and 26% suicided within 6 weeks of hospital discharge. The panel's retrospective risk assessment concluded that only 48% of cases could have been assessed as high risk. In the 4 weeks prior to suicide, treatment was rated as not reaching benchmark standards in 60% of cases. Electroconvulsive therapy had been given to 11%, lithium to 43% (but definitely therapeutic in only 11%), 31% had never been treated with lithium, and psychosocial interventions did not reach adequate standards in 57% during the previous year. CONCLUSIONS: In the majority of bipolar suicide cases in the present case series the subjects did not receive treatment at or above a benchmark standard, often due to illness and situational factors, but also possibly due to inadequate clinical interventions. Strategies to improve treatment may reduce suicide in bipolar disorder.