Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 8 de 8
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Br J Anaesth ; 132(5): 957-963, 2024 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38443287

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Pulse oximetry uses noninvasive optical measurements of light transmission from each of two sources through vascularised living tissue over the cardiac cycle (SpO2). From those measurements, the relative amount of oxygenated haemoglobin (SaO2) in circulating blood can be deduced. Recent reports have shown that, compared with SaO2 measurements from blood samples, SpO2 measurements are biased erroneously high for patients with dark skin. METHODS: We developed a new method, spectrally resolved photoplethysmography (srPPG), to examine how spectral bandwidth affects the transmission of polychromatic light through the fingertip across the cardiac cycle. We measured and recorded the spectral transmission through the fingertip as the O2 concentration in inspired air was reduced. We applied digital spectral filters of two different bandwidths, narrow or broad, to the same srPPG recordings to determine whether SpO2 readings systematically varied for the two bandwidths. The srPPG method also allowed us to measure the fractional amount of melanin in the optical path. The effect of melanin content on the ratio of SpO2 readings for narrow and broad spectral bandwidths was analysed. RESULTS: We hypothesised, based upon the Beer-Lambert law, and then showed experimentally, that the light emission spectra of light-emitting diode light sources, as used in commercial pulse oximeters, result in erroneously high SpO2 measurements for patients having greater melanin concentrations in their skin than those of the subject pool used for instrument calibration. CONCLUSIONS: To eliminate melanin bias, pulse oximeters should use much narrower spectral bandwidths than those used in current models.


Asunto(s)
Melaninas , Oximetría , Humanos , Oxígeno , Oxihemoglobinas , Calibración
2.
PLoS One ; 18(11): e0291083, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37976243

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Germicidal ultraviolet (UV-C) light has been shown as an effective modality for disinfection in laboratory settings and in the operative room. Traditionally, short-wavelength UV-C devices, which have previously been shown to cause DNA damage, are utilized only for disinfection in pre- and post-operative settings and are not continuously active during operations. Continuous use of intraoperative UV light has potential to decrease pathogens and subsequent surgical site infections (SSIs), which arise in approximately 5-15% of operative cases. SSIs are a significant determinant of patient morbidity, readmission rates, and overall cost. Therefore, a method of UV light disinfection with a low risk of DNA damage is needed so that greater antimicrobial protection can be afforded to patients during the entirety of their surgical procedures. A new disinfection device that harnesses longer-wavelength UV-A light to disinfect the surgical field throughout the entirety of the procedure, including pre- and post-operation has been developed. METHODS: This study aimed to determine if UV-A light administered intraoperatively was safe, as defined by the minimal presence of DNA damage and safe amounts of reflection upon medical personnel. Using in vitro models, we examined the differential impacts of UV-C and UV-A light on DNA damage and repair pathways. In a murine model, we looked at the production of DNA damage photoproduction in relation to UV-A versus UV-C exposure. RESULTS: Our results show UV-A light does not induce a significant amount of DNA damage at the cellular or tissue level. Furthermore, a preclinical porcine study showed that surgical personnel were exposed to safe levels of UV-A irradiance from an overhead UV-A light used during an operation. The amount of UV-A transmitted through surgical personal protective equipment (PPE) also remained within safe levels. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, we found that UV-A may be safe for intraoperative use.


Asunto(s)
Iluminación , Rayos Ultravioleta , Humanos , Animales , Ratones , Porcinos , Iluminación/efectos adversos , Desinfección/métodos
3.
Life (Basel) ; 12(11)2022 Oct 31.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36362902

RESUMEN

The germicidal efficacy of LED UV-A lighting has scarcely been compared in continuous and pulsed modes for contaminated surfaces. Herein, we compare the disinfection properties of pulsed versus continuous lighting at equal irradiances using a 365 nm LED device that replicates the doses of occupied-space continuous disinfection UV-A products. Representative organisms evaluated in this study included human-infectious enveloped and non-enveloped viruses (lentivirus and adeno-associated virus, respectively), a bacterial endospore (Bacillus atrophaeus), and a resilient gram-positive bacterium (Enterococcus faecalis). Nominal UV-A irradiances were tested at or below the UL standard limit for continuous human exposure (maximum irradiance of 10 W/m2). We observed photoinactivation properties that varied by organism type, with bacteria and enveloped virus being more susceptible to UV-A than non-enveloped virus and spores. Overall, we conclude that continuous-mode UV-A lighting is better suited for occupied-space disinfection than pulsing UV-A at equivalent low irradiances, and we draw comparisons to other studies in the literature.

4.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 43(3): 306-311, 2022 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33858538

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the use of colorimetric indicators for monitoring ultraviolet-C (UV-C) light delivery to sites in patient rooms. METHODS: In laboratory testing, we examined the correlation between changes in color of 2 commercial colorimetric indicators and log10 reductions in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and Clostridioides difficile spores with exposure to increasing doses of UV-C from a low-pressure mercury room decontamination device. In patient rooms, 1 of the colorimetric indicators was used to assess UV-C dose delivery to 27 sites in the room. RESULTS: In laboratory testing, the manufacturer's reference colors for MRSA and C. difficile reduction corresponded with doses of ∼10,000 and 46,000 µJ/cm2; these doses resulted in >3 log10 reductions in MRSA and C. difficile spores, respectively. In patient rooms, the colorimetric indicators demonstrated suboptimal delivery of UV-C dosing to shadowed areas, which was improved by providing cycles on each side of the patient bed rather than in a single position and altering device placement. Increasing duration of exposure increased the number of sites achieving adequate dosing to kill C. difficile spores. CONCLUSIONS: Commercial colorimetric indicators provide rapid and easy-to-interpret information on the UV-C dose delivered to sites in patient rooms. The indicators may be useful for training environmental services personnel and optimizing the effectiveness of UV-C room decontamination devices.


Asunto(s)
Clostridioides difficile , Infección Hospitalaria , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina , Recuento de Colonia Microbiana , Colorimetría , Infección Hospitalaria/prevención & control , Descontaminación/métodos , Desinfección/métodos , Humanos , Habitaciones de Pacientes , Rayos Ultravioleta
5.
J Res Natl Inst Stand Technol ; 126: 126052, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38469440

RESUMEN

A method is described for inactivation of pathogens, especially airborne pathogens, using ultraviolet (UV) radiation emitted directly into occupied spaces and exposing occupants to a dose below the accepted actinic exposure limit (EL). This method is referred to as direct irradiation below exposure limits, or DIBEL. It is demonstrated herein that low-intensity UV radiation below exposure limits can achieve high levels of equivalent air changes per hour (ACHeq) and can be an effective component of efforts to combat airborne pathogens such as the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the virus that causes coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). An ACHeq of 4 h-¹ is presently achievable over a continuous 8 h period for the SARS-CoV-2 virus with UV-C light-emitting diodes (LEDs) having peak wavelength at 275 nm, and future improvements in LED technology and optics are anticipated to enable improvements up to 150 h-¹ in the coming decade. For example, the actinic EL is 60 J/m² at 254 nm, and human coronaviruses, including SARS-CoV-2, have a UV dose required for 90 % inactivation of about 5 J/m² at 254 nm. Irradiation by 254 nm UV-C at the EL is expected to provide 90 % inactivation of these organisms in air in about 40 min when the UV-C is delivered at a constant irradiance over 8 h, or in about 5 min if the UV-C is delivered at a constant irradiance over 1 h. Since the irradiation is continuous, the inactivation of initial contaminants accumulates to 99 % and then 99.9 %, and it also immediately begins inactivating any newly introduced (e.g., exhaled) pathogens at the same rate throughout the 8 h period. The efficacy for inactivating airborne pathogens with DIBEL may be expressed in terms of ACHeq, which may be compared with conventional ventilation-based methods for air disinfection. DIBEL may be applied in addition to other disinfection methods, such as upper room UV germicidal irradiation, and mechanical ventilation and filtration. The ACHeq of the separate methods is additive, providing enhanced cumulative disinfection rates. Conventional air disinfection technologies have typical ACHeq values of about 1 h-¹ to 5 h-¹ and maximum practical values of about 20 h-¹. UV-C DIBEL currently provides ACHeq values that are typically about 1 h-¹ to 10 h-¹, thus either complementing, or potentially substituting for, conventional technologies. UV-C DIBEL protocols are forecast herein to evolve to >100 ACHeq in a few years, potentially surpassing conventional technologies. UV-A (315 nm to 400 nm) and/or UV-C (100 nm to 280 nm) DIBEL is also efficacious at inactivating pathogens on surfaces. The relatively simple installation, low acquisition and operating costs, and unobtrusive aesthetic of DIBEL using UV LEDs contribute value in a layered, multi-agent disinfection strategy.

6.
J Photochem Photobiol B ; 209: 111899, 2020 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32485344

RESUMEN

UV-A and visible light are thought to excite endogenous photosensitizers in microbes, thereby initiating complex chemical interactions that ultimately kill cells. Natural solar-based disinfection methods have been adapted into commercial lighting technologies with varying degrees of reported efficacy and associated safety hazards for human exposure. Here we utilize a narrow-spectrum UV-A LED prototype (currently in development for health care applications) to investigate the mechanism of bacterial photoinactivation using 365 nm light. Using a combination of reverse genetics and biochemical investigation, we report mechanistic evidence that 365nm light initiates a chain-reaction of superoxide-mediated damage via auto-excitation of vitamin-based electron carriers, specifically vitamin K2 menaquinones and the FAD flavoprotein in Complex II in the electron transport chain. We observe that photoinactivation is modifiable through supplementation of the environment to bypass cell damage. Lastly, we observe that bacteria forced into metabolic dormancy by desiccation become hypersensitized to the effects of UV-A light, thereby permitting photoinactivation at fluences that are significantly lower than the industry threshold for safe human exposure. In total, these results substantiate the mechanism and potential application of narrow- spectrum UV-A light for bacterial disinfection purposes.


Asunto(s)
Bacterias/efectos de la radiación , Desinfección/métodos , Fármacos Fotosensibilizantes/metabolismo , Rayos Ultravioleta , Relación Dosis-Respuesta en la Radiación
7.
Am J Infect Control ; 48(3): 337-339, 2020 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31492556

RESUMEN

We found that ultraviolet-A (UV-A) light exposure resulted in a modest reduction in recovery of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), Candida auris, bacteriophage MS2, and bacteriophage Phi X174, but not Clostridioides difficile spores, on steel disk carriers. Four hours of UV-A exposure from a ceiling light fixture resulted in a significant reduction in pathogenic microorganisms recovered from in-use medical equipment. These findings suggest that UV-A could be useful as a means to provide continuous low-level decontamination of surfaces in health care facilities.


Asunto(s)
Infección Hospitalaria/prevención & control , Descontaminación/métodos , Desinfección/métodos , Iluminación/métodos , Atención a la Salud/métodos , Equipos y Suministros de Hospitales/microbiología , Instituciones de Salud , Humanos , Rayos Ultravioleta
8.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 40(2): 158-163, 2019 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30698135

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of multiple ultraviolet (UV) light decontamination devices in a radiology procedure room. DESIGN: Laboratory evaluation. METHODS: We compared the efficacy of 8 UV decontamination devices with a 4-minute UV exposure time in reducing recovery of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE), and Clostridium difficile spores on steel disk carriers placed at 5 sites on a computed tomography patient table. Analysis of variance was used to compare reductions for the different devices. A spectrometer was used to obtain irradiance measurements for the devices. RESULTS: Four standard vertical tower low-pressure mercury devices achieved 2 log10CFU or greater reductions in VRE and MRSA and ~1 log10CFU reductions in C. difficile spores, whereas a pulsed-xenon device resulted in less reduction in the pathogens (P<.001). In comparison to the vertical tower low-pressure mercury devices, equal or greater reductions in the pathogens were achieved by 3 nonstandard low-pressure mercury devices that included either adjustable bulbs that could be oriented directly over the exam table, a robotic base allowing movement along the side of the table during operation, or 3 vertical towers operated simultaneously. The low-pressure mercury devices produced primarily UV-C light, whereas the pulsed-xenon device produced primarily UV-A and UV-B light. The time required to move the devices from the corner of the room and set up for operation varied from 18 to 59 seconds. CONCLUSIONS: Many currently available UV devices could provide an effective and efficient adjunct to manual cleaning and disinfection in radiology procedure rooms.


Asunto(s)
Desinfección/métodos , Equipo Médico Durable , Fómites/microbiología , Rayos Ultravioleta , Clostridioides difficile/efectos de la radiación , Recuento de Colonia Microbiana , Infección Hospitalaria/prevención & control , Descontaminación/métodos , Contaminación de Equipos/prevención & control , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina/efectos de la radiación , Esporas Bacterianas/efectos de la radiación , Factores de Tiempo , Enterococos Resistentes a la Vancomicina/efectos de la radiación , Xenón
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA