Background: Commonly cited discoid lateral meniscus (DLM) imaging definitions are based on adult magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) measurements. This pathology commonly presents in pediatric populations; however, whether accepted adult measurements reliably apply to children and adolescents is unknown. Purpose/Hypothesis: This purposes of the study were to determine (1) the utility of applying adult-accepted MRI definitions of DLM to pediatric patients, (2) whether sex differences affect the applicability of the criteria, and (3) whether MRI magnet strength and/or tear presence affect MRI measurements for diagnosing DLM in pediatric patients. It was hypothesized that MRI criteria for DLM would be similar in adults and pediatric patients. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: A total of 100 consecutive MRIs from pediatric patients with DLM were evaluated, with 91 scans included. Two study authors independently reviewed the MRIs, evaluating meniscal height and width on sagittal and coronal images, "bow tie signs" on sagittal images, tibial sagittal and coronal width, and tear presence. For analysis, MRI magnet strength was dichotomized into high (>1.5 T) and low (<1.5 T) groups. Results: The mean age of the patients at MRI evaluation was 12.3 ± 3.4 years; 51% of the patients were male, and 56% of the scans were of left knees. Included patients with DLM showed a mean of 3.68 bow tie signs, a sagittal total anterior to posterior meniscal width/tibial width ratio of 73%, a coronal meniscal width/tibial width ratio of 30%, and a coronal, transverse width of the lateral meniscus at the midportion of the meniscal body of 20.6 ± 7.7 mm. The MRI tesla strength of the images included in this study ranged from 0.3 to 3. It was determined that high- versus low-resolution MRI scans did not affect the inter- or intraobserver reliability of the MRI measurments (P > .05). However, several measurements showed improved intraclass correlation coefficients with increased tesla strength. Conclusion: This study confirms that pediatric patients with DLM, diagnosed by board-certified pediatric sports medicine orthopaedic surgeons, have measurements on MRI consistent with adult DLM diagnostic criteria. This finding held true regardless of sex or MRI tesla strength. Pediatric patients with DLM had >3 bow tie signs, >70% sagittal tibial plateau coverage, >14 mm coronal width, and >20% coronal tibial plateau coverage on MRI.
Background: As a subset of symptomatic discoid lateral meniscal (DLM) tears, anterior horn (AH) meniscal tears are not well studied in the pediatric population. There are even fewer studies reporting patient-reported outcomes after surgical treatment of AH tears in DLM. Purpose: To compare reported outcomes after surgical treatment of DLM tears involving the AH versus other locations in pediatric patients. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A retrospective review of prospectively collected patient data between 2013 and 2020 was conducted. Patients aged <18 years who underwent arthroscopic treatment of a symptomatic DLM were included. Pathology was classified as tears of the AH or tears not involving the anterior horn (NAH). Demographic data along with patient-reported outcome scores (Pediatric International Knee Documentation Committee [Pedi-IKDC] and Patient Assessment Questionnaire [PAQ]) were collected preoperatively through 24 months of follow-up. Results: A total of 41 patients were included (median age, 12.9 years; range, 7-17 years; 32% female, 68% male). The mean follow-up time for was 25 months (range, 8-58 months). There were 17 (41%) patients in the AH group and 24 (59%) patients in the NAH group. Of the AH group, 16 (94%) were treated with meniscal repair (vs menisectomy), while 19 (79%) of the NAH group were treated with meniscal repair. All patients achieved significant pre- to postoperative improvement on both the Pedi-IKDC and the PAQ. At 24-month follow-up, there were no differences between the AH and NAH groups on the Pedi-IKDC (92.51 vs 89.72; P = .18) or the PAQ (2.57 vs 2.61; P = .06). Conclusion: Patients who underwent meniscal repair for AH DLM reported positive postoperative outcomes.
BACKGROUND: Low-energy lateral ankle injuries (Salter-Harris 1 distal fibula, distal fibula avulsion fractures, and radiograph-negative lateral ankle injuries) are common in pediatric patients. Patient-based outcomes for the 2 treatment options, short leg walking cast (CAST) and controlled ankle motion (CAM) boot, are unknown. This study aims to determine differences between 2 treatments of low-energy lateral ankle injuries in pediatric patients. METHODS: A prospective, randomized controlled trial comparing the acute outcomes of CAST and CAM treatment for low-energy lateral ankle injuries in pediatric patients was completed. Patients were evaluated in-person at presentation and 4 weeks for ankle range of motion and Oxford foot and ankle score. A novel survey defining patient and parent satisfaction and time away from school/work was also completed. Treatment complications were documented. Patients were called at 8 weeks postinjury to determine other complications and the final time of return to sport. Mixed effects linear regression models evaluated change over time between the 2 treatment groups. RESULTS: After 60 patients were enrolled, 28 patients in the CAST group and 27 patients in the CAM group completed the study. Males comprised 51% (28), with 38 (69%) patients identifying as Hispanic. The patient's average age was 11.3±2.9 years and the average body mass index was 23.At the 4-week evaluation, the CAM group had improved range of motion, higher satisfaction scores (5.26 CAM vs. 4.25 CAST, P <0.05), similar pain scores (0.32 CAST vs. 0.41 CAM, P =0.75), and lower complications (0.54/patient CAST vs. 0.04/patient CAM, P <0.0001) than the CAST group. Female patients had improved inversion with CAM treatment than males ( P <0.05). Patients over age 12 in the CAST group had significantly decreased plantarflexion at week 4 ( P =0.002). Improvement in Oxford scores was similar between the CAST and CAM groups between the initial presentation and 4 weeks, except for increased improvement in CAM group Oxford scores for difficulty running and symptoms with walking/walking. At the 8-week evaluation, patients in the CAST group had a higher rate of continued symptoms than the CAM group (15.4% vs. 0%). CONCLUSIONS: CAM boot treatment of low-energy lateral ankle injuries in pediatric patients results in improved results and lower complications than CAST treatment. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level I -randomized, controlled trial with a statistically significant difference.
Ankle Fractures , Ankle Injuries , Lower Extremity Deformities, Congenital , Male , Humans , Child , Female , Adolescent , Ankle , Prospective Studies , Leg , Ankle Injuries/therapy , Walking
BACKGROUND: Discoid lateral meniscus (DLM) is a rare condition. Patient-reported outcomes using validated instruments are underreported in the literature. DLM outcomes have not been directly compared with nondiscoid meniscus (non-DLM) in adolescent patients. PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: This study sought to analyze the difference in patient characteristics, surgical treatment, and patient-reported outcomes for adolescent patients arthroscopically treated for symptomatic DLM and non-DLM pathology. We hypothesized that DLM and non-DLM patient-reported outcomes would be similar. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients aged <18 years with symptomatic DLM and non-DLM pathology was completed between 2015 and 2021 at a single academic institution. Chart reviews for patient characteristics and surgical operative indications and technique were completed. Patient-reported outcome scores were prospectively collected preoperatively and at 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years after surgery. RESULTS: Patients in the DLM group (n = 48), when compared with the non-DLM group (n = 45), were younger (12.71 vs 15.78 years, respectively; P < .001) and had lower body mass index (24.53 vs 28.91, respectively; P < .02). Both groups were majority Hispanic and more commonly male (DLM 65% vs non-DLM 60%). All of the DLM patients had surgery on the lateral discoid meniscus (n = 48), whereas the non-DLM group had surgery on the lateral meniscus (n = 37), medial meniscus (n = 7), or both (n = 1). A majority of patients in both groups underwent meniscal repair (DLM 73% and non-DLM 62%), and there was no difference in surgical treatment between groups (P > .05). A statistically significant improvement was seen in International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) and Physical Activity Questionnaire (PAQ) scores from the preoperative assessment to 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years after surgery for both DLM and non-DLM groups (P < .05). No difference was found in scores between DLM and non-DLM groups, between sexes, or between age groups (<13 years or ≥13 years) (P > .05). CONCLUSION: Although patients with DLM were younger and had lower body mass index, the IKDC and PAQ scores were not significantly different between the DLM and non-DLM groups. Both groups showed a significant improvement in scores relative to their preoperative scores. Sex and age did not affect IKDC or PAQ scores.
Menisci, Tibial , Humans , Adolescent , Male , Menisci, Tibial/surgery , Cohort Studies
BACKGROUND: Inferior pole patellar sleeve fractures (PSFs) are rare injuries that occur in skeletally immature patients that may be missed or falsely diagnosed as an inferior pole fracture (IPF) or Sinding-Larsen-Johansson syndrome (SLJS). PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to evaluate and compare clinical and radiographic features of patients with PSF, IPF, and SLJS. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: Retrospective review of skeletally immature patients diagnosed with PSF, IPF, and SLJS between 2011 and 2019 at a single urban academic center was performed. Chart and radiographic review was completed. Between-group differences were assessed using analysis of variance, Kruskal-Wallis test, and Fisher exact test, as appropriate to variable distributions. RESULTS: In total, 125 patients (82% male) were included, with a mean (SD) age of 10.7 (2) years (16 PSF, 51 IPF, 58 SLJS). There were no significant differences in patient characteristics between the 3 groups. One hundred percent of the patients with PSF (P < .001) and IPF (P < .001) had acute trauma, compared with 24% of patients with SLJS. Fewer patients with PSF had an intact straight leg raise (38%) compared with those with IPF (94%; P < .001) and SLJS (98%; P < .001). Fewer patients with SLJS had knee swelling (41%) compared with those with PSF (93%; P < .001) and IPF (94%; P < .001). More patients with PSF had knee effusion (81%) compared with those with IPF (37%; P = 0.011) and SLJS (3%; P < .001). More patients with SLJS were able to bear weight (88%) compared with those with IPF (12%; P < .001) and PSF (0; P < .001). Radiographically, compared with those with IPF and SLJS, patients with PSFs had increased mean prepatellar swelling (6.1 [P < .001] and 6.5 [P < .001] vs 12.9 mm), intra-articular effusion (6.1 [P = .014] and 4.9 [P = .001] vs 9.2 mm), maximum fragment size (26 [P = .004] and 17.7 [P < .001] vs 45.3 mm), and maximum fragment displacement (1.24 [P = .002] and 1.45 [P = .003] vs 13.30 mm), respectively. Compared with those with SLJS (1.10), patients with PSF (1.92; P < .001) and IPF (1.22; P < .001) had patella alta with higher mean Insall-Salvati ratios >1.2. CONCLUSION: Differences in clinical features such as ability to straight leg raise, knee swelling, knee effusion, ability to bear weight, and radiographic features, such as prepatellar swelling, intra-articular effusion, fragment displacement/size/shape/location, and patellar height, can all be helpful in recognizing rare pediatric inferior patellar pathology, thus increasing efficiency in indicating for higher-level imaging to reach a prompt diagnosis and provide appropriate treatment.
Fractures, Bone , Knee Injuries , Osteochondritis , Child , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Fractures, Bone/diagnostic imaging , Humans , Knee Injuries/diagnostic imaging , Male , Patella/diagnostic imaging , Patella/injuries
