Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Ear Nose Throat J ; : 1455613241266467, 2024 Aug 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39126318

RESUMEN

Objectives: To analyze trends in error publication in the top Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery (OHNS) journals. Methods: A retrospective bibliometric analysis utilizing journal-specific search engines of the top 30 OHNS journals (by impact factor) were queried for "errata OR erratum OR corrigenda OR corrigendum OR correction OR corrections," utilizing errors published between 2000 and 2023. Corrections were classified into "erratum" for errors originating from the journal and "corrigendum" for errors originating from the author. Error severity was categorized as trivial, minor, or major, based on the magnitude of their impact on outcomes or their interpretation by the reader. Results: Of the 739 analyzed errors, 62.5% (n = 462) were errata and 37.5% (n = 277) corrigenda, averaging 26.39 (±27.5) errors per journal. There was no correlation between impact factor and error occurrence (P = .979). Trends demonstrated growing numbers of errors published over the years. Mean duration between the publication date of the original article and the error was 10.8 months (±19.4 months), but there was no significant correlation between impact factor and this duration (P = .953). Most corrected articles were original research articles (n = 568, 76.9%), predominantly with the first author from the United States (n = 262, 36.1%). Most errors involved authorship (n = 273, 36.9%) and were "Trivial" in severity (n = 544, 73.6%). However, 72 (9.7%) errors were "Major" and altered the article's findings or interpretation significantly. Conclusion: A multitude of errors exist in the otolaryngology field. Despite most being insignificant and affecting authorship, roughly 10% significantly affect an article's conclusions/outcomes.Level of Evidence: 4.

2.
Am J Otolaryngol ; 45(5): 104419, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39053310

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Hypoglossal nerve stimulation (HNS) can be an effective treatment for moderate to severe obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in positive airway pressure (PAP) intolerant patients. To better understand patient perceptions of HNS therapy, we explored three Facebook groups pertaining to HNS therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of Facebook posts from three HNS-related Facebook groups, from October 1, 2022 to October 1, 2023, was performed. Posts were analyzed for author attitude, content (adverse events, inquiries, or sharing information), and the inclusion of media within the post. RESULTS: From 737 Facebook posts, 752 events were identified, predominantly authored by patients or family (99.5 %). Few posts included media attachments (7.3 %), primarily photos (85.5 %). Post tone was mainly neutral (79.4 %), rather than positive (12.9 %) or negative (7.7 %). Most posts (53.6 %) were queries to the Facebook group, as opposed to sharing information (28.9 %) or detailing adverse events (17.6 %). Notably queries posed by Facebook group members included those pertaining to the postoperative recovery course (10.17 %), physical activity restrictions (6.20 %), HNS therapy eligibility (4.71 %), financial considerations (4.22 %), and more. CONCLUSION: Overall, Facebook group members reported a predominantly neutral tone, typically posting queries to the group rather than sharing information or detailing adverse events. These findings illustrate how diverse data sources, such as social media, can enhance our understanding of patient experiences and identify gaps in patient education with HNS therapy.


Asunto(s)
Terapia por Estimulación Eléctrica , Nervio Hipogloso , Apnea Obstructiva del Sueño , Medios de Comunicación Sociales , Humanos , Apnea Obstructiva del Sueño/terapia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Terapia por Estimulación Eléctrica/métodos , Terapia por Estimulación Eléctrica/efectos adversos , Masculino , Femenino
3.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38855288

RESUMEN

Objective: The aim of this study was to review findings from a large prospective national database of chemosensory disturbances associated with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection. Data Sources: The Virginia Commonwealth University Smell and Taste Center national database of COVID-19 chemosensory disturbances. Methods: A series of online surveys, first opened on April 10, 2020, was made accessible nationwide to any adult with sudden chemosensory dysfunction since January 2020. Participants received subsequent follow-up surveys 14 days, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months after enrollment. An additional survey was sent to all participants on May 28, 2022 to assess long-term outcomes. Information pertaining to demographics, symptoms, comorbidities, treatments, and life impact was collected. Results: Of 363 participants who reported complete smell recovery, 51.2% recovered within 1 month, 70% within 3 months, and 79% within 6 months, while 8.8% took over 1 year to completely recover. Among all participants, 7.5% had no smell recovery. Positive predictors of recovery included age <40, male gender, and the presence of nasal congestion. Negative predictors included difficulty breathing and prior head injury. Many participants reported a decrease in quality of life and the presence of potential safety hazards associated with decreased smell loss. Conclusions: Most subjects with COVID-19-related chemosensory dysfunction recover, with the majority noting complete recovery within weeks of infection. Those aged over 40 years and female gender were associated with lower rates of recovery. A considerable number of participants reported significant impact on quality of life and safety.

4.
Laryngoscope ; 2024 Jun 18.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38888060

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Hypoglossal nerve stimulation (HNS) can be an effective treatment for moderate to severe obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in positive airway pressure (PAP) intolerant patients. To better understand patient experiences with HNS therapy, we explored reported events from HNS-related Facebook groups and the Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of HNS-related Facebook posts from three groups pertaining to HNS therapy, from October 1, 2022 to October 1, 2023, was performed. Posts were analyzed for patient-reported adverse events. Concurrently, the MAUDE database was reviewed for HNS-related events during the same timeframe. RESULTS: From 737 Facebook posts, 132 (17.55%) adverse events were identified. Adverse events included pain (34.85%), stimulation discomfort (14.39%), lip weakness (6.82%) and issues related to lead tethering or tight leads around the neck (3.79%). Analysis of the MAUDE database found 428 adverse events, including pain (24.07%), lip weakness (0.44%), and lead tethering (1.64%). CONCLUSION: Facebook group members reported higher rates of lip weakness and lead tethering than recorded in the MAUDE database. These findings illustrate how diverse data sources, such as social media, can enhance our understanding of patient experiences and identify gaps in patient education with HNS therapy. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: NA Laryngoscope, 2024.

5.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38943447

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to examine the adverse events associated with hypoglossal nerve stimulator (HNS) implantation for treating obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), drawing data from the Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database. We aim to provide a comprehensive and updated account of these adverse events. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective analysis. SETTING: MAUDE Database review. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed on the MAUDE database to collect all HNS-related reports from May 2014 to December 2023. Variables collected included date of event, event description, nature of event, iatrogenic injuries, required interventions, and, if available, root causes. Each event description was analyzed to classify the adverse event, the postevent intervention, and device model number. RESULTS: Out of 1178 reports fulfilling the inclusion criteria, 1312 adverse events were identified. Common adverse events included infection (24.0%), pain (19.7%), and hematoma/seroma (10.2%). Approximately 83.1% of these adverse events necessitated medical and/or surgical intervention. The most frequent procedures included explantation (29.4%) and device repositioning (15.8%). Pneumothorax was reported in 50 cases, with 41 (82.0%) requiring a chest tube to be inserted. Three adverse events described overstimulation in the setting of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) despite the implantation of MRI-compatible second-generation internal pulse generators. CONCLUSION: While HNS implantation has been established as a reliable intervention for OSA in cases of continuous positive airway pressure failure or intolerance, this study highlights several perioperative and postoperative difficulties and complications. Understanding these challenges is essential for refining surgical practices and enhancing patient consent processes, ultimately aiming to improve therapeutic outcomes.

6.
Am J Otolaryngol ; 45(2): 104134, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38103487

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To explore anatomic predictors of mortality from gunshot wounds involving the temporal bone. METHODS: A retrospective search of radiology reports was performed for all patients with CT reports suggestive of gunshot wounds (GSW) to the TB (2000-2020). All cases were reviewed by the senior author to confirm injury to the temporal bone. Detailed demographic and radiographic data were collected. MAIN FINDINGS: A total of 120 patients met inclusion criteria. The majority of patients were male (n = 101) and the average age was 32.9. The squamosa was the most commonly involved subsite (n = 90), followed by the mastoid (n = 43). Squamosal entry site had the highest associated mortality (89.7 %). For those with known disposition, 65.8 % (79 of 120) expired on the same hospital admission. Inpatient otolaryngology consultation was noted in 18.3 % (n = 22) of patients, with poor outpatient follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: This series represents the largest survey of GSW to the temporal bone to date. Although associated mortality is high and outpatient follow-up poor, otolaryngologists should be aware of associated morbidities to facilitate both inpatient and subsequent outpatient management.


Asunto(s)
Heridas por Arma de Fuego , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , Estudios Retrospectivos , Centros Traumatológicos , Hospitalización , Hueso Temporal/diagnóstico por imagen
7.
Am J Otolaryngol ; 44(2): 103729, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36495649

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Although uncommon, vascular injury can be seen in patients with lateral skull base fractures (LSBF). However, little is known about this potentially life-threatening comorbidity. The objective of this study is to better characterize the vascular injuries associated with temporal and lateral sphenoid bone fractures. BASIC PROCEDURES: Retrospective review of all patients with computed tomography angiography (CTA) performed specifically to evaluate for vascular injury following LSBF. In addition to patient demographics (age, gender, race), the mechanism of injury, the location of fracture(s), and the nature of vascular injury diagnosed by CTA was recorded. Two-way ANOVA was performed to determine if any variables were predictive of vascular injury. MAIN FINDINGS: From 2011 to 2021, 143 patients with 333 subsite fractures met inclusion criteria. Of all patients, 46 (32.2 %) had CTA evidence of at least one vascular injury, the most common type being venous thrombosis/filling defect (41.7 %). Evidence of vascular injury was unclear in 14 patients (9.8 %). Fractures most associated with vascular injury ranged from 0.7 % (otic capsule fractures) to 26.7 % (mastoid, lateral sphenoid fractures). Risk of vascular injury was no different between patients with single vs multiple fractures. There were no fracture locations that could reliably predict specific vascular injury. CONCLUSIONS: Over 40 % of all CTAs ordered following LSBF identified were suspicious for associated vascular injury. Yet fracture location and number cannot reliably predict vascular injury. Until such determinants can be better identified, clinicians should have a low threshold to obtain CTA to rule out associated vascular injury.


Asunto(s)
Traumatismos de las Arterias Carótidas , Base del Cráneo , Lesiones del Sistema Vascular , Estudios Retrospectivos , Lesiones del Sistema Vascular/diagnóstico por imagen , Base del Cráneo/lesiones , Arteria Carótida Interna/diagnóstico por imagen , Angiografía por Tomografía Computarizada , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Adolescente , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA