Layering vaccination with antibiotic therapy results in protection and clearance of Burkholderia pseudomallei in Balb/c mice.

Melioidosis is a disease that is difficult to treat due to the causative organism, Burkholderia pseudomallei being inherently antibiotic resistant and it having the ability to invade, survive, and replicate in an intracellular environment. Combination therapy approaches are routinely being evaluated in animal models with the aim of improving the level of protection and clearance of colonizing bacteria detected. In this study, a subunit vaccine layered with the antibiotic finafloxacin was evaluated in vivo against an inhalational infection with B. pseudomallei in Balb/c mice. Groups of mice vaccinated, infected, and euthanized at antibiotic initiation had a reduced bacterial load compared to those that had not been immunized. In addition, the subunit vaccine provided a synergistic effect when it was delivered with a CpG ODN and finafloxacin was initiated at 48 h post-challenge. Vaccination was also shown to improve the outcome, in a composite measure of survival and clearance. In summary, layering a subunit vaccine with the antibiotic finafloxacin is a promising therapeutic alternative for use in the treatment of B. pseudomallei infections.

In Vitro Activity of Finafloxacin against Panels of Respiratory Pathogens.

This study determined the in vitro activity of finafloxacin against panels of bacterial strains, representative of those associated with infection in cystic fibrosis patients and predominately isolated from clinical cases of respiratory disease. Many of these isolates were resistant to various antimicrobials evaluated including the aminoglycosides, cephalosporins, carbapenems and fluoroquinolones. Broth microdilution assays were performed at neutral and acidic pH, to determine antimicrobial activity. Finafloxacin demonstrated superior activity at reduced pH for all of the bacterial species investigated, highlighting the requirement to determine the activity of antimicrobials in host-relevant conditions.

Investigation of a combination therapy approach for the treatment of melioidosis.

The efficacy of finafloxacin as a component of a layered defense treatment regimen was determined in vitro and in vivo against an infection with Burkholderia pseudomallei. Doxycycline was down-selected from a panel of antibiotics evaluated in vitro and used in combination with finafloxacin in a Balb/c mouse model of inhalational melioidosis. When treatment was initiated at 24 h post-infection with B. pseudomallei, there were no differences in the level of protection offered by finafloxacin or doxycycline (as monotherapies) when compared to the combination therapy. There was evidence for improved bacterial control in the groups treated with finafloxacin (as monotherapies or in combination with doxycycline) when compared to mice treated with doxycycline. Survival comparisons of finafloxacin and doxycycline (as monotherapies) or in combination initiated at 36 h post-infection indicated that finafloxacin was superior to doxycycline. Doxycycline was also unable to control the levels of bacteria within tissues to the extent that doxycycline and finafloxacin used in combination or finafloxacin (as a sole therapy) could. In summary, finafloxacin is a promising therapy for use in the event of exposure to B. pseudomallei.

Finafloxacin Is an Effective Treatment for Inhalational Tularemia and Plague in Mouse Models of Infection.

Infection with aerosolized Francisella tularensis or Yersinia pestis can lead to lethal disease in humans if treatment is not initiated promptly. Finafloxacin is a novel fluoroquinolone which has demonstrated broad-spectrum activity against a range of bacterial species in vitro, in vivo, and in humans, activity which is superior in acidic, infection-relevant conditions. Human-equivalent doses of finafloxacin or ciprofloxacin were delivered at 24 h (representing prophylaxis) or at 72 or 38 h (representing treatment) postchallenge with F. tularensis or Y. pestis, respectively, in BALB/c mouse models. In addition, a short course of therapy (3 days) was compared to a longer course (7 days). Both therapies provided a high level of protection against both infections when administered at 24 h postchallenge, irrespective of the length of the dosing regimen; however, differences were observed when therapy was delayed. A benefit was demonstrated with finafloxacin compared to ciprofloxacin in both models when therapy was delivered later in the infection. These studies suggest that finafloxacin is an effective alternative therapeutic for the prophylaxis and treatment of inhalational infections with F. tularensis or Y. pestis.

Demonstration of the broad spectrum in vitro activity of finafloxacin against pathogens of biodefence interest.

This study investigated the in vitro activity of finafloxacin against panels of the biodefence pathogens. Broth microdilution assays were performed at neutral and acidic pH, to determine the effectiveness of the antibiotics in conditions typical of an intracellular environment. In all instances, finafloxacin demonstrated superior activity at low pH. These results highlight the importance of evaluating antimicrobial efficacy in conditions relevant to those encountered in vivo.

Early Clinical Assessment of the Antimicrobial Activity of Finafloxacin Compared to Ciprofloxacin in Subsets of Microbiologically Characterized Isolates.

Two phase II studies were performed with patients with uncomplicated urinary tract infections (uUTIs) and complicated urinary tract infections (cUTIs) or acute pyelonephritis (PN) to compare finafloxacin (300 mg twice a day [b.i.d.] orally for uUTI and 800 mg once a day [q.d.] intravenously [i.v.] for cUTI/PN) and ciprofloxacin (250 mg b.i.d. orally for uUTI and 400 mg b.i.d. i.v. for cUTI/PN). The early response to the study medications was evaluated in the microbiological intent-to-treat population (mITT) at day 3. A total of 21% of the isolates were ciprofloxacin resistant, 13.7% were primed pathogens carrying a mutation(s) potentially fostering fluoroquinolone resistance development, and 7.1% produced extended-spectrum ß-lactamases (ESBLs). Finafloxacin demonstrated very good early clinical activity, with microbiological eradication rates of 88.6% (n = 132), compared to 78.7% (n = 61) for ciprofloxacin, and 69.6% (n = 23), compared to 35.7% (n = 14) for ciprofloxacin, in patients with ciprofloxacin-resistant uropathogens; 94.1% (n = 17), compared to 80.0% (n = 10) for ciprofloxacin, in patients infected with uropathogens primed for fluoroquinolone resistance uropathogens; and 91.7% (n = 11), compared to 0% for ciprofloxacin, in patients infected with ESBL producers. Finafloxacin demonstrated early and rapid activity against uropathogens, including fluoroquinolone-resistant and/or multiresistant pathogens or ESBL producers, while ciprofloxacin was less active against this subset of resistant pathogens. Susceptibilities of pathogens were quantitated by broth microdilution. Isolates were subgrouped according to their susceptibility patterns, in particular first-step quinolone resistance, quinolone resistance, and ESBL production. Eradication was defined as the elimination or reduction of study entry pathogens to <103 CFU/ml in urine culture. (The studies described in this paper have been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under identifiers NCT00722735 and NCT01928433.).

Efficacy and tolerability of Laxatan Granulat in patients with chronic constipation.

BACKGROUND: On average 12% of the population worldwide suffer from acute or chronic constipation. Pathological intestine alterations, an unhealthy diet with reduced liquid intake, and little exercise are potential reasons. Often the motility of the intestine is disturbed. Changing nutrition habits or lifestyle is not always successful. In such cases, laxatives containing macrogol and inulin are highly effective. METHODOLOGY: The efficacy and tolerability of Laxatan(®) Granulat, a laxative containing macrogol, inulin, and mineral salts, was assessed in a drug-monitoring study of 105 patients for four weeks. RESULTS: At the end of this study, a highly significant reduction of the constipation symptoms in 98.1% of the patients was observed. No adverse events were reported during this drug-monitoring study. The overall efficacy was rated as being "very good" or "good" for 96% and the overall tolerability was rated as being "very good" or "good" for 99% of patients. CONCLUSION: The combination of macrogol, inulin, and mineral salts is highly effective in the treatment of chronic constipation. Due to its prebiotic activity, inulin probably leads to proliferation of lactic acid-producing bacteria. The lowered pH and increased water content probably increases the peristaltic action and therefore reduces constipation.

Safety and tolerance of ester-C compared with regular ascorbic acid.

The goal of this randomized, double-blind crossover clinical trial in 50 healthy volunteers sensitive to acidic foods was to evaluate whether Ester-C calcium ascorbate causes fewer epigastric adverse effects than are produced by regular ascorbic acid (AA). Volunteers were randomly separated into 2 groups of 25. The study comprised an observation period of 9 days (phase 1 medication for 3 consecutive days, washout phase for 3 consecutive days, phase 2 medication for 3 consecutive days). Participants took 1000 mg vitamin C as Ester-C during phase 1 of the study followed by 1000 mg of vitamin C as AA during phase 2, or vice versa. During the course of the study, 3 examinations for the evaluation of epigastric adverse effects were performed (on days 0, 3, and 9). Participants used a diary to record epigastric adverse effects on a daily basis. In total, 28 (56%) of 50 participants reported 88 epigastric adverse effects of mild to moderate intensity. Of these 88 adverse effects, 33 (37.5%) occurred after intake of Ester-C and 55 (62.5%) were noted after intake of AA. The tolerability of Ester-C was rated "very good" by 72% of participants, whereas AA was rated "very good" by only 54%. This difference is statistically significant (P<.05). Investigators concluded that Ester-C compared with AA caused significantly fewer epigastric adverse effects in participants sensitive to acidic foods and that Ester-C is much better tolerated.