Antiplatelet therapy and outcomes after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of antiplatelet therapy (APT) after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) remains unclear. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to summarize the associations of APT use after aSAH with outcomes. METHODS: We searched published medical literature to identify cohort studies involving adults with aSAH. The exposure was APT use after aSAH. Outcome measures were good functional outcome (modified Rankin Score 0-2 or Glasgow Outcome Scale 4-5), delayed cerebral ischemia (infarcts on neuroimaging), and intracranial hemorrhage. After assessing study heterogeneity and publication bias, we performed a meta-analysis using random-effects models to assess the strength of association between APT and SAH outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 14 studies with 4228 aSAH patients were included. APT after aSAH was associated with good functional outcome (pooled relative risk, 1.08; 95% confidence interval, [CI], 1.02-1.15; I2 = 45%, p for heterogeneity = 0.04), but there was no relationship with delayed cerebral ischemia (pooled relative risk, 0.80; 95% confidence interval, [CI], 0.63-1.02; I2 = 61%, p for heterogeneity <0.01) or intracranial hemorrhage (pooled relative risk, 1.50; 95% confidence interval, [CI], 0.98-2.31; I2 = 0, p for heterogeneity =0.71). In additional analyses, APT resulted in good functional outcomes in endovascularly-treated patients. When stratified by type of medication, aspirin, clopidogrel, and ticlopidine were associated with good functional outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: APT after aSAH was associated with a modest improvement in functional outcome, but there was no relationship with delayed cerebral ischemia or intracranial hemorrhage.

Is now our time? History to provider status for allied health professions and the path for pharmacists.

The designation of health care providers is limited to physicians, physician assistants, nurse practitioners, certified nurse midwives, nurse anesthetists, clinical psychologists, dietitians, and social workers. Pharmacists are not federally recognized health care providers and, therefore, are not eligible for cognitive service reimbursements. This commentary explains the intentions of adding pharmacists as Medicare Part B providers, evaluates current state pharmacist provider status, and calls pharmacists, technicians, and other key stakeholders to advocate on behalf of the profession of pharmacy. If federal provider status is granted to pharmacists, patients will gain better access to care, health spending will decline, and physician lead care teams will have an expert in medications readily available for consultation or other medication-related needs. Reimbursement would provide more resources to administer these needed services to more patients in areas with limited access to health care resources.

Concordance Between Active Partial Thromboplastin Time and Anti-Factor Xa Assays in Neurocritically Ill Patients Receiving Subcutaneous Heparin Prophylaxis.

Background: Laboratory monitoring is not recommended when subcutaneous unfractionated heparin (SQ-UFH) is administered at prophylactic doses. However, aPTT prolongation and associated hemorrhage has been reported in the neurocritically ill. At our institution, Neuroscience Intensive Care Unit (Neuro-ICU) patients with prolonged aPTT are further evaluated with a follow up aPTT and anti-factor Xa. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to describe concordance between aPTT and anti-factor Xa in neurocritically ill patients receiving prophylactic SQ-UFH with evidence of aPTT prolongation. Methods: A retrospective chart review of adult patients admitted to the Neuro-ICU from June 2017 to June 2019 was performed. Patients were included if they received SQ-UFH with aPTT levels and at least one anti-factor Xa level drawn within one hour of each other. Concordance between paired aPTT and anti-factor Xa was evaluated using Cohen's weighted kappa. Results: Forty two patients with 56 paired aPTT and anti-factor Xa levels were included. The most prescribed SQ-UFH regimen was 5000 units every 8 hours (60.7%) and anti-factor Xa levels were drawn a median (IQR) of 5.7 (3.1-10.7) hours after the SQ-UFH dose. Only 16 (28.6%) pairs were in concordance. The analysis showed a weighted kappa of .09; 95% CI [-.05 to .22] indicating poor agreement. Conclusions: In neurocritically ill patients receiving prophylactic SQ-UFH with aPTT prolongation, there was poor concordance between aPTT and anti-factor Xa. This suggests that aPTT prolongation may not be solely driven by heparin activity and further evaluation of mechanistic drivers for coagulopathy in this population is necessary.

Call to action: The pharmacist's role in improving contraceptive knowledge and access.

Pharmacists have the knowledge and training to participate in contraceptive education and management and should feel empowered to do so. Advocating for legislation to expand the pharmacist's role in this setting can improve patient access to hormonal contraceptives. As the nation digests the Supreme Court's decision to overturn Roe vs. Wade, many health care providers have stopped to think about what our role will be in this uncertain future. Approximately, 20 states/jurisdictions have legislation in place that allows pharmacists to prescribe or dispense oral contraceptives without a prescription; broadening the scope of practice for pharmacists increases patients' access to care, and may improve overall adherence. When compared to clinician-initiated contraception, pharmacists were more likely to prescribe contraception to eligible women and had a higher rate of continuation at 12 months. In addition, pharmacists providing education to both patients and prescribers can help debunk misinformation on hormonal contraceptives which may impact access and adherence. With the recently changing federal-and in many instances state-legislation, pharmacists will need to seek out more opportunities to facilitate access to hormonal contraceptives and increase knowledge surrounding emergency contraceptive options and other medications used for reproductive health. Pharmacists have the knowledge and accessibility to assist in contraceptive care. Now, more than ever, pharmacists' involvement in hormonal contraceptive care will be a necessary step to ensure that our patients receive the appropriate care they deserve.

Cryoprecipitate for Alteplase-Related Hemorrhagic Conversion of Acute Ischemic Stroke.

Background: Evidence to support cryoprecipitate for reversal of alteplase-related hemorrhagic conversion of acute ischemic stroke is limited. Guidelines recommend cryoprecipitate as first line treatment, followed by aminocaproic acid as a conditional recommendation with very low-quality evidence. The purpose of this case series was to describe the use of cryoprecipitate for alteplase-related hemorrhagic conversion of acute ischemic stroke. Methods: This was an IRB-approved retrospective case series of adults who received cryoprecipitate for an alteplase-related hemorrhagic conversion of acute ischemic stroke at two comprehensive stroke centers within a large academic medical center. Thromboembolism at 14 days and hemostasis within 24 hours were collected. The outcomes of cryoprecipitate alone vs cryoprecipitate with aminocaproic acid (C + A) were also described. Results: A total of 19 patients were included. Thrombosis occurred in 1/19 (5%) and hemostasis occurred in 4/14 (29%) of evaluable patients. In-hospital mortality was seen in 9/19 (47%) patients. Seventy four percent (14/19) of patients received concomitant blood products other than cryoprecipitate and 63% received a concomitant reversal agent. Thirteen patients received cryoprecipitate alone and six received C + A. Thrombosis was seen in 1/13 (8%) vs 0/6 (0%) and hemostasis occurred in 2/11 (18%) and 2/3 (67%) evaluable cryoprecipitate vs C + A patients respectively. Conclusion: Cryoprecipitate was associated with a low rate of thrombosis and hemostasis for alteplase-associated hemorrhagic conversion of acute ischemic stroke. There was significant heterogeneity in treatment regimens, including the use of and dosing of adjunctive aminocaproic acid and monitoring of fibrinogen levels.

Publication rate and impact stratified by gender among pharmacists designated Fellow in the American College of Critical Care Medicine.

BACKGROUND: There are approximately 352,000 pharmacists practicing in the United States, with most (59%) being female. Editorial board membership and publications with a female as the first author in selected pharmacy journals has increased in the past 2 decades. This study determined whether these positive trends are also occurring in critical care pharmacy. OBJECTIVE: To report publication rate and publication impact stratified by male and female gender among pharmacists designated Fellow of Critical Care Medicine (FCCM). METHODS: Pharmacists designated FCCM from inception through the 2020 convocation year were identified in January 2021 using a list provided by the Society of Critical Care Medicine. Pharmacists were excluded if they were designated Master of Critical Care Medicine, did not have an active pharmacist license, or did not have data in the Scopus database. Data were collected in February 2021 including year of first publication, total number of publications, citations, and Hirsch index (h-index). RESULTS: A total of 134 pharmacists were evaluable, including 76 males (57%) and 58 females (43%). Males had an earlier first publication year than females (2005 vs. 2010; P < 0.001). Males have produced a higher number of publications per individual pharmacist (29 vs. 13; P = 0.002) and a similar number of publications per year (2 vs. 1; P = 0.05). When comparing publication impact, males generated more citations (384 vs. 139; P = 0.001) and had a higher h-index (10 vs. 6, P < 0.001). These trends persisted when data from only the past 5 years were used. CONCLUSION: There is statistically significant gender disparity in publication rate and impact. However, this disparity seems to be decreasing with time as the rate of females designated FCCM is increasing. This is consistent with an overall increase in the proportion of pharmacists who are female and deserves further exploration.

Effect of desmopressin acetate on acute spontaneous intracranial hemorrhage in patients on antiplatelet therapy.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the impact of desmopressin acetate (DDAVP) on poor outcomes, hematoma expansion, and adverse events in patients diagnosed with a non-traumatic, antiplatelet-associated intracranial hemorrhage (ICH). METHODS: This was a multicenter, retrospective, propensity-matched cohort study comparing DDAVP to control in patients diagnosed with a non-traumatic ICH previously on antiplatelet therapy. Notable exclusion criteria included admission to trauma service, subarachnoid hemorrhages, confounding coagulopathic factors, and hematoma evacuation. Poor outcome, defined as discharge to hospice or in-patient mortality, was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included intracranial hematoma expansion and occurrence of adverse events, which included hyponatremia and thromboembolic events. RESULTS: A total of 49 patients receiving DDAVP were compared to 107 controls in the unmatched cohort. Thirty-seven patients treated with DDAVP and 55 controls were included in the propensity-matched analysis, which was adjusted for age, ethnicity, history of diabetes, receipt of platelet transfusion, and thromboembolism prophylaxis. Poor outcome (16.2% DDAVP vs 29% control, p = 0.13), rates of hematoma expansion (11.8% DDAVP vs 11.1% control, p = 0.99), and adverse events (21.6% DDAVP vs 20% control, p = 0.99) were statistically similar between the matched groups. CONCLUSIONS: DDAVP administration in patients with spontaneous antiplatelet-associated ICH was not associated with a reduction in poor outcomes, hematoma expansion, or an increase in adverse events. Use of DDAVP in this patient population appears to be safe. Larger prospective studies are warranted to evaluate DDAVP utility in this patient population.

The Safety and Efficacy of Desmopressin in Patients With Intracranial Hemorrhage and a History of Alcohol Use.

BACKGROUND: Patients with a history of alcohol use disorder are at an increased risk of hematoma expansion following intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) due to the effects of alcohol on platelet aggregation. Desmopressin (DDAVP) improves platelet aggregation and may decrease hematoma expansion in patients with ICH. However, DDAVP may also increase the risk of hyponatremia and thrombotic events. Evidence is limited regarding the safety and efficacy of DDAVP in alcohol use (AU)-associated ICH. METHODS: This was a retrospective chart review of adult patients with radiographic evidence of ICH and a confirmed or suspected history of alcohol use upon admission. Patients were categorized into groups based on DDAVP administration. Safety outcomes included hyponatremia (serum sodium <135 mEq/L or decrease in serum sodium of ≥ 5 mEq/L for patients with baseline sodium <135 mEq/L) within 24 hours of ICH and thrombotic events within 7 days of ICH. The primary efficacy outcome was the incidence of hematoma expansion, defined as any expansion of the hemorrhage noted on repeat imaging within 32 hours. RESULTS: In total, 52 patients were included in the safety analysis (27 DDAVP and 25 non-DDAVP). Although hyponatremia was numerically higher in the DDAVP group, there was no significant difference between groups (19.2% vs 4.2%, P = 0.192). Thrombotic complications were similar between the DDAVP and non-DDAVP groups (11.1% vs. 8%, P = 1.0). Thirty-nine patients met criteria for hemostatic efficacy analysis. There was no difference in hematoma expansion between the DDAVP and non-DDAVP groups (23.1% vs 34.6%, P = 0.71) and these findings were consistent after adjusting for differences in baseline characteristics (OR 0.63, 95% CI 0.1-3.3). CONCLUSION: The administration of DDAVP was not associated with adverse safety events, but did not significantly reduce the incidence of hematoma expansion in patients with AU-associated ICH.

Corticosteroid use in ARDS and its application to evolving therapeutics for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): A systematic review.

Data regarding the use of corticosteroids for treatment of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) are conflicting. As the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic progresses, more literature supporting the use of corticosteroids for COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 ARDS have emerged. Glucocorticoids are proposed to attenuate the inflammatory response and prevent progression to the fibroproliferative phase of ARDS through their multiple mechanisms and anti-inflammatory properties. The purpose of this systematic review was to comprehensively evaluate the literature surrounding corticosteroid use in ARDS (non-COVID-19 and COVID-19) in addition to a narrative review of clinical considerations of corticosteroid use in these patient populations. OVID Medline and EMBASE were searched. Randomized controlled trials evaluating the use of corticosteroids for COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 ARDS in adult patients on mortality outcomes were included. Risk of bias was assessed with the Risk of Bias 2.0 tool. There were 388 studies identified, 15 of which met the inclusion criteria that included a total of 8877 patients. The studies included in our review reported a mortality benefit in 6/15 (40%) studies with benefit being seen at varying time points of mortality follow-up (ICU survival, hospital, and 28 and 60 days) in the COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 ARDS studies. The two non-COVID19 trials assessing lung injury score improvements found that corticosteroids led to significant improvements with corticosteroid use. The number of mechanical ventilation-free days significantly were found to be increased with the use of corticosteroids in all four studies that assessed this outcome. Corticosteroids are associated with improvements in mortality and ventilator-free days in critically ill patients with both COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 ARDS, and evidence suggests their use should be encouraged in these settings. However, due to substantial differences in the corticosteroid regimens utilized in these trials, questions still remain regarding the optimal corticosteroid agent, dose, and duration in patients with ARDS.

The Safety of Continuous Infusion Propofol in Mechanically Ventilated Adults With Coronavirus Disease 2019.

BACKGROUND: Propofol is commonly used to achieve ventilator synchrony in critically ill patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), yet its safety in this patient population is unknown. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety, in particular the incidence of hypertriglyceridemia, of continuous infusion propofol in patients with COVID-19. METHODS: This was a retrospective study at 1 academic medical center and 1 affiliated teaching hospital in New York City. Adult, critically ill patients with COVID-19 who received continuous infusion propofol were included. Patients who received propofol for <12 hours, were transferred from an outside hospital while on mechanical ventilation, or did not have a triglyceride concentration obtained during the infusion were excluded. RESULTS: A total of 252 patients were included. Hypertriglyceridemia (serum triglyceride concentration ≥ 400 mg/dL) occurred in 38.9% of patients after a median cumulative dose of 4307 mg (interquartile range [IQR], 2448-9431 mg). The median time to triglyceride elevation was 3.8 days (IQR, 1.9-9.1 days). In the multivariable regression analysis, obese patients had a significantly greater odds of hypertriglyceridemia (odds ratio = 1.87; 95% CI = 1.10, 3.21). There was no occurrence of acute pancreatitis. The incidence of possible propofol-related infusion syndrome was 3.2%. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: Hypertriglyceridemia occurred frequently in patients with COVID-19 who received propofol but did not lead to acute pancreatitis. Elevated triglyceride concentrations occurred more often and at lower cumulative doses than previously reported in patients without COVID-19. Application of these data may aid in optimal monitoring for serious adverse effects of propofol in patients with COVID-19.

Comparison of 4F-PCC in obese and nonobese patients with life-threatening bleeding or requiring emergent surgery.

BACKGROUND: Four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (4F-PCC) dosing is based on INR and actual body weight (ABW), with maximum doses not to exceed the dose used in patients weighing >100 kg (Kcentra PI). There are limited data comparing the efficacy of 4F-PCC between patients with low body weight ≤100 kg (LoWT) and high body weight >100 kg (HiWT). METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients on warfarin who received 4F-PCC for life-threatening major bleeding or requiring emergent surgery between January 2015 to June 2018 at three academic medical centers. These data were combined with a dataset from 2 randomized Phase 3b clinical trials. RESULTS: We included 388 patients who received 4F-PCC, 318 (82%) were LoWT, and 70 (18%) were HiWT. Indication for 4F-PCC for life-threatening bleeding and emergent surgery was 266 (69%) and 122 (31%) patients, respectively. The most common bleeding type was intracranial hemorrhage (41%), followed by gastrointestinal (36%). The median dose was 2283 units (25 units/kg), and 2.1% of patients required a repeat dose. CONCLUSION: In those >100 kg, we found no difference in achieving international normalized ratio (INR) ≤1.3, hemostasis in intracranial hemorrhage, or thrombosis. In-hospital mortality occurred 15% in LoWt versus 6% in HiWT (CI 1.8%-17%, p = 0.034). Achievement of INR ≤ 1.5 was significantly lower in the LoWT group compared to the HiWT group (80% versus 91%, CI -20% to -2.5%, p = 0.03).

Characteristics of Calls to a COVID-19 Mental Health Hotline in the First Wave of the Pandemic in New York.

This report describes the development, implementation and outcomes of a "COVID-19 Anxiety Hotline," designed to address the community's mental health crisis provoked by the coronavirus pandemic. The service was specifically designed using survey data regarding the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on its staff and community members. Callers had around-the-clock direct access to mental healthcare providers at no cost. Quantitative analysis showed that nearly three out of four callers experienced new onset anxiety and insomnia driven by fear of exposure, and had difficulty accessing mental health care. In addition to immediate support, referral to tele-mental health care was provided to 86% of callers. Qualitative analysis indicates the effectiveness of immediate support and appropriate referrals using a tele-health platform. Our report indicates that the service was utilized by the general population, by health care workers, and rapidly provided referrals to individuals with limited access to mental health care during the pandemic.

Management of Hepatic Coagulopathy in Bleeding and Nonbleeding Patients: An Evidence-Based Review.

Patients with varying degrees of hepatic dysfunction often present with presumed bleeding diathesis based on interpretation of routine measures of coagulation (prothrombin time [PT], international normalized ratio [INR], and activated partial thromboplastin time). However, standard markers of coagulation do not reflect the actual bleeding risk in this population and may lead to inappropriate administration of hemostatic agents and blood products. The concept of "rebalanced hemostasis" explains both the risk of bleeding and clotting seen in patients with liver dysfunction. The role of pharmacologic agents and blood products for prevention of bleeding during high-risk procedures and treatment of clinically significant bleeding remains unclear. Viscoelastic measurements of the clotting cascade provide information about platelets, fibrinogen/fibrin polymerization, coagulation factors, and fibrinolysis that might better represent hemostasis in vivo and may better inform management strategies. Due to the paucity of available data, firm recommendations for the use of blood products and pharmacologic agents in patients with hepatic coagulopathies are lacking, and thus, these products should not be routinely administered. Traditional laboratory tests such as PT/INR should not be the sole determinant of potential interventions. Rather, clinicians should assess factors such as the severity of bleed or bleeding risk of the procedure, the patient's risk of thromboembolism, and the strength of available evidence for specific agents and blood products to guide decision-making.

Expanding Advocacy to the Grassroots Level: The New York State Model.

New York State has achieved pharmacy practice advancement legislation more slowly than other states. Despite the benefits of pharmacy advocacy in shaping legislation, in New York State advocacy activities have generally been limited to once per year during Lobby Day. Implementation of a grassroots advocacy infrastructure has been able to organize and sustain legislative engagement among members of our professional organization, with more than 100 legislative visits completed since creation of the Grassroots Advocacy Committee. A committee with infrastructure including a buddy system and legislative visit tracking process and educational programs, such as simulation training, have reduced the perceived burdens of participation. Other pharmacy organizations who have identified advocacy as a priority can utilize these tools to organize their members to support legislative goals.