Impact of Urinary Catheterization on Postoperative Outcomes After Roux-En-Y Gastric Bypass Surgery in Propensity-Matched Cohorts.

BACKGROUND: The impact of urinary catheter avoidance in bariatric enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols is yet to be established. The purpose of the current study is to determine whether urinary catheter use in patients undergoing Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) procedures has an effect on postoperative outcomes. METHODS: An institutional database was utilized to identify adult patients undergoing primary minimally invasive RYGB surgery. Outcomes included incidence of urinary tract infection (UTI) within 30 days postoperatively, 30-day readmission rates, proportion of patients discharged after postoperative day 1 (delayed discharge), length of stay (LOS), and operating room time. These were compared between propensity-matched groups with and without urinary catheter placement. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in postoperative UTI's (2.2% for both cohorts, P = .593) or 30-day readmission rates for patients with and without urinary catheters (6.6% and 4.4%, respectively, P = .260). Mean LOS (1.7 vs. 1.5 days, P = .001) and the proportion of patients having a delayed discharge (47.3% vs. 33.7%, P = .001) was greater in patients with a catheter. Operating room time was longer in the urinary catheter group (221.8 vs. 207.9 minutes, P = .002). DISCUSSION: Avoidance of indwelling urinary catheters in RYGB surgical patients decreased delayed discharges and LOS without affecting readmission or reoperation rates. Therefore, we recommend that avoidance of urinary catheters in routine RYGB surgery be considered for inclusion into standardized ERAS protocols. Urinary catheters should continue to be utilized in select cases, however, as these were not shown to affect rate of UTIs.

Examining emergency department utilization in the post-foregut surgery patient.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to examine emergency department (ED) utilization following minimally invasive foregut surgery and determine its impact on costs. Furthermore, we sought to determine their relationship to the index procedure, whether they are preventable, and describe strategies for decreasing unnecessary ED visits. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted for all patients undergoing foregut procedures from January 2018 through June 2019. ED utilization was examined from 0 to 90 days. The proportion of visits related to surgery, preventable visits, and median ED costs were compared between visits occurring 0-30 days (early) versus 31-90 days (delayed) postoperatively as well as occurring from 8 am to 5 pm versus 5 pm to 8 am. RESULTS: Of 458 patients who underwent foregut surgery, 72.5% were female and the mean age was 60 years old. 92 patients (20%) presented to the ED within 90 days. Of these, 59 patients (64.1%) presented to the ED early versus 33 patients (35.9%) delayed. 56.5% of ED visits occurred during clinic hours. 56 (60.9%) ED visits were related to the procedure and 20 (35.7%) were preventable. The median ED return cost was $970. Early ED visits were significantly more likely to be related to surgery (72.9% vs 39.4%, p = 0.0016). There was no significant difference in the proportion of visits that were preventable (32.6% vs 46.2%, p = 0.3755) and ED return cost did not vary significantly ($995 vs $965, p = 0.43) between early and delayed visits. CONCLUSIONS: ED visits are common after foregut surgery and represent a financial burden on healthcare. Most visits occur early and are more likely to be related to surgery. Importantly, more than one-third of ED visits related to surgery were preventable and most occurred during clinic hours on weekdays. Providers should consider implementation of strategies to improve outpatient utilization and decrease unnecessary ED visits.

Comparative Outcomes of Various Combinations of Bilateral Shoulder Arthroplasty.

Background: In the setting of bilateral shoulder arthroplasty (BSA), differences in functional outcomes and motion between anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) and reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) are unknown. The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of treatment for various combinations of TSA procedures. Methods: A review of prospectively collected data from an institutional shoulder surgery repository was performed for patients who underwent any combination of bilateral TSA or RSA surgery. Based on the combination of shoulder arthroplasty, patients were divided into the following subgroups: bilateral TSA (TSA/TSA), bilateral RSA (RSA/RSA), or unilateral TSA with contralateral RSA (TSA/RSA). A total of 73 patients (146 shoulders), with a minimum of 2-year follow-up, who underwent any combination of bilateral TSA or RSA from 2007 to 2014 were included. Pre- and postoperative patient-reported outcome measures and measured motion were evaluated between the 3 groups. Results: There were 47 TSA/TSA, 17 RSA/RSA, and 9 TSA/RSA patients with a mean age of 72 years and mean follow-up of 51 months. Preoperatively, TSA/TSA had significantly higher Simple Shoulder Test scores, Visual Analog Scale (VAS) function, active elevation, and active external rotation compared with RSA/RSA. Postoperative scores were significantly superior in TSA/TSA compared with other combinations of shoulder arthroplasty except VAS pain and function. Change in pre- to postoperative (effectiveness of treatment) internal rotation was superior in the TSA/TSA group compared with RSA/RSA and TSA/RSA; however, no other differences were observed. Conclusions: Bilateral TSA patients have higher preoperative function and motion. Although some postoperative outcomes differ among combinations of BSA, the overall effectiveness of treatment for patients undergoing BSA is similar between various combinations of arthroplasty.

Value comparison of humeral component press-fit and cemented techniques in reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Press-fit humeral fixation for reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) has been shown to have loosening rates and outcomes similar to a cemented technique; however, increased value has not been reported. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the press-fit technique could improve the value of RSA using the procedure value index (PVI). METHODS: Primary RSA patients with complete hospitalization cost data, preoperative and minimum 2-year postoperative Simple Shoulder Test (SST) scores, and postoperative satisfaction were included. The PVI was calculated as improvement in the SST score (in units of minimal clinically important difference) divided by total cost and normalized. Itemized cost data were obtained from hospital financial records and categorized. Radiographic complications, infections, and revisions were noted. Comparisons were made between the press-fit and cemented RSA cohorts. RESULTS: A total of 176 primary RSA patients (83 cemented and 93 press fit) met the inclusion criteria (mean follow-up period, 44.6 months). Surgical indications (except failed rotator cuff repair), baseline SST scores, and demographic characteristics were similar. The calculated minimal clinically important difference for the SST score was 3.98. The average PVI was significantly greater in the press-fit cohort (1.51 vs 1.03, P < .001), representing a 47% difference. SST score improvement was not significantly different (P = .23). However, total hospitalization costs were significantly lower for the press-fit cohort ($10,048.89 vs $13,601.14; P < .001). CONCLUSION: Use of a press-fit technique led to a 47% increase in value over a cemented technique. This appeared to be a function of decreased total costs rather than increased outcome scores.

Predicting outstanding results after anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty using percentage of maximal outcome improvement.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine whether thresholds in the percentage of maximal improvement in the Simple Shoulder Test (SST) or American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score exist for predicting "excellent" patient satisfaction after total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). METHODS: A retrospective query identified patients who underwent TSA with a minimum of 2 years' follow-up. Preoperative and postoperative SST and ASES scores and postoperative patient satisfaction were recorded. Receiver operating characteristic curve analyses were performed to determine thresholds in the percentage of maximal improvement in the SST and ASES scores that predict excellent satisfaction. Univariate and multivariate analyses determined preoperative factors that predicted achievement of these thresholds. RESULTS: A total of 301 and 319 patients had at least 2 years' follow-up for the SST score and ASES score, respectively. We determined 72.1% of maximal improvement in the SST score to be the threshold for excellent satisfaction (area under the curve, 0.777; 95% confidence interval, 0.712-0.841; P < .001). We determined 75.6% of maximal improvement in the ASES score to be the threshold for excellent satisfaction (area under the curve, 0.799; 95% confidence interval, 0.743-0.856; P < .001). Both groups showed significant positive correlations between percentage of maximal score achieved and excellent satisfaction (r = 0.396 for SST score [P < .001] and r = 0.325 for ASES score [P < .001]). Younger age was the only independent predictor for achieving the SST score threshold. No independent predictors existed for the ASES score threshold. CONCLUSION: Achievement of 72.1% of maximal SST score improvement and achievement of 75.6% of maximal ASES score improvement represent thresholds for achievement of excellent satisfaction after TSA. Most preoperative factors did not have an impact on the likelihood of achieving these thresholds.

The procedure value index: a new method for quantifying value in shoulder arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to introduce the procedure value index (PVI) and apply this value instrument to shoulder arthroplasty. The PVI uses the value equation in units of minimal clinically important difference (MCID) to provide an objective system of quantifying value-driven care. Secondarily, we describe the PVI for both primary anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) and reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) to highlight value differences between these patient populations. METHODS: Patients undergoing primary shoulder arthroplasty with minimum 2-year follow-up were identified retrospectively. MCIDs were determined for the Simple Shoulder Test (SST) score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, visual analog scale (VAS) score for pain, and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) score. Cost data were reported as total hospitalization costs, total charges, and total reimbursements. The PVI was calculated as the ratio of outcome improvement in units of MCID over the cost of care. Mean PVIs for TSA and RSA were compared. RESULTS: Five hundred thirty-four patients met the inclusion criteria. MCIDs for the SST, ASES, VAS pain, and SANE scores were 3.61, 29.49, 3.28, and 37.05, respectively. With the exception of the ASES score, improvements in units of MCID were not different between TSA and RSA. However, total hospitalization costs and charges were significantly higher for RSA (P < .001). PVIs based on total hospitalization costs and total charges for the SST, ASES, and VAS pain scores were significantly greater for TSA (P < .05). No other PVI was significantly different. CONCLUSIONS: The PVI was greater for TSA when total hospitalization costs and total charges were considered. The PVI helps highlight value differences in shoulder arthroplasty.

Comparison of implant survivability in primary 1- to 2-level lumbar fusion amongst opioid abusers and non-opioid abusers.

BACKGROUND: Primary lumbar fusion (LF) is a treatment option for degenerative disc disease. The literature is limited regarding postoperative complications in opioid abusers undergoing LF. The purpose of this study was to compare 2-year short term implant-related complications, infection rates, 90-day readmission rates, in-hospital length of stay, and cost of care amongst opioid abusers (OAS) and non-opioid abusers (NAS) undergoing primary 1- to 2-level primary lumbar fusion (1-2LF). METHODS: A retrospective review was performed using the Medicare Standard Analytical Files from an administrative database. Patients undergoing LF were queried using the International Classification of Disease, ninth revision (ICD-9) procedure codes 81.04-81.08. Patients who underwent 1-2LF were filtered using ICD-9 procedure code 81.62. Inclusion criteria for the study group consisted of patients undergoing primary 1-2LF with a diagnosis of opioid abuse and dependency 90-day prior to the procedure. NAS undergoing 1-2LF served as controls. Patients in the study group were matched to controls according to age, gender, and Charlson-Comorbidity Index (CCI). Two mutually exclusive cohorts were formed and outcome measures analyzed and compared were implant complications, infection rates, 90-day readmission rates, LOS, and cost of care. RESULTS: After the matching process 13,342 patients were identified with equal cohort distribution. OAS had higher odds implant related complications (OR: 2.78, P<0.001) such as prosthetic joint dislocation (OR: 3.83, P<0.001), requiring revision (OR: 2.89, P<0.001), pseudarthrosis (OR: 2.50, P<0.001), and spine related infections (OR: 1.58, P<0.001) compared to NAS. OAS had higher 90-day readmission rates, (OR: 1.29, P<0.001), higher hospital costs ($143,057.38 vs. $121,450.45, P<0.001), and greater in-hospital LOS (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: OAS are susceptible to complications following primary 1-2LF. Appropriate patient counseling regarding the effects of opioids on lumbar fusion should be given priority to maximize patient outcomes. Future studies should investigate the impact of pre-operative opioid abuse versus post-operative opioid use.

Preoperative Opioid Use Among Patients Undergoing Shoulder Arthroplasty Predicts Prolonged Postoperative Opioid Use.

INTRODUCTION: This study determines the incidence of opioid use before shoulder arthroplasty and analyzes its influence on postoperative use. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of patients undergoing shoulder arthroplasty with at least 2-year follow-up was performed. Then, at pre- and postoperative appointments, the patients were asked "Do you take narcotic pain medication (codeine or stronger)?" RESULTS: Among 490 patients included in the study, 35.5% reported preoperative opioid use. These patients had higher incidence of opioid use at 1-year follow-up (29.1% versus 4.9%; odds ratio, 8.320; P < 0.001) and at final follow-up (35.1% versus 7.3%; odds ratio, 6.877; P < 0.001). Opioid usage did not change markedly from 1 year follow-up to final follow-up (P > 0.18). DISCUSSION: Approximately one-third of patients used opioids preoperatively and were seven times more likely to continue opioid use postoperatively. Opioid usage did not change from 1 year follow-up to final follow-up, suggesting that patients still using opioids at their 1-year appointment were likely to continue opioid use. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Restoration of External Rotation Following Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty without Latissimus Dorsi Transfer.

BACKGROUND: Latissimus dorsi transfers have been considered necessary to restore active external rotation following reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). The purpose of this study was to assess the effectiveness of an RSA system that lateralizes the center of rotation in restoring active external rotation without a latissimus dorsi transfer in patients with a preoperative external rotation deficit (external rotation of <0°). METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records of patients who had undergone RSA with a lateralized center of rotation without a latissimus dorsi transfer. All patients had had a preoperative external rotation deficit (active external rotation of <0°), and all were followed for a minimum of 2 years. Patients were stratified into 2 groups on the basis of the preoperative diagnosis: (1) those with a combined loss of active elevation and external rotation as a result of rotator cuff tear arthropathy (CLEER group) and (2) those with a combined loss of active elevation and external rotation as a result of other posttraumatic etiologies (non-CLEER group). The mean improvement of external rotation was analyzed. Subgroup analysis was performed on the basis of the Goutallier classification, glenosphere lateralization, and total prosthetic lateralization. RESULTS: Thirty-three patients (24 in the CLEER group and 9 in the non-CLEER group) met the inclusion criteria. The average follow-up was 43.4 months (range, 24 to 77 months). External rotation improved significantly in both the CLEER group (from -21° preoperatively to 28° postoperatively; p < 0.001) and the non-CLEER group (from -19° preoperatively to 26° postoperatively; p = 0.001). Goutallier classification, glenosphere lateralization, and total prosthetic lateralization were not correlated with the degree of improvement of external rotation in either group (p > 0.05 for all). CONCLUSIONS: RSA with a lateralized center of rotation can effectively restore external rotation without the use of a latissimus dorsi transfer in patients with a preoperative external rotation deficit as a result of rotator cuff arthropathy or other posttraumatic etiologies. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Comparative Outcomes Between the First and Second Operated Shoulders in Bilateral Shoulder Arthroplasty.

INTRODUCTION: Studies that report outcomes after staged bilateral shoulder arthroplasty (BSA) are limited. This study compared the overall improvement between the first and second operated shoulders after BSA. METHODS: Preoperative and postoperative motion and patient-reported outcomes for function, pain, and general health were assessed for patients who underwent BSA with a 2-year follow-up. Ultimate outcomes and the efficacy of treatment were compared between the first and second operated shoulders. RESULTS: Seventy-three patients met the inclusion criteria (mean follow-up, 51.4 months). There were no notable differences between the first and second operated shoulders for all preoperative and postoperative variables except for the preoperative 12-item Short-Form Physical Component Score, which was greater in the second shoulder (P = 0.005). The efficacy of treatment was not markedly different except for the Physical Component Score (P = 0.001) and forward elevation (P = 0.01), which were greater after the first surgery. DISCUSSION: Improvements in function, pain, and motion were not markedly different between the first and second shoulder arthroplasty surgeries.

Morbid obesity and 1-year costs after elbow dislocation.

BACKGROUND: Morbid obesity has been linked with serious associated injuries following dislocations of the knee. While similar devastating injuries have been observed following elbow dislocations in the obese, no study to date has characterized the financial impact of elbow dislocations in the morbidly obese population. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to determine the impact of morbid obesity on 1-year costs related to elbow dislocation. METHODS: A retrospective query of the Medicare Standard Analytic Files database was performed for patients sustaining elbow dislocation from 2005 to 2014. 1-year reimbursement costs from the initial open or closed reduction procedures were compared for morbidly obese (BMI ≥ 40 kg/m2) patients versus those without morbid obesity (BMI < 40 kg/m2). Cohorts were matched based on age and gender. Total reimbursement costs associated with a diagnosis of elbow dislocation and/or reduction were analyzed. RESULTS: We identified 182 morbidly obese patients and 422 patients without morbid obesity who underwent open or closed reduction for elbow dislocation. 102 patients with 1-year cost data remained in each cohort after matching. Mean 1-year reimbursement costs related to elbow dislocation were significantly greater in morbidly obese patients ($6227.43 vs $4225.71, p = 0.006). CONCLUSION: 1-year costs related to elbow dislocation are significantly higher in morbidly obese patients. The increased costs likely reflect the complexity of managing dislocations in the obese population. Difficulties maintaining closed reduction, longer and more challenging surgeries with a higher likelihood on intra- and post-operative complications, and a higher risk of peri-operative medical complications may all contribute to these increased costs.

Effect of opioid dependence or abuse on opioid utilization after shoulder arthroplasty.

AIM: To examine whether opioid dependence or abuse has an effect on opioid utilization after anatomic or reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). METHODS: All anatomic TSA (ICD-9 81.80) and reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) (ICD-9 81.88) procedures from 2007 to 2015 were queried from within the Humana claims database utilizing the PearlDiver supercomputer (Colorado Springs, CO). Study groups were formed based on the presence or absence of a previous history of opioid dependence (ICD-9 304.00 and 304.03) or abuse (ICD-9 305.50 and 305.53). Opioid utilization among the groups was tracked monthly up to 1 year post-operatively utilizing National Drug Codes. A secondary analysis was performed to determine risk factors for pre-operative opioid dependence or abuse. RESULTS: Two percent of TSA (157 out of 7838) and 3% of RSA (206 out of 6920) patients had a history of opioid dependence or abuse. For both TSA and RSA, opioid utilization was significantly higher in opioid dependent patients at all post-operative intervals (P < 0.01) although the incidence of opioid use among groups was similar within the first post-operative month. After TSA, opioid dependent patients were over twice as likely to fill opioid prescriptions during the post-operative months 1-12. Following RSA, opioid dependent patients were over 3 times as likely to utilize opioids from months 3-12. Age less than 65 years, history of mood disorder, and history of chronic pain were significant risk factors for pre-operative opioid dependence/abuse in patients who underwent TSA or RSA. CONCLUSION: Following shoulder arthroplasty, opioid use between opioid-dependent and non-dependent patients is similar within the first post-operative month but is greater among opioid-dependent patients from months 2-12.

Loss of Functional Internal Rotation Following Various Combinations of Bilateral Shoulder Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Limited internal rotation (IR) remains a concern for activities of daily living (ADLs) following bilateral shoulder arthroplasty (BSA). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the loss of the ability to perform functional IR tasks following BSA using various combinations of anatomic (TSA) and reverse (RSA) shoulder arthroplasty. METHODS: A retrospective review of an institutional shoulder-surgery database was conducted for patients who underwent BSA with any combination of TSA or RSA with at least a 2-year follow-up. IR range of motion (ROM) and individual American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score and Simple Shoulder Test (SST) questions specific to IR were used to assess a patient's ability to perform IR tasks with at least one of their shoulders. RESULTS: Seventy-three patients met the inclusion criteria (47 TSA/TSA, 17 RSA/RSA, and 9 TSA/RSA). Average age at surgery was 72.1 years. Average follow-up was 51.4 months. Loss of ability to wash one's back was observed in 30.4% TSA/TSA, 33.3% TSA/RSA, and 52.9% RSA/RSA. Loss of ability to tuck in a shirt was observed in 10.6% TSA/TSA, 11.1% TSA/RSA, and 29.4% RSA/RSA. Loss of ability to manage toileting was observed in no TSA/TSA or TSA/RSA, but in 11.8% RSA/RSA. For each of the tasks, there were no significant differences in the ability to perform the task among the groups (p>0.05). Post-operative IR ROM for TSA/TSA was superior to those for TSA/RSA and RSA/RSA (p<0.01). IR ROM efficacies for both RSA/RSA and TSA/RSA were inferior to that for TSA/TSA (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: Bilateral RSA patients can perform most IR tasks, and their ability to complete these tasks does not differ significantly from those in patients with other BSA.

Use of a Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Following a Fracture-Dislocation with a Brachial Plexus Palsy: A Case Report.

CASE: An 80-year-old woman sustained a fracture-dislocation of the proximal aspect of the humerus with a near-complete brachial plexopathy, which was successfully managed acutely using a reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) with repair of the greater and lesser tuberosities. The palsy, which was confirmed with nerve conduction studies, recovered uneventfully along with functional improvement of the shoulder. At the most recent follow-up, there was complete resolution of the plexopathy, with excellent, pain-free range of motion. CONCLUSION: Acute RSA with tuberosity repair may be a reasonable treatment modality in the setting of an acute brachial plexus palsy following a comminuted fracture-dislocation of the proximal aspect of the humerus in an elderly patient.

Comorbidity effect on speed of recovery after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.

BACKGROUND: Comorbidities have been shown to affect rotator cuff healing and postoperative outcomes. The purpose of this study was to analyze the effect of comorbidities on speed of recovery (SOR) and overall outcomes after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (RCR). METHODS: We identified 627 patients who underwent primary arthroscopic RCR from 2006 to 2015. Measured motion and patient-reported outcome measures for pain and function were analyzed for preoperative, 3-month, 6-month, and 1-year intervals. Subgroup analysis of overall outcome and plateau in maximum improvement was performed for diabetes, smoking, obesity, hypercholesterolemia, and age. RESULTS: Diabetic patients had worse pain (visual analog scale for pain) and functional outcome (American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons function, Simple Shoulder Test, visual analog scale for function, and elevation) scores at 6 months and 1 year (P < .05), with an earlier plateau in recovery (6 months) for nearly all variables. Smoking had no impact on postoperative outcome scores; however, plateaus occurred earlier in smokers (6 months). Obese patients had worse American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons function score and external rotation at 1 year (P < .05) with similar plateau points. No significant differences were observed in outcomes for patients with hypercholesterolemia; however, plateaus for Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation and motion occurred earlier (6 months). Outcome scores for patients older than 65 years were not significantly different from those for younger patients. CONCLUSION: After arthroscopic RCR, SOR for pain outpaced that for function and motion. Diabetic patients had worse outcomes and earlier plateau points. Earlier plateaus were seen for smokers and for motion in patients with obesity or hypercholesterolemia. Obese patients showed lower functional scores and external rotation. Age did not significantly influence SOR.

Trends in Management of Radial Head and Olecranon Fractures.

BACKGROUND: Advancement in surgical techniques and implants has improved the ability to manage radial head and olecranon fractures. However, trends in management of these fractures are largely unstudied. OBJECTIVE: This purpose of this study is to evaluate management trends for these common fractures. METHODS: A retrospective review of a comprehensive Humana database was performed using Pearl Diver supercomputer (Warsaw, IN, USA) for radial head and neck (RHNF) and olecranon fractures (OF) between 2007 and 2014. Treatment methods including open reduction internal fixation (ORIF), radial head arthroplasty (RHA), and non-operative treatment were reviewed. Total reported incidence of office visits and utilization of each treatment modality were investigated. Sub-analysis with stratification by age 15-74 and greater than 75-years was performed for OF. RESULTS: A total of 10,609 OF and 20,400 RHNF were identified between 2007 and 2014. A significant trend increase in the annual incidence of RHNF (266 cases/year, p<0.001) and OF (133.9 cases/year, p=0.001) was observed. A significant trend increase in annual percent utilization of RHA (0.22% per year, p=0.011) and a significant trend decrease in the annual percent utilization of ORIF (-1.0% per year, p=0.004) and non-operative management (-0.53% per year, p=0.046) was observed for RHNF. A significant trend increase was observed in percent utilization (0.40% per year, p=0.022) for OF non-operative management, especially in patients over 75 years (66% per year, p=0.034). CONCLUSION: The percentage of patients being treated with RHA is increasing. Non-operative management of OF has increased, specifically in the patients who are over 75 years.

Speed of recovery after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to delineate the time taken to achieve maximum improvement (plateau of recovery) and the degree of recovery observed at various time points (speed of recovery) for pain and function after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. METHODS: An institutional shoulder surgery registry query identified 627 patients who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair between 2006 and 2015. Measured range of motion, patient satisfaction, and patient-reported outcome measures were analyzed for preoperative, 3-month, 6-month, 1-year, and 2-year intervals. Subgroup analysis was performed on the basis of tear size by retraction grade and number of anchors used. RESULTS: As an entire group, the plateau of maximum recovery for pain, function, and motion occurred at 1 year. Satisfaction with surgery was >96% at all time points. At 3 months, 74% of improvement in pain and 45% to 58% of functional improvement were realized. However, only 22% of elevation improvement was achieved (P < .001). At 6 months, 89% of improvement in pain, 81% to 88% of functional improvement, and 78% of elevation improvement were achieved (P < .001). Larger tears had a slower speed of recovery for Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation scores, forward elevation, and external rotation. Smaller tears had higher motion and functional scores across all time points. Tear size did not influence pain levels. CONCLUSION: The plateau of maximum recovery after rotator cuff repair occurred at 1 year with high satisfaction rates at all time points. At 3 months, approximately 75% of pain relief and 50% of functional recovery can be expected. Larger tears have a slower speed of recovery.

American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons membership and its association with primary and revision shoulder arthroplasty volume.

BACKGROUND: The overall impact of American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) membership on volume of primary and revision procedures has not been evaluated. The purpose of this study was to examine the association between high-volume primary and revision arthroplasty surgeons and membership in the ASES using recent Medicare data. METHODS: Data from 2014 for all providers performing primary shoulder arthroplasty (Current Procedural Terminology codes 23470 and 23472) and revision procedures (Current Procedural Terminology codes 23473 and 23474) were identified using the Medicare Physician and Other Supplier Public Use File for 2016. Providers were rank ordered on the basis of the total number of procedures performed and subdivided as ASES members and nonmembers. RESULTS: ASES members composed 16% of all surgeons performing shoulder arthroplasty but performed 28% of primary arthroplasty and 63% of revision procedures. The mean number of procedures per provider was significantly greater for ASES members compared with non-ASES members (44.2 ± 30.7 vs. 21.4 ± 13.2; P < .001); 70% of the 53 highest volume surgeons were ASES members and performed 71% of all primary and 89% of all revision shoulder arthroplasties among this group. CONCLUSION: ASES members represent the largest proportion of high-volume shoulder arthroplasty surgeons in the United States and perform a majority of all primary and revision arthroplasties among this group.