Dermatological opinions are imperative in ambulatory and acute care settings for pediatric skin disorders - HL-SkinPed.

BACKGROUND: Children with skin disorders usually receive care from a pediatrician, despite their limited training in this discipline. The advice of a dermatologist is frequently requested. OBJECTIVES: To estimate the degree of concordance in the diagnosis, treatment, advice, and recommended follow-up of skin disorders between pediatricians (in private practice or a pediatric emergency department [PED]) and a dermatologist. METHODS: This prospective study was carried out between June 25 and September 13, 2018. All patients younger than 18 years consulting at the PED of the University Children's Hospital or a pediatric private practice in Nancy, France, for a dermatological disorder (primary complaint) were included. Photographs, medical data, diagnosis, treatment, advice and follow-up recommended by the pediatricians were recorded in a dedicated anonymous medical file. Clinical data and photographs were subsequently reviewed by a dermatologist who provided a diagnosis. RESULTS: A total of 103 patients were included and 99 were analyzed: 53 from the PED and 46 from private practice (three patients were excluded because of unclear photographs and one was referred for maxillofacial advice). The median age was 4 years and there was a slight predominance of females (53.5%). The seven main diagnoses were: atopic dermatitis, insect bites, nonspecific viral rash, viral urticaria, hand-foot-and-mouth disease, impetigo, and contact dermatitis. The rate of agreement between the pediatricians and the dermatologist was 55% for diagnosis (73% for atopic dermatitis, 53% for insect bites, 33% for nonspecific viral rash), 40% for treatment, 54% for advice, and 58% for recommended follow-up. Reinterpretation by the dermatologist changed patient management in 15% of cases. CONCLUSIONS: The significant discordance between the pediatricians and the dermatologist suggests the need for a greater emphasis on dermatological disorders in medical training programs and for closer collaboration between disciplines for the benefit of younger patients.

Development of Reliable and Validated Tools to Evaluate Technical Resuscitation Skills in a Pediatric Simulation Setting: Resuscitation and Emergency Simulation Checklist for Assessment in Pediatrics.

OBJECTIVES: To develop a reliable and validated tool to evaluate technical resuscitation skills in a pediatric simulation setting. STUDY DESIGN: Four Resuscitation and Emergency Simulation Checklist for Assessment in Pediatrics (RESCAPE) evaluation tools were created, following international guidelines: intraosseous needle insertion, bag mask ventilation, endotracheal intubation, and cardiac massage. We applied a modified Delphi methodology evaluation to binary rating items. Reliability was assessed comparing the ratings of 2 observers (1 in real time and 1 after a video-recorded review). The tools were assessed for content, construct, and criterion validity, and for sensitivity to change. RESULTS: Inter-rater reliability, evaluated with Cohen kappa coefficients, was perfect or near-perfect (>0.8) for 92.5% of items and each Cronbach alpha coefficient was ≥0.91. Principal component analyses showed that all 4 tools were unidimensional. Significant increases in median scores with increasing levels of medical expertise were demonstrated for RESCAPE-intraosseous needle insertion (P = .0002), RESCAPE-bag mask ventilation (P = .0002), RESCAPE-endotracheal intubation (P = .0001), and RESCAPE-cardiac massage (P = .0037). Significantly increased median scores over time were also demonstrated during a simulation-based educational program. CONCLUSIONS: RESCAPE tools are reliable and validated tools for the evaluation of technical resuscitation skills in pediatric settings during simulation-based educational programs. They might also be used for medical practice performance evaluations.