Transition From Peer Review to Peer Learning: Lessons Learned.

Landmark publications, such as To Err is Human, confronted the healthcare community with the egregious toll medical errors played in both patient safety and overall healthcare costs. This heralded a paradigm shift and a call for action by professional organizations to enact methods to ensure physician competency and quality assurance. The American College of Radiology similarly convened a task force to discuss these concerns and how best to address quality assurance in radiology practice, leading to the development of RADPEER, a score-based peer review system. However, critics were quick to point out the deficiencies of this model, highlighting it as punitive and a poor evaluator of physician performance. The recognized deficiencies in score-based peer review prompted the pursuit of an alternate model that would instead emphasize learning and improvement. Peer learning was proposed and highlighted the necessity of an inclusive and collaborative environment where colleagues could discuss case errors as learning opportunities without fear of punitive consequence. This paper explores peer learning, its benefits and challenges, as well as how to identify specific learning opportunities by utilizing case examples.

Restriction spectrum imaging improves MRI-based prostate cancer detection.

PURPOSE: To compare the diagnostic performance of restriction spectrum imaging (RSI), with that of conventional multi-parametric (MP) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for prostate cancer (PCa) detection in a blinded reader-based format. METHODS: Three readers independently evaluated 100 patients (67 with proven PCa) who underwent MP-MRI and RSI within 6 months of systematic biopsy (N = 67; 23 with targeting performed) or prostatectomy (N = 33). Imaging was performed at 3 Tesla using a phased-array coil. Readers used a five-point scale estimating the likelihood of PCa present in each prostate sextant. Evaluation was performed in two separate sessions, first using conventional MP-MRI alone then immediately with MP-MRI and RSI in the same session. Four weeks later, another scoring session used RSI and T2-weighted imaging (T2WI) without conventional diffusion-weighted or dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging. Reader interpretations were then compared to prostatectomy data or biopsy results. Receiver operating characteristic curves were performed, with area under the curve (AUC) used to compare across groups. RESULTS: MP-MRI with RSI achieved higher AUCs compared to MP-MRI alone for identifying high-grade (Gleason score greater than or equal to 4 + 3=7) PCa (0.78 vs. 0.70 at the sextant level; P < 0.001 and 0.85 vs. 0.79 at the hemigland level; P = 0.04). RSI and T2WI alone achieved AUCs similar to MP-MRI for high-grade PCa (0.71 vs. 0.70 at the sextant level). With hemigland analysis, high-grade disease results were similar when comparing RSI + T2WI with MP-MRI, although with greater AUCs compared to the sextant analysis (0.80 vs. 0.79). CONCLUSION: Including RSI with MP-MRI improves PCa detection compared to MP-MRI alone, and RSI with T2WI achieves similar PCa detection as MP-MRI.

Thromboxane A2-induced arrhythmias in the anesthetized rabbit.

Experiments were conducted in the anesthetized rabbit to investigate mechanisms for arrhythmias that occur after left atrial injection of the thromboxane A(2) (TxA(2)) mimetic U-46619. Arrhythmias were primarily of ventricular origin, dose dependent in frequency, and TxA(2) receptor mediated. The response was receptor specific since arrhythmias were absent after pretreatment with a specific TxA(2) receptor antagonist (SQ-29548) and did not occur in response to another prostaglandin, PGF(2alpha). Alterations in coronary blood flow were unlikely the cause of these arrhythmias because coronary blood flow (as measured with fluorescent microspheres) was unchanged after U-46619, and there were no observable changes in the ECG-ST segment. In addition, arrhythmias did not occur after administration of another vasoconstrictor (phenylephrine). The potential involvement of autonomic cardiac efferent nerves in these arrhythmias was also investigated because TxA(2) has been shown to stimulate peripheral nerves. Pretreatment of animals with the beta-adrenergic receptor antagonist propranolol did not reduce the frequency of these arrhythmias. Pretreatment with atropine or bilateral vagotomy resulted in an increased frequency of arrhythmias, suggesting that parasympathetic nerves may actually inhibit the arrhythmogenic activity of TxA(2). These experiments demonstrate that left atrial injection of U-46619 elicits arrhythmias via a mechanism independent of a significant reduction in coronary blood flow or activation of the autonomic nervous system. It is possible that TxA(2) may have a direct effect on the electrical activity of the heart in vivo, which provides significant implications for cardiac events where TxA(2) is increased, e.g., after myocardial ischemia or administration of cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors.