The Yearly Periodicity of Operative Upper Extremity Trauma: A Retrospective Study of "Trauma Season".

BACKGROUND: Upper extremity (UE) trauma requiring operative care increases during the summer and fall months, which the authors colloquially refer to as "trauma season." METHODS: CPT databases were queried for codes related to acute UE trauma at a single level-1 trauma center. Monthly CPT code volume was tabulated for 120 consecutive months and average monthly volume was calculated. Raw data were plotted as a time series and transformed as a ratio to the moving average. Autocorrelation was applied to the transformed data set to detect yearly periodicity. Multivariable modeling quantified the proportion of volume variability attributable to yearly periodicity. Subanalysis assessed presence and strength of periodicity in four age groups. RESULTS: A total of 11,084 CPT codes were included. Monthly trauma-related CPT volume was highest in July through October and lowest in December through February. Time-series analysis revealed yearly oscillation in addition to a growth trend. Autocorrelation revealed statistically significant positive and negative peaks at a lag of 12 and 6 months, respectively, confirming yearly periodicity. Multivariable modeling revealed R 2 attributable to periodicity of 0.53 ( P < 0.01). Periodicity was strongest in younger populations and weaker in older populations. R 2 was 0.44 for ages 0 to 17, 0.35 for ages 18 to 44, 0.26 for ages 45 to 64, and 0.11 for ages 65 and older. CONCLUSIONS: Operative UE trauma volumes peak in the summer and early fall and reach a winter nadir. Periodicity accounts for 53% of trauma volume variability. The authors' findings have implications for allocation of operative block time and personnel and expectation management over the course of the year.

Predictors of Digital Amputation in Diabetic Patients With Surgically Treated Finger Infections.

BACKGROUND: Diabetes is a well-established risk factor for severe digital infection, and patients are more likely to require digital amputation for adequate source control. This study aims to identify factors predictive of digital amputation compared with preservation in patients with diabetes who present with surgically treated finger infections. METHODS: Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) and International Classification of Diseases Versions 9 and 10 (ICD-9/10) databases from a single academic medical center were queried to identify patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus who underwent surgical treatment in the operating room for treatment of a digital infection from 2010 to 2020. Electronic medical records were reviewed to obtain historical and acute clinical variables at the time of hospital presentation. Bivariate and multivariable regression were used to identify factors associated with amputation. RESULTS: In total, 145 patients (61 digital amputation, 84 digital preservation) met inclusion criteria for this retrospective cohort study. Mean hospital stay was 6 days, and the average patient underwent 2 operations. Multivariable analysis revealed that the presence of osteomyelitis, ipsilateral upper extremity dialysis fistula, end-stage renal disease, and vascular disease each had significant independent predictive value for amputation rather than digital preservation. CONCLUSIONS: Digital amputation is common in the setting of diabetic finger infection. The 4 variables found to independently predict the outcome of amputation can be understood as factors which decrease the likelihood of successful digital salvage and increase the potential consequence of ongoing uncontrolled infection. Further study should focus on clinical factors affecting surgical decision making and how the treatment rendered affects patient outcomes.

Surgical interventions for the treatment of painful neuroma: a comparative meta-analysis.

A consensus on the optimal treatment of painful neuromas does not exist. Our objective was to identify available data and to examine the role of surgical technique on outcomes following surgical management of painful neuromas. In accordance with the PRISMA guidelines, we performed a comprehensive literature search to identify studies measuring the efficacy of the surgical treatment of painful neuromas in the extremities (excluding Morton's neuroma and compression neuropathies). Surgical treatments were categorized as excision-only, excision and transposition, excision and cap, excision and repair, or neurolysis and coverage. Data on the proportion of patients with a meaningful reduction in pain were pooled and a random-effects meta-analysis was performed. The effects of confounding, study quality, and publication bias were examined with stratified, meta-regression, and bias analysis. Fifty-four articles met the inclusion criteria, many with multiple treatment groups. Outcomes reporting varied significantly and few studies controlled for confounding. Overall, surgical treatment of neuroma pain was effective in 77% of patients [95% confidence interval: 73-81]. No significant differences were seen between surgical techniques. Among studies with a mean pain duration greater than 24 months, or median number of operations greater than 2 prior to definitive neuroma pain surgery, excision and transposition or neurolysis and coverage were significantly more likely than other operative techniques to result in a meaningful reduction in pain (P < 0.05). Standardization in the reporting of surgical techniques, outcomes, and confounding factors is needed in future studies to enable providers to make comparisons across disparate techniques in the surgical treatment of neuroma pain.