Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
: 20 | 50 | 100
1 - 2 de 2
1.
Diabetes Res Clin Pract ; 157: 107860, 2019 Nov.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31526825

AIM: This study aimed to assess efficacy and safety of evogliptin versus sitagliptin, when added to background metformin therapy in Indian patients with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes. METHOD: Overall, 184 patients with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes (7% ≤ HbA1c < 10%) receiving ≥8 weeks of stable metformin monotherapy (≥1 g/day), were randomized to receive add-on treatment (evogliptin 5 mg or sitagliptin 100 mg) for 24 weeks. Primary endpoint was change in HbA1c from baseline to 12 weeks (non-inferiority margin: <0.35). RESULTS: Mean reductions in HbA1c at 12 weeks in evogliptin- and sitagliptin-treated patients were -0.37 (1.06) and -0.32 (1.14), respectively. The adjusted mean difference between treatment groups was -0.022 (95% CI: -0.374, 0.330; P = 0.901), that demonstrated non-inferiority. Reductions in FPG and PPG were similar between evogliptin and sitagliptin at 12 and 24 weeks. Changes in body weight were comparable between the treatment groups. Patients achieving target HbA1c < 7.0% (evogliptin, 26.7% vs. sitagliptin, 20%) was almost equal in both groups. Treatment-emergent adverse events occured in 52 patients (evogliptin, 25% and sitagliptin, 31.5%) and were generally mild. CONCLUSIONS: Evogliptin was non-inferior to sitagliptin in HbA1c reduction. It effectively improved glycemic control and was well tolerated in type 2 diabetes patients inadequately controlled by metformin alone.


Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/drug therapy , Hypoglycemic Agents/therapeutic use , Metformin/therapeutic use , Sitagliptin Phosphate/therapeutic use , Asian People , Blood Glucose , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/pathology , Double-Blind Method , Drug Therapy, Combination , Female , Humans , India , Male , Middle Aged , Piperazines/pharmacology , Time Factors
2.
Ann Rheum Dis ; 66(2): 267-9, 2007 Feb.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16868018

OBJECTIVES: To examine whether oral contraceptive use is associated with the presence of serum rheumatoid factor in women of reproductive age without rheumatoid arthritis. METHODS: 304 women selected from parents of children who were at increased risk of developing type 1 diabetes were studied, because they were enriched with the human leucocyte antigen-DR4 allele, a susceptibility marker for both type 1 diabetes and rheumatoid arthritis. Participants visited a clinic where blood was drawn for rheumatoid factor testing, and exposure data were collected via questionnaires. A medical history and joint examination were performed to rule out rheumatoid arthritis. Participants and examiners were unaware of the participants' rheumatoid factor status at the time of examination and questionnaire. RESULTS: Use of oral contraceptives at any time was inversely associated with rheumatoid factor positivity (adjusted odds ratio (OR) 0.2, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.07 to 0.52) independent of age, education and smoking. Smoking > or = 20 pack-years was also associated with rheumatoid factor positivity (adjusted OR 56.38, 95% CI 4.31 to 736.98) compared with never smoking. Smoking 1-19 pack-years was not associated with a positive rheumatoid factor. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that oral contraceptive use, and possibly cigarette smoking, act early in the development of the immune dysregulation that occurs in rheumatoid arthritis.


Contraceptives, Oral, Hormonal/administration & dosage , Rheumatoid Factor/analysis , Adult , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/etiology , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/immunology , Cohort Studies , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/immunology , Disease Susceptibility , Female , HLA-DR4 Antigen , Humans , Odds Ratio , Smoking/adverse effects
...