Laparoscopic total fundoplication is superior to medical treatment for reducing the cancer risk in Barrett's esophagus: a long-term analysis.

The present study aims to compare the effectiveness of surgical and medical therapy in reducing the risk of cancer in Barrett's esophagus in a long-term evaluation. A prospective cohort was designed that compared Barrett's esophagus patients submitted to medical treatment with omeprazole or laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication. The groups were compared using propensity score matching paired by Barrett's esophagus length. A total of 398 patients met inclusion criteria. There were 207 patients in the omeprazole group (Group A) and 191 in the total fundoplication group (Group B). After applying the propensity score matching paired by Barrett's esophagus length, the groups were 180 (Group A) and 190 (Group B). Median follow-up was 80 months. Group B was significantly superior for controlling GERD symptoms. Group B was more efficient than Group A in promoting Barrett's esophagus regression or blocking its progression. Group B was more efficient than Group A in preventing the development of dysplasia and cancer. Logistic regression was performed for the outcomes of adenocarcinoma and dysplasia. Age and body mass index were used as covariates in the logistic regression models. Even after regression analysis, Group B was still superior to Group A to prevent esophageal adenocarcinoma or dysplasia transformation (odds ratio [OR]: 0.51; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.27-0.97, for adenocarcinoma or any dysplasia; and OR: 0.26; 95% CI: 0.08-0.81, for adenocarcinoma or high-grade dysplasia). Surgical treatment is superior to medical management, allowing for better symptom control, less need for reflux medication use, higher regression rate of the columnar epithelium and intestinal metaplasia, and lower risk for progression to dysplasia and cancer.

Esophageal achalasia: a risk factor for carcinoma. A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Achalasia of the cardia is associated with an increased risk of esophageal carcinoma. The real burden of achalasia at the malignancy genesis is still a controversial issue. Therefore, there are no generally accepted recommendations on follow-up evaluation for achalasia patients. This study aims to estimate the risk of esophageal adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma in achalasia patients. We searched for association between carcinoma and esophageal achalasia in databases up to January 2017 to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis. A total of 1,046 studies were identified from search strategy, of which 40 were selected for meta-analysis. A cumulative number of 11,978 esophageal achalasia patients were evaluated. The incidence of squamous cell carcinoma was 312.4 (StDev 429.16) cases per 100,000 patient-years at risk. The incidence of adenocarcinoma was 21.23 (StDev 31.6) cases per 100,000 patient-years at risk. The prevalence for esophageal carcinoma was 28 carcinoma cases in 1,000 esophageal achalasia patients (CI 95% 2, 39). The prevalence for squamous cell carcinoma was 26 cases in 1,000 achalasia patients (CI 95% 18, 39) and for adenocarcinoma was 4 cases in 1,000 achalasia patients (CI 95% 3, 6).The absolute risk increase for squamous cell carcinoma was 308.1 and for adenocarcinoma was 18.03 cases per 100,000 patients per year. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first meta-analysis estimating the burden of achalasia as an esophageal cancer risk factor. The high increased risk rate for cancer in achalasia patients points to a strict endoscopic surveillance for these patients. Also, the increased risk for developing adenocarcinoma in achalasia patients suggests fundoplication after myotomy, to avoid esophageal reflux and Barret esophagus, a known risk factor for adenocarcinoma.