Use of an Additional Diagnostic Work-up Following a Treatment Recommendation from the Preoperative Conference of the Mammography Screening Units.

Objective: If a focus of suspicion is classified as being B 3-5 by a punch biopsy as part of a mammography screening, a recommendation for further action to be taken will be given in the preoperative conference of the screening unit. As part of this investigation, these treatment recommendations were compared with the final therapeutic approach taken at a certified breast centre. Furthermore, it was investigated whether and which additional examinations were performed on patients, depending on compliance with the recommended treatment. Material and Method: The data from 272 breast cancer patients from the years 2007, 2008 and 2009 was analysed. The patients took part in the screening programmes of four screening units in the German mammography screening programme, in one federal state. In addition, the data from each patient from one screening unit was analysed in two further federal states. Results: In total, the most recently conducted intervention deviated from the treatment recommendation from the preoperative conference in the screening unit in 77 out of 272 patients (28.3 %). Of these, there were 50 recommendations for open biopsy which ultimately resulted in breast-conserving surgery, which is not to be evaluated as an error, as the bioptic result was supplemented by the open biopsy. Additional examinations were performed in patients with deviating treatment recommendation in 39 cases (50.6 %) and in patients without deviating treatment recommendation in 66 cases (34.0 %). The additional examinations carried out included additional punch biopsies (most frequent) and MRI scans, but also additional ultrasounds or a mammography. Conclusions: Additional examinations lead to a change in treatment in a higher percentage of patients in comparison with the initial screening including assessment. An exact reexamination of the findings obtained in the screening is therefore preoperatively necessary in order to guarantee optimum treatment.

Volumetric quantification of the effect of aging and hormone replacement therapy on breast composition from digital mammograms.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the physiological changes in breast composition with aging using volumetric breast composition measurement from digital mammograms and to assess the effect of hormone replacement therapy (HRT). METHODS: A total of 764 consecutive mammograms of 208 non-HRT using women and 508 mammograms of 134 HRT-using women were analyzed using a volumetric breast composition assessment software (Quantra™, Hologic Inc.). Fibroglandular tissue volume (FTV), breast volume (BV), and percent density (PD) were measured. For statistical analysis, women were divided into a premenopausal (<46 years), a perimenopausal (46-55 years), and a postmenopausal (>55 years) age group. More detailed graphical analysis was performed using smaller age brackets. Women using HRT were compared to age-matched controls not using HRT. RESULTS: Women in the postmenopausal age group had a significantly lower FTV and PD and a significantly higher BV than women in the premenopausal age group (FTV: 77 vs. 120 cm(3), respectively; PD: 16% vs. 28%, respectively; BV 478 vs. 406 cm(3), respectively; p<0.01 for all). Median FTV was nearly stable in consecutive mammograms in the premenopausal and postmenopausal age groups, but declined at a rate of 3.9% per year in the perimenopausal period. Median PD was constant in the premenopausal and postmenopausal age groups and declined at a rate of 0.57% per year in the perimenopausal age group. BV continuously increased with age. Women using HRT throughout the study had a 5% higher PD than women not using HRT (22% vs. 17%, respectively; p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Accurate knowledge of normal changes in breast composition are of particular interest nowadays due to the importance of breast density for breast cancer risk evaluation. FTV and PD change significantly during the perimenopausal period but remain relatively constant before and thereafter. Median total breast volume consistently increases with age and further contributes to changes in breast density. HRT use is associated with a significantly higher PD.

Impact of magnification views on the characterization of microcalcifications in digital mammography.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the additional benefit of true geometric (air-gap) magnification views for the characterization of microcalcifications in digital mammography. MATERIALS AND METHODS: After ethical approval, we retrospectively reviewed patient records to identify 100 patients with suspicious microcalcifications (35 malignant, 65 benign) who had a standard digital mammography and an additional digital magnification view in the same projection within three months. All images were obtained using an amorphous silicon-based full-field digital system (Senographe 2000 D, GE Healthcare, Chalfont St. Giles, UK). Images were independently analyzed by six board-certified radiologists. The probability of malignancy was estimated using first standard contact mammography alone (MG) and then mammography in combination with the magnification view (MG+MAG) using a modified Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) classification system and a percentage scale. Results were compared using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. In addition, readers assessed the subjective visibility of the calcifications. RESULTS: For all six readers combined, the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.664 ±â€Š0.052 for MG and 0.813 ±â€Š0.042 for MG + MAG, resulting in a statistically significant improvement of 0.148 ±â€Š0.120. Each reader had a higher AUC for MG + MAG than MG, with the improvement being statistically significant in four of the six readers. In 76.34 % of the cases, MG + MAG resulted in better visibility of calcifications compared with mammography alone. In 33 % slightly more and in 39 % significantly more calcifications were found. CONCLUSION: Even in digital mammography with the option of using electronic magnification (zoom) at the viewing workstation, true geometric (air-gap) magnification views remain important for the visibility and correct classification of microcalcifications and for the assessment of their extent.

Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography versus MRI: Initial results in the detection of breast cancer and assessment of tumour size.

OBJECTIVES: To compare mammography (MG), contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the detection and size estimation of histologically proven breast cancers using postoperative histology as the gold standard. METHODS: After ethical approval, 80 women with newly diagnosed breast cancer underwent MG, CESM, and MRI examinations. CESM was reviewed by an independent experienced radiologist, and the maximum dimension of suspicious lesions was measured. For MG and MRI, routine clinical reports of breast specialists, with judgment based on the BI-RADS lexicon, were used. Results of each imaging technique were correlated to define the index cancer. Fifty-nine cases could be compared to postoperative histology for size estimation. RESULTS: Breast cancer was visible in 66/80 MG, 80/80 CESM, and 77/79 MRI examinations. Average lesion largest dimension was 27.31 mm (SD 22.18) in MG, 31.62 mm (SD 24.41) in CESM, and 27.72 mm (SD 21.51) in MRI versus 32.51 mm (SD 29.03) in postoperative histology. No significant difference was found between lesion size measurement on MRI and CESM compared with histopathology. CONCLUSION: Our initial results show a better sensitivity of CESM and MRI in breast cancer detection than MG and a good correlation with postoperative histology in size assessment. KEY POINTS: • Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) is slowly being introduced into clinical practice. • Access to breast MRI is limited by availability and lack of reimbursement. • Initial results show a better sensitivity of CESM and MRI than conventional mammography. • CESM showed a good correlation with postoperative histology in size assessment. • Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography offers promise, seemingly providing information comparable to MRI.

Volumetric breast density assessment: reproducibility in serial examinations and comparison with visual assessment.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Mammographic breast density is the strongest known marker of breast cancer risk. Visual breast density assessment is subject to significant intra- and inter-rater variability. The aim of the present study was to test the reproducibility of automatic breast density assessment and to compare the results to the visual assessment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Serial mammograms of 141 patients were retrospectively reviewed. Breast density was assessed both visually using a BI-RADS four-category breast density scale and with a software tool for volumetric breast density measurement. RESULTS: The intra- and inter-rater reproducibility as well as inter-examination reproducibility were assessed for both techniques by calculating the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The inter-examination reproducibility of the volumetric measurement of breast percent density was 0.91 (ICC; 95 % CI 0.87 - 0.93). There was no difference in the strength of the correlation between patients with a large vs. small difference in compression force. The intra- and inter-rater reproducibility ranged from 0.81 - 0.84 and 0.71 - 0.77, respectively. The inter-examination reproducibility of visual assessment was 0.75 - 0.81. The agreement of visual assessment with volumetric measurement was similar to the agreement among readers. CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that volumetric breast density measurement provides higher reproducibility in serial examinations than visual assessment and may thus be preferable in the longitudinal assessment of breast density and in the measurement of breast density for risk stratification.

MRI of the breast as part of the assessment in population-based mammography screening.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the indications and impact of MRI of the breast as an assessment modality in population-based mammography screening. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 135 consecutive contrast-enhanced MRI exams of the breast, which were performed between April 2007 and October 2012 as part of the assessment at one mammography screening unit before issuance of a final management recommendation (e. g. definitely benign or malignant), were retrospectively reviewed. Overall, the cases with an MRI exam of the breast during assessment represent less than 2 % of all assessment cases at this screening unit. All MRI exams were performed as part of the routine clinical care on a 1.5 T or 3 T whole-body magnet using a standard dynamic breast MRI protocol. RESULTS: In the 135 study patients, a total of 30 malignancies in 28 patients were found, including two bilateral cancers. One patient was diagnosed with a non-Hodgkin lymphoma, and of the remaining 29 malignant lesions, 3 (10 %) were in-situ cancers (DCIS) and 26 (90 %) were invasive breast cancers including 3 multifocal or multicentric cancers. All 26 detected invasive cancers were lymph-node negative and 25/29 (86 %) of the detected breast cancer were early stage cancers (stage 0 or 1). 53 of the 135 MRI exams (39.3 %) were suspicious for malignancy (BIRADS 4 or 5) with no cancer missed by MRI. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of the MRI on a per patient basis were 100 %, 77 %, 0.53, and 1, respectively. CONCLUSION: MRI is a useful problem-solving tool in mammography screening assessment with a high sensitivity and an acceptable positive predictive value.

[Consensus Meeting of Course Directors in Breast Imaging, 7 May 2011, in Frankfurt am Main--topic: MRI of the breast]. / Konsensustreffen der Kursleiter in der Mammadiagnostik am 7.5.2011 in Frankfurt am Main--Magnet-Resonanz-Tomografie der Mamma.

PURPOSE: The general gap in the BIRADS lexicon between lesion description and categorization leads to very different recommendations in clinical breast radiology. This is particularly true for breast MRI. The third consensus meeting of course directors in breast imaging aimed at an increase in standardization of breast MRI. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 166 and 344 participants in the audience (A) and 9 and 13 expert panel participants (P) took part in an electronic wireless voting system. The audience consisted of 98% radiologists and 2% gynecologists (A: n=295; P: n=12: radiologists 92%/gynecologists 8%). Of all participants, 62% had more than 10 years of experience in breast imaging and only 9% had less than 3 years of experience (P: 100%>10 years of experience). The day before 44, clinically relevant, though unresolved questions were formulated by the expert panel. For the evaluation a distinction was made between answers with a great majority (>75%), simple majority (50-<75%) and no majority (<50%) as well as answers from the expert panel and answers from the audience. RESULTS: Of 44 questions, all but two were answered with simple or great majority. CONCLUSION: Technique, reporting and clinical use are becoming more and more accurately defined in MRI of the breast and MR-guided interventions. The third consensus meeting of this kind gained numerous answers and thus enables recommendations for didactic as well as clinical routine work.

Intraoperative specimen radiography in patients with nonpalpable malignant breast lesions.

PURPOSE: Specimen mammography of nonpalpable wire-localized breast lesions is the standard in breast-conserving surgery. The aim of this study was to evaluate the reliability of intraoperative 2-view specimen mammography in different cancer types. MATERIALS AND METHODS: After ethics approval, 3 readers retrospectively evaluated margins on 266 2-view specimen radiographs. They determined the closest margin and the orientation. The results were correlated with the histopathology (intra-class correlation coefficient [ICC] and contingency coefficient [CC]) and compared (Wilcoxon test). RESULTS: Invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) was present in 115 (43 %), IDC in 75 (28 %), invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) in 57 (22 %) and rare cancers (CA) in 19 specimens (7 %). The sensitivity/specificity and positive/negative predictive value (P/NPV) of specimen mammography were 0.50/0.86 and 0.86/0.50 for CA, 0.42/0.68 and 0.48/0.63 for IDC, 0.36/0.81 and 0.69/0.51 for ILC, and 0.22/0.78 and 0.68/0.32 for IDC+DCIS. Readers correctly identified the orientation of the closest margin in at least one view in an average of 149 specimens (56 %). CCs were between 0.680 (IDC) and 0.912 (CA), suggesting a moderate correlation between radiographic and histological orientation. The correlations were worse for the radiographic and histological distances, with ICC ranging from 0.238 (ILC) to 0.475 (CA). The Wilcoxon test revealed overestimation of the radiographic margins compared to the histological ones for DCIS. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that specimen radiography has relatively good overall specificity and good PPV, while the sensitivity and NPV are low for DCIS. A negative result on specimen radiography does not rule out histologically involved margins.

[Sonographic detection of microcalcifications - potential of new method]. / Sonografische Mikrokalkdetektion - Potenzial einer neuen Methode.

PURPOSE: Does the easier microcalcification detection (EMD) method enable sonographic visualization of microcalcifications in breast core biopsy specimens compared with mammography? MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a prospective randomized study, 105 core biopsy specimens obtained with stereotactic guidance were examined by mammography and ultrasound. EMD is integrated in a high-end ultrasound system and uses three level settings (0 - 2 blue, 3 - 5 violet, and 6 - 8 black-and-white; 14 MHz). Detection of microcalcifications per core specimen was determined for ultrasound and mammography. EMD image quality was rated on a scale of 1 - 9. ANOVA and Sidak post-hoc testing, Pearson regression analysis (r), and Spearman rank correlation (rho) were performed. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was calculated, and an ROC analysis was conducted. RESULTS: The blue color map 1 was assigned the highest mean score of 1.5 ± 0.7 (p< 0.05 compared with black-and-white and violet). There was good correlation between the two modalities (r= 0.708 and rho= 0.694) with detection of 3.5 ± 3.1 microcalcifications per specimen by ultrasound versus 4.3 ± 4.8 by mammography (p> 0.05). The ICC of 0.773 indicates little disagreement between the two modalities. ROC analysis showed mammography to be superior to ultrasound compared with histological detection of microcalcifications (AUC= 0.837 vs. AUC= 0.728). CONCLUSION: Sonographic detection of microcalcifications in stereotactic biopsy specimens using the EMD method correlates well with digital mammography. Mammography is slightly superior.

Qualitative JPEG 2000 compression in digital mammography - evaluation using 480 mammograms of the CDMAM phantom.

PURPOSE: The DICOM standard supports both quantitative and qualitative lossy compression of mammograms.The purpose of this study was to investigate qualitative JPEG 2000 lossy compression and how different factors such as object thickness, radiation dose, and lossy compression levels affect image quality. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The CDMAM phantom Artinis 3.4 was radiographed with 4 different object thicknesses and 5 different doses. The images were compressed at 10 different compression levels. The image quality was assessed by the software interpolated IQFinv value. RESULTS: Lossy 90 resulted in 89 % data reduction, lossy 70 in 95 % data reduction and lossy 60 in 96 % data reduction. At higher compression levels (lossy 30), the resulting image quality ranged from 80 - 36 %, and at low compression levels (lossy 90), it ranged from 89 - 93 %. The object thickness was found to significantly interact with the compression level with regard to the resulting image quality: a higher object thickness resulted in increasingly poor image quality at increasing compression levels (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Higher qualitative JPEG 2000 compression levels contribute only little additional data reduction, while the resulting image quality cannot be reliably predicted. Factors affecting image quality such as radiation dose and object thickness should be taken into account when performing image compression. Large object thicknesses should be compressed with caution because the loss of image quality is greater when intelligent data compression algorithms are used.

Quality indicators in breast cancer care.

To define a set of quality indicators that should be routinely measured and evaluated to confirm that the clinical outcome reaches the requested standards, Eusoma has organised a workshop during which twenty four experts from different disciplines have reviewed the international literature and selected the main process and outcome indicators available for quality assurance of breast cancer care. A review of the literature for evidence-based recommendations have been performed by the steering committee. The experts have identified the quality indicators also taking into account the usability and feasibility. For each of them it has been reported: definition, minimum and target standard, motivation for selection and level of evidence (graded according to AHRO). In overall 17 main quality indicators have been identified, respectively, 7 on diagnosis, 4 on surgery and loco-regional treatment, 2 on systemic treatment and 4 on staging, counselling, follow-up and rehabilitation. Breast Units in Europe are invited to comply with these indicators and monitor them during their periodic audit meetings.

[Consensus Meeting of Course Directors in Breast Imaging, 9 May 2009, in Frankfurt am Main - Topic: Masses]. / Konsensustreffen der Kursleiter in der Mammadiagnostik am 9.5.2009 in Frankfurt am Main - Thema: Herdbefunde.

Fourteen directors of breast imaging courses met on behalf of the German Society of Radiology to discuss the actual standards of the diagnosis of masses. Open questions on the fields of mammography, breast ultrasound and breast MRI were elucidated by a presentation of one of the 14 panel members, followed by an electronic anonymous voting. Beside of the panel members, more than 300 participants of the consensus meeting contributed their opinions by electronic voting. Answers with definite majorities (> 75 %), answers with narrow majorities and those with missing majorities were discriminated from each other. The opinions of the plenum were compared to the majorities of the podium and showed only a few critical differences. Due to unequivocal majorities seven answers to important questions concerning the diagnosis of masses can lead to a further standardization of breast cancer diagnosis.

[Workflow in digital screening mammography]. / Workflow in der digitalen Screeningmammographie.

The overriding goal of an organized mammography screening program is to offer high level medical care to everyone at a justifiable cost. The following overview will demonstrate how both aspects of screening, quality and cost efficiency, are supported by a fully digital workflow. Digital mammography systems allow for a constant high image quality and repeat examinations due to overexposure or underexposure can be avoided. Dedicated mammography screening workstations with integration of image viewing and reporting enable efficient softcopy reading. Many aspects of the screening workflow, such as double reading, archiving and retrieval of stored films, as well as information exchange between members of the certified team of the screening unit and other physicians involved in the further treatment, are made significantly easier by the presence of image data in digital form.

[Teleradiology and mammography screening: evaluation of a network with dedicated workstations for reporting]. / Teleradiologie im Mammographie-Screening: Evaluation eines Testnetzes mit dedizierten Befundungsstationen.

PURPOSE: Evaluation of a system that supports a workflow for breast cancer screening by mammography. The time of installation, system reliability and workstation operation were evaluated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The evaluated system (Image Diagnost, Munich, Germany) contains 2 diagnostic mammography workstations, a centralized server, and 2 Dicom shuttles for exchanging images via a physically existing network structure. Temporary archiving is possible. A mask designed for the needs of mammography screening facilitates assignment of BIRADS categories. The system automatically compares the categories assigned by a first and second reviewer and decides whether a consensus conference should be held. In the event that a conference is needed, the reviews are transmitted to the mammography expert responsible for the screening program and the consensus conference. Images are transferred via ISDN, Germany's National Research and Education Network (in the following DFN) and a central server between 2 sites which are approx. 100 km apart. We evaluated the duration of installation, the reliability of the system, and the usability of the workstation. Since we used curative mammography for evaluating the system, the patient age was noted for comparison. RESULTS: The system was installed in five days. Once installed, the system functioned without any major breakdowns. Mammography units of 2 manufacturers were able to be connected to the system without difficulty. Mammographies of 151 patients were exchanged between the sites and evaluated by 2 radiologists. 57 % of the patients were in the screening age (50-69 years). 9 exams were classified BIRADS 4a, 2 were 4b and 3 were BIRADS 5. The evaluations were technically perfect in 146/151 cases; hanging protocols had to be altered manually in 6 cases; the window/level had to be manually adjusted in 26/151 cases. Magnification was sufficient in all cases. The system exchanges examinations extremely quickly; up to 100 mammography exams may be evaluated in 1 hr. CONCLUSION: The system supports the workflow given by the German Mammography Screening program both locally and in a network.

[Mammography screening in Germany: how, when and why?]. / Mammographie-Screening in Deutschland: Wie, wann und warum?

It is well-known from several large randomized trials that regular mammography screening can reduce breast cancer mortality. While in many countries mammography screening programs have been in existence for quite some time, an organized population-based screening program is only now being implemented in Germany. In this review article, the different elements of a mammography screening program and their effect on the cost-benefit ratio are discussed and the planned German screening program is compared to the international programs.

Near monochromatic X-rays for digital slot-scan mammography: initial findings.

X-ray spectra are composed of a broad bremsspectrum and anode-characteristic emission lines. In mammography typically molybdenum (Mo), rhodium (Rh) or tungsten (W) anodes are used in combination with Mo, Rh or aluminium filters. Only the photons with energies between 17 and 22 keV of the resulting spectrum are suitable for the soft tissue imaging needed for mammography. The aim of this article is to present first results obtained with a monochromator module mounted at the exit of the X-ray tube of a conventional clinical mammography unit. The experimental setup consists of a Siemens Mammomat 300, an X-ray monochromator module and a linear array detector for image acquisition. The technique is similar to the slot-scan technique known from digital mammography. The experimental machine allows to obtain images both with polychromatic and monochromatic X-rays. Initial evaluation of the system was performed by examination of a contrast-detail phantom (CD-MAM-phantom, Nijmegen, The Netherlands). Images done with the new monochromatic technique were compared to images of the phantom done with polychromatic spectra, with film-screen mammography as well as with digital mammography. The new technique with monochromatic slot-scan mammography resulted in correct identification of 93% of the phantom. Digital slot-scan mammography with polychromatic beam resulted in correct identification of 87%, digital full-field mammography in 83% and conventional film-screen mammography in 70% of the phantom. The results suggest that monochromatization has a potential for improving image quality or decreasing dose in X-ray mammography.

[Preoperative MRT of the breast in invasive lobular carcinoma in comparison with invasive ductal carcinoma]. / Präoperative MRT der Brust beim invasiv-lobulären im Vergleich zum invasiv-duktalen Karzinom.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the role of preoperative MRI of the breast in invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) compared to invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: For one year, all patients transferred by the hospital's gynecologic outpatient service for suspicious findings in routine mammography and/or ultrasound (conventional modalities = CM) underwent preoperative MRI of the breast. Retrospective analysis of the histologic findings identified 17 patients with ILC. These were compared with 30 proven IDC patients, chosen by random. The MRI findings of these 2 patient groups were compared with regard to the detection of additional lesions. The average number of additional lesions detected by MRI was compared for significant differences between both groups using the T-test for paired samples. RESULTS: In the 17 patients with ILC, conventional modalities (CM) identified 21malignant lesions whereas MRI detected a total of 30 lesions. At least one additional lesion was detected by MRI in 7 of the 17 patients with ILC. In the 30 patients with IDC, on the other hand, MRI detected an additional lesion in three instances only. In one patient of the ILC group, MRI identified an additional lesion in the contralateral breast that had escaped detection by CM. No additional contralateral lesion was detected by MRI in any of the IDC patients. Benefit of MRI in ILC-Group: The mean numbers of detected malignant lesions differed significantly between diagnosis by MRI and CM in the ILC group (1.77 carcinomas per patient with MRI versus 1.24 with conventional modalities, T-test, p = 0.0078). Benefit of MRI in IDC-Group: although it was possible to find 1.27 carcinomas vs. 1.17 carcinomas per patient in the IDC-Group, this benefit was not statistical significant (T-test, p = 0.0831). CONCLUSION: Preoperative MRI detects multiple additional lesions compared to the ones already known by CM. The higher incidence of multiple lesions in ILC compared to IDC and the difficult diagnosis of ILC in CM might be the reason for the fact that preoperative MRI is particularly useful in patients with ILC.