Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Radiographics ; 40(6): 1658-1670, 2020 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33001790

RESUMEN

The radiology report represents the sum of a radiologist's highest level of synthesis and insight into a patient's condition. It is the most important product that radiologists generate to help direct patient care. Despite the self-evident importance of clear and effective radiology reporting, radiologists usually receive little or no formal reporting education during training. Instead, it is learned in a piecemeal and often indirect fashion through occasional correction and imitating the reports of other radiologists. The audience of the radiology report extends far beyond the ordering provider and includes patients and their families, medical support staff, subspecialty providers, other radiologists, and research interests. Creating a report that fulfills the needs of this diverse group is a formidable if not quixotic ambition. However, there are certain key principles to reporting the imaging findings, impression, and recommendations that serve as a guide and promote careful consideration about how reports are understood. The findings section should emphasize short, informative, and factual observations while avoiding inappropriate interpretation, excessive use of terms of perception, and redundancy. The impression is the thoughtful synthesis of the meaning of the findings leading to a diagnosis, a differential diagnosis, and management recommendations. Creating a clear and impactful impression allows radiologists to provide the highest level of clinical care and direction but takes time and effort beyond simply restating the findings. The impression should use language that is understandable, memorable, and actionable. Reporting skills require ongoing attention and must adapt to the evolving practice patterns and communication styles in medicine. ©RSNA, 2020.


Asunto(s)
Diagnóstico por Imagen , Documentación/normas , Escritura Médica/normas , Radiólogos , Humanos , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Terminología como Asunto
2.
Oman Med J ; 27(6): 491-3, 2012 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23236566

RESUMEN

Gastrointestinal lymphoma of the bowel is uncommon compared to adenocarcinoma. Signet ring cell lymphoma (SRCL) is a rare variant of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma that is characterized by clear cytoplasm with displaced nuclei to the periphery giving a signet ring appearance. Small bowel involvement has not been previously reported. We report the rare case of a 78-year-old female who presented with short history of fever, loss of appetite, nausea, vomiting, mild weight loss with abdominal discomfort and was later diagnosed to have SRCL of the ileum.

3.
Med Teach ; 31(1): e6-12, 2009 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19253150

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: e-learning is established in many medical schools. However the effectiveness of e-learning has been difficult to quantify and there have been concerns that such educational activities may be driven more by novelty, than pedagogical evidence. Where some domains may lend themselves well to e-learning, clinical skills has been considered a challenging area for online learning. AIMS: The aims of this study are to assess undergraduate medical students? perceived level of IT ability and accessibility, and attitudes towards e-learning in basic clinical skills education, compared to other teaching methods. METHODS: A self-administered questionnaire was developed to capture undergraduate medical students: (i) demographic details (ii) perceived level of IT ability and accessibility (iii) experiences and attitudes towards e-learning and clinical skills training. Responses were linked to student?s performance in a clinical skills OSCE. RESULTS: The majority of students reported good access to computers and the internet, both on and off campus and appear confident using IT. Overall students felt that e-learning had a positive impact on their learning of clinical skills and was comparable to other traditional forms of clinical skills teaching. Students who displayed deep learning traits when using e-learning, performed better in clinical skills OSCEs. CONCLUSION: Undergraduate medical students value the use of e-learning in clinical skills education, however they vary in their utilization of such learning environments. Students rate e-learning just as highly as other traditional methods of clinical skills teaching and acknowledge its integration in a blended approach. Developers of clinical skills curricula need to ensure e-learning environments utilize media that encourage deeper approaches to learning.


Asunto(s)
Instrucción por Computador/métodos , Educación de Pregrado en Medicina/organización & administración , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Internet/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudiantes de Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Competencia Clínica , Curriculum/normas , Evaluación Educacional , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Modelos Educacionales , Aprendizaje Basado en Problemas/organización & administración , Facultades de Medicina/organización & administración , Estudiantes de Medicina/psicología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Reino Unido , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA