Preparation for implantation of mechanical circulatory support: psychological adjustment and treatment of mental disorders in the pre- and postoperative period. / Przygotowanie do implantacji mechanicznego wspomagania krazenia oraz oddzialywanie psychologiczne i leczenie zaburzen psychicznych w okresie przed- i pooperacyjnym.

Treatment of patients with advanced heart failure (HF) with the use of left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) improves the quality of life and the length of survival. Despite the undeniable benefits associated with improved physical performance, as a result of the decrease of the underlying disease symptoms, it carries the risk of complications in the area of the patient's somatic and psychological status. Long-term circulatory failure can contribute to a weakening of the adaptative mechanism and consequently lead to a variety of emotional disruptions. Patients must face the fear of imminent physical, family, and social changes that LVAD requires. They may experience sleep disorders, mood disorders, anxiety disorders, and in the early postoperative period also disorders of consciousness with a pattern of delirium. For this reason, it is advisable to provide multidisciplinary medical care for the patient at all stages of treatment, including regular monitoring of general health and mental health. This article presents risk factors for psychiatric disorders in patients with LVADs and ways of pharmacological and non-pharmacological management when these factors are identified and disorders are diagnosed.

The Results of Minimally Invasive Implantation of the HeartMate 3 LVAD Left Ventricular Assist Device.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety, feasibility and effectiveness of minimally invasive HeartMate 3 LVAD implantation. METHODOLOGY: Forty-seven patients who underwent the HeartMate 3 LVAD implantation by sternotomy and 26 ones who had implantation via minimally invasive method were analyzed. The observation lasted from November 2016 to May 2020. RESULTS: ECMO as a bridge to LVAD, was more usual in the sternotomy group (11% vs 0%, P = .03). In the minimally invasive group, a history of previous cardiac surgery was more common (54% vs 12%, P < .001), this was the main indication for a minimally invasive approach in our institution. Patients undergoing a minimally invasive implantation had a significantly longer duration of surgery (Med. = 367.5 min vs Med. = 265.0 minutes, P < .001), and significantly higher intraoperative use of fresh frozen plasma (FFP) and platelet concentrates (PCs). There was no significant difference in the number of postoperative bleedings requiring surgical intervention. Postoperative wound infections were observed significantly more often in the sternotomy group (6% vs 0.0%, P < .001). There was no significant difference in survival between groups in the first 180 days after surgery. A slightly lower percentage of patients reached 2-year postsurgery survival in the group undergoing sternotomy, but this finding was not statistically significant. The mean survival time among sternotomy patients was 430.0 days (+/- 291.77 days) vs 633.15 days (+/- 426.84) in minimally invasive group. CONCLUSIONS: Minimally invasive implantation of the HeartMate 3 LVAD may be an alternative method of LVAD implantation in a selected group of patients.

Early detection of HVAD pump thrombosis based on technical analysis and power consumption measurements.

BACKGROUND: Continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) have been extensively used in a strategy of bridge to orthotopic heart transplant and destination therapy. The usage of LVAD, however, is not free from limitations such as device-related adverse events, including pump thrombosis (PT). We aimed to develop an algorithm of early PT detection based on the maintenance parameters monitored by the implanted device. METHODS: We analyzed log files of 101 patients implanted with HeartWare pump (HVAD) with 18 PT events among them. For signal processing, we used the open-high-low-close format transformation and typical price (TP) technical analysis indicator. Model parameters were tuned with 5-fold cross-validation, and the final performance was measured on a separate group of patients. RESULTS: Our algorithm achieved 100% sensitivity and 100% specificity of indications. In the final evaluation, alarms preceded the clinical acknowledgement of events by 2 days and 20 h on average. In the worst-case scenario, an alarm was raised 1 day and 8 h prior to the event. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed algorithm could be installed to work directly with the device controller and provide clinicians with automatic readings analysis, raising an alarm when there is a high probability of thromboembolism. Early event detection could enable better thrombosis management and improve prognosis in patients implanted with HVAD.

Mechanical circulatory support restores eligibility for heart transplant in patients with significant pulmonary hypertension.

BACKGROUND: An increasing number of patients with end­stage heart failure implies a wider use of left ventricular assist devices (LVADs). Irreversible pulmonary hypertension (PH) is a predictor of unfavorable prognosis and a contraindication to orthotopic heart transplant (OHT). AIMS: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of continuous­flow LVAD (CF­LVAD) support on pulmonary pressure and pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) as well as the impact of pre­LVAD hemodynamic parameters on survival during LVAD support. METHODS: Data collected from 106 patients who underwent CF­LVAD implantation in the years 2009 to 2018 (men, 95.3%; mean [SD] age, 51.8 [12] years; mean [SD] INTERMACS profile, 2.9 [1.6]; mean [SD] LVAD support time, 661 [520] days; follow­up until May 2019) were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: Right heart catheterization was performed before LVAD implantation in 94 patients (88.7%), after implantation-in 31 (29.2%), and before and after implantation-in 28 (26.4%). We observed mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) >25 mm Hg in 65 patients (61.3%) and PVR >2.5 Wood units in 33 patients (31.1%) before LVAD implantation. A significant improvement after CF­LVAD implantation was noted in mPAP, pulmonary capillary wedge pressure, transpulmonary gradient, PVR, cardiac output (P <0.001 for all parameters), and cardiac index (P = 0.003). All patients with initially irreversible PH became eligible for OHT during LVAD support. Survival during LVAD support did not depend on initial mPAP and PVR. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with end­stage heart failure, CF­LVAD support leads to a significant reduction of pre­ and postcapillary PH. Survival on CF­LVAD support is independent of elevated mPAP and PVR before implantation, which suggests that LVADs decrease the risk associated with PH.

Short- and long-term outcomes of continuous-flow left ventricular assist device therapy in 79 patients with end-stage heart failure.

INTRODUCTION: An increasing number of patients with end­stage heart failure, along with a shortage of heart donors, necessitates the use of mechanical circulatory support. OBJECTIVES: This single­center retrospective study evaluated short- and long term outcomes of continuous­flow left ventricular assist device (CF LVAD) therapy in patients with end stage heart failure. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We collected and assessed data of 79 patients (77 men, 2 women; mean age, 50.3 years; mean INTERMACS profile, 3.1) implanted with a CF­LVAD between 2009 and 2017 (HeartMate 3 in 19 patients [24%]; HeartMate 2 in 9 [11.4%]; and HeartWare in 51 [64.6%]). RESULTS: The mean time on CF-LVAD support was 604 days (range, 1­1758 days). There were 2 device exchanges due to pump thrombosis and 1 explantation due to heart regeneration; 9 patients (11.4%) underwent heart transplant. Stroke (nondisabling, 48%) occurred in 27.8% of patients (ischemic in 9 patients; hemorrhagic, in 14; both types, in 1) despite the standardized anticoagulation regimen. Major gastrointestinal bleeding and pump thrombosis were reported in 13 patients (16.5%), while 18 patients (22.8%) developed driveline infections (recurrent in 15 patients [19%]). Hemorrhagic stroke and bacteremia had a negative impact on survival. Hemorrhagic stroke was the main cause of death. Survival probability was 0.9 at 1 month and 0.81, 0.71, 0.61, and 0.53 at 1, 2, 3, and 4 years, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Although CF­LVAD support is associated with substantial adverse events, they do not significantly affect mortality (except hemorrhagic stroke and bacteremia). Novel devices seem to overcome these limitations, but larger studies are needed to support these findings.