Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Arch Pediatr ; 30(1): 67-70, 2023 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36462992

RESUMEN

We report the case of a 4-year-old child who presented with vomiting, abdominal pain, and intense pallor 2 h after amoxicillin ingestion. An IgE-mediated reaction was suspected at first, which was finally diagnosed as a drug-induced enterocolitis syndrome. In this rare and poorly described non-IgE-mediated drug allergy, adrenaline is not effective. This diagnostic challenge must be known in order to administer adequate treatment, i.e., antiemetic drugs (ondansetron) and fluid challenge.


Asunto(s)
Hipersensibilidad a las Drogas , Enterocolitis , Hipersensibilidad a los Alimentos , Hipersensibilidad Inmediata , Humanos , Lactante , Preescolar , Enterocolitis/inducido químicamente , Enterocolitis/diagnóstico , Vómitos/inducido químicamente , Amoxicilina , Síndrome , Hipersensibilidad a los Alimentos/diagnóstico , Proteínas en la Dieta
2.
Arch Pediatr ; 28(4): 319-324, 2021 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33858732

RESUMEN

Food oral immunotherapy (OIT) is a promising treatment for persistent and severe food allergies (FAs) in children, but also for accelerating tolerance to cow's milk and cooked egg in young children. In the near future, pediatricians will increasingly encounter severely allergic children undergoing FA-OIT. FA-OIT consists in daily ingestion of increasing doses of the allergen during the up-dosing phase, and ingestion of a constant dose during the maintenance phase. The global aim is to increase the reactive threshold of allergic patients, and finally enable them to ingest a target quantity of allergen without any reaction throughout the treatment (desensitization). Many studies showed the efficacy of FA-OIT in desensitization, and some of them in sustained unresponsiveness. This corresponds to tolerance after FA-OIT discontinuation, especially for cow's milk and hen's egg allergy. However, there is an ongoing debate about the safety of the treatment. Side effects are frequent, notably aversion to the allergen and oral syndromes as well as systemic allergic symptoms. These reactions occur mainly during the up-dosing phase and become less frequent with time, but they are common causes of FA-OIT discontinuation. Patients and their families must be trained to manage these reactions at home. Long-term side effects can also occur, such as eosinophilic esophagitis. Pediatricians play an important role in maintaining patient motivation; they also provide knowledge on possible allergic reactions and the reactogenic cofactors (mainly fever and viral infection, anti-inflammatory intake, physical activity), and refer the patient to the relevant specialists in the case of long-term care. Other routes of administration for food immunotherapy (epicutaneous and sublingual) and different adjuvant treatments (probiotics, anti-IgE molecule) are currently under study. This will allow us to improve the efficacy of immunotherapy and reduce the risk of any side effects, in order to provide a more favorable risk-benefit ratio.


Asunto(s)
Hipersensibilidad a los Alimentos/terapia , Factores Inmunológicos/uso terapéutico , Inmunoterapia , Pediatras , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Humanos , Inmunosupresores
3.
Sleep Med ; 72: 59-64, 2020 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32554055

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE/BACKGROUND: Currently, obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) management in Robin sequence (RS) infants has not been standardized. Sleep laboratory polysomnography (PSG) is the gold standard for OSAS diagnosis, however, access is restricted. This study aimed to compare the respiratory indexes measured in a sleep laboratory using PSG as well as a possible alternative, polygraphy (PG). PATIENTS/METHODS: This retrospective study was conducted between 2015 and 2017 in a tertiary hospital. PSG performed in RS infants in the sleep laboratory was analysed by a single reviewer. After sleep data removal, anonymized raw data were analysed to obtain only PG data. Respiratory indexes were compared for (i) PSG and PG and (ii) patients with or without OSAS clinical signs. RESULTS: Among the 20 RS (median [IQR] age: 43 [25-114] days at evaluation), 70% of the patients had OSAS clinical signs but all of them had severe OSAS. The median mixed obstructive apnea hypopnea index was not significantly different between PSG and PG (27/h [18-38] versus 26/h [18-56], p = 0.43). The median obstructive apnea index was higher with no significant difference between PG and PSG (19/h [15-31] versus 7/h [4-25], p = 0.05). The median obstructive hypopnea index was significantly lower on PG than on PSG (2/h [0-3] versus 8/h [8-19], p = 0.01). No difference on PSG or PG was observed for patients with and without clinical signs of OSAS. CONCLUSION: Although PSG remains the gold standard for OSA evaluation, a PG seems to be a useful alternative to measure OSA in RS infants because of their OSAS severity. This evaluation should be recommended in all RS infants, even in the absence of OSAS clinical signs. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Not applicable.


Asunto(s)
Laboratorios , Apnea Obstructiva del Sueño , Adulto , Humanos , Lactante , Polisomnografía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Sueño , Apnea Obstructiva del Sueño/diagnóstico
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...