Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Int J Hyg Environ Health ; 247: 114071, 2023 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36446273

RESUMEN

Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) are a highly persistent, mobile, and bioaccumulative class of chemicals, of which emissions into the environment result in long-lasting contamination with high probability for causing adverse effects to human health and the environment. Within the European Biomonitoring Initiative HBM4EU, samples and data were collected in a harmonized way from human biomonitoring (HBM) studies in Europe to derive current exposure data across a geographic spread. We performed mixture risk assessments based on recent internal exposure data of PFASs in European teenagers generated in the HBM4EU Aligned Studies (dataset with N = 1957, sampling years 2014-2021). Mixture risk assessments were performed based on three hazard-based approaches: the Hazard Index (HI) approach, the sum value approach as used by the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) and the Relative Potency Factor (RPF) approach. The HI approach resulted in the highest risk estimates, followed by the RPF approach and the sum value approach. The assessments indicate that PFAS exposure may result in a health risk in a considerable fraction of individuals in the HBM4EU teenager study sample, thereby confirming the conclusion drawn in the recent EFSA scientific opinion. This study underlines that HBM data are of added value in assessing the health risks of aggregate and cumulative exposure to PFASs, as such data are able to reflect exposure from different sources and via different routes.


Asunto(s)
Monitoreo Biológico , Fluorocarburos , Adolescente , Humanos , Medición de Riesgo , Inocuidad de los Alimentos , Bioacumulación
2.
Food Chem Toxicol ; 112: 242-250, 2018 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29284136

RESUMEN

Contact allergy to preservatives is an important public health problem. Ideally, new substances should be evaluated for the risk on skin sensitisation before market entry, for example by using a quantitative risk assessment (QRA) as developed for fragrances. As a proof-of-concept, this QRA was applied to the preservative methylisothiazolinone (MI), a common cause of contact allergy. MI is used in different consumer products, including personal care products (PCPs) and household cleaning products (HCPs). Aggregate exposure to MI in PCPs and HCPs was therefore assessed with the Probabilistic Aggregated Consumer Exposure Model (PACEM). Two exposure scenarios were evaluated: scenario 1 calculated aggregate exposure on actual MI product concentrations before the restricted use in PCPs and scenario 2 calculated aggregate exposure using the restrictions for MI in PCPs. The QRA for MI showed that in scenarios 1 and 2, the proportion of the population at risk for skin sensitisation is 0.7% and 0.5%, respectively. The restricted use of MI in PCPs does not seem very effective in lowering the risk on skin sensitization. To conclude, it is important to consider aggregate exposure from the most important consumer products into consideration in the risk assessment.


Asunto(s)
Cosméticos/análisis , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/etiología , Detergentes/análisis , Conservadores Farmacéuticos/análisis , Piel/efectos de los fármacos , Tiazoles/análisis , Pruebas de Toxicidad/métodos , Cosméticos/toxicidad , Detergentes/toxicidad , Humanos , Perfumes/análisis , Perfumes/toxicidad , Conservadores Farmacéuticos/toxicidad , Tiazoles/toxicidad
3.
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol ; 88: 34-44, 2017 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28545776

RESUMEN

An interspecies sensitization assessment factor (SAF) is used in the quantitative risk assessment (QRA) for skin sensitization when a murine-based NESIL (No Expected Sensitization Induction Level) is taken as point of departure. Several studies showed that, on average, the murine sensitization threshold is in good correspondence with that determined in humans. However, on an individual level, the murine and human sensitization thresholds may differ considerably. In this study, the interspecies SAF was quantified by using a probabilistic approach, to be able to take these cases into account. As expected, the geometric means of the probability distributions of murine and human sensitization threshold ratios were close to one, but taking the 95 th percentile of these distributions resulted in an interspecies SAF of 15. By using this value, one is sure that with 95% probability, the sensitization threshold determined in mice does not underestimate the human threshold. It can be concluded that a murine-based NESIL requires the use of an interspecies SAF (of 15) in the QRA for skin sensitization, to correct for the differences between mice and humans. This empirically derived interspecies SAF contributes to refinement of the risk assessment methodology.


Asunto(s)
Alérgenos/efectos adversos , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/prevención & control , Piel/efectos de los fármacos , Animales , Cosméticos/química , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Productos Domésticos/análisis , Humanos , Ratones , Nivel sin Efectos Adversos Observados , Medición de Riesgo , Especificidad de la Especie
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...