The effect of placement and management of intrathecal catheters following accidental dural puncture on the incidence of postdural puncture headache and severity: a retrospective real-world study.

Accidental dural puncture during an attempt to establish labour epidural analgesia can result in postdural puncture headache and long-term debilitating conditions. Epidural blood patch, the gold standard treatment for this headache, is invasive and not always successful. Inserting an intrathecal catheter after accidental dural puncture may prevent postdural puncture headache. We evaluated the effect of intrathecal catheter insertion on the incidence of postdural puncture headache and the need for epidural blood patch and whether duration of intrathecal catheterisation or injection of intrathecal saline affected outcome. Our retrospective study was conducted at two tertiary, university-affiliated medical centres between 2017 and 2022 and included 92,651 epidurals and 550 cases of accidental dural puncture (0.59%); 219 parturients (39.8%) received an intrathecal catheter and 331 (60.2%) a resited epidural. Use of an intrathecal catheter versus resiting the epidural did not decrease the odds of postdural puncture headache, adjusted odds ratio (aOR) (95%CI) 0.91 (0.81-1.01), but was associated with a lower need for epidural blood patch (aOR (95%CI) 0.82 (0.73-0.91), p < 0.001). We found no benefit in leaving in the intrathecal catheter for 24 h postpartum (postdural puncture headache, aOR (95%CI) 1.01 (1.00-1.02), p = 0.015; epidural blood patch, aOR (95%CI) 1.00 (0.99-1.01), p = 0.40). We found an added benefit of injecting intrathecal saline as it decreased the incidence of postdural puncture headache (aOR (95%CI) 0.85 (0.73-0.99), p = 0.04) and the need for epidural blood patch (aOR (95%CI) 0.75 (0.64-0.87), p < 0.001). Our study confirms the benefits of intrathecal catheterisation and provides guidance on how to best manage an intrathecal catheter.

A national Israeli survey of neuraxial anesthesia for cesarean delivery: pre-operative block assessment and intra-operative pain management.

BACKGROUND: Neuraxial protocols for cesarean delivery differ among institutions, with various means of assessing the block prior to incision and managing breakthrough intra-operative pain. The different approaches used to deal with these issues in Israel have not been assessed. METHODS: Questionnaires were distributed to all anesthesiologists working in obstetric units in Israeli hospitals. The survey included several non-identifying respondent details intended to allow a description of the study population as a whole and multiple-choice questions addressing neuraxial techniques, method of pre-operative block assessment and medications used to treat intra-operative pain. RESULTS: Three hundred and sixty-one doctors completed the survey in 24 medical centers, an 81.1% response rate. Thirteen different protocols for spinal anesthesia and 20 different protocols for epidural anesthesia were described. Nine different protocols for assessment of the block prior to incision were identified, with significant inter-institutional differences (P <0.001). For treatment of intra-operative pain prior to delivery, 35.7% of spinals given and 40% of epidurals given were converted to general anesthesia whereas, after delivery, conversion of spinal to general anesthesia was 18% and epidural to general anesthesia was 18.6%. CONCLUSIONS: There were a variety of spinal and epidural regimens used as well as different methods for assessing the block and managing intra-operative pain. Further studies should be performed to identify optimal techniques for neuraxial anesthesia for pre-operative block assessment and for management of intra-operative pain.