Clinical outcomes of patients with giant cell arteritis treated with tocilizumab in real-world clinical practice: decreased incidence of new visual manifestations.

BACKGROUND: Placebo-controlled clinical trials have demonstrated the efficacy of tocilizumab (TCZ) for remission maintenance and glucocorticoid sparing in patients with giant cell arteritis (GCA). However, limited data exist on the effectiveness and safety of TCZ for GCA in real-world clinical practice. METHODS: This was a retrospective, single-center analysis of patients with GCA treated with intravenous or subcutaneous TCZ (2010-2018). Outcomes evaluated before and after TCZ initiation included occurrence of flare, time to flare, annualized flare rate, flare characteristics (i.e., polymyalgia rheumatica [PMR] symptoms, cranial manifestations), prednisone use, and safety. Flare was defined as the recurrence of unequivocal GCA manifestations requiring treatment intensification. Subgroup analyses of patients with PMR or visual manifestations at GCA diagnosis were performed. RESULTS: Sixty patients with GCA were included. The median (IQR) disease duration before and after the start of TCZ was 0.6 (0.2-1.6) and 0.5 (0.3-1.4) years, respectively. At least 1 flare was observed in 43 patients (71.7%) before and in 18 (30.0%) after TCZ initiation. Median (IQR) time to flare was 0.5 (0.3-0.7) years before TCZ treatment and 2.1 (0.6-2.6) years after TCZ initiation (HR 0.22; 95% CI 0.10-0.50; p = 0.0003). The annualized flare rate significantly decreased following TCZ use (before TCZ 1.4 [95% CI 1.0-2.1]; after TCZ 0.6 [95% CI 0.3-1.0] events/year; p < 0.001). Similar improvements were observed in patients with visual manifestations or PMR symptoms at GCA diagnosis. TCZ reduced the incidence of new visual manifestations, and no flares associated with permanent vision loss occurred while patients were receiving TCZ. Mean (SD) prednisone dose at TCZ onset and at the end of follow-up was 30 (18.3) and 5 (6.9) mg/day, respectively (p < 0.0001). After TCZ initiation, 46.6% of patients successfully discontinued prednisone. The incidence of adverse events, primarily attributed to glucocorticoids, was similar before and after TCZ initiation. CONCLUSIONS: In this real-world setting, TCZ improved GCA clinical outcomes significantly and demonstrated effectiveness in the subgroups of patients with PMR symptoms and GCA-related visual manifestations at GCA diagnosis. No new cases of blindness occurred after TCZ initiation. Adverse events, many attributable to glucocorticoids, were comparable before and after TCZ treatment.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Results Following Discontinuation of Methotrexate in Rheumatoid Arthritis Treated with Subcutaneous Tocilizumab: The COMP-ACT MRI Substudy.

OBJECTIVE: To assess differences in joint damage and inflammation using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) between patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who achieved low disease activity with tocilizumab (TCZ) + methotrexate (MTX) and subsequently continued or discontinued MTX. METHODS: In the COMP-ACT trial, US patients with RA received subcutaneous TCZ 162 mg + MTX. Those who achieved 28-joint count Disease Activity Score calculated with erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-ESR) ≤ 3.2 at Week 24 were randomized 1:1 (double-blind) to discontinue MTX (TCZ monotherapy; mono) or continue TCZ + MTX until Week 52. In a subset of patients, 1.5-Tesla MRI was used to obtain images of bilateral hands and wrists at weeks 24 and 40. Outcomes included changes in MRI-assessed synovitis, osteitis, erosion, and cartilage loss from Week 24 to Week 40, and in the proportion of patients with progression of each score. RESULTS: Of 296 patients who achieved DAS28-ESR ≤ 3.2 at Week 24, 79 were enrolled in the pilot MRI substudy and randomized to TCZ mono (n = 38) or TCZ + MTX (n = 41). Treatment with either TCZ mono or TCZ + MTX suppressed erosion progression, synovitis, osteitis, and cartilage loss. The proportion of patients with no progression in each outcome measure was similar between groups (range, TCZ mono: 84.8-97.0%; TCZ + MTX: 92.3-100%). CONCLUSION: In a subset of patients who achieved low disease activity with TCZ + MTX, MRI changes were minimal in intraarticular inflammation and damage measures in patients who discontinued MTX versus those who continued TCZ + MTX.

Adverse Events in Giant Cell Arteritis and Rheumatoid Arthritis Patient Populations: Analyses of Tocilizumab Clinical Trials and Claims Data.

INTRODUCTION: The safety profile of tocilizumab (TCZ) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is well established. TCZ was approved to treat giant cell arteritis (GCA) in 2017 in the USA and Europe, and its safety profile in patients with GCA continues to be defined. The objective of this analysis was to examine incidence rates (IRs) of adverse events of special interest (AESI) occurring during the TCZ clinical development program and in healthcare claims data in patients with GCA or RA. METHODS: TCZ-naïve patients with GCA or RA were identified in the MarketScan administrative healthcare claims database. TCZ-treated patients with GCA from the GiACTA trial and TCZ-treated patients with RA from pooled clinical trial data were analyzed. The IRs of AESI (AESI IRs) were calculated for all cohorts. In the claims cohorts, risks of AESI were estimated using Poisson regression. RESULTS: TCZ-naïve claims cohorts comprised 4804 patients with GCA [mean (standard deviation) age 73.4 (9.8) years; follow-up 3.9 (3.1) years] and 15,164 patients with RA [age 60.3 (8.2) years; follow-up, 4.5 (2.8) years]. TCZ-treated clinical trial cohorts comprised 149 patients with GCA [age 69.5 (8.4) years; exposure approx. 138 patient-years (PY)] and 7647 with RA [age 52 (12.6) years; exposure approx. 22,394 PY]. The IRs of infections, stroke, malignancies, myocardial infarction, and gastrointestinal perforations in the GCA claims cohort exceeded those in the RA claims cohort; the risk of AESI (adjusted for age and glucocorticoid use) was higher in patients with GCA than in those with RA. Similar patterns to the claims cohorts in terms of the AESI IRs were observed in clinical trial cohorts, although the number of events was limited in the GCA trial cohort. CONCLUSION: Higher IRs of AESI were observed in patients with GCA versus those with RA in both TCZ-naïve and -treated cohorts. Differences in underlying disease, age, and glucocorticoid use may influence AESI incidence, irrespective of intervention. FUNDING: This study was funded by F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd and Genentech, Inc. Article processing charges were funded by F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. Plain language summary is available for this article.

Impact of tocilizumab administered intravenously or subcutaneously on patient-reported quality-of-life outcomes in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) have shown tocilizumab (TCZ) administered intravenously or subcutaneously with conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) to be superior to csDMARDs alone for improving rheumatoid arthritis (RA) disease activity. This study evaluated the effect of TCZ-intravenous and TCZ-subcutaneous on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in three RCT populations. METHODS: OPTION (NCT00106548), BREVACTA (NCT01232569) and SUMMACTA (NCT01194414) were independent RCTs evaluating the efficacy and safety of TCZ-intravenous and/or TCZ-subcutaneous with csDMARDs in patients with RA. PROs included patient global assessment, pain, Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index, Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue and Short Form-36. Study outcomes included the proportions of patients reporting changes from baseline in PRO scores ≥ minimum clinically important differences (MCID) and scores ≥ age and gender-matched normative values. RESULTS: In OPTION, more patients who received TCZ-intravenous reported improvements in PROs ≥MCID (50%-82% vs 31%-57%) and scores ≥ normative values (16%-44% vs 5%-28%) at week 16 compared with placebo. Similarly, a greater proportion of patients in BREVACTA who received TCZ-subcutaneous reported improvements ≥ MCID (54%-73% vs 42%-55%) and scores ≥ normative values (8%-34% vs 4%-25%) at week 12 compared with placebo. In SUMMACTA, 61%-84% of patients who received TCZ-subcutaneous and 64%-84% of those who received TCZ-intravenous reported improvements ≥ MCID and 14%-41% and 15%-24%, respectively, scores ≥ normative values at week 24. CONCLUSIONS: TCZ-intravenous or TCZ-subcutaneous with csDMARDs resulted in more patients reporting clinically meaningful improvements and PRO scores ≥ normative values compared with placebo. These improvements were similar with TCZ-intravenous and TCZ-subcutaneous.

Sustained Response Following Discontinuation of Methotrexate in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis Treated With Subcutaneous Tocilizumab: Results From a Randomized, Controlled Trial.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether tocilizumab (TCZ) monotherapy is noninferior to treatment with TCZ plus methotrexate (MTX) for maintaining clinical responses in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in whom low disease activity is achieved with TCZ plus MTX. METHODS: Patients with RA who experienced an inadequate response to MTX received MTX plus TCZ 162 mg subcutaneously. At 24 weeks, patients who achieved a Disease Activity Score in 28 joints using the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-ESR) of ≤3.2 were randomized to receive TCZ monotherapy or to continue treatment with TCZ plus MTX until week 52. The primary outcome measure was the comparison of the mean change in the DAS28-ESR from week 24 to week 40 between the TCZ monotherapy and TCZ plus MTX arms (noninferiority margin of 0.6). Secondary outcome measures included worsening of the DAS28-ESR by ≥1.2, achievement of a DAS28-ESR of <2.6 and ≤3.2, and safety and immunogenicity. RESULTS: Among the 718 patients enrolled, 296 were randomized at week 24 to receive TCZ monotherapy (n = 147) or TCZ plus MTX (n = 147). The mean changes in the DAS28-ESR from week 24 to week 40 were 0.46 and 0.14 in the TCZ monotherapy arm and the TCZ plus MTX arm, respectively (weighted difference between the groups, 0.318 [95% confidence interval 0.045, 0.592]); discontinuing MTX in TCZ responders was noninferior to continuing MTX. Safety events were broadly similar between the randomized treatment groups; the most common serious adverse event was infection, which occurred in 2.1% of patients in the TCZ monotherapy group and 2.2% of patients receiving TCZ plus MTX. CONCLUSION: Patients with RA receiving TCZ plus MTX who achieve low disease activity can discontinue MTX without significant worsening of disease activity during the 16 weeks following MTX discontinuation.

Impact of tocilizumab monotherapy on patient-reported outcomes in patients with rheumatoid arthritis from two randomised controlled trials.

OBJECTIVE: Two randomised controlled trials, AMBITION (NCT00109408) and ADACTA (NCT01119859), showed tocilizumab (TCZ) monotherapy superior to methotrexate (MTX) and adalimumab (ADA) monotherapy, respectively, for improving rheumatoid arthritis (RA) disease activity. This study compared the benefit of TCZ versus MTX or ADA monotherapy for improving patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in patients with RA. METHODS: PROs included patient global assessment (PtGA), pain, Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI), Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT)-Fatigue and Short Form-36 (SF-36) physical component summary (PCS) and mental component summary (MCS) and eight domain scores. Outcomes included proportions of patients reporting changes from baseline in PRO scores ≥minimum clinically important differences (MCID) and ≥age-matched and gender-matched normative values at 24 weeks. RESULTS: In AMBITION, TCZ-treated patients reported significantly greater mean improvements in HAQ (-0.7 vs -0.5), FACIT-Fatigue (8.7 vs 5.7), SF-36 PCS (9.8 vs 7.8) and five SF-36 domains at week 24 than with MTX; 45.0%-84.0% of TCZ-treated patients reported improvements ≥MCID, and 24.3%-52.1% reported scores ≥normative values across all PROs versus 39.4%-81.8% and 14.5%-45.0%, respectively, with MTX. In ADACTA, TCZ-treated patients reported significantly greater improvements in PtGA (-42.3 vs -31.8), pain (-40.1 vs -28.7), SF-36 MCS (7.9 vs 5.0) and three SF-36 domains than with ADA; 57.7%-83.3% of TCZ-treated patients reported improvements ≥MCID, and 22.1%-49.3% reported scores ≥normative values across all PROs versus 13.6%-37.8%, respectively, with ADA. CONCLUSIONS: TCZ monotherapy resulted in more patients reporting clinically meaningful PRO improvements and PRO scores ≥normative values compared with MTX or ADA monotherapy. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS: NCT00109408 and NCT01119859; Post-results.

GSK-3 kinases enhance calcineurin signaling by phosphorylation of RCNs.

The conserved RCN family of proteins can bind and directly regulate calcineurin, a Ca(2+)-activated protein phosphatase involved in immunity, heart growth, muscle development, learning, and other processes. Whereas high levels of RCNs can inhibit calcineurin signaling in fungal and animal cells, RCNs can also stimulate calcineurin signaling when expressed at endogenous levels. Here we show that the stimulatory effect of yeast Rcn1 involves phosphorylation of a conserved serine residue by Mck1, a member of the GSK-3 family of protein kinases. Mutations at the GSK-3 consensus site of Rcn1 and human DSCR1/MCIP1 abolish the stimulatory effects on calcineurin signaling. RCNs may therefore oscillate between stimulatory and inhibitory forms in vivo in a manner similar to the Inhibitor-2 regulators of type 1 protein phosphatase. Computational modeling indicates a biphasic response of calcineurin to increasing RCN concentration such that protein phosphatase activity is stimulated by low concentrations of phospho-RCN and inhibited by high concentrations of phospho- or dephospho-RCN. This prediction was verified experimentally in yeast cells expressing Rcn1 or DSCR1/MCIP1 at different concentrations. Through the phosphorylation of RCNs, GSK-3 kinases can potentially contribute to a positive feedback loop involving calcineurin-dependent up-regulation of RCN expression. Such feedback may help explain the large induction of DSCR1/MCIP1 observed in brain of Down syndrome individuals.