Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J AOAC Int ; 104(4): 867-871, 2021 Aug 20.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33822088

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Infectious Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) was used in the validation of methods for detection of SARS-CoV-2 on stainless-steel surfaces in the AOAC Research Institute Emergency Response Validation project. Handling infectious virus requires Biosafety Level (BSL)-3 facilities. OBJECTIVE: To compare the recovery and detection of infectious and heat-inactivated (HI; 65°C for 30 min) SARS-CoV-2 from stainless steel by the modified US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real Time Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR) Diagnostic Panel. METHOD: Viral stocks were diluted in viral transport medium (VTM) and deposited onto stainless-steel test areas at 2 × 103 and 2 × 104 genomic copies for low and high, respectively. Test areas were sampled and aliquots of the resulting test solutions analyzed by RT-qPCR according to the CDC method. Results were analyzed by probability of detection (POD) statistics. RESULTS: The low level, where fractional positive results (25-75%) are expected, yielded PODI = 0.80 (0.58, 0.92) for the infectious virus and PODHI = 0.15 (0.05, 0.36) for the HI virus. The bias, dPODHI = -0.65 (-0.80, -0.35), demonstrated a statistical difference between infectious and HI virus detection. No difference was observed at the high inoculation level. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the statistical difference observed, the use of the HI virus is a viable alternative for matrix extension studies using a method comparison study design. Highlights: The use of HI SARS-CoV-2 can mitigate the need for a BSL-3 facility for matrix extension validation of alternative methods in SARS-CoV-2 studies. HIGHLIGHTS: The use of HI SARS-CoV-2 can mitigate the need for a BSL-3 facility for matrix extension validation of alternative methods in SARS-CoV-2 studies.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. , Calor , Humanos , ARN Viral/genética , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa de Transcriptasa Inversa , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Acero Inoxidable , Estados Unidos
2.
J AOAC Int ; 104(4): 1084-1097, 2021 Aug 20.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33774653

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The GENE-UP®Salmonella assay (Performance Tested MethodSM [PTM] 121802) is a PCR detection method that utilizes fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) hybridization probes for the rapid detection of Salmonella species in foods and on environmental surfaces. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this validation was to evaluate the method's interlaboratory performance for submission to AOAC INTERNATIONAL for adoption as First Action Official Method of AnalysisSM. METHOD: The GENE-UP method was evaluated in a multi-laboratory study using unpaired test portions for one food matrix, raw ground beef (80% lean). The candidate method was compared to the US Department of Agriculture (USDA), Food Safety Inspection Service, Microbiology Laboratory Guidebook (MLG) 4.10 reference method. An alternative confirmation procedure, using ASAP™ and CHROMID®Salmonella chromogenic agars, was included in the validation study. Fifteen collaborators from 14 laboratories participated. Three levels of contamination were evaluated: a non-inoculated control level (0 CFU/test portion), a low contamination level (∼0.7 CFU/test portion), and a high contamination level (∼2 CFU/test portion). Data were analyzed using the probability of detection (POD) statistical model. RESULTS: The dLPODC values with 95% confidence interval for the GENE-UP Salmonella method, with either alternative or traditional confirmation, were: 0.00 (-0.03, 0.03), -0.02 (-0.15, 0.12), and 0.02 (-0.03, 0.09) for the non-inoculated, low, and high contamination levels respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The dLPODC results demonstrate no difference in performance between the candidate method and reference method for the matrix evaluated. HIGHLIGHTS: The GENE-UP Salmonella method, with ASAP and CHROMID Salmonella, provides industry with a simplified, rapid, and accurate workflow for the detection of Salmonella in a broad range of foods and select environmental surfaces.


Asunto(s)
Microbiología de Alimentos , Salmonella , Animales , Bovinos , Alimentos , Contaminación de Alimentos/análisis , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa , Salmonella/genética
3.
J AOAC Int ; 102(3): 926-935, 2019 May 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30305206

RESUMEN

Background: Listeria Right NowTM is a novel, enrichment-free molecular method for detection of Listeria spp. in swab samples from environmental surfaces. The test provides results in real time, indicating the current or recent presence of Listeria spp. in the environment. After sampling, the entire contents of the swab are subject to sample processing, releasing large quantities of target ribosomal RNA molecules into the lysate. A portion of the lysate is then tested using the ANSR® for Listeria isothermal nucleic acid amplification assay. Objective: A Performance Tested MethodSM study was conducted to validate the method for detection of Listeria spp. in swab samples from stainless steel and sealed concrete surfaces. Methods and Results: In inclusivity testing, 60 of 60 Listeria spp. strains tested positive. In exclusivity testing, 31 of 31 nontarget bacterial strains tested negative. In LOD testing, the test was able to detect as few as 2 CFU of L. monocytogenes applied to a stainless steel surface. In matrix testing of inoculated stainless steel and sealed concrete surfaces, there were no statistically significant differences in method performance comparing the Listeria Right Now and U.S. Food and Drug Administration Bacteriological Analytical Manual reference culture procedures as determined by probability of detection analysis. In robustness testing, modest changes to three assay operating parameters simultaneously did not significantly affect performance of the test. Conclusions and Highlights: Results can be obtained in less than 1 h using the Listeria Right Now test, allowing food industry personnel to take immediate corrective action in the case of Listeria contamination incidents.


Asunto(s)
Contaminación de Equipos/prevención & control , Listeria/aislamiento & purificación , ARN Bacteriano/análisis , ARN Ribosómico/análisis , Técnicas Bacteriológicas/métodos , Microbiología de Alimentos/métodos , Límite de Detección , Listeria/genética , Técnicas de Amplificación de Ácido Nucleico/métodos , Acero Inoxidable
4.
J AOAC Int ; 102(5): 1589-1594, 2019 Sep 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33216929

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Listeria Right Now™ is a novel, enrichment-free test for the detection of Listeria spp. in swab samples taken from environmental surfaces. Results are available in less than 1 h. In a previous Performance Tested MethodSM (PTM) study, the test was validated for swab samples from stainless-steel and sealed concrete surfaces. OBJECTIVE: A PTM matrix extension study was conducted to validate the method for the detection of Listeria spp. in swab samples from ceramic tile, plastic, and rubber surfaces. METHODS: Performance of the Listeria Right Now method was compared to that of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Bacteriological Analytical Manual reference culture procedure for the detection of Listeria spp. in swab samples taken from inoculated ceramic tile, plastic, and rubber surfaces. Data were analyzed using a probability of detection model. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in performance between the Listeria Right Now and reference culture methods for any of the three surfaces tested, as determined by probability of detection analysis. CONCLUSIONS: The Listeria Right Now method is an effective procedure for the detection of Listeria spp. from a variety of environmental surfaces. HIGHLIGHTS: Listeria Right Now provides accurate results, without enrichment, in real time. This enables food industry personnel to react swiftly to suspected Listeria contamination incidents.


Asunto(s)
Técnicas Bacteriológicas/métodos , Técnicas Bacteriológicas/normas , Microbiología Ambiental , Listeria/aislamiento & purificación , Industria de Alimentos , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Propiedades de Superficie
5.
J AOAC Int ; 96(2): 225-8, 2013.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23767343

RESUMEN

A validation study of the 3M Petrifilm Environmental Listeria (EL) Plate (3M Food Safety, St. Paul, MN) was conducted at Q Laboratories, Inc., Cincinnati, OH. The method was compared to the Health Canada MFHPB-30 reference method for the analysis of stainless steel environmental surfaces. Twenty replicates of the environmental surface were analyzed at a low and a high inoculum level. The low-level sampling area was inoculated with 0.2-2 CFU/5 cm2, and the high-level sampling area was inoculated with 2-5 CFU/5 cm2. Five control replicates were also analyzed at 0 CFU/5 cm2. There was no significant difference in the number of positives detected by the 3M Petrifilm EL Plate method and the Health Canada MFHPB-30 reference method for the environmental surface analyzed in this study.


Asunto(s)
Técnicas Bacteriológicas/métodos , Técnicas Bacteriológicas/normas , Microbiología Ambiental/normas , Listeria/aislamiento & purificación , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Sensibilidad y Especificidad
6.
J AOAC Int ; 96(2): 218-24, 2013.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23767342

RESUMEN

A validation study of the 3M Tecra Listeria Visual Immunoassay (VIA; 3M Food Safety, St. Paul, MN) was conducted at Q Laboratories, Inc., Cincinnati, OH. The 3M Tecra Listeria VIA method was compared to the Health Canada MFHPB-30 reference method for the analysis of five ready-to-eat (RTE) meats: deli turkey, hot dogs, liver pate, raw fermented sausage, and deli ham, and on a stainless steel environmental surface. Twenty replicates of each of the five food matrixes were analyzed at a low and a high inoculum level. The low-level test portions were inoculated with 0.2-2 CFU/25 g, and the high-level test portions with 2-5 CFU/25 g. In addition, 20 replicates of one environmental surface were analyzed at a low and a high inoculum level. The low-level sampling area was inoculated with 0.2-2 CFU/5 cm2, and the high-level area with 2-5 CFU/5 cm2. Five control replicates were also analyzed at 0 CFU/25 g (uninoculated) for the foods and at 0 CFU/5 cm2 for the environmental sampling area. There was no significant difference in the number of positives detected by the 3M Tecra Listeria VIA and the Health Canada MFHPB-30 reference method for four of the RTE meats and the stainless steel environmental surface analyzed in this study. For the raw, fermented sausage, there was a significant difference in the number of positives detected for the high inoculum level by the 3M Tecra Listeria VIA and the Health Canada MFHPB-30 reference method, with the 3M Tecra Listeria VIA method detecting more positives.


Asunto(s)
Microbiología Ambiental/normas , Microbiología de Alimentos/normas , Inmunoensayo/métodos , Inmunoensayo/normas , Listeria/aislamiento & purificación , Animales , Carne/microbiología , Estándares de Referencia , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Sensibilidad y Especificidad
7.
J AOAC Int ; 92(1): 165-74, 2009.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19382575

RESUMEN

The automated system for enumeration of total viable count (TVC) in foods, TEMPO TVC, uses a dehydrated culture medium and an enumeration card containing 48 wells across 3 different dilutions for the automatic determination of the most probable number (MPN). The alternative method was compared in a multilaboratory collaborative study to AOAC Method 966.23 for determination of aerobic plate count for nondairy products and the Standard Methods for the Examination of Dairy Products (SMEDP) Standard Plate Count for dairy products. Five food types, raw ground beef, raw ground chicken, cooked whitefish fillets, bagged lettuce, and milk, were analyzed for TVC by 14 collaborating laboratories throughout the United States and Canada. Three lots of naturally contaminated food products representing a wide range of counts were tested for each of the 5 food types. The study demonstrated that the overall repeatability, reproducibility, and mean log counts of the TEMPO TVC method were statistically comparable to those of the 2 standard methods at the 5% level.


Asunto(s)
Bacterias Aerobias/aislamiento & purificación , Recuento de Colonia Microbiana/métodos , Microbiología de Alimentos , Carne/análisis , Animales , Automatización , Bovinos , Pollos , Peces , Indicadores y Reactivos , Laboratorios/normas , Lactuca/química , Leche/química , Leche/normas , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA