Detection of ECG effects of (2R,4R)-monatin, a sweet flavored isomer of a component first identified in the root bark of the Sclerochitin ilicifolius plant.

Enzymatically-synthesized (2R,4R)-monatin has, due to its pure sweet taste, been evaluated for potential use in foods. Non-clinical studies have shown that (2R,4R)-monatin is well tolerated at high dietary concentrations, is not genotoxic/mutagenic, carcinogenic, or overtly toxic. In a pharmacokinetic and metabolism study involving 12 healthy males, consumption of a single oral dose (2 mg/kg) of (2R,4R)-monatin resulted in a small reduction of heart rate and prolongation of the QTcF interval of 20-24 ms, corresponding to the time of peak plasma levels (t(max)). These findings were evaluated in a cross-over thorough QT/QTc study with single doses of 150 mg (2R,4R)-monatin, placebo and positive control (moxifloxacin) in 56 healthy males. Peak (2R,4R)-monatin plasma concentration (1720 ± 538 ng/mL) was reached at 3.1 h (mean tmax). The placebo-corrected, change-from-baseline QTcF (ΔΔQTcF) reached 25 ms three hours after dosing, with ΔΔQTcF of 23 ms at two and four hours. Using exposure response (QTc) analysis, a significant slope of the relationship between (2R,4R)-monatin plasma levels and ΔΔQTcF was demonstrated with a predicted mean QT effect of 0.016 ms per ng/mL. While similarly high plasma levels are unlikely to be achieved by consumption of (2R,4R)-monatin in foods, QTc prolongation at this level is a significant finding.

A review and assessment of potential sources of ethnic differences in drug responsiveness.

The International Conference on Harmonization (ICH) E5 guidelines were developed to provide a general framework for evaluating the potential impact of ethnic factors on the acceptability of foreign clinical data, with the underlying objective to facilitate global drug development and registration. It is well recognized that all drugs exhibit significant inter-subject variability in pharmacokinetics and pharmacologic response and that such differences vary considerably among individual drugs and depend on a variety of factors. One such potential factor involves ethnicity. The objective of the present work was to perform an extensive review of the world literature on ethnic differences in drug disposition and responsiveness to determine their general significance in relation to drug development and registration. A few examples of suspected ethnic differences in pharmacokinetics or pharmacodynamics were identified. The available literature, however, was found to be heterologous, including a variety of study designs and research methodologies, and most of the publications were on drugs that were approved a long time ago.

The conduct of in vitro and in vivo drug-drug interaction studies: a Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA) perspective.

Current regulatory guidances do not address specific study designs for in vitro and in vivo drug-drug interaction studies. There is a common desire by regulatory authorities and by industry sponsors to harmonize approaches, to allow for a better assessment of the significance of findings across different studies and drugs. There is also a growing consensus for the standardization of cytochrome P450 (P450) probe substrates, inhibitors and inducers and for the development of classification systems to improve the communication of risk to health care providers and to patients. While existing guidances cover mainly P450-mediated drug interactions, the importance of other mechanisms, such as transporters, has been recognized more recently, and should also be addressed. This article was prepared by the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA) Drug Metabolism and Clinical Pharmacology Technical Working Groups and represents the current industry position. The intent is to define a minimal best practice for in vitro and in vivo pharmacokinetic drug-drug interaction studies targeted to development (not discovery support) and to define a data package that can be expected by regulatory agencies in compound registration dossiers.

The conduct of in vitro and in vivo drug-drug interaction studies: a PhRMA perspective.

Current regulatory guidances do not address specific study designs for in vitro and in vivo drug-drug interaction studies. There is a common desire by regulatory authorities and by industry sponsors to harmonize approaches to allow for a better assessment of the significance of findings across different studies and drugs. There is also a growing consensus for the standardization of cytochrome P450 (CYP) probe substrates, inhibitors, and inducers and for the development of classification systems to improve the communication of risk to health care providers and patients. While existing guidances cover mainly CYP-mediated drug interactions, the importance of other mechanisms, such as transporters, has been recognized more recently and should also be addressed. This paper was prepared by the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA) Drug Metabolism and Clinical Pharmacology Technical Working Groups and represents the current industry position. The intent is to define a minimal best practice for in vitro and in vivo pharmacokinetic drug-drug interaction studies targeted to development (not discovery support) and to define a data package that can be expected by regulatory agencies in compound registration dossiers.