Clinical and treatment outcomes of a second subcutaneous or intravenous anti-TNF in patients with ulcerative colitis treated with two consecutive anti-TNF agents: data from the ENEIDA registry.

Background: Infliximab seems to be the most efficacious of the three available anti-TNF agents for ulcerative colitis (UC) but little is known when it is used as the second anti-TNF. Objectives: To compare the clinical and treatment outcomes of a second subcutaneous or intravenous anti-TNF in UC patients. Design: Retrospective observational study. Methods: Patients from the ENEIDA registry treated consecutively with infliximab and a subcutaneous anti-TNF (or vice versa), naïve to other biological agents, were identified and grouped according to the administration route of the first anti-TNF into IVi (intravenous initially) or SCi (subcutaneous initially). Results: Overall, 473 UC patients were included (330 IVi and 143 SCi). Clinical response at week 14 was 42.7% and 48.3% in the IVi and SCi groups (non-statistically significant), respectively. Clinical remission rates at week 52 were 32.8% and 31.4% in the IVi and SCi groups (nonsignificant differences), respectively. A propensity-matched score analysis showed a higher clinical response rate at week 14 in the SCi group and higher treatment persistence in the IVi group. Regarding long-term outcomes, dose escalation and discontinuation due to the primary failure of the first anti-TNF and more severe disease activity at the beginning of the second anti-TNF were inversely associated with clinical remission. Conclusion: The use of a second anti-TNF for UC seems to be reasonable in terms of efficacy, although it is particularly reduced in the case of the primary failure of the first anti-TNF. Whether the second anti-TNF is infliximab or subcutaneous does not seem to affect efficacy.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the clinical and treatment outcomes of a second subcutaneous or intravenous anti-TNF in UC patients. DESIGN: Retrospective observational study. METHODS: Patients from the ENEIDA registry treated consecutively with infliximab and a subcutaneous anti-TNF (or vice versa), naïve to other biological agents, were identified and grouped according to the administration route of the first anti-TNF into IVi (intravenous initially) or SCi (subcutaneous initially). RESULTS: Overall, 473 UC patients were included (330 IVi, 143 SCi). Clinical response at week 14 was 42.7% and 48.3% in the IVi and SCi groups (non-statistically significant), respectively. Clinical remission rates at week 52 were 32.8% and 31.4%, in the IVi and SCi groups (nonsignificant differences), respectively. A propensity-matched score analysis showed a higher clinical response rate at week 14 in the SCi group and higher treatment persistence in the IVi group. Regarding long-term outcomes, dose escalation and discontinuation due to the primary failure of the first anti-TNF and more severe disease activity at the beginning of the second anti-TNF were inversely associated with clinical remission. CONCLUSION: The use of a second anti-TNF for UC seems to be reasonable in terms of efficacy, although it is particularly reduced in the case of the primary failure of the first anti-TNF. Whether the second anti-TNF is infliximab or subcutaneous does not seem to affect efficacy.

Clinical and treatment outcomes of a second subcutaneous or intravenous anti-TNF in patients with ulcerative colitis treated with two consecutive anti-TNF agents. Data from the ENEIDA registry Background: Infliximab seems to be the most efficacious of the three available anti-TNF agents for ulcerative colitis (UC), but little is known when it is used as the second anti-TNF.

Usefulness of monitoring antitumor necrosis factor serum levels during the induction phase in patients with Crohn's disease.

AIMS: The aims of this study were (a) to know the kinetics of antitumor necrosis factor (TNF) drug serum levels during the induction phase in patients with Crohn's disease; (b) to identify variables associated with these levels; and (c) to assess the relation between these levels and short-term effectiveness in Crohn's disease patients. METHODS: Patients with Crohn's disease naïve to anti-TNF treatment were prospectively included. Remission was defined as a Crohn's disease activity index (CDAI) score <150 after 14 weeks of treatment. Blood samples were obtained at baseline and at weeks 4, 8, and 14. Adalimumab and infliximab levels were measured, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed, and the area under the ROC curve was calculated. RESULTS: One-hundred fifty patients with Crohn's disease were included, 79 (53%) received infliximab and 71 (47%) had CDAI > 150 at study entry. At week 14, 52 out of 71 patients with CDAI > 150 at baseline (73%) had clinical remission. There were no differences in infliximab levels between patients with and without remission (8 vs. 9.1 µg/mL, P > 0.05) or with and without response (7 vs. 11 µg/mL, P > 0.05) at week 14. There was a trend to higher levels of adalimumab concentration in responders in comparison with nonresponders (13 vs. 6.7 µg/mL, P = 0.05) and in patients who achieved remission in comparison with nonremitters (13.5 vs. 8.4 µg/mL, P = 0.06). In the multivariate analysis, no variable was predictive of short-term remission, including infliximab and adalimumab serum levels. CONCLUSION: Determining anti-TNF serum levels during the induction phase is not useful for predicting short-term remission in patients with Crohn's disease.

Functional rare variants influence the clinical response to anti-TNF therapy in Crohn's disease.

BACKGROUND: The effect of low-frequency functional variation on anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF) response in Crohn's disease (CD) patients remains unexplored. The objective of this study was to investigate the impact of functional rare variants in clinical response to anti-TNF therapy in CD. METHODS: CD anti-TNF naïve patients starting anti-TNF treatment due to active disease [Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI > 150)] were included. The whole genome was sequenced using the Illumina Hiseq4000 platform. Clinical response was defined as a CDAI score <150 at week 14 of anti-TNF treatment. Low-frequency variants were annotated and classified according to their damaging potential. The whole genome of CD patients was screened to identify homozygous loss-of-function (LoF) variants. The TNF signaling pathway was tested for overabundance of damaging variants using the SKAT-O method. Functional implication of the associated rare variation was evaluated using cell-type epigenetic enrichment analyses. RESULTS: A total of 41 consecutive CD patients were included; 3250 functional rare variants were identified (2682 damaging and 568 LoF variants). Two homozygous LoF mutations were found in HLA-B and HLA-DRB1 genes associated with lack of response and remission, respectively. Genome-wide LoF variants were enriched in epigenetic marks specific for the gastrointestinal tissue (colon, p = 4.11e-4; duodenum, p = 0.011). The burden of damaging variation in the TNF signaling pathway was associated with response to anti-TNF therapy (p = 0.016); damaging variants were enriched in epigenetic marks from CD8+ (p = 6.01e-4) and CD4+ (p = 0.032) T cells. CONCLUSIONS: Functional rare variants are involved in the response to anti-TNF therapy in CD. Cell-type enrichment analysis suggests that the gut mucosa and CD8+ T cells are the main mediators of this response.

Utilidad y coste de la cápsula endoscópica. Tres años de experiencia de nuestro centro / Utility and cost of the endoscopic capsule. Three years’ experience in our center

INTRODUCCIÓN: Nuestro objetivo fue evaluar el impacto clínico y la seguridad, así como estimar el gasto de la cápsula endoscópica (CE) en nuestro centro. RESULTADOS: Se analizaron retrospectivamente los estudios realizados en nuestro centro desde el año 2009 hasta 2012. Las indicaciones más frecuentes fueron el estudio de anemia (39%),el estudio de la hemorragia digestiva de origen incierto (HDOO) (19%) y de la enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal (EII) (18%). Se encontraron hallazgos positivos en un 51% de los casos, lo que tuvo impacto clínico en el 36,5%. La EII fue la indicación en la que la CE tuvo mayor impacto clínico (74,5%, p < 0,001). El impacto clínico de la CE en la HDOO o la anemia fue del 41 y el 26%, respectivamente. Una aproximación al gasto de las exploraciones recogidas supone una inversión de al menos 132.600 €; dado que el 63,5% de las exploraciones no tuvo impacto clínico quiere decir que la inversión de hasta 84.200 € no tuvo repercusión en el manejo de los pacientes. En aquellos pacientes que recibieron CE por un cuadro de HDOO se relacionó la realización precoz de la prueba (< 7 días) con la presencia de hallazgos patológicos y de impacto clínico. No se encontraron otros factores epidemiológicos, clínicos o analíticos capaces de predecir la presencia del impacto clínico de la CE en las diferentes indicaciones. CONCLUSIONES: En nuestra experiencia, la realización de la CE tuvo mayor impacto clínico en el estudio de la EII, y de la HDOO si se realiza de forma precoz; por el contrario, sería necesario un esfuerzo en mejorar las indicaciones de CE en el estudio de anemia para conseguir un mayor impacto clínico en este contexto

INTRODUCTION: T he aim of this study was to evaluate the safety, clinical impact and costs associated with capsule endoscopy (CE) in our center. RESULTS: We retrospectively analyzed the CE procedures carried out in our center from 2009 to 2012. The most frequent indications were investigation of anemia (39%), obscure gastrointestinal bleeding (OGIB) (19%) and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD)(18%). Findings were positive in 51% of the patients, which had a clinical impact in 36.5%. The indication in which CE had the greatest clinical impact was IBD (74.5%, p < 0,001). The clinical impact of CE in OGIB and anemia was 41% and 26%, respectively. The procedures performed represented an investment of at least 132 600€; since 63.5% of the procedures had no clinical impact, an investment of 84 200€ had no effect on patient management. In patients who underwent CE for OGIB, early performance of the procedure (< 7 days) was related to the presence of pathological findings and clinical impact. We found no other epidemiological, clinical or analytic factors able to predict the clinical impact of CE in the various indications

[Utility and cost of the endoscopic capsule. Three years' experience in our center]. / Utilidad y coste de la cápsula endoscópica. Tres años de experiencia de nuestro centro.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety, clinical impact and costs associated with capsule endoscopy (CE) in our center. RESULTS: We retrospectively analyzed the CE procedures carried out in our center from 2009 to 2012. The most frequent indications were investigation of anemia (39%), obscure gastrointestinal bleeding (OGIB) (19%) and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD)(18%). Findings were positive in 51% of the patients, which had a clinical impact in 36.5%. The indication in which CE had the greatest clinical impact was IBD (74.5%, p<0,001). The clinical impact of CE in OGIB and anemia was 41% and 26%, respectively. The procedures performed represented an investment of at least 132 600€; since 63.5% of the procedures had no clinical impact, an investment of 84 200€ had no effect on patient management. In patients who underwent CE for OGIB, early performance of the procedure (<7 days) was related to the presence of pathological findings and clinical impact. We found no other epidemiological, clinical or analytic factors able to predict the clinical impact of CE in the various indications. CONCLUSIONS: In our experience, CE had the greatest impact in the study of IBD and, if performed early, in OGIB. However, the indications for CE in the study of anemia should be most precisely defined to achieve a greater clinical impact in this disorder.