Efficacy of Integrated Exposure Therapy vs Integrated Coping Skills Therapy for Comorbid Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and Alcohol Use Disorder: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Co-occurrence of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and alcohol use disorder (AUD) is common and associated with psychiatric and functional problems. Understanding whether exposure therapy is tolerable and efficacious for treating PTSD and AUD is critical to ensure that best practice treatments are available. Objective: To compare the efficacy of integrated (ie, targeting both PTSD and alcohol use) prolonged exposure (I-PE) therapy with present-centered integrated coping skills (I-CS) therapy, a more commonly available treatment, in reducing PTSD symptoms and alcohol use. Design, Setting, and Participants: This prospective randomized clinical trial with masked assessments considered 186 veterans seeking Veterans Affairs mental health services. A total of 119 veterans with PTSD and AUD were randomized. Data were collected from February 1, 2013, to May 31, 2017, before treatment, after treatment, and at 3- and 6-month follow-ups. Intention-to-treat analyses were performed. Interventions: Veterans underwent I-PE (Concurrent Treatment of PTSD and Substance Use Disorder Using Prolonged Exposure) or I-CS (Seeking Safety) therapy. Main Outcomes and Measures: A priori planned outcomes were PTSD symptoms (Clinician Administered PTSD Scale for DSM-5) and percentage of heavy drinking days (Timeline Follow-Back) before treatment, after treatment, and at 3- and 6-month follow-ups. Results: A total of 119 veterans (mean [SD] age, 41.6 [12.6] years; 107 [89.9%] male) were randomized. Linear mixture models found that PTSD symptoms decreased in both conditions, with a significantly greater decrease for I-PE treatment compared with I-CS treatment (treatment × time interaction, -2.83; F3,233.1 = 4.92; Cohen d = 0.41; P = .002). The percentage of heavy drinking days improved in both conditions but was not statistically different between I-PE and I-CS treatment (treatment × time interaction, 1.8%; F3,209.9 = 0.18; Cohen d = 0.04; P = .91). Conclusions and Relevance: The I-PE arm had a greater reduction in PTSD symptoms than the I-CS arm and comparable drinking decreases. The study provides evidence that exposure therapy is more efficacious in treating PTSD than a more commonly available integrated treatment without exposure for comorbid PTSD and AUD. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01601067.

Maximizing the utility of a single site randomized controlled psychotherapy trial.

PURPOSE OF THE RESEARCH: There is increasing interest in including measures of biological mechanisms as mediators and moderators of treatment outcome in randomized controlled trials (RCT's) of psychotherapy efficacy. However, examining biological mechanisms is often expensive and budget caps of most major funding agencies have remained stable in recent years. The goal of this manuscript is to describe how a psychotherapy efficacy trial is using a model of collaborative, affiliated grants to maximize resources and the potential knowledge to be gained from a single site RCT. Principal results and conclusions: The trial is an ongoing RCT comparing two psychotherapies for the treatment of concurrent posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and alcohol use disorder (AUD) with a sample of treatment seeking veterans. Through collaboration with a team of investigators with independently-funded but affiliated grants, measures of select sleep, neurobiological, and genetic biomarkers were integrated into this single site RCT. This model has allowed us to pose research questions regarding the role of biological mechanisms, maximize the utility of recruitment, and be efficient in maximizing knowledge to be gained in a way that would not be possible solely on the funding of a single site RCT. Challenges of this model include high participant burden in regard to assessment and complicated coordinating procedures among studies. Strategies to address these challenges are described.