Permanent pacemaker implantation after valve and arrhythmia surgery in patients with preoperative atrial fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: Among patients referred for cardiac surgery, atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common comorbidity and a risk factor for postoperative arrhythmias (eg, sinus node dysfunction, atrioventricular heart block), including those requiring permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prevalence and long-term survival of postoperative PPM implantation in patients with preoperative AF who underwent valve surgery with or without concomitant procedures. METHODS: Presented analysis pertains to the HEIST (HEart surgery In atrial fibrillation and Supraventricular Tachycardia) registry. During the study period, 11,949 patients underwent valvular (aortic, mitral, or tricuspid valve replacement or repair) surgery and/or surgical ablation (SA) and were stratified according to postoperative PPM status. RESULTS: PPM implantation after surgery was necessary in 2.5% of patients, with significant variation depending on the type of surgery (from 1.1% in mitral valve repair to 3.3% in combined mitral and tricuspid valve surgery). In a multivariate logistic regression model, tricuspid intervention (P <.001), cardiopulmonary bypass time (P = .024), and endocarditis (P = .014) were shown to be risk factors for PPM. Over long-term follow-up, PPM was not associated with increased mortality compared to no PPM (hazard ratio 0.96; 95% confidence interval 0.77-1.19; P = .679). SA was not associated with PPM implantation. However, SA improved survival regardless of PPM status (log rank P <.001). CONCLUSION: In patients with preoperative AF, the need for PPM implantation after valve surgery or SA is not an infrequent outcome, with SA not affecting its prevalence but actually improving long-term survival.

Results of surgical treatment of primary lung cancer with synchronous brain metastases.

INTRODUCTION: The surgical treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with synchronous brain matastases is more effective than other therapeutic options, but this management is still controversial. THE AIM OF THE STUDY: The aim of the study was to evaluate the survival of patients after pulmonary resection NSCLC preceded by resection of brain metastases. MATERIAL AND METHODS: From 2007 to 2012, 645 patients underwent pulmonary resection for NSCLC at our department. In 25 of them (3.87%) thoracic surgery was preceded by resection of a single brain metastasis of NSCLC and a PET CT scan. No signs of nodal involvement or distant metastases were detected. RESULTS: The group consisted of 18 men (72%) and 7 women (28%). Average age was 57.62 years (46-70). In all cases, whole brain radiotherapy (5 × 4 Gy) was performed. The average interval between excision of brain metastasis and lung resection was 31.4 days (27-41). Pneumonectomy was performed in 1, lobectomy/bilobectomy in 17 and wedge resection in 7 cases. Pathological stage N0 was diagnosed in 17, N1 in 5 and N2 in 3 patients. Average survival was 18.68 months (4-74). Survival at 1, 2 and 5 years was 64%, 28% and 28% respectively. Average disease-free survival was 17.52 months. Histological type (p = 0.57) and G (p = 0.82) have no influence on survival. All the patients with hilar lymph node involvement died within 26 months and with mediastinal one within 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical treatment of patients with NSCLC with synchronous brain metastases may prove beneficial in selected patients after excluding other distant metastases and lymph node involvement.