A phase 2 study for evaluating doxycycline 50 mg once daily and 100 mg once daily as preemptive treatment for skin toxicity in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with an anti-EGFR and chemotherapy.

PURPOSE: To assess the efficacy, safety, and quality-of-life outcomes of doxycycline 50 or 100 mg once daily in the prevention of skin toxicity in patients undergoing chemotherapy plus anti-EGFR therapy as first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). METHODS: Phase II, multicenter, single-arm, exploratory study was conducted in 7 Spanish hospitals. The primary study outcome was the incidence of ≥ grade 2 skin toxicities during the 6-week skin treatment period. Quality of life was assessed with the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) questionnaire. Patients had to receive either doxycycline 50 mg once daily in a first stage with 10 patients, or, if more than three patients presented ≥ grade 2 skin toxicities, the next 30 patients had to receive 100 mg once daily. RESULTS: Thirty-four patients with RAS wild-type mCRC were enrolled in the study. Ten patients were first treated with doxycycline 50 mg once daily, and the following 24 were treated with doxycycline 100 mg once daily. A total of 60.0% (95% CI 29.6-90.0) and 20.8% (95% CI 4.6-37.0) of patients who received doxycycline 50 mg/day and 100 mg/day, respectively, had at least one ≥ grade 2 skin toxicity. Patients treated with doxycycline 100 mg once daily experienced less QoL deterioration. Only 1 patient reported a mild doxycycline-related gastrointestinal adverse event. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that doxycycline doses as low as 100 mg once daily are efficacious and well tolerated for the prevention of skin toxicity in patients with mCRC who undergo treatment with chemotherapy plus EGFR-targeted therapies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03448731.

Capecitabine as first-line treatment for patients older than 70 years with metastatic colorectal cancer: an oncopaz cooperative group study.

PURPOSE: To determine the tolerability of capecitabine in elderly patients with advanced colorectal cancer (CRC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty-one patients with advanced CRC who were >/= 70 years and considered ineligible for combination chemotherapy received oral capecitabine 1,250 mg/m(2) twice daily on days 1 to 14 every 3 weeks. Patients with a creatinine clearance of 30 to 50 mL/min received a dose of 950 mg/m(2) twice daily. RESULTS: A total of 248 cycles of capecitabine were administered (median, five cycles; range, one to eight cycles). The overall response rate was 24% (95% CI, 15% to 41%), including two complete responses (CR; 4%) and 10 partial responses (PR; 20%). Disease control (CR + PR + stable disease) was achieved in 67% of patients. The median times to disease progression and overall survival were 7 months (95% CI, 6.4 to 9.5 months) and 11 months (95% CI, 8.6 to 13.3 months), respectively. Of the 35 patients evaluated for clinical benefit response, 14 (40%; 95% CI, 24% to 58%) showed clinical benefit. Capecitabine was well tolerated. Treatment-related grade 3 and 4 adverse events were observed in only six patients (12%), and the most common events were diarrhea, hand-foot syndrome, and thrombocytopenia. One patient (2%) had an episode of angina, but no treatment-related deaths were reported. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that capecitabine is effective and well tolerated in elderly patients with advanced CRC who are considered ineligible for combination chemotherapy.

Phase II trial of vinorelbine and estramustine in the treatment of metastatic hormone-resistant prostate cancer.

The purpose of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of combination chemotherapy using estramustine and vinorelbine in chemotherapy-naïve patients with hormone-resistant prostate cancer (HRPC). The patients (n = 54) received oral estramustine 840 mg/day on Days 1 to 14 and IV vinorelbine 25 mg/m(2) on Days 1 and 8 of every 3 wk cycle. The median number of cycles per patient was 9 (range, 1 to 27). Fifty-three patients were evaluable for toxicity and survival and 52 for prostate specific antigen (PSA) response. Median age was 68 (range, 46-80). PSA sustained decrease >50% was seen in 52% of patients (95% CI: 38-66%). A complete response was seen in 3 and a partial response in 12 of 25 patients with measurable disease, for an overall objective response of 60% (95% CI: 41-79%). Improvement in performance status was observed in 30 out of 43 evaluable for clinical benefit response. The median duration of response was 7 mo and median time to progression was 6 mo. The median survival time was 15 mo. The most common adverse event was mild gastrointestinal toxicity. In general, toxicity G3-4 was low: granulocytopenia Grade 3-4 (8%), thrombocytopenia Grade 3 (6%), and anemia Grade 3 (13%). Other Grade 3 toxicities included deep vein thrombosis (4%), hepatic (2%), cardiac ischemia (2%), fatigue (6%), and sensory neuropathy (2%). There were 2 treatment-related deaths (4%). We conclude that vinorelbine and estramustine as used in this trial is an efficacious and well-tolerated therapeutic regimen in the management of HRPC.