The impact of the California state lockdown during the COVID-19 pandemic on management of patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The SARS-COVID-19 pandemic significantly limited healthcare access. We sought to evaluate whether California's lockdown in March 2020 affected staging and time to treatment of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). We hypothesized that patients diagnosed after the lockdown would have longer time to treatment and higher stage at presentation. METHODS: We retrospectively identified and categorized 1294 patients presenting to five University of California healthcare systems with a new diagnosis of PDAC into "pre-lockdown" and "post-lockdown" groups based on timing of pathologic diagnosis. RESULTS: In the 12 months pre-lockdown, 835 patients were diagnosed with PDAC, and 459 patients in the 6 months post-lockdown. Demographics, staging, and treatment type were similar between eras. There was a decreased male:female ratio post- versus pre-lockdown (0.97 vs. 1.25; p = 0.03). Time from symptom onset to first treatment was significantly increased among females post-lockdown (p = 0.001). However, overall time from diagnosis to first treatment was shorter in the post-lockdown era (median 23 vs. 26 days, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The COVID-19 lockdown did not significantly delay initial presentation, diagnosis, or treatment of newly diagnosed PDAC patients. Time from diagnosis to first treatment was shorter post-lockdown. Reduced healthcare utilization for minor complaints and increased telehealth utilization may have contributed.

Whole-genome bisulfite sequencing identifies stage- and subtype-specific DNA methylation signatures in pancreatic cancer.

In pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), no recurrent metastasis-specific mutation has been found, suggesting that epigenetic mechanisms, such as DNA methylation, are the major contributors of late-stage disease progression. Here, we performed the first whole-genome bisulfite sequencing (WGBS) on mouse and human PDAC organoid models to identify stage-specific and molecular subtype-specific DNA methylation signatures. With this approach, we identified thousands of differentially methylated regions (DMRs) that can distinguish between the stages and molecular subtypes of PDAC. Stage-specific DMRs are associated with genes related to nervous system development and cell-cell adhesions, and are enriched in promoters and bivalent enhancers. Subtype-specific DMRs showed hypermethylation of GATA6 foregut endoderm transcriptional networks in the squamous subtype and hypermethylation of EMT transcriptional networks in the progenitor subtype. These results indicate that aberrant DNA methylation contributes to both PDAC progression and subtype differentiation, resulting in significant and reoccurring DNA methylation patterns with diagnostic and prognostic potential.

Characterization of natural killer and cytotoxic T-cell immune infiltrates in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is an aggressive cancer with poor response to systemic therapies, including immunotherapy. Given the immunotherapeutic potential of natural killer (NK) cells, we evaluated intratumoral NK cell infiltrates along with cytotoxic T cells in PDAC to determine their association with patient outcomes. METHODS: We analyzed tumors from 93 PDAC patients treated from 2012 to 2020. Predictor variables included tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), T-cell markers (CD3, CD8, CD45RO), NK marker (NKp46), and NK inhibitory marker (major histocompatibility complex class I [MHC-I]) by immunohistochemistry. Primary outcome variables were recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Mean TILs, CD3, and NKp46 scores were 1.3 ± 0.63, 20.6 ± 17.5, and 3.1 ± 3.9, respectively. Higher expression of CD3 and CD8 was associated with higher OS, whereas NK cell infiltration was not associated with either RFS or OS. There was a tight positive correlation between MHC-I expression and all T-cell markers, but not with NKp46. CONCLUSIONS: Overall NK cell infiltrates were low in PDAC and did not predict clinical outcomes, whereas T-cell infiltrates did. Further characterization of the immune infiltrate in PDAC, including inhibitory signals and suppressive cell types, may yield better biomarkers of prognosis and immune targeting in this refractory disease.

Assessing the Sentimag system for guiding sentinel node biopsies in patients with breast cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Sentinel lymph node biopsy for breast cancer is a method to localize and excise the first draining lymph node from an invasive cancer of the breast. The histopathologic evaluation of the sentinel lymph node is used for predicting recurrence and survival and thus, guiding oncologists for treatment-decision making to administer adjuvant therapies. The ability to identify the sentinel node depends on methods to map lymphatic drainage from the breast to the sentinel node and accurately discriminate that node from other non-sentinel lymph nodes of the axilla. AREAS COVERED: This review covers the clinical demand for technologies to assist the surgeon in intraoperative lymphatic mapping to specifically identify the sentinel lymph node in patients with breast cancer. Performance characteristics are reviewed for superparamagnetic iron oxide tracers used in lymphatic mapping compared to other current available technologies for lymphatic mapping. EXPERT OPINION: The Magtrace (superparamagnetic iron oxide tracer) Sentimag (handheld magnetic probe) system is an FDA-approved technology for intraoperative lymphatic mapping to facilitate sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer with technologic performance characteristics that are equivalent to 99Technetium-sulfur colloid. Barriers to broader utilization primarily center around the need for nonmetallic devices to be used for the conduct of surgery, which would interfere with the paramagnetic method for tracer localization.

Regionalization of pancreatic surgery in California: Benefits for preventing postoperative deaths and reducing healthcare costs.

Introduction: Pancreatic cancer (PC) surgery has been associated with improved outcomes and value when performed at high-volume centers (HVC; ≥20 surgeries annually) compared to low-volume centers (LVC). Some have used these differences to suggest that regionalization of PC surgery would optimize patient outcomes and expenditures. Methods: A Markov model was created to evaluate 30-day mortality, 30-day complications, and 30-day costs. The differences in these outcome measures between the current and future states were measured to assess the population-level benefits of regionalization. A sensitivity analysis was performed to evaluate the impact of variations of input variables in the model. Results: Among 5958 new cases of pancreatic cancer in California in 2021, a total of 2443 cases (41 %) would be resectable; among patients with resectable PC, a total of 977 (40 %) patients would undergo surgery. In aggregate, HVC and LVC 30-day postoperative complications occurred in 364 patients, 30-day mortality in 35 patients, and healthcare costs expended managing complications were $6,120,660. In the predictive model of complete regionalization to only HVC in California, an estimated 29 fewer complications, 17 fewer deaths, and a cost savings of $487,635 per year would occur. Conclusions and relevance: Pancreatic cancer (PC) surgery has been associated with improved outcomes and value when performed at high-volume centers (HVC; ≥20 surgeries annually) compared to low-volume centers (LVC). Complete regionalization of pancreatic cancer surgery predicted benefits in mortality, complications and cost, though implementing this strategy at a population-level may require investment of resources and redesigning care delivery models.

Optimal Definition of Pancreaticoduodenectomy in the International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision, Procedure Coding System.

BACKGROUND: The implementation of the International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision, Procedure Coding System (ICD-10-PCS) has created difficulty in identifying certain procedures, including pancreaticoduodenectomy. We sought to evaluate which combinations of ICD-10-PCS codes best identify pancreaticoduodenectomy. STUDY DESIGN: We used 2017-2018 Medicare data to identify acute care hospitalization claims of beneficiaries with both ICD-10-PCS and Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes available. We developed 12 candidate ICD-10-PCS definitions of pancreaticoduodenectomy and evaluated their test characteristics in identifying hospitalizations involving CPT codes 48150, 48152, 48153, 48154, or 48155 as the criterion standard. We selected one candidate definition with the best balance of test characteristics, then performed decision tree analysis and evaluated the conditional marginal sensitivity and positive predictive value of each individual code to understand which were most informative. RESULTS: Among 964,613 hospitalization claims from 4648 hospitals, 385 claims from 217 hospitals involved a CPT code for pancreaticoduodenectomy. The ICD-10-PCS definition with the best balance had a sensitivity of 92.2% (95% CI: 89.2%-94.4%), specificity of 99.9977% (95% CI: 99.9961%-99.9984%), positive predictive value of 93.7% (95% CI: 90.3%-95.9%), and negative predictive value of 99.9969% (95% CI: 99.9955%-99.9978%). The most informative procedure codes involved open nondiagnostic excision or resection of the duodenum (0DB90ZZ and 0DT90ZZ) and pancreas (0FBG0ZZ and 0FTG0ZZ). CONCLUSION: An ICD-10-PCS definition of pancreaticoduodenectomy using codes for (1) open or percutaneous endoscopic excision or resection of the pancreas and (2) similar codes for the duodenum, consistent with coding guidelines, has satisfactory test characteristics. We suggest researchers consider such characteristics in defining pancreaticoduodenectomy using ICD-10-PCS.

Survival After Contralateral Secondary Breast Cancer by Age Group in California.

PURPOSE: Breast cancer (BC) is the most common secondary cancer and has poorer survival than primary BC (pBC) after any prior malignancy. For BC survivors, developing a contralateral secondary BC (CSBC) is the most frequent second-cancer event and is currently treated similarly to pBC. Identifying survival differences between pBC and CSBC could influence future counseling and treatments for patients with CSBC. METHODS: Women (≥15 years) diagnosed with pBC from 1991 to 2015 in the California Cancer Registry (n = 377,176) were compared with those with CSBC (n = 15,586) by age group (15-39 years, n = 406; 40-64 years, n = 6814; ≥ 65 years, n = 8366). Multivariable logistic regression models assessed factors associated with CSBC. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models assessed BC-specific survival (BCSS), while accounting for the competing risk of death. RESULTS: Across all ages, CSBC patients were more likely to have smaller tumors (T2 vs. T1a; 15-39 yeras: OR 0.25, CI 0.16-0.38; 40-64 years: OR 0.41, CI 0.37-0.45; ≥ 65 years: OR 0.46, CI 0.42-0.51) and lymph node-negative disease (positive vs. negative; 15-39 years: OR 0.86, CI 0.69-1.08; 40-64 years: OR 0.88, CI 0.83-0.93; ≥ 65 years: OR 0.89, CI 0.84-0.94). Additionally, CSBC was associated with worse survival compared with pBC across all ages (15-39 years: HR 2.73, CI 2.30-3.25; 40-64 years: HR 2.13, CI 2.01-2.26; ≥ 65 years: HR 1.52, CI 1.43-1.61). CONCLUSION: BCSS is worse among all women diagnosed with CSBC compared with pBC, with the strongest impact seen in adolescent and young adult women. Worse survival after CSBC, despite associations with smaller tumors and lymph node negativity, suggests that CSBC may need eventual treatment reconsideration.

Shifting paradigms for the treatment of ductal carcinoma in situ: Less is more.

Ductal carcinoma in situ is a diverse disease in which only 50% of lesions progress to invasive carcinoma, but unfortunately, all patients receive similar treatment recommendations independent of the disease variability. De-escalation is the philosophy that treatment for this disease should be differentiated based on the likelihood of future progression and recurrence. Four surgical trials are looking at the possibility of removing surgical intervention, the current mainstay of treatment, from the algorithm. Molecular assays have been developed to help differentiate the risk of an ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence and potentially guide the postsurgical utility of radiation therapy. Primary endocrine therapy is also being explored as an alternative to standard local therapy. Ductal carcinoma in situ therapy is a very complicated algorithm that should be discussed and treated through shared decision-making.

The Impact of Preexisting Psychiatric Disorders on Outcomes After Pancreatic Cancer Surgery.

OBJECTIVES: Comorbid psychiatric illness has been associated with worse outcomes after some major surgical procedures. We hypothesized that patients with preexisting mood disorders would have worse postoperative and oncologic outcomes after pancreatic cancer resection. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study analyzed Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results patients with resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma. A preexisting mood disorder was classified if a patient was diagnosed and/or treated with medication approved for depression/anxiety within 6 months before surgery. RESULTS: Of 1305 patients, 16% had a preexisting mood disorder. Mood disorders had no impact on hospital length of stay (12.9 vs 13.2 days, P = 0.75), 30-day complications (26% vs 22%, P = 0.31), 30-day readmissions (26% vs 21%, P = 0.1), or mortality (30 days: 3% vs 4%, P = 0.35); only an increased 90-day readmissions rate (42% vs 31%, P = 0.001) was observed. No effect on adjuvant chemotherapy receipt (62.5% vs 69.2%, P = 0.06) or survival (24 months, 43% vs 39%, P = 0.44) was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Preexisting mood disorders influenced 90-day readmissions after pancreatic resection, but not other postoperative or oncologic outcomes. These findings suggest that affected patients should be expected to have outcomes similar to patients without mood disorders.

Secondary Breast Cancer Sociodemographic Characteristics and Survival by Age Group.

BACKGROUND: Secondary cancers account for 16% of all new cancer diagnoses, with breast cancer (BC) the most common secondary cancer. We have shown that secondary BC has unique characteristics and decreased survival compared with primary BC in adolescent and young adults (AYA; 15-39 years old). However, older BC populations are less well studied. METHODS: Females (age ≥ 15 years) diagnosed with primary BC during 1991-2015 (n = 377,167) and enrolled in the California Cancer Registry were compared with those with secondary BC (n = 37,625) by age (15-39, 40-64, ≥ 65 years). We examined BC-specific survival (BCSS) accounting for other causes of death as a competing risk using multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression. RESULTS: Most secondary BC patients were of older age (15-39, n = 777; 40-64, n = 15,848; ≥ 65, n = 21,000). Compared with primary BC treatment, secondary BCs were more often treated with mastectomy and less often with chemotherapy and/or radiation. BCSS was shorter in secondary BC patients than primary BC patients, but the survival difference between secondary and primary BC diminished with age [15-39 hazard ratio (HR): 2.09, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.83-2.39; 40-64 HR: 1.51; 95% CI 1.44-1.58; ≥ 65 HR: 1.14; 95% CI 1.10-1.19]. Survival differences were most pronounced in women with hormone receptor positive disease and Hispanic and Asian/Pacific Islanders 40-64 years of age. CONCLUSIONS: When BC is diagnosed following a prior cancer of any organ site, BCSS is worse than when compared with patients for whom BC is the primary diagnosis, suggesting that we may need to tailor our treatments for women with secondary BC.

Chemotherapy After Diagnosis of Malignant Bowel Obstruction is Associated with Superior Survival for Medicare Patients with Advanced Malignancy.

BACKGROUND: Although malignant bowel obstruction (MBO) often is a terminal event, systemic therapies are advocated for select patients to extend survival. This study aimed to evaluate factors associated with receipt of chemotherapy after MBO and to determine whether chemotherapy after MBO is associated with survival. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study investigated patients 65 years of age or older with metastatic gastrointestinal, gynecologic, or genitourinary cancers who were hospitalized with MBO from 2008 to 2012 using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare database. Fine and Gray models were used to identify factors associated with receipt of chemotherapy accounting for the competing risk of death. Cox models identified factors associated with overall survival. RESULTS: Of the 2983 MBO patients, 39% (n = 1169) were treated with chemotherapy after MBO. No differences in receipt of chemotherapy between the surgical and medical patients were found in the univariable analysis (subdistribution hazard ratio [SHR], 0.96; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.86-1.07; p = 0.47) or multivariable analysis (SHR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.00-1.26; p = 0.06). Older age, African American race, medical comorbidities, non-colorectal and non-ovarian cancer diagnoses, sepsis, ascites, and intensive care unit stays were inversely associated with receipt of chemotherapy after MBO (p < 0.05). Chemotherapy with surgery was associated with longer survival than surgery (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 2.97; 95% CI, 2.65-3.34; p < 0.01) or medical management without chemotherapy (aHR, 4.56; 95% CI, 4.04-5.14; p < 0.01). Subgroup analyses of biologically diverse cancers (colorectal, pancreatic, and ovarian) showed similar results, with greater survival related to chemotherapy (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Chemotherapy plays an integral role in maximizing oncologic outcome for select patients with MBO. The data from this study are critical to optimizing multimodality care for these complex patients.

Is Improved Survival in Early-Stage Pancreatic Cancer Worth the Extra Cost at High-Volume Centers?

BACKGROUND: Volume of operative cases may be an important factor associated with improved survival for early-stage pancreatic cancer. Most high-volume pancreatic centers are also academic institutions, which have been associated with additional healthcare costs. We hypothesized that at high-volume centers, the value of the extra survival outweighs the extra cost. STUDY DESIGN: This retrospective cohort study used data from the California Cancer Registry linked to the Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development database from January 1, 2004 through December 31, 2012. Stage I-II pancreatic cancer patients who underwent resection were included. Multivariable analyses estimated overall survival and 30-day costs at low- vs high-volume pancreatic surgery centers. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) and incremental net benefit (INB) were estimated, and statistical uncertainty was characterized using net benefit regression. RESULTS: Of 2,786 patients, 46.5% were treated at high-volume centers and 53.5% at low-volume centers. There was a 0.45-year (5.4 months) survival benefit (95% CI 0.21-0.69) and a $7,884 extra cost associated with receiving surgery at high-volume centers (95% CI $4,074-$11,694). The ICER was $17,529 for an additional year of survival (95% CI $7,997-$40,616). For decision-makers willing to pay more than $20,000 for an additional year of life, high-volume centers appear cost-effective. CONCLUSIONS: Although healthcare costs were greater at high-volume centers, patients undergoing pancreatic surgery at high-volume centers experienced a survival benefit (5.4 months). The extra cost of $17,529 per additional year is quite modest for improved survival and is economically attractive by many oncology standards.

Planning for post-pandemic cancer care delivery: Recovery or opportunity for redesign?

The delivery of cancer care has never changed as rapidly and dramatically as we have seen with the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. During the early phase of the pandemic, recommendations for the management of oncology patients issued by various professional societies and government agencies did not recognize the significant regional differences in the impact of the pandemic. California initially experienced lower than expected numbers of cases, and the health care system did not experience the same degree of the burden that had been the case in other parts of the country. In light of promising trends in COVID-19 infections and mortality in California, by late April 2020, discussions were initiated for a phased recovery of full-scale cancer services. However, by July 2020, a surge of cases was reported across the nation, including in California. In this review, the authors share the response and recovery planning experience of the University of California (UC) Cancer Consortium in an effort to provide guidance to oncology practices. The UC Cancer Consortium was established in 2017 to bring together 5 UC Comprehensive Cancer Centers: UC Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center, UC Los Angeles Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, UC Irvine Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center, and the UC San Francisco Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center. The interventions implemented in each of these cancer centers are highlighted, with a focus on opportunities for a redesign in care delivery models. The authors propose that their experiences gained during this pandemic will enhance pre-pandemic cancer care delivery.

The Role of Radiation Therapy in Addition to Lumpectomy and Hormone Therapy in Men 70 Years of Age and Older with Early Breast Cancer: A NCDB Analysis.

PURPOSE: Current treatment guidelines for male breast cancer are guided by female-only trials despite data suggesting distinct clinicopathologic differences between sexes. We sought to evaluate whether radiation therapy (RT) after lumpectomy was associated with equivalent survival among men > 70 years of age with stage I, estrogen receptor (ER) positive tumors, as seen in women from the Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) 9343 trial. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of 752 stage I, ER-positive male breast cancer patients ≥ 70 years who were treated with hormone therapy and surgery, with or without RT, from the National Cancer Database between 2004 and 2014. Patients were categorized based on surgery and RT (lumpectomy alone, lumpectomy with RT, and mastectomy alone). Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was used to compare overall survival between treatment groups. RESULTS: Most patients underwent total mastectomy, with only 32.6% treated with lumpectomy. Of those who underwent lumpectomy, 72.7% received adjuvant RT. In multivariate analysis, there was no statistical difference in overall survival when comparing lumpectomy alone and lumpectomy with RT (aHR 0.72 [95% CI 0.38-1.37], p = 0.31) or when comparing lumpectomy (alone or with RT) and mastectomy (aHR 1.28 [95% CI 0.88-1.87], p = 0.20). CONCLUSIONS: In this national sample of elderly men with ER-positive early-stage disease treated with endocrine therapy, there were no significant differences in overall survival when comparing lumpectomy alone and lumpectomy with RT, or lumpectomy (alone or with RT) and mastectomy. These results suggest that less aggressive treatment may be appropriate for a subset of male breast cancer patients.