RESUMEN
Introduction: Clinical verification of rheumatoid vasculitis (RV) persists as a mid-to-late diagnosis with medical imaging or biopsy. Early and subclinical presentations of RV, in particular, can remain underdiagnosed in the absence of adequate diagnostic testing. In this study, the research demonstrated the precursory changes for RV in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) using non-invasive ultrasound imaging of a peripheral vessel. Method: Six participants were recruited: three participants with (RA) and three age- and gender-matched healthy controls. All participants completed a Foot Health Survey Questionnaire (FHSQ), and participants with RA completed a Rheumatoid Arthritis Disease Activity Index-5 (RADAI-5). Bilateral B-mode and Doppler ultrasound of the dorsalis pedis artery (DPA) was performed. The degree of inflammation, lumen and artery diameters, lumen diameter-to-artery diameter ratio and peak systolic velocity in the proximal DPA were compared between the two groups. Results: The mean RADAI-5 score (5.4 ± 0.8 out of 10) indicated moderate disease activity amongst participants with RA. Inflammation was observed in the DPA wall in all participants with RA, compared to no inflammation observed in the control group (Friedmans two-way analysis: χ2 = 15.733, P = 0.003). Differences between groups for inflammation, lumen diameter and lumen diameter-to-artery diameter ratio were found (P < 0.034), without differences for artery diameter and peak systolic velocity (P > 0.605). DPA wall inflammation did not correlate with FHSQ scores (r = -0.770, P = 0.073). Conclusion: Despite moderate RA disease activity, this is the first study to demonstrate the use of ultrasound to observe inflammation in small vessel disease. Our findings suggest ultrasound imaging may be a viable screening tool to demonstrate arterial wall inflammation, indicating the precursory changes of RV.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Assessment of small vessel inflammatory diseases such as rheumatoid vasculitis is challenging. Small arteries such as the dorsalis pedis artery (DPA) are difficult to assess for changes in the arterial wall with medical imaging. Ultrasound imaging is a viable tool for examining the integrity and inflammatory changes in the arterial wall; however, no empirical data on its reliability have been described. METHODS: We measured the intra- and inter-rater reliability of ultrasound measurements across five parameters evaluating arterial integrity of the proximal DPA in participants with and without small vessel disease. We recruited 10 participants with rheumatoid arthritis and 10 healthy controls. Two sonographers using ultrasound independently measured DPA lumen diameter, artery diameter, lumen-to-arterial diameter ratio, arterial Doppler velocity and inflammatory changes in the proximal wall of the DPA. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to evaluate 95% confidence intervals within and between raters. Bland-Altman analyses were used to assess limits of agreement and were compared with minimal clinically important differences (MCID). RESULTS: Four of five selected parameters were found to have excellent intra- and inter-rater reliability within and between raters (ICC = 0.903-0.996). Acceptable reliability was found for measurement of arterial blood flow velocity within raters (ICC = 0.815-0.909), but not between raters (ICC = 0.634). Standard mean errors in all parameters were within minimal clinically important differences. CONCLUSION: Ultrasound imaging has been found to be a reliable method of assessment of arterial integrity and inflammation of the proximal DPA in people with small vessel disease. Evaluation of arterial blood flow velocity requires cautious interpretation.