[RENAPE network: Towards more equitable access to care and expertise for patients with rare peritoneal cancers]. / Réseau RENAPE : vers une meilleure équité d'accès aux soins et à l'expertise pour les patients atteints de cancers rares du péritoine.

Since its creation in 2010, the progressive structuration of the RENAPE network (Réseau national de prise en charge des tumeurs rares du péritoine) supported by the "Institut national du cancer" and the "Direction générale de l'offre de soins", allowed the optimization of the healthcare system involved in the management of the rare cancers of the peritoneum. In this setting, the RENA-PATH group has also been reinforced, notably by its recognized diagnostic expertise in pathology and its interface with the MESOPATH group. Moreover RENAPE and RENA-PATH led to guidelines diffusion through the integration, in 2019, to the ``Thesaurus National de Cancérologie Digestive'' (TNCD) and to post-university medical education programs. The aim of this article is to highlight the missions of the RENAPE and RENA-PATH, notably the equity in terms of expertise, access to the networks and their improvement in the management of peritoneal diseases.

Comparison of Neoadjuvant Systemic Chemotherapy Protocols for the Curative-Intent Management of Peritoneal Metastases from Colorectal Cancer, Regarding Morphological Response, Pathological Response, and Long-Term Outcomes: A Retrospective Study.

BACKGROUND: Selected patients with colorectal cancer peritoneal metastases (CRPM) could be offered a curative-intent strategy based on complete cytoreductive surgery (CRS), potentially combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) and perioperative systemic chemotherapy. The impact of different neoadjuvant systemic chemotherapy (NACT) regimens remains unclear due to a lack of comparative data. METHODS: Consecutive CRPM patients from a monocentric database who were treated with complete CRS after single-line NACT were included in this study. Chemotherapy regimens were tailored as a doublet drug (FOLFOX/FOLFIRI) with/without targeted therapy (anti-epidermal growth factor receptor/bevacizumab) and triplet-drug combination (FOLFIRINOX). Morphological response (MR) was assessed using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors criteria, and pathological response (PR) was assessed using the Peritoneal Regression Grading Score (PRGS). Long-term oncologic outcomes were compared. RESULTS: The cohort comprised 388 patients, including 127, 202, and 59 patients in the doublet, doublet + targeted, and triplet groups, respectively. MR rates were higher in the triplet (68.0%) and doublet + targeted groups (64.2%) when compared with the doublet group (42.4%, p = 0.003). Complete and major PRs were observed in 13.6% and 32.0% of patients, respectively. Higher MR rates were observed after doublet + targeted or triplet regimens, while no difference was observed for PR rates. In multivariate analysis, FOLFIRINOX was independently associated with better overall survival (hazard ratio 0.49, 95% confidence interval 0.25-0.96; p = 0.037). FOLFIRINOX also resulted in a higher rate of severe postoperative complications. CONCLUSIONS: In this retrospective study, a FOLFIRINOX regimen as NACT seemed to result in better long-term outcomes for CRPM patients after complete CRS/HIPEC, although with higher morbidity. Prospective studies are needed, including groups without NACT and those with FOLFIRINOX + bevacizumab.

Scalloping of the Liver and Spleen on Preoperative CT-Scan of Pseudomyxoma Peritonei Patients: Impact on Prediction of Resectability, Grade, Morbidity and Survival.

Pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP) is ideally treated by cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), leading to significant morbidity. Beyond the histologic grade, the prognosis lies in the completeness of cytoreduction (CC-score of 0/1 vs. 2/3) and the severe complication rate. The mucinous nature of the peritoneal implants sometimes induces liver and/or spleen scalloping on imaging. The predictive value of scalloping was assessed regarding resectability, grade, survival and severe morbidity. This monocentric, retrospective analysis compared CC-0/1 with CC-2/3 groups regarding liver and spleen scalloping parameters, assessed on pre-operative computed tomography (CT) scan, reviewed for the study. In addition, prognostic factors of severe complications and recurrence-free and overall survivals were explored in the CC-0/1 population. Overall, 129 patients were included (109 CC-0/1, 20 CC-2/3), with 58 (45%) exhibiting scalloping. All patients with splenic scalloping also had a liver one. Scalloping was more frequent (75% vs. 39%), with greater median maximal depth (21 vs. 11 mm) and higher PCI (32 vs. 14) in the CC-2/3 population, but was not predictive of either grade or survival. In CC-0/1 patients, survivals and postoperative complications were not affected by scalloping parameters. Scalloping appeared as a marker of advanced PMP, but was not predictive of grade, severe complications, or long-term outcomes.

Non-resectable Malignant Peritoneal Mesothelioma Treated with Pressurized Intraperitoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC) Plus Systemic Chemotherapy Could Lead to Secondary Complete Cytoreductive Surgery: A Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Diffuse malignant peritoneal mesothelioma (DMPM) is an aggressive primary peritoneal neoplasia. At diagnosis, few patients are eligible for a recommended cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). Among neoadjuvant strategies, pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) combined with systemic chemotherapy has been recently proposed. This study evaluated this strategy in a cohort of DMPM patients. METHODS: Patients with DMPM and primary or recurrent non-resectable diseases who received at least one PIPAC procedure in alternation with systemic chemotherapy were included in this retrospective study to analyze oncologic outcomes. RESULTS: Overall, 26 DMPM patients were treated with at least one PIPAC, including 20 patients with no previous CRS. Of 22 patients (85%) who had symptoms, 9 had perceptible ascites. Overall, 79 PIPAC procedures were performed, with half of the patients receiving three PIPAC procedures or more. Among eight patients (31%), 10 adverse events (13% of procedures) were reported, including two severe complications, both corresponding to digestive perforations. Improvement of symptoms was reported for 32% of the patients, whereas control of ascites was noted in 46%. All but one procedure among 14 patients (54%) secondarily treated by CRS-HIPEC were considered complete resections. After a median follow-up period of 29.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 17.6-not reached [NR]), the median overall survival period was 12 months (95% CI 11.1-NR). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was significantly better among the patients who underwent resection than among those who did not (33.5 vs 7.4 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.18; 95% CI 0.06-0.755; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: For patients with initially non-resectable DMPM, PIPAC is feasible for treatment with neoadjuvant intent and could facilitate complete secondary resection.

Multicystic peritoneal mesothelioma treated with cytoreductive surgery followed or not by hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy: results from a large multicentric cohort.

BACKGROUND: Multicystic peritoneal mesothelioma (MCPM) is a rare, slowly growing, condition prone to recur after surgery. The role of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) added to complete cytoreductive surgery (CRS) remains controversial and difficult to assess. As patients are mostly reproductive age women, surgical approach, and fertility considerations are important aspects of the management. This observational retrospective review aimed to accurate treatment strategy reflections. METHODS: The RENAPE database (French expert centers network) was analyzed over a 1999-2019 period. MCPM patients treated with CRS were included. A special focus on HIPEC, mini-invasive approach, and fertility considerations was performed. RESULTS: Overall 60 patients (50 women) were included with a median PCI of 10 (4-14) allowing 97% of complete surgery, followed by HIPEC in 82% of patients. A quarter of patients had a laparoscopic approach. Twelve patients (20%) recurred with a 3-year recurrence free survival of 84.2% (95% confidence interval 74.7-95.0). The hazard of recurrence was numerically reduced among patients receiving HIPEC, however, not statistically significant (hazard ratio 0.41, 0.12-1.42, p = 0.200). A severe post-operative adverse event occurred in 22% of patients with five patients submitted to a subsequent reoperation. Among four patients with a childbearing desire, three were successful (two had a laparoscopic-CRS-HIPEC and one a conventional CRS without HIPEC). CONCLUSION: MCPM patients treatment should aim at a complete CRS. The intraoperative treatment options as laparoscopic approach, fertility function sparing and HIPEC should be discussed in expert centers to propose the most appropriate strategy.

Risk of Omental Metastases in Patients Undergoing Cytoreductive Surgery for Colorectal Peritoneal Metastases.

BACKGROUND: Complete cytoreductive surgery of macroscopic tumor is a potentially curative treatment for patients with colorectal peritoneal metastases. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to determine the risk of microscopic tumor involvement of the greater omentum in patients with normal-looking omentum at the time of cytoreductive surgery for colorectal peritoneal metastases. DESIGN: This was a cohort study. SETTINGS: The prospective BIG-RENAPE database (NCT02823860) was analyzed. PATIENTS: All patients who underwent a complete cytoreductive surgery with greater omentectomy for colorectal peritoneal metastases at a single institution between January 2005 and December 2017 were included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Data regarding involvement of the greater omentum were extracted from surgical and pathological records. RESULTS: Of 337 patients who underwent cytoreductive surgery for colorectal peritoneal metastases, 241 (71.51%) presented macroscopic omental invasion. Among the 96 patients who underwent a complete cytoreductive surgery with no macroscopic evidence of disease in the greater omentum during surgical exploration, 17 patients (17.70%) had microscopic evidence of tumor in the omentum. Patients with pathological evidence of omental tumor involvement were more likely to have a higher peritoneal cancer index (median 9 vs 4, p = 0.006). LIMITATIONS: No survival analysis could be provided regarding the impact of omentectomy. CONCLUSION: In patients with a normal-looking omentum during surgery for colorectal peritoneal metastases, microscopic tumor was present in 17%. Routine greater omentectomy should be considered in these patients to ensure complete cytoreduction. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B262.ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02823860 RIESGO DE METÁSTASIS OMENTALES EN PACIENTES SOMETIDOS A CIRUGÍA CITORREDUCTORA, POR METÁSTASIS PERITONEALES COLORRECTALES: La cirugía citorreductora completa del tumor macroscópico, es un tratamiento potencialmente curativo, en pacientes con metástasis peritoneales colorrectales.Determinar el riesgo de afectación tumoral microscópica del epiplón mayor, en pacientes con epiplón de aspecto normal, al momento de la cirugía citorreductora por metástasis peritoneales colorrectales.Este fue un estudio de cohorte.Se analizó la base de datos prospectiva BIG-RENAPE (NCT02823860).Se incluyeron a todos los pacientes sometidos a una cirugía citorreductora completa con omentectomía mayor, por metástasis peritoneales colorrectales, de una sola institución, entre enero de 2005 y diciembre de 2017.Se extrajeron los datos de la afectación del epiplón mayor, de los registros quirúrgicos y patológicos.De 337 pacientes sometidos a cirugía citorreductora por metástasis peritoneales colorrectales, 241 (71.51%) presentaron invasión omental macroscópica. Entre los 96 pacientes sometidos a cirugía citorreductora completa, sin evidencia macroscópica de enfermedad en el epiplón mayor, durante la exploración quirúrgica, 17 pacientes (17,70%) tuvieron en el epiplón, evidencia microscópica de tumor. Los pacientes con evidencia patológica de afectación del tumor omental, fueron más propensos a tener un índice de cáncer peritoneal más alto (mediana 9 frente a 4, p = 0,006).No se pudo obtener ningún análisis de supervivencia, sobre el impacto de la omentectomía.En pacientes con epiplón de aspecto normal, durante la cirugía por metástasis peritoneales colorrectales, estuvo presente el tumor microscópico, en el 17% de los casos. Se debe considerar una omentectomía mayor de rutina en estos pacientes, para asegurar una citorreducción completa. Consulte Video Resumen http://links.lww.com/DCR/B262.Identificador de ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02823860.

The Pathologic Peritoneal Cancer Index (PCI) Strongly Differs From the Surgical PCI in Peritoneal Metastases Arising From Various Primary Tumors.

BACKGROUND: The surgical peritoneal cancer index (sPCI) is calculated based on a subjective evaluation of the extent of peritoneal disease during surgery. The pathologic PCI (pPCI) may be a more accurate and objective method for determining the PCI. This study aimed to compare the sPCI and pPCI and to study the potential pitfalls and clinical implications of using the pPCI. METHODS: This prospective study (July to December 2018) included all patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery (CRS). The pPCI was calculated for each patient and compared with the sPCI. The impact of potential confounding factors on the difference between pPCI and sPCI was evaluated. RESULTS: Among 191 patients undergoing CRS at four centers, the pPCI and sPCI were concordant for 37 patients (19.3%). The pPCI was lower than the sPCI for 125 patients (65.4%) and higher for 29 patients (15.1%). The concordance between the two groups was maximum for gastric cancer (38.8%) and colorectal cancer (27.6%) and least for mesothelioma (6.7%) and rare primary tumors (5.6%) (p = 0.04). The difference was 0 to 3 points for 119 patients (62.3%), 4 to 5 points for 27 patients (14.1%), and more than 5 points for 45 patients (23.5%). The rate of concordance was not influenced by the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) (p = 0.4), but the difference was greater when NACT was used (p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: The pPCI strongly differs from the sPCI for patients undergoing CRS for peritoneal disease and may provide a more accurate evaluation of the peritoneal disease extent. Further studies are needed to determine its prognostic value compared with sPCI, and consensus guidelines are needed for calculating it.

No Renal Toxicity After Repeated Treatment with Pressurized Intraperitoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC) in Patients with Unresectable Peritoneal Metastasis.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) is a recent approach for intraperitoneal chemotherapy with promising results for patients with peritoneal metastasis (PM). The aim of this study was to report renal toxicity for patients who received at least 3 repeated PIPAC procedures. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All patients who underwent at least 3 PIPAC cycles of cisplatin (7.5 mg/m2) and doxorubicin (1.5 mg/m2) for unresectable PM from December 2015 to September 2017, were analysed regarding postoperative renal toxicity. RESULTS: Among 103 patients registered in a prospective single center database, 43 patients underwent at least 3 PIPAC cycles representing a total of 175 PIPAC. Median age was 59.8 years, 24 (55.8%) patients were female and median BMI was 22.2 kg/m2 Most common origins of PM were gastric 22 (51.1%) and ovarian 11 (25.6%) cancer. Median peritoneal cancer index (PCI) was 17 (range=5-39). For 39 (90.1%) patients, systemic chemotherapy was performed in addition to PIPAC. Forty-three (100%), 17 (39.5%), 14 (32.5%), 8 (18.6%), 3 (7%), 2 (4.7%) and 2 (4.7%) patients underwent three, four, five, six, seven, eight and nine PIPAC procedures, respectively. Repeated PIPAC did not induce significant acute nor cumulative renal toxicity in any patients. CONCLUSION: Repeated PIPAC did not induce clinically relevant renal toxicity. This study confirms the previous published results in a larger group of patients.

Digital Glissonectomy: A Safe Perihepatic Peritonectomy.

BACKGROUND: Complete cytoreductive surgery (CRS), combining organ resection and peritonectomy, is the only treatment that could offer cure for patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis. Initially, when the Glisson's capsule was involved without deep liver parenchyma invasion, either electroevaporation or Glisson's capsule resection was proposed. The objective of this study is to present and evaluate the safety of this standardized digital glissonectomy. METHODS: Since 2009, the peritonectomy of the Glisson's capsule, or digital glissonectomy, has been standardized at our institution. RESULTS: Among 655 patients who underwent a complete CRS between 2009 and 2014, 91 (14 %) glissonectomies were performed. Pseudomyxoma peritonei was the primary indication, and a glissonectomy was more frequently performed for patients with high peritoneal cancer index. The morbidity and mortality of CRS were not increased after glissonectomy (p = 0.069 and 0.949, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Digital glissonectomy is feasible and safe, when proposed for superficial deposits on Glisson's capsule.