Optimal echo times for quantitative susceptibility mapping: A test-retest study on basal ganglia and subcortical brain nuclei.

Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping (QSM) is a recent MRI-technique able to quantify the bulk magnetic susceptibility of myelin, iron, and calcium in the brain. Its variability across different acquisition parameters has prompted the need for standardisation across multiple centres and MRI vendors. However, a high level of agreement between repeated imaging acquisitions is equally important. With this study we aimed to assess the inter-scan repeatability of an optimised multi-echo GRE sequence in 28 healthy volunteers. We extracted and compared the susceptibility measures from the scan and rescan acquisitions across 7 bilateral brain regions (i.e., 14 regions of interest (ROIs)) relevant for neurodegeneration. Repeatability was first assessed while reconstructing QSM with a fixed number of echo times (i.e., 8). Excellent inter-scan repeatability was found for putamen, globus pallidus and caudate nucleus, while good performance characterised the remaining structures. An increased variability was instead noted for small ROIs like red nucleus and substantia nigra. Secondly, we assessed the impact exerted on repeatability by the number of echoes used to derive QSM maps. Results were impacted by this parameter, especially in smaller regions. Larger brain structures, on the other hand, showed more consistent performance. Nevertheless, with either 8 or 7 echoes we managed to obtain good inter-scan repeatability on almost all ROIs. These findings indicate that the designed acquisition/reconstruction protocol has wide applicability, particularly in clinical or research settings involving longitudinal acquisitions (e.g. rehabilitation studies).

Explainable AI Points to White Matter Hyperintensities for Alzheimer's Disease Identification: a Preliminary Study.

Deep Learning approaches are powerful tools in a great variety of classification tasks. However, they are limitedly accepted or trusted in clinical frameworks due to their typical "black box" outline: their architecture is well-known, but processes employed in classification are often inaccessible to humans. With this work, we explored the problem of "Explainable AI" (XAI) in Alzheimer's disease (AD) classification tasks. Data from a neuroimaging cohort (n = 251 from OASIS-3) of early-stage AD dementia and healthy controls (HC) were analysed. The MR scans were initially fed to a pre-trained DL model, which achieved good performance on the test set (AUC: 0.82, TPR: 0.78, TNR: 0.81). Results were then investigated by means of an XAI approach (Occlusion Sensitivity method) that provided measures of relevance (RV) as outcome. We compared RV values obtained within healthy tissues with those underlying white matter hyperintensity (WMH) lesions. The analysis was conducted on 4 different groups of data, obtained by stratifying correct and misclassified images according to the health condition of participants (AD/HC). Results highlighted that the DL model found favourable leveraging lesioned brain areas for AD identification. A statistically significant difference ( ) between WMH and healthy tissue contributions was indeed observed for AD recognition, differently from the HC case ( p=0.27). Clinical Relevance - This study, though preliminary, suggested that DL models might be trained to use known clinical information and reinforced the role of WMHs as neuroimaging biomarker for AD dementia. The outlined findings have a significant clinical relevance as they prepare the ground for a progressive increase in the level of trust laid in DL approaches.

Integrating large-scale neuroimaging research datasets: Harmonisation of white matter hyperintensity measurements across Whitehall and UK Biobank datasets.

Large scale neuroimaging datasets present the possibility of providing normative distributions for a wide variety of neuroimaging markers, which would vastly improve the clinical utility of these measures. However, a major challenge is our current poor ability to integrate measures across different large-scale datasets, due to inconsistencies in imaging and non-imaging measures across the different protocols and populations. Here we explore the harmonisation of white matter hyperintensity (WMH) measures across two major studies of healthy elderly populations, the Whitehall II imaging sub-study and the UK Biobank. We identify pre-processing strategies that maximise the consistency across datasets and utilise multivariate regression to characterise study sample differences contributing to differences in WMH variations across studies. We also present a parser to harmonise WMH-relevant non-imaging variables across the two datasets. We show that we can provide highly calibrated WMH measures from these datasets with: (1) the inclusion of a number of specific standardised processing steps; and (2) appropriate modelling of sample differences through the alignment of demographic, cognitive and physiological variables. These results open up a wide range of applications for the study of WMHs and other neuroimaging markers across extensive databases of clinical data.

White matter hyperintensities classified according to intensity and spatial location reveal specific associations with cognitive performance.

White matter hyperintensities (WMHs) on T2-weighted images are radiological signs of cerebral small vessel disease. As their total volume is variably associated with cognition, a new approach that integrates multiple radiological criteria is warranted. Location may matter, as periventricular WMHs have been shown to be associated with cognitive impairments. WMHs that appear as hypointense in T1-weighted images (T1w) may also indicate the most severe component of WMHs. We developed an automatic method that sub-classifies WMHs into four categories (periventricular/deep and T1w-hypointense/nonT1w-hypointense) using MRI data from 684 community-dwelling older adults from the Whitehall II study. To test if location and intensity information can impact cognition, we derived two general linear models using either overall or subdivided volumes. Results showed that periventricular T1w-hypointense WMHs were significantly associated with poorer performance in the trail making A (p = 0.011), digit symbol (p = 0.028) and digit coding (p = 0.009) tests. We found no association between total WMH volume and cognition. These findings suggest that sub-classifying WMHs according to both location and intensity in T1w reveals specific associations with cognitive performance.