Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 13 de 13
Filtrar
1.
BMC Anesthesiol ; 24(1): 146, 2024 Apr 17.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38627682

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The decision to maintain or halt antiplatelet medication in septic patients admitted to intensive care units presents a clinical dilemma. This is due to the necessity to balance the benefits of preventing thromboembolic incidents and leveraging anti-inflammatory properties against the increased risk of bleeding. METHODS: This study involves a secondary analysis of data from a prospective cohort study focusing on patients diagnosed with severe sepsis or septic shock. We evaluated the outcomes of 203 patients, examining mortality rates and the requirement for transfusion. The cohort was divided into two groups: those whose antiplatelet therapy was sustained (n = 114) and those in whom it was discontinued (n = 89). To account for potential biases such as indication for antiplatelet therapy, propensity score matching was employed. RESULTS: Therapy continuation did not significantly alter transfusion requirements (discontinued vs. continued in matched samples: red blood cell concentrates 51.7% vs. 68.3%, p = 0.09; platelet concentrates 21.7% vs. 18.3%, p = 0.82; fresh frozen plasma concentrates 38.3% vs. 33.3%, p = 0.7). 90-day survival was higher within the continued group (30.0% vs. 70.0%; p < 0.001) and the Log-rank test (7-day survivors; p = 0.001) as well as Cox regression (both matched samples) suggested an association between continuation of antiplatelet therapy < 7 days and survival (HR: 0.24, 95%-CI 0.10 to 0.63, p = 0.004). Sepsis severity expressed by the SOFA score did not differ significantly in matched and unmatched patients (both p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that continuing antiplatelet therapy in septic patients admitted to intensive care units could be associated with a significant survival benefit without substantially increasing the need for transfusion. These results highlight the importance of a nuanced approach to managing antiplatelet medication in the context of severe sepsis and septic shock.


Asunto(s)
Sepsis , Choque Séptico , Humanos , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/uso terapéutico , Estudios de Cohortes , Estudios Prospectivos , Enfermedad Crítica/terapia , Sepsis/tratamiento farmacológico , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos
2.
Minerva Anestesiol ; 90(5): 359-368, 2024 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38656085

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: This study investigates the predictive value and suitable cutoff values of the Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment Score (SOFA) and Simplified Acute Physiology Score II (SAPS-II) to predict mortality during or after Intensive Care Unit Cardiac Arrest (ICU-CA). METHODS: In this secondary analysis the ICU database of a German university hospital with five ICU was screened for all ICU-CA between 2016-2019. SOFA and SAPS-II were used for prediction of mortality during ICU-CA, hospital-stay and one-year-mortality. Receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC), area under the ROC (AUROC) and its confidence intervals were calculated. If the AUROC was significant and considered "acceptable," cutoff values were determined for SOFA and SAPS-II by Youden Index. Odds ratios and sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values were calculated for the cutoff values. RESULTS: A total of 114 (78 male; mean age: 72.8±12.5 years) ICU-CA were observed out of 14,264 ICU-admissions (incidence: 0.8%; 95% CI: 0.7-1.0%). 29.8% (N.=34; 95% CI: 21.6-39.1%) died during ICU-CA. SOFA and SAPS-II were not predictive for mortality during ICU-CA (P>0.05). Hospital-mortality was 78.1% (N.=89; 95% CI: 69.3-85.3%). SAPS-II (recorded within 24 hours before and after ICU-CA) indicated a better discrimination between survival and death during hospital stay than SOFA (AUROC: 0.81 [95% CI: 0.70-0.92] vs. 0.70 [95% CI: 0.58-0.83]). A SAPS-II-cutoff-value of 43.5 seems to be suitable for prognosis of hospital mortality after ICU-CA (specificity: 87.5%, sensitivity: 65.6%; SAPS-II>43.5: 87.5% died in hospital; SAPS-II<43.5: 65.6% survived; odds ratio:13.4 [95% CI: 3.25-54.9]). Also for 1-year-mortality (89.5%; 95% CI: 82.3-94.4) SAPS-II showed a better discrimination between survival and death than SOFA: AUROC: 0.78 (95% CI: 0.65-0.91) vs. 0.69 (95% CI: 0.52-0.87) with a cutoff value of the SAPS-II of 40.5 (specificity: 91.7%, sensitivity: 64.3%; SAPS-II>40.5: 96.4% died; SAPS-II<40.5: 42.3% survived; odd ratio: 19.8 [95% CI: 2.3-168.7]). CONCLUSIONS: Compared to SOFA, SAPS-II seems to be more suitable for prediction of hospital and 1-year-mortality after ICU-CA.


Asunto(s)
Paro Cardíaco , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Puntuaciones en la Disfunción de Órganos , Sepsis , Puntuación Fisiológica Simplificada Aguda , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Anciano , Paro Cardíaco/mortalidad , Persona de Mediana Edad , Sepsis/mortalidad , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Mortalidad Hospitalaria
3.
Anaesthesiologie ; 72(6): 408-415, 2023 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36562798

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The present study evaluated the implementation of the European Resuscitation Council Corona-Virus-Disease 2019 (COVID-19) resuscitation guidelines in Germany 1 year after publication. AIM OF THE WORK: To evaluate the practical implementation of the COVID-19 resuscitation guidelines in Germany one year after their publication. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In an online survey between April and May 2021 participants were asked about awareness of COVID-19 resuscitation guidelines, corresponding training, the resuscitation algorithm used and COVID-19 infections of emergency medicine personnel associated with COVID-19 resuscitation. RESULTS: A total of 961 (8%) of the 11,000 members took part in the survey and 85% (818/961) of questionnaires were fully completed. While 577 (70%) of the respondents were aware of the COVID-19 guidelines, only 103 (13%) had received respective training. A specific COVID-19 resuscitation algorithm was used by 265 respondents (32%). Adaptations included personal protective equipment (99%), reduction of staff caring for the patient, or routine use of video laryngoscopy for endotracheal intubation (each 37%), securing the airway before rhythm analysis (32%), and pausing chest compressions during endotracheal intubation (30%). Respondents without a specific COVID-19 resuscitation algorithm were more likely to use mouth-nose protection (47% vs. 31%; p < 0.001), extraglottic airway devices (66% vs. 55%; p = 0.004) and have more than 4 team members close to the patient (45% vs. 38%; p = 0.04). Use of an Filtering-Face-Piece(FFP)-2 or FFP3 mask (89% vs. 77%; p < 0.001; 58% vs. 70%; p ≤ 0.001) or performing primary endotracheal intubation (17% vs. 31%; p < 0.001) were found less frequently and 9% reported that a team member was infected with COVID-19 during resuscitation. CONCLUSION: The COVID-19 resuscitation guidelines are still insufficiently implemented 1 year after publication. Future publication strategies must ensure that respective guideline adaptations are implemented in a timely manner.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiología , Resucitación , Alemania/epidemiología , Intubación Intratraqueal , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
4.
Eur J Anaesthesiol ; 39(5): 452-462, 2022 05 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35200202

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Cardiac arrest in intensive care is a rarely studied type of in-hospital cardiac arrest. OBJECTIVE: This study examines the incidence, characteristics, risk factors for mortality as well as long-term prognosis following cardiac arrest in intensive care. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Five noncardiac surgical ICUs (41 surgical and 37 medical beds) at a German university hospital between 2016 and 2019. PATIENTS: Adults experiencing cardiac arrest defined as the need for chest compressions and/or defibrillation occurring for the first time on the ICU. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary endpoint: occurrence of cardiac-arrest in the ICU. Secondary endpoints: diagnostic and therapeutic measures; risk factors and marginal probabilities of no-return of spontaneous circulation; rates of return of spontaneous circulation, hospital discharge, 1-year-survival and 1-year-neurological outcome. RESULTS: A total of 114 cardiac arrests were observed out of 14 264 ICU admissions; incidence 0.8%; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.7 to 1.0; 45.6% received at least one additional diagnostic test, such as blood gas analysis (36%), echocardiography (19.3%) or chest x-ray (9.9%) with a resulting change in therapy in 52%, (more frequently in those with a return of spontaneous circulation vs none, P  = 0.023). Risk factors for no-return of spontaneous circulation were cardiac comorbidities (OR 5.4; 95% CI, 1.4 to 20.7) and continuous renal replacement therapy (OR 5.9; 95% CI, 1.7 to 20.8). Bicarbonate levels greater than 21 mmol 1 were associated with a higher mortality risk in combination either with cardiac comorbid-ities (bicarbonate <21 mmol I-1: 13%; 21 to 26 mmolI-1 45%; >26mmolI-1:42%)orwithaSOFA at least 2 (bicarbonate <21 mmolI-1 8%; 21 to 26 mmolI-1: 40%; >26mmolI-1: 37%). "In-hospital mortality was 78.1% (n = 89); 1-year-survival-rate was 10.5% (95% CI, 5.5 to 17.7) and survival with a good neurological outcome was 6.1% (95% CI, 2.5 to 12.2). CONCLUSION: Cardiac arrest in ICU is a rare complication with a high mortality and low rate of good neurological outcome. The development of a structured approach to resuscitation should include all available resources of an ICU and adequately consider the complete diagnostic and therapeutic spectra as our results indicate that these are still underused. The development of prediction models of death should take into account cardiac and hepatic comorbidities, continuous renal replacement therapy, SOFA at least 2 before cardiac arrest and bicarbonate level. Further research should concentrate on identifying early predictors and on the prevention of cardiac arrest in ICU.


Asunto(s)
Reanimación Cardiopulmonar , Paro Cardíaco , Adulto , Bicarbonatos , Reanimación Cardiopulmonar/métodos , Paro Cardíaco/diagnóstico , Paro Cardíaco/epidemiología , Paro Cardíaco/terapia , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Hospitales , Humanos , Incidencia , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Estudios Retrospectivos
5.
Minerva Anestesiol ; 87(12): 1320-1329, 2021 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34263582

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to evaluate the effects of European Resuscitation Council (ERC) COVID-19-guidelines on resuscitation quality emphasizing advanced airway management in out-of-hospital-cardiac-arrest. METHODS: In a manikin study paramedics and emergency physicians performed advanced cardiac life support in three settings: ERC guidelines 2015 (control), COVID-19-guidelines as suggested with minimum staff (COVID-19-minimal-personnel); COVID-19-guidelines with paramedics and an emergency physician (COVID-19-advanced-airway-manager). Main outcome measures were no-flow-time, quality metrics as defined by ERC and time intervals to first chest compression, oxygen supply, intubation and first rhythm analysis. Data were presented as mean±standard deviation. RESULTS: Thirty resuscitation scenarios were completed. No-flow-time was markedly prolonged in COVID-19-minimal-personnel (113±37 s) compared to control (55±9 s) and COVID-19-advanced-airway-manager (76±38s; P<0.001 each). In both COVID-19-groups chest compressions started later (COVID-19-minimal-personnel: 32±6 s; COVID-19-advanced-airway-manager: 37±7 s; each P<0.001 vs. control [21±5 s]), but oxygen supply (COVID-19-minimal-personnel: 29±5 s; COVID-19-advanced-airway-manager: 34±7 s; each P<0.001 vs. control [77±19 s]) and first intubation attempt (COVID-19-minimal-personnel: 111±14 s; COVID-19-advanced-airway-manager: 131±20 s; each P<0.001 vs. control [178±44 s]) were performed earlier. However, time interval to successful intubation was similar (control: 198±48 s; COVID-19-minimal-personnel: 181±42 s; COVID-19-advanced-airway-manager: 130±25 s) due to a longer intubation time in COVID-19-minimal-personnel (61±35 s) compared to COVID-19-advanced-airway-manager (P=0.002) and control (19±6 s; P<0.001). Time to first rhythm analysis was more than doubled in COVID-19-minimal-personnel (138±96 s) compared to control (50±12 s; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Delayed chest compressions and prolonged no-flow-time markedly reduced the quality of resuscitation. These negative effects were attenuated by increasing the number of staff and by adding an experienced airway manager. The use of endotracheal intubation for reducing aerosol release during resuscitation should be discussed critically as its priorization is associated with an increase in no-flow-time.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Reanimación Cardiopulmonar , Paro Cardíaco Extrahospitalario , Hospitales , Humanos , Intubación Intratraqueal , Maniquíes , SARS-CoV-2
6.
J Clin Anesth ; 73: 110366, 2021 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34087660

RESUMEN

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine 30-day-mortality, incidence and characteristics of perioperative cardiac arrest as well as the respective independent risk factors in preterm infants undergoing non-cardiac surgery. DESIGN: Retrospective observational Follow-up-study. SETTING: Bielefeld University Hospital, a German tertiary care hospital. PATIENTS: Population of 229 preterm infants (age < 37th gestational week at the time of surgery) who underwent non-cardiac surgery between 01/2008-12/2018. MEASUREMENTS: Primary endpoint was overall 30-day-mortality. Secondary endpoints were the incidence of perioperative cardiac arrest and identification of independent risk factors. We performed univariate and multivariate analyses and calculated odds ratios (OR) for risk factors associated with these endpoints. MAIN RESULTS: 30-day-mortality was 10.9% and perioperative mortality 0.9%. Univariate risk factors for 30-day-mortality were perioperative cardiac arrest (OR,12.5;95%CI,3.1 to 50.3), comorbidities of lungs (OR,3.7;95%CI,1.2 to 11.3) and gastrointestinal tract (OR,3.5;95%CI,1.3 to 9.6); sepsis (OR,3.6;95%CI,1.4 to 9.5); surgery between 22:01-7:00 (OR,7.3;95%CI,2.4 to 21.7); emergency (OR,4.5;95%CI,1.6 to 12.4); pre-existing catecholamine therapy (OR,5.0;95%CI,2.1 to 11.9). Multivariate logistic regression indicated that perioperative cardiac arrest (OR,13.9;95%CI,2.7 to 71.3), low body weight (weight < 1000 g: OR,26.0;95%CI,3.2 to 212; 1000-1499 g: OR,10.3; 95%CI,1.1 to 94.9 compared to weight > 2000 g), and time of surgery (OR,5.9;95%CI,1.6 to 21.3) for 22:01-7:00 compared to 7:01-15:00) were the major independent risk factors of mortality. Incidence of perioperative cardiac arrests was 3.9% (9 of 229;95%CI,1.8 to 7.3). Univariate risk factors were congenital anomalies of the airways (OR,4.7;95%CI,1.2 to 20.3), lungs (OR,4.7;95%CI,1.2 to 20.3) and heart (OR,8.0;95%CI,2 to 32.2), pre-existing catecholamine therapy (OR,59.5;95%CI,3.4 to 1039), specifically, continuous infusions of epinephrine (OR,432;95%CI,43.2 to 4318). CONCLUSIONS: 30-day-mortality and the incidence of perioperative cardiac arrest of preterms undergoing non-cardiac surgery were higher than previously reported. The identified independent risk factors may improve interdisciplinary perioperative risk assessment, optimal preoperative stabilization and scheduling of optimal surgical timing.


Asunto(s)
Paro Cardíaco , Recien Nacido Prematuro , Paro Cardíaco/epidemiología , Paro Cardíaco/etiología , Humanos , Incidencia , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo
8.
Eur J Med Res ; 26(1): 19, 2021 Feb 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33557953

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Diaphragmatic lesions as a result of blunt or penetrating trauma are challenging to detect in the initial trauma setting. This is especially true when diaphragmatic trauma is part of a polytrauma. Complications of undetected diaphragmatic defects with incarcerating bowel are rare, but as in our patient can be serious. CASE PRESENTATION: A 57-year-old female presented to the Emergency Room of our Hospital in a critical condition with 3 days of increasing abdominal pain. The initial clinical examination showed peritonism with tinkling peristaltic bowel sounds of mechanical obstruction. A thoraco-abdominal CT scan demonstrated colon prolapsed through the left diaphragmatic center with a large sero-pneumothorax under tension. As the patient was hemodynamically increasingly unstable with developing septic shock, an emergency laparotomy was performed. After retraction of the left colon, which had herniated through a defect of the tendinous center of the left diaphragm and was perforated due to transmural ischemia, large amounts of feces and gas discharged from the left thorax. A left hemicolectomy resulting in a Hartmann-type procedure was performed. A fully established pleural empyema required meticulous debridement and lavage conducted via the 7-10 cm in diameter phrenic opening followed by a diaphragmatic defect reconstruction. Due to pneumonia and recurring pleural empyema redo-debridement of the left pleural space via thoracotomy were required. The patient was discharged on day 56. A thorough history of possible trauma revealed a bicycle-fall trauma 7 months prior to this hospitalization with a surgically stabilized fracture of the left femur and conservatively treated fractures of ribs 3-9 on the left side. CONCLUSION: This is the first report on a primarily established empyema at the time of first surgical intervention for feco-pneumothorax secondary to delayed diagnosed diaphragmatic rupture following abdomino-thoracic blunt trauma with colic perforation into the pleural space, requiring repetitive surgical debridement in order to control local and systemic sepsis. Thorough investigation should always be undertaken in cases of blunt abdominal and thoracic trauma to exclude diaphragmatic injury in order to avoid post-traumatic complications.


Asunto(s)
Colon/patología , Diafragma/lesiones , Traumatismo Múltiple/complicaciones , Neumotórax/etiología , Ciclismo , Colon/cirugía , Diafragma/cirugía , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neumotórax/cirugía , Prolapso , Rotura/etiología , Rotura/cirugía , Traumatismos Torácicos/etiología
9.
Crit Care ; 25(1): 17, 2021 01 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33407793

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Supplementation of vitamin C in septic patients remains controversial despite eight large clinical trials published only in 2020. We aimed to evaluate the evidence on potential effects of vitamin C treatment on mortality in adult septic patients. METHODS: Data search included PubMed, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library. A meta-analysis of eligible peer-reviewed studies was performed in accordance with the PRISMA statement. Only studies with valid classifications of sepsis and intravenous vitamin C treatment (alone or combined with hydrocortisone/thiamine) were included. RESULTS: A total of 17 studies including 3133 patients fulfilled the predefined criteria and were analyzed. Pooled analysis indicated no mortality reduction in patients treated with vitamin C when compared to reference (risk difference - 0.05 [95% CI - 0.11 to - 0.01]; p = 0.08; p for Cochran Q = 0.002; I2 = 56%). Notably, subgroup analyses revealed an improved survival, if vitamin C treatment was applied for 3-4 days (risk difference, - 0.10 [95% CI - 0.19 to - 0.02]; p = 0.02) when compared to patients treated for 1-2 or > 5 days. Also, timing of the pooled mortality assessment indicated a reduction concerning short-term mortality (< 30 days; risk difference, - 0.08 [95% CI - 0.15 to - 0.01]; p = 0.02; p for Cochran Q = 0.02; I2 = 63%). Presence of statistical heterogeneity was noted with no sign of significant publication bias. CONCLUSION: Although vitamin C administration did not reduce pooled mortality, patients may profit if vitamin C is administered over 3 to 4 days. Consequently, further research is needed to identify patient subgroups that might benefit from intravenous supplementation of vitamin C.


Asunto(s)
Ácido Ascórbico/uso terapéutico , Mortalidad/tendencias , Choque Séptico/tratamiento farmacológico , Administración Intravenosa/métodos , Antioxidantes/farmacología , Antioxidantes/normas , Antioxidantes/uso terapéutico , Ácido Ascórbico/farmacología , Ácido Ascórbico/normas , Humanos , Choque Séptico/mortalidad
10.
Anesth Analg ; 133(3): 747-754, 2021 09 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33264117

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Recently, a very low incidence of 3 per 10,000 and a mortality of 30% were reported for pediatric perioperative cardiac arrest (POCA). However, high-risk patients, namely children already anesthetized on the intensive care unit (ICU), were excluded. This study investigates the incidence and mortality of POCA in children in whom anesthesia was induced in the ICU or in the operating room using real-world data. In addition, different classifications of POCA were compared with respect to outcome relevance. METHODS: This is a retrospective observational study conducted at a German level 1 perinatal center and tertiary care hospital between 2008 and 2018. Children ≤15 years who underwent an anesthetic procedure and suffered from POCA (defined as any condition requiring chest compressions and/or defibrillation) from the beginning of care provided by an anesthesiologist to 60 minutes after anesthesia or sedation were included. Primary end points were incidence and mortality of POCA in children with anesthesia induced in the ICU versus in the operating room. Secondary end points included incidences and outcomes with respect to the pathophysiological cause (respiratory versus circulatory associated). RESULTS: There were 18 POCA during 22,650 anesthetic procedures (incidence 7.9 per 10,000; 95% confidence interval [CI], 4.7-12.5). Thirty-day mortality was 3.5 per 10,000 (95% CI, 1.5-6.9). Incidence and mortality were higher in children in whom anesthesia was induced in the ICU versus in the operating room (incidence: 131.6; 95% CI, 57 to 257.6 versus 4.5; 95% CI, 2.2-8.3; P < .001; and mortality: 82.2; 95% CI, 26.7-190.8 versus 1.4; 95% CI, 0.3-3.9; P < .001). Mortality in circulatory-induced POCA (n = 8; 44%) was 100%, in respiratory-induced POCA (n = 9; 50%) 0% (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Children with anesthesia induction in the ICU represent a high-risk population for POCA and POCA-associated mortality. POCA classification should be based on the individual cause (respiratory versus circulatory) rather than on the perioperative phase or the responsible specialty.


Asunto(s)
Anestesia/efectos adversos , Paro Cardíaco/epidemiología , Factores de Edad , Anestesia/mortalidad , Preescolar , Cardioversión Eléctrica , Femenino , Alemania/epidemiología , Paro Cardíaco/diagnóstico , Paro Cardíaco/mortalidad , Paro Cardíaco/terapia , Masaje Cardíaco , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Incidencia , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Unidades de Cuidado Intensivo Pediátrico , Masculino , Quirófanos , Periodo Perioperatorio , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
11.
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med ; 28(1): 90, 2020 Sep 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32912262

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Paediatric resuscitation is rare but potentially associated with maximal lifetime reduction. Notably, several nations experience high infant mortality rates even today. To improve clinical outcomes and promote research, detailed analyses on evolution and current state of research on paediatric resuscitation are necessary. METHODS: Research on paediatric resuscitation published in-between 1900 and 2019 were searched using Web of Science. Metadata were extracted and analyzed based on the science performance evaluation (SciPE) protocol. Research performance was evaluated regarding quality and quantity over time, including comparisons to adult resuscitation. National research performance was related to population, financial capacities, infant mortality rate, collaborations, and authors' gender. RESULTS: Similar to adult resuscitation, research performance on paediatric resuscitation grew exponentially with most original articles being published during the last decade (1106/1896). The absolute number, however, is only 14% compared to adults. The United States dominate global research by contributing the highest number of articles (777), Hirsch-Index (70), and citations (18,863). The most productive collaboration was between the United States and Canada (52). When considering nation's population and gross domestic product (GDP) rate, Norway is leading regarding population per article (62,467), per Hirsch-Index (223,841), per citation (2226), and per GDP (2.3E-04). Regarding publications per infant mortality rate, efforts of India and Brazil are remarkable. Out of the 100 most frequently publishing researchers, 25% were female. CONCLUSION: Research efforts on paediatric resuscitation have increased but remain underrepresented. Specifically, nations with high infant mortality rates should be integrated by collaborations. Additional efforts are required to overcome gender disparities.


Asunto(s)
Investigación Biomédica/estadística & datos numéricos , Pediatría , Resucitación , Bibliometría , Humanos , Edición/estadística & datos numéricos
12.
Eur J Anaesthesiol ; 37(4): 286-293, 2020 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31977629

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Treatment of reversible causes of cardiac arrest often requires intrahospital transportation during ongoing resuscitation. But high-quality chest compression with minimal interruption is the most essential prerequisite for an optimal outcome after cardiac resuscitation. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate chest compression quality according to the provider position during intrahospital transportation. DESIGN: Manikin observational study. SETTING: German Tertiary Care Hospital. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 20 paramedics (eight female, 12 male); average professional experience 4.8 ±â€Š3.1 years since their initial enrolment for training. INTERVENTION(S): Participants performed chest compressions during simulated intrahospital transportation in four groups: provider kneeling beside manikin on the floor (control group), walking next to the bed (group 1), kneeling on the bed beside the manikin (group 2), kneeling astride the manikin on the bed (group 3). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Quality metrics as European Resuscitation Council Guidelines 2015. Subsequently, the participants were asked to assess their own subjective feelings of safety, comfort and strain, and to recommend one position. RESULTS: The quality of chest compression in the control group and groups 2 and 3 did not differ significantly. Group 1 performed significantly worse in terms of the correct hand placement on the chest (P = 0.044 vs. control group) and compression depth (P = 0.004 vs. control group, P = 0.035 vs. group 2, P = 0.006 vs. group 3). Transport speed was faster in groups 2 and 3 vs. group 1 (P < 0.05 vs. group 1, P < 0.05 vs. group 2). The majority of participants rated position 1 as unsafe (90%), unpleasant (100%) and exhausting (100%). They predominantly favoured position 3 (70%). CONCLUSION: Performing guideline-compliant chest compressions during intra-hospital transportation is feasible with an appropriate provider position. Our results suggest, kneeling beside or astride the patient on the bed enables high-quality chest compressions, faster transport and is perceived by the providers as more pleasant. 'Walking next to the bed' while performing chest compressions should be avoided.


Asunto(s)
Reanimación Cardiopulmonar , Paro Cardíaco , Femenino , Paro Cardíaco/terapia , Hospitales , Humanos , Masculino , Maniquíes , Presión
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...