RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is performed very commonly but laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) is performed infrequently. We aimed to determine the most significant barriers to performing LCBDE and to identify the highest yield interventions to facilitate adoption. METHODS AND PROCEDURES: A national survey was designed by content experts, who regularly perform LCBDE. The survey was distributed by email to the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons and the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma memberships. Non-U.S. surgeon responses were excluded. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the results. RESULTS: Seven hundred twenty six practicing surgeons responded to the survey, 543 of which were US surgeons who perform laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Only 27% of respondents preferred to manage choledocholithiasis with LCBDE. Their technique of choice was choledochoscopy (70%). Despite this, 36% of surgeons did not have access to a choledochoscope or were unsure if they did. Seventy percent of surgeons who performed LCBDE did not have supplies readily available in a central stocking location. Only 8.5% of surgeons agreed that routine LCBDE would impact their referral relationship with gastroenterology. About half the respondents (47%) considered LCBDE worth the time, but only 25% knew about reimbursement for the procedure. Almost all (85%) of surgeons understood that LCBDE results in shorter length of stay compared to ERCP. CONCLUSIONS: Only a quarter of the surgeons performing cholecystectomy perform LCBDE. Multiple barriers contribute to low LCBDE utilization. Increasing availability of appropriate equipment, a dedicated supply cart, and teaching fluoroscopic LCBDE interventions may address limitations and increase adoption. These efforts may also increase efficiency, minimizing perceived time and skill restraints. Although many surgeons understand LCBDE decreases length of stay, they are unaware of surgeon-specific LCBDE financial benefits. Systematically addressing these barriers may increase LCBDE adoption, improve patient care, and decrease healthcare costs.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Cholangiography for visualization of the biliary tree during laparoscopic cholecystectomy is an important diagnostic roadmap in the context of suspected choledocholithiasis (CDL). The renewed interest in transcystic laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) necessitates a general description of the range of CDL presentations. Our aim was to establish a novel classification system of intraoperative cholangiograms (IOCs) to advance research efforts in this field. METHODS: A novel cholangiogram classification system, featuring 8 distinct presentations of choledocholithiasis, was applied to a data set of 80 preintervention IOCs for suspected choledocholithiasis. The classification system is as follows: A (no common bile duct stones, duodenal filling present, and concern for air bubbles), B (no common bile duct stones, no duodenal filling, and concern for sludge), C1 (stone(s) < 2x size of cystic duct with duodenal filling), C2 (stone(s) < 2x size of cystic duct without duodenal filling), D1 (stone(s) ≥ 2x size of cystic duct with duodenal filling), D2 (stone(s) ≥ 2x size of cystic duct without duodenal filling), E1 (congenital anatomical variant and/or common duct stricture), and E2 (surgically altered biliary anatomy). RESULTS: Cholangiogram review yielded preintervention classifications for 6 of 8 variants (A-E): A (7.5%), B (3.75%), C1 (23.75%), C2 (42.5%), D1 (15%), and D2 (7.5%). Analysis of cystic duct diameter yielded no significant differences among classification groups, indicating no predominant pattern of cystic duct anatomy within a given classification. DISCUSSION: An IOC classification system for suspected choledocholithiasis is foundational to answering key clinical questions for transcystic laparoscopic common bile duct exploration.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Choledocholithiasis in children is commonly managed with an "endoscopy first" (EF) strategy (endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) under a separate anesthetic). Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography is limited at the end of the week (EoW). We hypothesize that a "surgery first" (SF) approach with LC, intraoperative cholangiogram (IOC), and possible laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) can decrease length of stay (LOS) and time to definitive intervention (TTDI). METHODS: This is a retrospective single-center cohort study conducted between 2018 and 2023 in pediatric patients with suspected choledocholithiasis. Work week (WW) presentation included admission between Monday and Thursday. Time to definitive intervention was defined as time to LC. RESULTS: 88 pediatric patients were identified, 61 managed with SF (33 WW and 28 EoW) and 27 managed with EF (18 WW and 9 EoW). Both SF groups had shorter mean LOS for WW and EoW presentation (64.5 h, 92.4 h, 112.9 h, and 113.0 h; P < .05). There was a downtreading TTDI in the SF groups (SF: WW 24.7 h and EoW 21.7 h; EF: WW 31.7 h and EoW 35.9 h; P = .11). 44 patients underwent LCBDE with similar success rates (91.6% WW and 85% EoW; P = 1.0). All EF patients received 2 procedures; 69% of SF patients were definitively managed with one. CONCLUSION: Children with choledocholithiasis at the EoW have a longer LOS and TTDI. These findings are amplified when children enter an EF treatment pathway. An SF approach results in shorter LOS with fewer procedures, regardless of the time of presentation.
RESUMEN
Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) utility in management of choledocholithiasis may decrease length of stay and patient cost, but postoperative management remains widely debated. We examined periprocedural LFTs for patients undergoing LCBDE and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) speculating for trend existence after successful LCBDE. We hypothesized that postoperative LCBDE LFTs would not downtrend even after successful ductal clearance. We identified 99 patients under 18 who underwent ERCP or LCBDE with at least one pre- and post-procedural LFT. Periprocedural LFTs between groups were compared using Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. The 22 ERCP patients demonstrated a significant downtrend across Tbili (P < .001), AST (P = .001), ALT (P = .002), and ALP (P < .001). The 27 LCBDE patients demonstrated a significant downtrend in Tbili (P = .002) only, while AST (P > .05), ALT (P > .05), and ALP (P > .05) were nonsignificant. Lack of consistent downtrend in the LCBDE group raises doubt regarding the utility of postoperative LFTs for post-procedural management.
Asunto(s)
Colangiopancreatografia Retrógrada Endoscópica , Coledocolitiasis , Conducto Colédoco , Laparoscopía , Humanos , Coledocolitiasis/cirugía , Niño , Femenino , Masculino , Conducto Colédoco/cirugía , Adolescente , Estudios Retrospectivos , Preescolar , Pruebas de Función Hepática , Cuidados Posoperatorios/métodosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Patients with choledocholithiasis are often treated with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). Upfront LC, intraoperative cholangiogram (IOC), and possible transcystic laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) could potentially avoid the need for ERCP. We hypothesized that upfront LC + IOC ± LCBDE will decrease length of stay (LOS) and the total number of interventions for children with suspected choledocholithiasis. METHODS: A multicenter, retrospective cohort study was performed on pediatric patients (<18 years) between 2018 and 2022 with suspected choledocholithiasis. Demographic and clinical data were compared for upfront LC + IOC ± LCBDE and possible postoperative ERCP (OR1st) versus preoperative ERCP prior to LC (OR2nd). Complications were defined as postoperative pancreatitis, recurrent choledocholithiasis, bleeding, or abscess. RESULTS: Across four centers, 252 children with suspected choledocholithiasis were treated with OR1st (n = 156) or OR2nd (n = 96). There were no differences in age, gender, or body mass index. Of the LCBDE patients (72/156), 86% had definitive intraoperative management with the remaining 14% requiring postoperative ERCP. Complications were fewer and LOS was shorter with OR1st (3/156 vs. 15/96; 2.39 vs 3.84 days, p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Upfront LC + IOC ± LCBDE for children with choledocholithiasis is associated with fewer ERCPs, lower LOS, and decreased complications. Postoperative ERCP remains an essential adjunct for patients who fail LCBDE. Further educational efforts are needed to increase the skill level for IOC and LCBDE in pediatric patients with suspected choledocholithiasis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.
Asunto(s)
Colecistectomía Laparoscópica , Coledocolitiasis , Humanos , Niño , Coledocolitiasis/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Colangiopancreatografia Retrógrada Endoscópica , Tiempo de Internación , Conducto Colédoco/cirugíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Acute care surgery (ACS) is well positioned to manage choledocholithiasis at the time of laparoscopic cholecystectomy, but barriers to laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) include experience and the perceived need for specialized equipment. The technical complexity of this pathway is generally seen as challenging. As such, LCBDE is historically relegated to the "enthusiast." However, a simplified, effective LCBDE technique as part of a "surgery first" strategy could drive wider adoption in the specialty most often managing these patients. To determine efficacy and safety, we sought to compare our initial ACS-driven experience with a simple, fluoroscopy-guided, catheter-based LCBDE approach during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) to LC with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). METHODS: We reviewed ACS patients who underwent LCBDE or LC + ERCP (pre-/postoperative) at a tertiary care center in the 4 years since starting this surgery first approach. Demographics, outcomes, and length of stay (LOS) were compared on an intention to treat basis. Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration was performed via using wire/catheter Seldinger techniques under fluoroscopic guidance with flushing or balloon dilation of the sphincter as needed. Our primary outcomes were LOS and successful duct clearance. RESULTS: One hundred eighty patients were treated for choledocholithiasis with 71 undergoing LCBDE. The success rate of catheter-based LCBDE was 70.4%. Length of stay was significantly reduced for the LCBDE group compared with the LC + ERCP group (48.8 vs. 84.3 hours, p < 0.01). Of note, there were no intraoperative or postoperative complications in the LCBDE group. CONCLUSION: A simplified catheter-based approach to LCBDE is safe and associated with decreased LOS when compared with LC + ERCP. This simplified step-up approach may help facilitate wider LCBDE utilization by ACS providers who are well positioned for a timely surgery first approach in the management of uncomplicated choledocholithiasis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic/Care Management; Level IV.
Asunto(s)
Colecistectomía Laparoscópica , Coledocolitiasis , Cálculos Biliares , Humanos , Coledocolitiasis/cirugía , Cálculos Biliares/cirugía , Colangiopancreatografia Retrógrada Endoscópica/métodos , Colecistectomía Laparoscópica/métodos , Fluoroscopía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tiempo de InternaciónRESUMEN
The steep learning curve associated with learning laparoscopic techniques and limited training opportunities represents a challenge to general surgery resident training. The objective of this study was to use a live porcine model to improve surgical training in laparoscopic technique and management of bleeding. Nineteen general surgery residents (ranging from PGY 3 to 5) completed the porcine simulation and completed pre-lab and post-lab questionnaires. The institution's industry partner served as sponsors and educators on hemostatic agents and energy devices. Residents had a significant increase in confidence with laparoscopic techniques and the management of hemostasis (P = .01 and P = .008, respectively). Residents agreed and then strongly agreed that a porcine model was suitable to simulate laparoscopic and hemostatic techniques, but there was no significant change between pre- and post-lab opinions. This study demonstrates that a porcine lab is an effective model for surgical resident education and increases resident confidence.
Asunto(s)
Cirugía General , Internado y Residencia , Laparoscopía , Porcinos , Animales , Competencia Clínica , Laparoscopía/educación , Curriculum , Hemostasis , Cirugía General/educaciónRESUMEN
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) with laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) is gaining traction for the management of choledocholithiasis. Liver function tests (LFTs) are often used to determine the success of ductal clearance, yet the impact of differing therapeutic interventions, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) or LCBDE, have on postprocedure LFT is insufficiently described. We hypothesize that these interventions have different postoperative LFT profiles. The preprocedural and postprocedural total bilirubin (Tbili), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) were analyzed of 167 patients who had successful ERCPs (117) or LCBDEs (50). Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography patients demonstrated a significant decrease in all LFTs postprocedure (n = 117; P = <0.001 for all) with a continued downtrend when a second set of LFTs was obtained (n = 102; P = <0.001 for all). For successful LC+LCBDEs, there was no significant change between preoperative and 1st postoperative Tbili, AST, ALT, and ALP and the 2nd postoperative labs.
Asunto(s)
Colecistectomía Laparoscópica , Coledocolitiasis , Humanos , Colangiopancreatografia Retrógrada Endoscópica/métodos , Conducto Colédoco/cirugía , Pruebas de Función Hepática , Coledocolitiasis/cirugía , Colecistectomía Laparoscópica/efectos adversos , Colecistectomía Laparoscópica/métodos , Bilirrubina , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
Objectives: Although controversial, recent data suggest nighttime versus daytime laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) have comparable outcomes. Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) for choledocholithiasis decreases length of stay (LOS) as compared with LC with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) but increases case complexity/time. The influence of time of day on LCBDE outcomes has not been evaluated. Our aim was to examine outcomes and LOS for nighttime (PM) compared with daytime LC+LCBDE (DAY). Methods: Consecutive patients who underwent LCBDE were reviewed. Demographics, operative duration, success of LCBDE, time to postoperative ERCP (if required), LOS, and complications were compared. PM procedures were defined as beginning 19:00-07:00 hours. Results: Between 2018 and 2022, sixty patients underwent LCBDE (PM 42%). Groups had equivalent age/sex and preoperative liver function tests (LFTs). LCBDE success was 69% PM versus 71% DAY (p=0.78). Operative duration did not differ (2.8 IQR: 2.2-3.3 hours vs. 2.8 IQR: 2.3-3.2 hours, p=0.9). LOS was compared, and PM LOS was shorter (p=0.03). Time to ERCP after a failed LCBDE at night was compared with daytime (13.8 IQR: 10.6-29.5 hours vs. 19.9 IQR: 18.7-54.4 hours, p=0.07). LOS for failed PM LCBDE requiring ERCP was similar to successful DAY LCBDE (p=0.29). One complication (transient hyperbilirubinemia) was reported in the DAY group, none in PM. Conclusion: PM LCBDE cases are equivalent in safety and success rate to DAY cases but have reduced LOS. Widespread adoption of acute care surgery-driven management of choledocholithiasis via LCBDE during cholecystectomy may decrease LOS, especially in PM cases. Level of evidence: Level IV.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) at the time of cholecystectomy has well-established benefits for managing pediatric choledocholithiasis. However, providers increasingly favor ERCP pre-or-post laparoscopic cholecystectomy (ERCP+LC) due to perceived complexity of LCBDE. We refined a stepwise method employing wire-ready balloon dilation of the Sphincter of Oddi. This study compares outcomes of balloon sphincteroplasty (LCBDE+BSP) with standard transcystic LCBDE (LCBDE-STD) and ERCP+LC. METHODS: We performed a retrospective chart review of pediatric patients who underwent LCBDE-STD and LCBDE+BSP since 2018. A report of consecutive choledocholithiasis patients prior to 2018 yielded an ERCP+LC cohort. Age, operative time, complications, and length of stay (LOS) were compared across all groups. Success rate and fluoroscopy time were compared between LCBDE groups. RESULTS: 44 patients were identified (14:LCBDE-STD; 15:LCBDE+BSP; 15:ERCP+LC) . There was no difference in patient age or BMI. Operative time was longer in the LCBDE+BSP group (p =< 0.05). ERCP+LC demonstrated increased LOS (4.36 ± 2.78 vs 1.31 ± 0.93; p =< 0.05) and complications compared to LCBDE groups including three stent placements and one stent migration. LCBDE+BSP had a higher success rate than LCBDE-STD (100% vs 78%; p = 0.06). The three patients who failed LCBDE-STD required postoperative ERCP. Average fluoroscopy time was not significantly impacted by addition of sphincteroplasty. CONCLUSION: Incorporating LCBDE into standard management of pediatric choledocholithiasis reduces LOS and avoids additional invasive procedures regardless of the specific technique employed. This stepwise approach to wire-ready cholangiography with balloon sphincteroplasty is a viable method for LCBDE that utilizes techniques familiar to pediatric surgeons and provides definitive management under a single anesthetic. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.
Asunto(s)
Colecistectomía Laparoscópica , Coledocolitiasis , Niño , Humanos , Colangiopancreatografia Retrógrada Endoscópica/métodos , Colecistectomía Laparoscópica/métodos , Coledocolitiasis/cirugía , Conducto Colédoco/cirugía , Tiempo de Internación , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) at the time of cholecystectomy is an efficient pathway for management of choledocholithiasis. Performing this safely under one anesthetic offers advantages over a two-step process with cholecystectomy and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Despite the proven efficacy of LCBDE, endoscopy continues to be predominantly utilized. Simplifying the intervention may drive LCBDE adoption. To this end, we refined a stepwise intraoperative pathway that utilizes over the wire balloon catheters to dilate the Sphincter of Oddi to facilitate stone passage into the duodenum. To determine the efficacy during the initial adoption phase on a general surgery service, we reviewed our experience with LCBDE balloon sphincteroplasty as part of this pathway. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records of patients who underwent LCBDE with balloon sphincteroplasty at a single tertiary care center over a three-year period. Preoperative demographics, imaging/laboratory results, intra and postoperative outcomes were reviewed. RESULTS: Choledocholithiasis was managed with transcystic balloon sphincteroplasty during LCBDE in 28 cases over a three-year period. The cohort included 16 women and 12 men with a mean age of 47 years (range = 19-89). Operative indications included cholecystitis (n = 11, 39%), choledocholithiasis (n = 13, 47%), cholelithiasis (n = 2, 7%), and gallstone pancreatitis (n = 2, 7%). The stones were successfully cleared by the balloon sphincteroplasty technique in 75% of the cases. The average fluoroscopy time during LCBDE was 338 s (± 214). The average operating room time was 173 min (± 35). Mean length of stay was 58 h (± 46). There were no intra- or postoperative complications. CONCLUSION: Wire ready cholangiography followed by balloon sphincteroplasty with saline/contrast flush is a simple and safe way to clear the common bile duct. This technique is a gateway for further expansion and adoption of LCBDE.
Asunto(s)
Colecistectomía Laparoscópica , Coledocolitiasis , Masculino , Humanos , Femenino , Adulto Joven , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Coledocolitiasis/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Colecistectomía Laparoscópica/métodos , Colangiopancreatografia Retrógrada Endoscópica/métodos , Conducto Colédoco/cirugíaRESUMEN
A 25-year-old man presented with right lower quadrant abdominal wall erythema, a punctum of purulence, and localized pain at the site of a previous appendicostomy. Cross-sectional imaging revealed appendicitis at his previous appendicostomy with a fecalith near the skin. He was managed with appendectomy. The surgical approach mimicked a loop ileostomy reversal by circumferentially dissecting the tissue around the appendicostomy to the level of the fascia and then dividing the appendix at the base of the cecum through a small two-centimeter incision. Appendicitis in a previous appendicostomy is uncommon and has only been described in three previous case reports (two adults and one child) and was surgically approached through a low-midline laparotomy. Our case is unique as it is an uncommon presentation of a common disease managed with a minimally invasive approach not previously described.
Asunto(s)
Cavidad Abdominal , Apendicitis , Apéndice , Masculino , Adulto , Niño , Humanos , Apendicitis/diagnóstico , Apendicitis/cirugía , Apendicitis/etiología , Apéndice/cirugía , Apendicectomía/métodos , Ileostomía/efectos adversosRESUMEN
Introduction: Choledocholithiasis is a disease process that can be managed by laparoscopic common bile duct exploration at the time of cholecystectomy. However, it can be negatively perceived by surgeons as lengthening procedure time and adding technical complexity. Materials and Methods: We have created a dual balloon biliary intervention catheter designed to make common duct exploration efficient, simple, and safe. The device consists of two balloons, one compliant and one noncompliant, to perform initial cholangiography, dilate the sphincter, and occlude the proximal duct for distal power flushing of stones. The catheter design facilitates a stepwise, over the wire progression of interventions with a singular device. Results: The catheter has been successfully deployed in a porcine feasibility model and the dual balloon concepts reduced to practice using currently available devices. Conclusion: Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration is a safe and effective way to treat choledocolithiasis. The Dual Balloon Catheter is a novel device that allows for duct occlusion for cholangiogram and power flushing in conjunction with duct and sphincter dilation.
Asunto(s)
Colecistectomía Laparoscópica , Coledocolitiasis , Porcinos , Animales , Colecistectomía Laparoscópica/métodos , Coledocolitiasis/cirugía , Colangiografía/métodos , Dilatación , Conducto Colédoco/cirugíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: We hypothesized that a Chief Resident Service educational model provides safe care for patients compared to that received on standard academic services where rotating residents adopt the practices and preferences of their attending. DESIGN: We retrospectively identified patients undergoing inguinal hernia repairs from July 2016 through June 2019 and matched Chief's service patients to standard academic service patients 1:1 on CPT, sex and age. We compared patient characteristics, recurrence rates, outcomes and complications. SETTING: Tertiary care center, single institution. PARTICIPANTS: Overall, 77 patients undergoing inguinal hernia repairs (66% open and 34% laparoscopic) on the Chief's service matched successfully to 77 standard academic service patients during the study period. RESULTS: Age, BMI and ASA were similar between the services, but Chief's service patients were less likely to be current smokers (1.3% vs. 24.7%) and more likely to be former smokers (59.7% vs. 26.0%) than standard academic service patients (p < 0.01). Patients presenting with incarcerated hernias (5.2% vs. 9.1%), recurrent (10.4% vs. 5.2%) and bilateral hernias (19.5% vs. 10.4%) were similar between the Chief's service and standard academic services, respectively (all p > 0.05). Operative times were longer for the Chief's service for open (123 min vs. 67, p < 0.01) and laparoscopic (112 min vs. 79, pâ¯=â¯0.02) repairs. Recurrence rates (6.5% vs. 3.9%, pâ¯=â¯0.47) and complications including infection, seroma or hematoma requiring evacuation and need for reoperation were similarly low (p > 0.05) between the Chief's and standard academic services, respectively. Despite low complication rates, Chief's service patients were more likely to present to the ED post-op (14.3% vs. 1.3%; pâ¯=â¯0.001), but readmission rates were similarly low (2.6% vs. 0%, pâ¯=â¯0.09). CONCLUSIONS: Providing general surgery chief residents with a supervised opportunity to direct, plan and provide surgical care in clinic and the operating room, as a transition to independent practice following graduation, is safe for patients presenting with inguinal hernias. Concerns about patient safety should not be a barrier to maximizing entrustment for the evaluation and operative management of select core general surgery diagnoses and operations.
Asunto(s)
Hernia Inguinal , Laparoscopía , Hernia Inguinal/cirugía , Herniorrafia/efectos adversos , Humanos , Modelos Educacionales , Tempo Operativo , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Introduction: Biliary dyskinesia is typically defined as a gallbladder ejection fraction (EF) <35% on hepatobiliary iminodiacetic acid scan with cholecystokinin stimulation (CCK-HIDA) testing. Cholecystectomy often leads to resolution of associated biliary colic symptoms. Alternatively, there is a subset of symptomatic patients with normal gallbladder EF on CCK-HIDA. It has been proposed that pain with CCK injection is more predictive of symptom resolution after cholecystectomy than low gallbladder EF. We reviewed our experience with pediatric patients with positive CCK provocation testing and a normal gallbladder EF in the absence of gallstones. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the records of all pediatric patients with normal hepatobiliary iminodiacetic acid EFs (35%-80%) and pain with CCK injection at a tertiary care center between 2016 and 2020. Age, gender, body mass index (BMI), CCK-HIDA results, and pathology analysis were noted. Short- and long-term resolution of symptoms was determined by patient self-reporting at a mean of 3 weeks and 46 months, respectively. Results: Seventeen patients met inclusion criteria. Average age was 15.1 years (range, 12-17 years) with median BMI 24.9 (± 4.9 kg/m2). Mean CCK-HIDA EF was 56.3% (± 11.4%). In total, 62.5% of patients had evidence of chronic cholecystitis and/or cholesterolosis on pathology analysis. Of patients available for short-term and long-term postoperative follow-up, 80% and 83% reported complete or near complete resolution of symptoms, respectively. Conclusions: Normokinetic biliary dyskinesia is poorly understood but appears to be associated with chronic inflammation and cured by surgical intervention. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy results in resolution of symptoms for a majority of patients and should be considered in those with pain with CCK injection despite normal imaging studies. Clinical Trial Registration Number: 1657640-2.
Asunto(s)
Discinesia Biliar , Colecistectomía Laparoscópica , Adolescente , Niño , Humanos , Discinesia Biliar/cirugía , Colecistectomía , Colecistectomía Laparoscópica/efectos adversos , Colecistectomía Laparoscópica/métodos , Colecistoquinina , Iminoácidos , Dolor , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Biliary dyskinesia (BD) is a poorly understood functional gallbladder disorder. Diagnosis is made with abdominal pain and an intact gallbladder without signs of anatomical obstruction on imaging or pathology. Our aim was to assess whether laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) resolves hyperkinetic BD symptoms. METHODS: Records of patients ≥18 years of age, who underwent LC by four surgeons at a tertiary care center between 2012 and 2020, were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were excluded if they had a documented gallbladder ejection fraction (GBEF) <80% or had biliary stones or sludge on pathology or imaging. Demographic information, HIDA results, preoperative testing, operative details, gallbladder pathology, and symptom status at follow-up were collected from electronic medical records. Improvement in BD symptoms was assessed using McNemar's test. Risk differences with standard errors were employed to estimate percent reduction in symptoms. RESULTS: Ninety-eight patients met inclusion criteria. Of those who presented for follow-up (n = 91), 92.3% (n = 84) reported partial or complete resolution of symptoms. Preoperative symptoms, including back pain (16.7%, 95% CI: [7.9%, 25.5%]; P < .0001), epigastric pain (31.1% [21.3%, 41.3%]; P < .0001), nausea (56.7% [45.0%, 65.8%]; P < .0001), RUQ pain (57.8% [46.1%, 66.9%]; P < .0001), and vomiting (27.8% [18.4%, 37.7%]; P < .0001) showed significant improvement after LC. Chronic cholecystitis and/or cholesterolosis were present on pathology in 79.8% of gallbladders. DISCUSSION: Our study currently represents the largest cohort of patients with hyperkinetic BD. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy appears to result in resolution of symptoms for this clinical entity.
Asunto(s)
Discinesia Biliar , Colecistectomía Laparoscópica , Dolor Abdominal/cirugía , Discinesia Biliar/complicaciones , Discinesia Biliar/diagnóstico , Discinesia Biliar/cirugía , Colecistectomía Laparoscópica/efectos adversos , Colecistectomía Laparoscópica/métodos , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
The incidence of cholecystectomy in children has increased considerably since the early 1990s. Management of gallbladder disease in children must include an awareness of choledocholithiasis treatment strategies. Both endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and common bile duct exploration (open or laparoscopic) are accepted management techniques for choledocholithiasis. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy with preoperative or postoperative ERCP is at least a two-procedure process while cholecystectomy with laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) can provide definitive treatment in a single procedure under one anesthetic. Despite this, the trend over the last decade continues towards less LCBDE utilization in favor of ERCP. This trend has resulted in decreased familiarity with LCBDE by adult and pediatric surgeons and their trainees. Access to the necessary tools and education on the technical aspects can allow for successful single-stage treatment of choledocholithiasis by surgeons during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. This may include a pre-defined stepwise algorithm and understanding of all the equipment and resources necessary to perform a LCBDE. Ultimately, increased understanding of the equipment and procedural steps necessary for LCBDE will result in widened adoption of the technique and thus confer advantages to the patient such as decreased length of stay and fewer required anesthetics.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Biliary dyskinesia generally refers to a hypofunctioning gallbladder with an ejection fraction (EF) of <35% on hepatobiliary iminodiacetic acid scan with cholecystokinin stimulation (CCK-HIDA testing). In adults, biliary hyperkinesia has a defined association with biliary colic symptoms and can be relieved with surgical intervention. This clinical entity has not been well described in children or adolescents. In fact, only recently have we seen biliary hyperkinesia on HIDA at our centers. To that end, we reviewed our recent experience with adolescents who have presented and been treated for this unusual clinical entity. METHODS: With IRB approval, we retrospectively reviewed the records of all patients with abnormally high HIDA EFs (>80%) cared for by the pediatric surgery services at two tertiary care centers over the span of a three-year period. Age, sex, BMI, CCK-HIDA results, and preoperative testing and post-operative pathology were noted. Resolution of symptoms was determined by subjective patient self-reporting at postoperative visit. RESULTS: Eighteen patients met inclusion criteria. Average age 15.7 (range, 10-17 years), median BMI 27.3 (±8.2). Fifteen patients were female and 3 were male. Average CCK-HIDA EF was 91.6% (±5.2), 82.4% of the patients had evidence of chronic cholecystitis and/or cholesterolosis on pathology. Postoperatively, 82.4% of the patients available for follow up (n=17) reported complete or near complete resolution of symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Biliary hyperkinesia is an emerging clinical entity in children and adolescents and has a similar presentation to biliary hypokinesia. While the pathophysiologic mechanism of pain is not fully elucidated, laparoscopic cholecystectomy appears to provide a surgical cure for these patients and should be considered in the differential for the patient with an unremarkable workup and history suggestive of biliary colic.