Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 9 de 9
Filtrar
1.
J Vet Diagn Invest ; 32(6): 815-825, 2020 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32996402

RESUMEN

The exquisite sensitivity of in vitro amplification assays such as real-time polymerase chain reaction (rtPCR) requires the establishment of thorough and robust laboratory practices. To this end, an American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians (AAVLD) committee of subject matter experts was convened to develop a set of best practices for performance of nucleic acid amplification assays. Consensus advice for the performance of preanalytical, analytical, and postanalytical steps is presented here, along with a review of supporting literature.


Asunto(s)
Laboratorios/normas , Reacción en Cadena en Tiempo Real de la Polimerasa/veterinaria , Animales , Control de Calidad , Sensibilidad y Especificidad
2.
J Vet Diagn Invest ; 32(6): 802-814, 2020 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32988335

RESUMEN

This consensus document presents the suggested guidelines developed by the Laboratory Technology Committee (LTC) of the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians (AAVLD) for development, validation, and modification (methods comparability) of real-time PCR (rtPCR) assays. These suggested guidelines are presented with reference to the World Organisation for Animal Health (OIE) guidelines for validation of nucleic acid detection assays used in veterinary diagnostic laboratories. Additionally, our proposed practices are compared to the guidelines from the Foods Program Regulatory Subdivision of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and from the American Society for Veterinary Clinical Pathology (ASVCP). The LTC suggestions are closely aligned with those from the OIE and comply with version 2021-01 of the AAVLD Requirements for an Accredited Veterinary Medical Diagnostic Laboratory, although some LTC recommendations are more stringent and extend beyond the AAVLD requirements. LTC suggested guidelines are substantially different than the guidelines recently published by the U.S. FDA for validation and modification of regulated tests used for detection of pathogens in pet food and animal-derived products, such as dairy. Veterinary diagnostic laboratories that perform assays from the FDA Bacteriological Analytical Method (BAM) manual must be aware of the different standard.


Asunto(s)
Adhesión a Directriz/normas , Laboratorios/normas , Reacción en Cadena en Tiempo Real de la Polimerasa/veterinaria , Animales , Guías como Asunto/normas , Patología Clínica/normas , Control de Calidad , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Estados Unidos
3.
J Vet Diagn Invest ; 30(5): 699-707, 2018 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29916768

RESUMEN

The highly contagious foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV) afflicts cloven-hoofed animals, resulting in significant costs because of loss of trade and recovery from disease. We developed a sensitive, specific, and rapid competitive ELISA (cELISA) to detect serum antibodies to FMDV. The cELISA utilized a monoclonal blocking antibody specific for a highly conserved FMDV nonstructural 3B epitope, a recombinant mutant FMDV 3ABC coating protein, and optimized format variables including serum incubation for 90 min at 20-25°C. Samples from 16 animals experimentally infected with one FMDV serotype (A, O, Asia, or SAT-1) demonstrated early detection capacity beginning 7 d post-inoculation. All samples from 55 vesicular stomatitis virus antibody-positive cattle and 44 samples from cloven-hoofed animals affected by non-FMD vesicular diseases were negative in the cELISA, demonstrating 100% analytical specificity. The diagnostic sensitivity was 100% against sera from 128 cattle infected with isolates of all FMDV serotypes, emphasizing serotype-agnostic results. Diagnostic specificities of U.S. cattle ( n = 1135) and swine ( n = 207) sera were 99.4% and 100%, respectively. High repeatability and reproducibility were demonstrated with 3.1% coefficient of variation in percent inhibition data and 100% agreement using 2 kit lots and 400 negative control serum samples, with no difference between bench and biosafety cabinet operation. Negative results from vaccinated, uninfected cattle, pig, and sheep sera confirmed the DIVA (differentiate infected from vaccinated animals) capability. This rapid (<3 h), select agent-free assay with high sensitivity and specificity, DIVA capability, and room temperature processing capability will serve as a useful tool in FMDV surveillance, emergency preparedness, response, and outbreak recovery programs.


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Antivirales/sangre , Ensayo de Inmunoadsorción Enzimática/veterinaria , Virus de la Fiebre Aftosa/aislamiento & purificación , Fiebre Aftosa/diagnóstico , Proteínas no Estructurales Virales/aislamiento & purificación , Animales , Bovinos , Enfermedades de los Bovinos/diagnóstico , Enfermedades de los Bovinos/virología , Ensayo de Inmunoadsorción Enzimática/métodos , Epítopos/inmunología , Fiebre Aftosa/virología , Ovinos , Enfermedades de las Ovejas/diagnóstico , Enfermedades de las Ovejas/virología , Porcinos , Enfermedades de los Porcinos/diagnóstico , Enfermedades de los Porcinos/virología
4.
J Vet Diagn Invest ; 30(4): 603-608, 2018 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29633923

RESUMEN

Bovine trichomoniasis is a sexually transmitted disease that results in infertility, abortion, and calf age variability. To date, management strategies include testing for Tritrichomonas foetus and culling of infected males. Challenges associated with testing include cost of culture medium, time and labor burden of sample incubation and processing, and adverse effects of bacterial growth on detection sensitivity. To overcome these challenges, we developed a direct reverse-transcription quantitative real-time PCR (direct RT-qPCR) utilizing smegma, eliminating the use of culture medium. In an analysis of 166 field samples (56 positives and 110 negatives as determined using microscopic reading of cultures as the reference test), the direct RT-qPCR exhibited 100% diagnostic sensitivity and 100% specificity, whereas the currently employed qPCR (culture qPCR), which utilizes cultured samples, exhibited 95% diagnostic sensitivity and 100% specificity. Agreement between direct RT-qPCR and culture qPCR was 98%. Moreover, direct RT-qPCR identified 3 more positive samples and exhibited lower quantification cycle (Cq) values among positives by culture reading than did culture qPCR (direct RT-qPCR Cq range = 14.6-32.3 vs. culture qPCR Cq range = 18.7-37.4). The direct RT-qPCR enables simplified sample collection, elimination of culture medium, faster results, applicability in cows, and lower cost than culture qPCR.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades de los Bovinos/parasitología , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa/veterinaria , Infecciones Protozoarias en Animales/diagnóstico , Tritrichomonas foetus/genética , Animales , Bovinos , Enfermedades de los Bovinos/diagnóstico , Enfermedades de los Bovinos/prevención & control , Femenino , Masculino , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa/métodos , Embarazo , Infecciones Protozoarias en Animales/parasitología , Reacción en Cadena en Tiempo Real de la Polimerasa/veterinaria , Esmegma/parasitología , Manejo de Especímenes
5.
Vet Immunol Immunopathol ; 185: 20-33, 2017 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28241999

RESUMEN

A reverse vaccinology system, Vaxign, was used to identify and select a subset of five African Swine Fever (ASF) antigens that were successfully purified from human embryonic kidney 293 (HEK) cells and produced in Modified vaccinia virus Ankara (MVA) viral vectors. Three HEK-purified antigens [B646L (p72), E183L (p54), and O61R (p12)], and three MVA-vectored antigens [B646L, EP153R, and EP402R (CD2v)] were evaluated using a prime-boost immunization regimen swine safety and immunogenicity study. Antibody responses were detected in pigs following prime-boost immunization four weeks apart with the HEK-293-purified p72, p54, and p12 antigens. Notably, sera from the vaccinees were positive by immunofluorescence on ASFV (Georgia 2007/1)-infected primary macrophages. Although MVA-vectored p72, CD2v, and EP153R failed to induce antibody responses, interferon-gamma (IFN-γ+) spot forming cell responses against all three antigens were detected one week post-boost. The highest IFN-γ+ spot forming cell responses were detected against p72 in pigs primed with MVA-p72 and boosted with the recombinant p72. Antigen-specific (p12, p72, CD2v, and EP153R) T-cell proliferative responses were also detected post-boost. Collectively, these results are the first demonstration that ASFV subunit antigens purified from mammalian cells or expressed in MVA vectors are safe and can induce ASFV-specific antibody and T-cell responses following a prime-boost immunization regimen in swine.


Asunto(s)
Virus de la Fiebre Porcina Africana/inmunología , Fiebre Porcina Africana/prevención & control , Antígenos Virales/inmunología , Vacunas Virales/inmunología , Fiebre Porcina Africana/inmunología , Virus de la Fiebre Porcina Africana/genética , Animales , Anticuerpos Antivirales/sangre , Antígenos Virales/genética , Vectores Genéticos , Genoma Viral , Células HEK293 , Humanos , Inmunogenicidad Vacunal , Masculino , Porcinos , Linfocitos T/inmunología , Vacunas Sintéticas/genética , Vacunas Sintéticas/inmunología , Virus Vaccinia/genética , Vacunas Virales/genética
6.
Prev Vet Med ; 119(1-2): 1-9, 2015 Apr 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25732914

RESUMEN

Bovine anaplasmosis is an infectious, non-contagious disease caused by the rickettsial pathogen Anaplasma marginale (A. marginale). The organism has a global distribution and infects erythrocytes, resulting in anemia, jaundice, fever, abortions and death. Once infected, animals remain carriers for life. The carrier status provides immunity to clinical disease, but is problematic if infected and naïve cattle are comingled. Knowledge of infection prevalence and spatial distribution is important in disease management. The objective of this study was to assess A. marginale infection in-herd prevalence in Texas cattle using both molecular and serological methods. Blood samples from 11 cattle herds within Texas were collected and analyzed by reverse transcription quantitative real-time PCR (RT-qPCR) and a commercial competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (cELISA). Samples from experimentally infected animals were also analyzed and RT-qPCR detected A. marginale infection up to 15 days before cELISA, providing empirical data to support the interpretation of herd prevalence results. Herds with high prevalence were located in the north Texas Rolling Plains and west Trans-Pecos Desert, with RT-qPCR prevalence as high as 82% and cELISA prevalence as high as 88%. Overall prevalence was significantly higher in cattle in north and west Texas compared to cattle in east Texas (p<0.0001 for prevalence based on both RT-qPCR and cELISA). The overall RT-qPCR and cELISA results exhibited 90% agreement (kappa=0.79) and provide the first A. marginale infection prevalence study for Texas cattle using two diagnostic methods. Since cattle are the most important reservoir host for A. marginale and can serve as a source of infection for tick and mechanical transmission, information on infection prevalence is beneficial in the development of prevention and control strategies.


Asunto(s)
Anaplasma marginale/aislamiento & purificación , Anaplasmosis/epidemiología , Enfermedades de los Bovinos/epidemiología , Anaplasmosis/sangre , Anaplasmosis/parasitología , Animales , Bovinos , Enfermedades de los Bovinos/sangre , Enfermedades de los Bovinos/parasitología , Ensayo de Inmunoadsorción Enzimática/veterinaria , Femenino , Masculino , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa/veterinaria , Prevalencia , Texas/epidemiología
7.
J Vet Diagn Invest ; 27(2): 140-9, 2015 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25776540

RESUMEN

African swine fever (ASF), classical swine fever (CSF), and foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) are highly contagious animal diseases of significant economic importance. Pigs infected with ASF and CSF viruses (ASFV and CSFV) develop clinical signs that may be indistinguishable from other diseases. Likewise, various causes of vesicular disease can mimic clinical signs caused by the FMD virus (FMDV). Early detection is critical to limiting the impact and spread of these disease outbreaks, and the ability to perform herd-level surveillance for all 3 diseases rapidly and cost effectively using a single diagnostic sample and test is highly desirable. This study assessed the feasibility of simultaneous ASFV, CSFV, and FMDV detection by multiplex reverse transcription real-time polymerase chain reaction (mRT-qPCR) in swine oral fluids collected through the use of chewing ropes. Animal groups were experimentally infected independently with each virus, observed for clinical signs, and oral fluids collected and tested throughout the course of infection. All animal groups chewed on the ropes readily before and after onset of clinical signs and before onset of lameness or serious clinical signs. ASFV was detected as early as 3 days postinoculation (dpi), 2-3 days before onset of clinical disease; CSFV was detected at 5 dpi, coincident with onset of clinical disease; and FMDV was detected as early as 1 dpi, 1 day before the onset of clinical disease. Equivalent results were observed in 4 independent studies and demonstrate the feasibility of oral fluids and mRT-qPCR for surveillance of ASF, CSF, and FMD in swine populations.


Asunto(s)
Asfarviridae/aislamiento & purificación , Virus de la Fiebre Porcina Clásica/aislamiento & purificación , Virus de la Fiebre Aftosa/aislamiento & purificación , Enfermedades de los Porcinos/diagnóstico , Fiebre Porcina Africana/diagnóstico , Fiebre Porcina Africana/virología , Animales , Asfarviridae/genética , Peste Porcina Clásica/diagnóstico , Peste Porcina Clásica/virología , Virus de la Fiebre Porcina Clásica/genética , ADN Viral/análisis , Fiebre Aftosa/diagnóstico , Fiebre Aftosa/virología , Virus de la Fiebre Aftosa/genética , Boca/virología , Reacción en Cadena en Tiempo Real de la Polimerasa/veterinaria , Transcripción Reversa , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Porcinos , Enfermedades de los Porcinos/virología
8.
J Vet Diagn Invest ; 25(6): 709-19, 2013 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24091683

RESUMEN

Bluetongue virus (BTV) and Epizootic hemorrhagic disease virus (EHDV) possess similar structural and molecular features, are transmitted by biting midges (genus Culicoides), and cause similar diseases in some susceptible ruminants. Generally, BTV causes subclinical disease in cattle, characterized by a prolonged viremia. EHDV-associated disease in cattle is less prominent; however, it has emerged as a major economic threat to the white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) industry in many areas of the United States. The recent emergence of multiple BTV and EHDV serotypes previously undetected in the United States demonstrates the need for robust detection of all known serotypes and differential diagnosis. For this purpose, a streamlined workflow consisting of an automated nucleic acid purification and denaturation method and a multiplex one-step reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction for the simultaneous detection of BTV serotypes 1-24 and EHDV serotypes 1-7 was developed using previously published BTV and EHDV assays. The denaturation of double-stranded (ds) BTV and EHDV RNA was incorporated into the automated nucleic acid purification process thus eliminating the commonly used separate step of dsRNA denaturation. The performance of this workflow was compared with the World Organization of Animal Health BTV reference laboratory (National Veterinary Services Laboratory, Ames, Iowa) workflow for BTV and EHDV detection, and high agreement was observed. Implementation of the workflow in routine diagnostic testing enables the detection of, and differentiation between, BTV and EHDV, and coinfections in bovine blood and cervine tissues, offering significant benefits in terms of differential disease diagnosis, herd health monitoring, and regulated testing.


Asunto(s)
Virus de la Lengua Azul/aislamiento & purificación , Lengua Azul/virología , Enfermedades de los Bovinos/virología , Ciervos/virología , Virus de la Enfermedad Hemorrágica Epizoótica/aislamiento & purificación , Infecciones por Reoviridae/veterinaria , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa de Transcriptasa Inversa/veterinaria , Animales , Lengua Azul/diagnóstico , Virus de la Lengua Azul/genética , Bovinos , Virus de la Enfermedad Hemorrágica Epizoótica/genética , ARN Viral/química , ARN Viral/genética , Análisis de Regresión , Infecciones por Reoviridae/diagnóstico , Infecciones por Reoviridae/virología , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa de Transcriptasa Inversa/métodos , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Estados Unidos
9.
J Vet Diagn Invest ; 24(5): 945-53, 2012 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22914823

RESUMEN

Calf diarrhea (scours) is a primary cause of illness and death in young calves. Significant economic losses associated with this disease include morbidity, mortality, and direct cost of treatment. Multiple pathogens are responsible for infectious diarrhea, including, but not limited to, Bovine coronavirus (BCV), bovine Rotavirus A (BRV), and Cryptosporidium spp. Identification and isolation of carrier calves are essential for disease management. Texas Veterinary Medical Diagnostic Laboratory current methods for calf diarrhea pathogen identification include electron microscopy (EM) for BCV and BRV and a direct fluorescent antibody test (DFAT) for organism detection of Cryptosporidium spp. A workflow was developed consisting of an optimized fecal nucleic acid purification and multiplex reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) for single tube concurrent detection of BCV, BRV, and Cryptosporidium spp., and an internal control to monitor nucleic acid purification efficacy and PCR reagent functionality. In "spike-in" experiments using serial dilutions of each pathogen, the analytical sensitivity was determined to be <10 TCID(50)/ml for BCV and BRV, and <20 oocysts for Cryptosporidium spp. Analytical specificity was confirmed using Canine and Feline coronavirus, Giardia spp., and noninfected bovine purified nucleic acid. Diagnostic sensitivity was ≥98% for all pathogens when compared with respective traditional methods. The results demonstrate that the newly developed assay can purify and subsequently detect BCV, BRV, and Cryptosporidium spp. concurrently in a single PCR, enabling simplified and streamlined calf diarrhea pathogen identification.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades de los Bovinos/diagnóstico , Coronavirus Bovino/aislamiento & purificación , Cryptosporidium/aislamiento & purificación , Diarrea/veterinaria , Rotavirus/aislamiento & purificación , Animales , Bovinos , Enfermedades de los Bovinos/microbiología , Criptosporidiosis/diagnóstico , Criptosporidiosis/patología , Criptosporidiosis/veterinaria , Diarrea/diagnóstico , Diarrea/parasitología , Diarrea/virología , Tomografía con Microscopio Electrónico , Heces/parasitología , Heces/virología , Ácidos Nucleicos , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa de Transcriptasa Inversa , Rotavirus/clasificación , Sensibilidad y Especificidad
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...