Is it possible to predict the origin of epithelial cells? - A comparison of secondary transfer of skin epithelial cells versus vaginal mucous membrane cells by direct contact.

In alleged sexual assault and rape cases, the focus has often been to collect samples from the victim's body, for detection of body fluids or skin cells from the offender. But in many cases intimate body samples from the perpetrator(s) can also be informative. However, in cases where the female victim claims vaginal penetration, the defendant may display an alternative explanation to the DNA findings, i.e. that the victim's skin cells has been secondarily transferred to his penis. We hypothesized that female DNA will be detected in a significantly greater amount on swabs from penis after intercourse than after secondary transfer by skin contact. Fourteen male-female couples were recruited to test the above hypothesis, by collecting penile swabs from 3 specified anatomical locations: Glans, shaft, and the coronal sulcus, after two different situations: Vaginal intercourse and secondary transfer of epithelial cells by skin contact. The results show that penile swabs following intercourse produce significantly higher DNA concentrations than after secondary transfer by skin contact. Our results, indicates which of the anatomical regions is best suited for sampling. The DNA profiling results show a preponderance of female profiles over male profiles following intercourse compared to secondary skin contact. Based on these data, it is possible to make a statistical model to distinguish between samples taken after intercourse and samples taken after secondary transfer by skin contact based on the amount of female DNA and mixture proportion (Mx) between female and male DNA in samples collected from penis swabs.

Detecting and collecting traces of semen and blood from outdoor crime scenes using crime scene dogs and presumptive tests.

In 2009, the Norwegian police academy educated their first crime scene dogs, trained to locate traces of seminal fluid and blood in outdoor and indoor crime scenes. The Department of Forensic Biology was invited to take part in this project to educate the police in specimen collection and presumptive testing. We performed tests where seminal fluid was deposited on different outdoor surfaces from between one hour to six days, and blood on coniferous ground from between one hour to two days. For both body fluids the tests were performed with three different volumes. The crime scene dogs located the stains, and acid phosphatase/tetrabasebariumperoxide was used as presumptive tests before collection for microscopy and DNA analysis. For seminal fluid the dogs were able to locate all stains for up to two days and only the largest volume after four days. The presumptive tests confirmed the dog's detection. By microscopy we were able to detect spermatozoa for the smallest volumes up to 32h, and for the largest volume up to 4 days, and the DNA results are in correlation to these findings. For blood all the stains were detected by the dogs, except the smallest volume of blood after 32h. The presumptive tests confirmed the dog's detection. We were able to get DNA results for most stains in the timeframe 1-48h with the two largest volumes. The smallest volume shows diversities between the parallels, with no DNA results after 24h. These experiments show that it is critical that body fluids are collected within a timeframe to be able to get a good DNA result, preferably within the first 24-48h. Other parameters that should be taken into account are the weather conditions, type of surfaces and specimen collection.