Stereotactic radiosurgery for the treatment of brain metastases: impact of cerebral disease burden on survival.

Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for brain metastases has been carried out at the Leeds Gamma Knife Centre since March 2009. The aim of this study was to examine the outcomes and toxicity in our initial cohort of patients. The medical records of patients with brain metastases referred to the Leeds Gamma Knife Centre between March 2009 and July 2010 were retrospectively reviewed. Data on survival, primary tumour, Karnofsky performance status, time from diagnosis to identification of brain metastases, previous treatment for brain metastases and results of staging prior to SRS were recorded. Patients were followed up with regular magnetic resonance imaging of the brain for a minimum of 6 months and data on toxicity and oral steroid dose were recorded. Statistical analysis was carried out using SPSS v14.0. Survival curves were compared using the Log Rank test. Fifty eight patients (19 male) had a median survival of 50.4 weeks (95% CI, 32.6-68.2 weeks). Lung (36%) and breast (27%) were the most common primary tumours. Patients with a total volume of metastases treated < 5000 mm(3) (p = 0.007) or between 5000 mm(3) and 10,000 mm(3) (p = 0.01) had significantly improved survival compared with patients with a total treated volume > 10,000 mm(3). In addition, largest treated lesion < 5000 mm(3) was a positive prognostic factor. Patients with a single metastasis did not survive significantly longer than those with multiple metastases. Steroid dose dropped significantly after SRS (p < 0.01) and was the same or less in 91% of patients. There were only three cases of grade 3 toxicity. Our study reports survival comparable with other series on radiosurgery and demonstrates a significant decrease in steroid dose following treatment. It also shows that the size of the largest treated metastasis and total volume of metastatic disease seemed a better predictor of outcome than number of metastases treated.

Randomised trial of external beam radiotherapy alone or combined with high-dose-rate brachytherapy boost for localised prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND: A randomised phase-III trial compared external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) alone with EBRT combined with high-dose-rate brachytherapy boost (HDR-BTb) in localised prostate adenocarcinoma. METHODS: From December 1997 to August 2005, 218 patients were assigned to EBRT alone (n=108) or EBRT followed by a temporary high-dose-rate implant (n=110). Patients were stratified according to tumour stage, PSA, Gleason score and androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). Biochemical/clinical relapse-free survival (RFS) was the primary endpoint. Secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), urinary and bowel toxicity. RESULTS: RFS was significantly higher in patients treated with EBRT+HDR-BTb (log rank p=0.04). In multivariate analysis treatment arm, risk category and ADT were significant covariates for risk of relapse. Differences in OS were not significant. Incidence of severe late urinary and bowel morbidity was similar. CONCLUSIONS: EBRT+HDR-BTb resulted in a significant improvement in RFS compared to EBRT alone with a 31% reduction in the risk of recurrence (p=0.01) and similar incidence of severe late urinary and rectal morbidity.

Eye doses to staff in a nuclear medicine department.

OBJECTIVE: Occupational radiation doses to the Nuclear Medicine Department staff at Mount Vernon Hospital are routinely measured using optically stimulated luminescence dosemeters for whole-body effective dose and ring thermoluminescence dosemeters (TLDs) for finger dose. In 2002, a project was carried out using LiF:Mg,Cu,P Chinese TLDs to measure the dose to the lens of the eye received by staff during normal working procedures. METHODS: Separate pairs of TLDs were worn by staff on their forehead between their eyes while dispensing and releasing in the radiopharmacy, injecting, and when administering I-131 capsules to patients. The dose received was calculated using calibration data from identical TLDs irradiated with Tc-99m, I-131, and the Ir-192 source of a Gammamed High Dose Rate (HDR) treatment unit. Data were collected over a 5-month period and the mean dose to the eye was calculated for each procedure. RESULTS: Using a typical yearly workload, the annual dose to the eye for a single member of staff was calculated and found to be 4.5 mSv. CONCLUSION: The occupational eye dose limit was, at the time, 150 mSv; therefore, staff were well below the level (3/10th of this limit) that would have required them to be classified. However, there have been large increases in radiopharmacy production and I-131 therapies administered at Mount Vernon in subsequent years. It is therefore expected that the eye dose received by staff will have increased to be significantly higher than 4.5 mSv and will in fact be greater than 6 mSv, which is 3/10th of the proposed new dose limit and would require these staff to become classified workers.

High dose rate afterloading brachytherapy for prostate cancer: catheter and gland movement between fractions.

Fractionated high dose rate afterloading brachytherapy for prostate cancer requires a robust means of catheter fixation with good quality assurance. Catheter position and dosimetry has been formally evaluated in 20 consecutive patients representing a total of 332 catheters undergoing two HDR afterloading brachytherapy fractions over 36 h. The mean interfraction movement of catheters as measured by external length was less than 1 mm, but within the prostate on consecutive CT scans there was a mean interfraction movement of 11.5 mm away from the prostate base. This has a significant impact on implant dosimetry as measured by D90 and the COIN index, unless corrected by repositioning the catheters.