Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros











Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Lancet Respir. Med ; 12(2): 153-166, fev.2024.
Artículo en Inglés | CONASS, Sec. Est. Saúde SP, SESSP-IDPCPROD, Sec. Est. Saúde SP | ID: biblio-1527259

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction, sleep-disordered breathing, comprising obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) and central sleep apnoea (CSA), is associated with increased morbidity, mortality, and sleep disruption. We hypothesised that treating sleep-disordered breathing with a peak-flow triggered adaptive servo-ventilation (ASV) device would improve cardiovascular outcomes in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction. METHODS: We conducted a multicentre, multinational, parallel-group, open-label, phase 3 randomised controlled trial of peak-flow triggered ASV in patients aged 18 years or older with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (left ventricular ejection fraction ≤45%) who were stabilised on optimal medical therapy with co-existing sleep-disordered breathing (apnoea-hypopnoea index [AHI] ≥15 events/h of sleep), with concealed allocation and blinded outcome assessments. The trial was carried out at 49 hospitals in nine countries. Sleep-disordered breathing was stratified into predominantly OSA with an Epworth Sleepiness Scale score of 10 or lower or predominantly CSA. Participants were randomly assigned to standard optimal treatment alone or standard optimal treatment with the addition of ASV (1:1), stratified by study site and sleep apnoea type (ie, CSA or OSA), with permuted blocks of sizes 4 and 6 in random order. Clinical evaluations were performed and Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire, Epworth Sleepiness Scale, and New York Heart Association class were assessed at months 1, 3, and 6 following randomisation and every 6 months thereafter to a maximum of 5 years. The primary endpoint was the cumulative incidence of the composite of all-cause mortality, first admission to hospital for a cardiovascular reason, new onset atrial fibrillation or flutter, and delivery of an appropriate cardioverter-defibrillator shock. All-cause mortality was a secondary endpoint. Analysis for the primary outcome was done in the intention-to-treat population. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01128816) and the International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number Register (ISRCTN67500535), and the trial is complete. FINDINGS: The first and last enrolments were Sept 22, 2010, and March 20, 2021. Enrolments terminated prematurely due to COVID-19-related restrictions. 1127 patients were screened, of whom 731 (65%) patients were randomly assigned to receive standard care (n=375; mean AHI 42·8 events per h of sleep [SD 20·9]) or standard care plus ASV (n=356; 43·3 events per h of sleep [20·5]). Follow-up of all patients ended at the latest on June 15, 2021, when the trial was terminated prematurely due to a recall of the ASV device due to potential disintegration of the motor sound-abatement material. Over the course of the trial, 41 (6%) of participants withdrew consent and 34 (5%) were lost to follow-up. In the ASV group, the mean AHI decreased to 2·8-3·7 events per h over the course of the trial, with associated improvements in sleep quality assessed 1 month following randomisation. Over a mean follow-up period of 3·6 years (SD 1·6), ASV had no effect on the primary composite outcome (180 events in the control group vs 166 in the ASV group; hazard ratio [HR] 0·95, 95% CI 0·77-1·18; p=0·67) or the secondary endpoint of all-cause mortality (88 deaths in the control group vs. 76 in the ASV group; 0·89, 0·66-1·21; p=0·47). For patients with OSA, the HR for all-cause mortality was 1·00 (0·68-1·46; p=0·98) and for CSA was 0·74 (0·44-1·23; p=0·25). No safety issue related to ASV use was identified. INTERPRETATION: In patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction and sleep-disordered breathing, ASV had no effect on the primary composite outcome or mortality but eliminated sleep-disordered breathing safely.


Asunto(s)
Síndromes de la Apnea del Sueño/complicaciones , Función Ventricular Izquierda , Volumen Sistólico , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/complicaciones
2.
Hypertension ; 58(5): 811-7, 2011 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21968750

RESUMEN

Recognition and treatment of secondary causes of hypertension among patients with resistant hypertension may help to control blood pressure and reduce cardiovascular risk. However, there are no studies systematically evaluating secondary causes of hypertension according to the Seventh Joint National Committee. Consecutive patients with resistant hypertension were investigated for known causes of hypertension irrespective of symptoms and signs, including aortic coarctation, Cushing syndrome, obstructive sleep apnea, drugs, pheochromocytoma, primary aldosteronism, renal parenchymal disease, renovascular hypertension, and thyroid disorders. Among 125 patients (age: 52±1 years, 43% males, systolic and diastolic blood pressure: 176±31 and 107±19 mm Hg, respectively), obstructive sleep apnea (apnea-hypopnea index: >15 events per hour) was the most common condition associated with resistant hypertension (64.0%), followed by primary aldosteronism (5.6%), renal artery stenosis (2.4%), renal parenchymal disease (1.6%), oral contraceptives (1.6%), and thyroid disorders (0.8%). In 34.4%, no secondary cause of hypertension was identified (primary hypertension). Two concomitant secondary causes of hypertension were found in 6.4% of patients. Age >50 years (odds ratio: 5.2 [95% CI: 1.9-14.2]; P<0.01), neck circumference ≥41 cm for women and ≥43 cm for men (odds ratio: 4.7 [95% CI: 1.3-16.9]; P=0.02), and presence of snoring (odds ratio: 3.7 [95% CI: 1.3-11]; P=0.02) were predictors of obstructive sleep apnea. In conclusion, obstructive sleep apnea appears to be the most common condition associated with resistant hypertension. Age >50 years, large neck circumference measurement, and snoring are good predictors of obstructive sleep apnea in this population.


Asunto(s)
Resistencia a Medicamentos , Hipertensión/tratamiento farmacológico , Hipertensión/etiología , Apnea Obstructiva del Sueño/complicaciones , Anciano , Análisis de Varianza , Antihipertensivos/uso terapéutico , Determinación de la Presión Sanguínea , Brasil , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Hiperaldosteronismo/complicaciones , Hiperaldosteronismo/diagnóstico , Hipertensión/epidemiología , Incidencia , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Polisomnografía/métodos , Obstrucción de la Arteria Renal/complicaciones , Obstrucción de la Arteria Renal/diagnóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Apnea Obstructiva del Sueño/diagnóstico , Apnea Obstructiva del Sueño/epidemiología
3.
Hypertension ; Hypertension;58(5): 811-817, 2011. ilus, tab
Artículo en Inglés | Sec. Est. Saúde SP, SESSP-IDPCPROD, Sec. Est. Saúde SP | ID: biblio-1063305

RESUMEN

Recognition and treatment of secondary causes of hypertension among patients with resistant hypertension mayhelp to control blood pressure and reduce cardiovascular risk. However, there are no studies systematically evaluatingsecondary causes of hypertension according to the Seventh Joint National Committee. Consecutive patients withresistant hypertension were investigated for known causes of hypertension irrespective of symptoms and signs, includingaortic coarctation, Cushing syndrome, obstructive sleep apnea, drugs, pheochromocytoma, primary aldosteronism, renalparenchymal disease, renovascular hypertension, and thyroid disorders. Among 125 patients (age: 52 1 years, 43%males, systolic and diastolic blood pressure: 176 31 and 107 19 mm Hg, respectively), obstructive sleep apnea(apnea-hypopnea index: 15 events per hour) was the most common condition associated with resistant hypertension(64.0%), followed by primary aldosteronism (5.6%), renal artery stenosis (2.4%), renal parenchymal disease (1.6%),oral contraceptives (1.6%), and thyroid disorders (0.8%). In 34.4%, no secondary cause of hypertension was identified(primary hypertension). Two concomitant secondary causes of hypertension were found in 6.4% of patients. Age 50years (odds ratio: 5.2 [95% CI: 1.9 –14.2]; P 0.01), neck circumference 41 cm for women and 43 cm for men (oddsratio: 4.7 [95% CI: 1.3–16.9]; P 0.02), and presence of snoring (odds ratio: 3.7 [95% CI: 1.3–11]; P 0.02) werepredictors of obstructive sleep apnea. In conclusion, obstructive sleep apnea appears to be the most common conditionassociated with resistant hypertension. Age 50 years, large neck circumference measurement, and snoring are goodpredictors of obstructive sleep apnea in this population.


Asunto(s)
Causalidad , Hipertensión , Presión Arterial , Síndromes de la Apnea del Sueño
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA