Erosions and fatty lesions of sacroiliac joints in patients with axial spondyloarthritis: evaluation of different MRI techniques and two scoring methods.

OBJECTIVE: Assessment of structural damage of sacroiliac joints (SIJ) in patients with axial spondyloarthritides (axSpA) has been discussed as a useful outcome measure in clinical trials. The aim of our study was to evaluate different magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scoring methods and pulse sequences with a focus on fatty lesions and bony erosions. METHODS: Seventy-five patients with the diagnosis of axSpA underwent MRI at 3 timepoints as part of the ESTHER trial, which compared 2 groups of patients treated with etanercept or sulfasalazine. Two MRI sequences [unenhanced T1-weighted (T1w) turbo spin-echo (TSE) and unenhanced T1w opposed-phase gradient-echo sequences (opGRE)] and 2 different scoring systems (simple and comprehensive Berlin method) were used for the evaluation of fatty lesions and erosions of the SIJ. Differences between techniques and methods were evaluated by intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and standardized response means (SRM). RESULTS: Applying the simple Berlin method, mean fatty lesion scores for etanercept-treated patients were 4.59 and 5.19 at baseline and Week 48, respectively, while the comprehensive Berlin method revealed mean fatty lesion scores of 6.59 and 7.64, respectively. Corresponding SRM were 0.59 and 0.86 for simple and comprehensive methods, respectively, while ICC dropped from 0.76-0.77 to 0.59-0.62. Scoring of erosions on T1w opGRE images resulted in a higher interreader agreement (ICC of 0.65) compared to T1w TSE sequences (ICC of 0.18). CONCLUSION: Better characterization of fatty lesion changes within 1 year was achieved by the comprehensive Berlin scoring method; however, more reader variation has to be taken into account. The delineation of erosions is markedly improved when using T1w opGRE pulse sequences.

Characterisation of hand small joints arthropathy using high-resolution MRI--limited discrimination between osteoarthritis and psoriatic arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that microanatomical differences in joint disease localisation could be exploited using high-resolution MRI to better differentiate among rheumatoid arthritis (RA), spondyloarthritis/psoriatic arthritis (SpA/PsA) and osteoarthritis (OA) in clinical practice. METHODS: Sixty-nine patients with suspected inflammatory joint disease of the hand or feet underwent high-resolution MRI using a small loop coil. Images were scored blinded to the clinical status. Various joint changes like periostitis, osteitis, erosions, enthesitis and synovitis were recorded. The image-based diagnosis was compared with the clinical diagnosis. RESULTS: In 59.4 % of the patients the clinical diagnosis was confirmed on image analysis. This was high for OA (80 %), moderately good for RA (67 %) but only 50 % for SpA/PsA. The major difficulty was to distinguish OA from SpA/PsA where common imaging findings are evident including periostitis (SpA/PsA 45 %, OA 40 % compared with RA 0 %; P = 0.015). Likewise, osteitis was frequently detected in SpA/PsA (79 %) and OA (80 %) and less frequently in RA (42 %) (P = 0.014). CONCLUSION: Characterisation of inflammatory disorders of small joints merely using high-resolution MRI remains challenging especially in the differentiation between OA and PsA. These findings are likely explained by common microanatomical similarities in disease expression rather than limitations of imaging techniques. KEY POINTS: • High-resolution MRI is increasingly used to investigate joint disease. • Osteitis and periostitis occur in psoriatic and osteoarthritis (but not rheumatoid arthritis). • In severely affected patients the amount of synovitis and erosions is similar.