Identification of Antibodies to DQß:DRα Interisotypic Heterodimers in Human Sera.

BACKGROUND: HLA class II antigens, DR, DQ, and DP, comprised an α and ß chains, which typically combine, within the same isotype, to form the major histocompatibility complex:peptide complex. Interisotypic pairing is not commonly observed. Although reports of DQß:DRα heterodimers exist, the pairing was reported to be unstable and, therefore, not studied to any extent. METHODS: DQß:DRα single antigens were produced through transfectant cell lines and used to identify and characterize positive reactive human sera by a multiplex bead-based assay. RESULTS: Stable DQß:DRα transfectants were constructed. Cell surface staining with class II-specific monoclonal antibodies revealed that some DQB1 alleles appear to be more efficient in expressing DQß:DRα heterodimers. Interestingly, alleles within the same serological group varied in their efficiency of forming dimers on the cell surface. For example, DQß0601:DRα had the highest transfection and cell membrane expression efficiency among 16 common DQB1 alleles tested. In contrast, DQß0603:DRα-positive transfectants demonstrated minimal surface expression. Assembly of DQß0601:DRα was not affected by the presence of a DQα chain. DQß0601:DRα and DQß0603:DRα single-antigen beads were used to screen human sera. Positive sera were identified that reacted to the unique epitopes of DQß0601:DRα protein on the cell surface of the transfectants. CONCLUSIONS: Our studies have demonstrated that unique DQß:DRα heterodimers can be formed and are stably expressed on the cell surface. Such antigenic combinations, presented on single-antigen beads, demonstrated that patient sera can react with such heterodimers. Investigations on the potential clinical roles of antibodies against such interisotypic heterodimers are now possible.

HLA class I peptide polymorphisms contribute to class II DQß0603:DQα0103 antibody specificity.

Antibodies reactive to human leukocyte antigens (HLA) represent a barrier for patients awaiting transplantation. Based on reactivity patterns in single-antigen bead (SAB) assays, various epitope matching algorithms have been proposed to improve transplant outcomes. However, some antibody reactivities cannot be explained by amino acid motifs, leading to uncertainty about their clinical relevance. Antibodies against the HLA class II molecule, DQß0603:DQα0103, present in some candidates, represent one such example. Here, we show that peptides derived from amino acids 119-148 of the HLA class I heavy chain are bound to DQß0603:DQα0103 proteins and contribute to antibody reactivity through an HLA-DM-dependent process. Moreover, antibody reactivity is impacted by the specific amino acid sequence presented. In summary, we demonstrate that polymorphic HLA class I peptides, bound to HLA class II proteins, can directly or indirectly be part of the antibody binding epitope. Our findings have potential important implications for the field of transplant immunology and for our understanding of adaptive immunity.

COVID-19 infection and vaccination rarely impact HLA antibody profile in waitlisted renal transplant candidates- a multicenter cohort.

Although rare, infection and vaccination can result in antibodies to human leukocyte antigens (HLA). We analyzed the effect of SARS-CoV-2 infection or vaccination on HLA antibodies in waitlisted renal transplant candidates. Specificities were collected and adjudicated if the calculated panel reactive antibodies (cPRA) changed after exposure. Of 409 patients, 285 (69.7 %) had an initial cPRA of 0 %, and 56 (13.7 %) had an initial cPRA > 80 %. The cPRA changed in 26 patients (6.4 %), 16 (3.9 %) increased, and 10 (2.4 %) decreased. Based on cPRA adjudication, cPRA differences generally resulted from a small number of specificities with subtle fluctuations around the borderline of the participating centers' cutoff for unacceptable antigen listing. All five COVID recovered patients with an increased cPRA were female (p = 0.02). In summary, exposure to this virus or vaccine does not increase HLA antibody specificities and their MFI in approximately 99 % of cases and 97 % of sensitized patients. These results have implications for virtual crossmatching at the time of organ offer after SARS-CoV-2 infection or vaccination, and these events of unclear clinical significance should not influence vaccination programs.

Identification of the novel HLA-B*08:79:02 allele by next generation sequencing.

The HLA-B*08:79:02 allele differs from the HLA-B*08:01:01:01 by 4 nucleotides in Exon 3.

Loss of heterozygosity leading to incorrect HLA typing for platelet-transfusion refractory patient.

BACKGROUND: Management of platelet-transfusion refractory (PR) patients due to anti-HLA antibodies includes the provision of HLA-matched (HLAm) platelets (PLT) or PLTs that are negative for HLA antigens corresponding to the recipient antibodies. Obtaining HLAm PLTs is predicated on accurate HLA antigen typing of the recipient and donor. Here, we present the clinical implications of a case involving loss of heterozygosity (LOH) in a patient presented for PR workup. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: HLA typing was performed by three methods: (1) Real-time PCR; (2) Sequence-specific oligonucleotide (SSO) typing test; and (3) Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS). Cytogenomic SNP microarray was utilized to assess LOH. RESULTS: A 30-year-old female with newly diagnosed acute myelogenous leukemia was found to be PR secondary to HLA sensitization. A peripheral blood (PB) sample, containing 93% myeloid blast cells, was sent for HLA typing for the provision of HLAm PLTs. HLA typing revealed homozygosity at the HLA-A locus but was heterozygous at the -B and -C loci. After chemotherapy, HLA typing on a new PB sample, devoid of blast cells, identified HLA-A locus heterozygosity, which was subsequently confirmed by real-time PCR and NGS. Cytogenomic SNP microarray analysis demonstrated LOH of the HLA-A locus on chromosome 6p in the pretreatment sample but not in the posttreatment sample. CONCLUSION: In hematologic patients with high tumor burden, HLA homozygosity should be viewed with suspicion for potential LOH. Therefore, HLA testing should be repeated, preferably with a non-hematological source (e.g., buccal swab) or following successful reduction of the tumor burden.

A Primer on Chimerism Analysis: A Straightforward, Thorough Review.

Short tandem repeat (STR) analysis to assess chimerism is a critical aspect of routine care particularly in patients facing stem cell transplants but is also relevant in other clinical scenarios. STR analysis provides a means to assess donor and recipient cellular origins in a patient, and, as such, can inform engraftment, rejection, and relapse status in stem cell transplant recipients. In this review of STR testing, the most commonly used method to assess chimerism, its background, procedural details, and clinical utility are discussed.

Development of donor specific antibodies after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in kidney and heart transplant recipients.

This study examined the development of new or changes in donor specific antibodies (DSA) mean-fluorescence intensity (MFI) after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in 100 kidney and 50 heart transplant recipients. The study was performed when the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommended two doses of Pfizer/BioNTech [BNT162b2] and Moderna [mRNA-1273 SARS-CoV-2] vaccine or 1 dose Johnson & Johnson/Janssen [Ad26.COV2·S] vaccines for full vaccination in transplant recipients. A novel assay bead-based platform for detecting antibodies against 4 domains of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein to determine vaccine response (SA) and one nucleocapsid protein (NC) to determine prior SARS-CoV-2 infection was utilized. These assays were performed on the multiplex, bead-based platform utilized to assay DSA levels. 61/150 patients (40.7%) had successful vaccination. 18 patients had confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection based on positive NC assay or previous Covid-19 oropharyngeal swab. 138 patients had no DSA prior to vaccination but 3 heart recipients developed new DSA's. Among 12 patients with known DSA prior to vaccination, 4 developed new DSA's or increased MFI. All 7 patients with new or increased DSA had stable graft function without rejection and had no changes in immunosuppression. All 8 patients with stable post vaccine DSA had stable graft function and immunosuppression was not changed. The presence of DSA before vaccination was associated with subsequent development of increased MFI or new DSA's (p = 0.001). There was no association between pre-vaccine DSA and positive vaccine response (NS). There was no association with successful vaccination or prior SARS-CoV-2 infection and DSA changes (NS).

Implementing virtual crossmatch based diagnostic management teams in human leukocyte antigen laboratories and transplant programs.

Histocompatibility testing has continuously evolved since its inception. One such advancement is the implementation of the virtual crossmatch (VXM). Recent changes to allograft allocation schemes have resulted in increased organ sharing over greater distances, resulting in expanded utilization of the VXM to assess donor: recipient compatibility. In fact, the VXM has become a major arbitrator of pre-transplant compatibility assessment prior to both deceased and living donor organ allocation. This shift in pre-transplant practice is concurrent with the US healthcare systems' move towards more inclusive and coordinated team-based management approach to disease diagnosis. Diagnostic Management Teams (DMTs) exemplify this shift in patient care. Our institution seized the opportunity to build and implement a VXM DMT to improve and streamline pre-transplant assessment. This VXM DMT is compliant with US regulatory standards and provides a consultative report containing relevant pre-transplant information, test interpretation as well as recommendations for HLA additional (if any) testing. Herein we describe the development of and experience with the VXM DMT a year after its launch.

hlaR: A rapid and reproducible tool to identify eplet mismatches between transplant donors and recipients.

Eplet mismatch load, both overall and at the single molecule level, correlates with transplant recipient outcomes. However, precise eplet assessment requires high-resolution HLA typing of both the donor and recipient. Anything less than high-resolution typing requires imputation of HLA types. The currently available methods to identify eplet mismatch are both tedious and demanding. Therefore, we developed a software package and user-friendly web application (hlaR), that simplifies the workflow of eplet analysis, provides functions to impute high-resolution from low-resolution data and calculates both overall and single molecule eplet mismatch for single or multiple donor recipient pairs. Compared to manual assessments using currently available tools (namely, HLAMatchMaker), hlaR resulted in only minimal discrepancy in eplet mismatches (mean absolute difference of 0.56 for class I and 0.86 for class II for unique sum across loci). Additionally, output of the single molecule eplet function compared well to manual calculation, with an average single antigen count increase of 0.19. Importantly, the hlaR tool permits rapid and reproducible imputation and eplet mismatch including comparison between eplet reference tables (e.g. HLAMatchMaker version 2 or 3). Users can import data from a spreadsheet rather than relying on keystroke entry of individual donor and recipient data, thus reducing the risk of data entry errors. The resulting improved scalability of the hlaR tool is highlighted by plotting analysis time against the size of the input dataset. The new hlaR tool can provide eplet mismatch data with a streamlined workflow. With decreased effort from the end user, eplet matching and mismatch load data can be further incorporated into both research and clinical use.

Employment status at transplant influences ethnic disparities in outcomes after deceased donor kidney transplantation.

BACKGROUND: African American (AA) recipients of deceased-donor (DD) kidney transplants (KT) have shorter allograft survival than recipients of other ethnic groups. Reasons for this disparity encompass complex interactions between donors and recipients characteristics. METHODS: Outcomes from 3872 AA and 19,719 European American (EA) DDs who had one kidney transplanted in an AA recipient and one in an EA recipient were analyzed. Four donor/recipient pair groups (DRP) were studied, AA/AA, AA/EA, EA/AA, and EA/EA. Survival random forests and Cox proportional hazard models were fitted to rank and evaluate modifying effects of DRP on variables associated with allograft survival. These analyses sought to identify factors contributing to the observed disparities in transplant outcomes among AA and EA DDKT recipients. RESULTS: Transplant era, discharge serum creatinine, delayed graft function, and DRP were among the top predictors of allograft survival and mortality among DDKT recipients. Interaction effects between DRP with the kidney donor risk index and transplant era showed significant improvement in allograft survival over time in EA recipients. However, AA recipients appeared to have similar or poorer outcomes for DDKT performed after 2010 versus before 2001; allograft survival hazard ratios (95% CI) were 1.15 (0.74, 1.76) and 1.07 (0.8, 1.45) for AA/AA and EA/AA, compared to 0.62 (0.54, 0.71) and 0.5 (0.41, 0.62) for EA/EA and AA/EA DRP, respectively. Recipient mortality improved over time among all DRP, except unemployed AA/AAs. Relative to DDKT performed pre-2001, employed AA/AAs had HR = 0.37 (0.2, 0.69) versus 0.59 (0.31, 1.11) for unemployed AA/AA after 2010. CONCLUSION: Relative to DDKT performed before 2001, similar or worse overall DCAS was observed among AA/AAs, while EA/EAs experienced considerable improvement regardless of employment status, KDRI, and EPTS. AA recipients of an AA DDKT, especially if unemployed, had worse allograft survival and mortality and did not appear to benefit from advances in care over the past 20 years.

Stem cell donor HLA typing improves CPRA in kidney allocation.

The Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) Kidney Allocation System provides a priority to sensitized candidates based on the calculated panel reactive antibody (CPRA) value. The human leukocyte antigen (HLA) haplotype reference panel used for calculation of the CPRA by the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS), the OPTN contractor, has limitations. We derived a novel panel from the National Marrow Donor Program HLA haplotype data set and compared the accuracy of CPRA values generated with this panel (NMDP-CPRA) to those generated from the UNOS panel (UNOS-CPRA), using predicted and actual deceased donor kidney offers for a cohort of 24 282 candidates. The overall accuracy for kidney offers was similar using NMDP-CPRA and UNOS-CPRA. Accuracy was slightly higher for NMDP-CPRA than UNOS-CPRA for candidates in several highly sensitized CPRA categories, with deviations in linkage disequilibrium for Caucasians and the smaller size of the UNOS panel as contributing factors. HLA data derived from stem cell donors yields CPRA values that are comparable to those derived from deceased kidney donors while improving upon several problems with the current reference panel. Consideration should be given to using stem cell donors as the reference panel for calculation of CPRA to improve equity in kidney transplant allocation.

Development and Validation of a Multiplex, Bead-based Assay to Detect Antibodies Directed Against SARS-CoV-2 Proteins.

BACKGROUND: Transplant recipients who develop COVID-19 may be at increased risk for morbidity and mortality. Determining the status of antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 in both candidates and recipients will be important to understand the epidemiology and clinical course of COVID-19 in this population. While there are multiple tests to detect antibodies to SARS-CoV-2, their performance is variable. Tests vary according to their platforms and the antigenic targets which make interpretation of the results challenging. Furthermore, for some assays, sensitivity and specificity are less than optimal. Additionally, currently available serological tests do not exclude the possibility that positive responses are due to cross reactive antibodies to community coronaviruses rather than SARS-CoV-2. METHODS: This study describes the development and validation of a high-throughput multiplex antibody detection assay. RESULTS: The multiplex assay has the capacity to identify, simultaneously, patient responses to 5 SARS-CoV-2 proteins, namely, the full spike protein, 3 individual domains of the spike protein (S1, S2, and receptor binding domain), and the nucleocapsid protein. The antibody response to the above proteins are SARS-CoV-2-specific, as antibodies against 4 common coronaviruses do not cross-react. CONCLUSIONS: This new assay provides a novel tool to interrogate the spectrum of immune responses to SAR-CoV-2 and is uniquely suitable for use in the transplant setting. Test configuration is essentially identical to the single antigen bead assays used in the majority of histocompatibility laboratories around the world and could easily be implemented into routine screening of transplant candidates and recipients.

The utility of second single antigen bead assay: Clearing the water or stirring up mud?

Though solid-phase single antigen bead (SAB) testing has provided major advances to the HLA community and organ allocation, it has not been without limitations. In particular, false-positive reactions lead to interpretative challenges and the potential to preclude a transplant if the corresponding antigens are deemed unacceptable. Two different vendor platforms are commercially available for SAB testing, one more recent than the other. The aim herein was to assess the benefit of using the newer SAB platform in situations where the primary platform yielded suspicious (specifically, false positive) reactions. Therefore, 42 serum samples with commonly encountered false-positive patterns observed in our laboratory were tested with the newer platform. Cases were classified as resolved, equivalent, or divergent based on whether the second platform produced no reactivity, the same pattern, or a distinctly different pattern compared to the primary platform, respectively. Approximately 33% of cases were resolved, 46% were equivalent, and 21% were divergent. The project revealed advantages of adding a second SAB platform to the laboratory's test menu including resolving challenging samples and including broader coverage of different alleles and unique class II alpha/beta subunit combinations. However, the challenges of validating, maintaining, and billing for another test method in the laboratory may be barriers to routine use.