Post-COVID-19 Ongoing Symptoms and Health-Related Quality of Life: Does Rehabilitation Matter?: Preliminary Evidence.

OBJECTIVE: Individuals with persisting symptoms after coronavirus disease 2019 have reported a decrease in health-related quality of life. This study explores the outcome of 50 subjects with post-coronavirus disease 2019 ongoing symptoms including "long COVID"(symptoms lasting over 3 mos), after a rehabilitation program focused on three symptoms: fatigue, breathlessness, and pain. The aims were as follows: to assess the feasibility of the program, to observe a possible change in symptoms and quality of life (null hypothesis: no differences in variables before and after treatment), and to investigate a possible relationship between symptoms and quality of life. DESIGN: This is a retrospective observational study. RESULTS: Symptoms intensity measured with numeric rating scale decreased. Mean differences are as follows: breathlessness, -2.91; fatigue, -2.05; and pain, -2.41 ( P > 0.001). Quality of life measured with Euroqol-5D improved. Mean differences are as follows: Euroqol-5D index, 0.104, and Euroqol-5D visual analog scale, 19.21 ( P < 0.001). Effect size of these changings is classifiable as large (Cohen d > 0.8 and <1.3) except for Euroqol-5D index (Cohen d = -0.575), resulting medium (>0.5 and <0.8). Correlation (Pearson r ) between symptoms and Euroqol-5D resulted moderate for pain and fatigue (-0.609 and -0.531, P < 0.001) and low for breathlessness (-0.533, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Rehabilitation can be feasible and may improve symptoms and quality of life. Further research is needed.

Appropriateness of admission to rehabilitation: definition of a set of criteria and rules through the application of the Delphi method.

BACKGROUND: Controlling inappropriateness of care is an essential issue, especially in rehabilitation medicine. In fact, admitting a patient to a rehabilitation hospital or unit is a complex decision also due to the absence of shared and objective admission criteria. AIM: The aim was to define clinical admission criteria and rules in rehabilitation medicine. DESIGN: Survey based on the application of the Delphi method on a sample of rehabilitation medicine experts. SETTING: Administration of electronic online questionnaires concerning appropriateness of admission to intensive rehabilitation. POPULATION: Volunteer sample of 53 experts with the following inclusion criteria: being members of the Italian Society of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, having practical experience in the research field, agreeing to the confidentiality of the information and being skilled in both rehabilitation and healthcare organization. METHODS: A three-round Delphi survey was conducted according to international guidelines. The two initial rounds consisted of an electronic online questionnaire while in the third one a report of the results was provided to the participants. The experts had to score their agreement with each item in the questionnaires, based on either a Likert scale or a dichotomous statement. Consensus between the experts was assessed. RESULTS: A total of 53 health professionals completed the Delphi survey. 19 out of 20 Italian regions were represented. The first round consisted of 8 multiple-choice questions. The second round was designed according to the suggestions provided by the panelists in the previous one and consisted of a twelve items questionnaire. At the end of the survey, seven criteria of appropriateness of admission to rehabilitation were identified and five rules defining an appropriate admission to a rehabilitation facility were elaborated. CONCLUSIONS: This study represents an attempt to create a worthwhile and reliable tool for a more conscious clinical practice in admission to rehabilitation, based on a set of shared criteria and rules. CLINICAL REHABILITATION IMPACT: To increase appropriateness of admission to rehabilitation. Improving appropriateness in healthcare delivery must be a primary goal in order to improve healthcare quality, save money and ensure system sustainability.

First impact of COVID-19 on services and their preparation. "Instant paper from the field" on rehabilitation answers to the COVID-19 emergency.

This paper reports the immediate impact of the epidemic on rehabilitation services in Italy, the first country in Europe hit by COVID-19. In a country with almost 5000 Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine physicians, the webinar had 230 live viewers (4.5%), and more than 8900 individual visualizations of the recorded version. The overall inadequate preparation of the rehabilitation system to face a sudden epidemic was clear, and similar to that of the acute services. The original idea of confining the COVID-19 cases to some areas of rehabilitation wards and/or hospitals, preserving others, proved not to be feasible. Continuous reorganization and adaptation were required due to the rapid changes. Overall, rehabilitation needs had to surrender to the more acute emergency, with total conversion of beds, wards and even hospitals. The quarantine needs heavily involved also outpatient services that were mostly closed. Rehabilitation professionals needed support, but also acted properly, again similarly to what happened in the acute wards. The typical needs of rehabilitation, such as human and physical contacts, but also social interactions including patient, team, family and caregivers, appeared clearly in the current unavoidable need of being suppressed. These notes could serve the preparation of other services worldwide.

Rehabilitative treatment of patients with COVID-19 infection: the P.A.R.M.A. evidence based clinical practice protocol.

BACKGROUND: The impact of the SARS-CoV-2 on the National Health System (NHS) required a reorganization of the various levels of care, which also involved the rehabilitation reality. AIM OF THE WORK: A clinical practice review of the literature was conducted to provide operational-rehabilitation guidelines adapted to the local reality and to the recent corporate reorganization in the context of the COVID-19 emergency. METHODS: A practice review of the available scientific evidence was regularly conducted from the start of the COVID-19 pandemic to periodically update the clinical practice guidelines. Articles that met the following inclusion criteria were included: studies conducted on human adult subjects with COVID-19 infection, undergoing rehabilitation in any hospitalization setting. RESULTS: The results of this clinical practice update were periodically discussed with colleagues and collaborators in a multi-professional team, in order to guarantee a good clinical practice protocol, named P.A.R.M.A. CONCLUSIONS: The P.A.R.M.A. protocol is the result of a periodic review literature update, which has allowed us to take charge of patients affected by COVID-19 according to the most up-to-date clinical evidences, guaranteeing a shared and uniform treatment within a local reality in an era of health emergency.

Psychometric validation of the Italian Rehabilitation Complexity Scale-Extended version 13.

In Italy, at present, a well-known problem is inhomogeneous provision of rehabilitative services, as stressed by MoH, requiring appropriate criteria and parameters to plan rehabilitation actions. According to the Italian National Rehabilitation Plan, Comorbidity, Disability and Clinical Complexity should be assessed to define the patient's real needs. However, to date, clinical complexity is still difficult to measure with shared and validated tools. The study aims to psychometrically validate the Italian Rehabilitation Complexity Scale-Extended v13 (RCS-E v13), in order to meet the guidelines requirements. An observational multicentre prospective cohort study, involving 8 intensive rehabilitation facilities of the Emilia-Romagna Region and 1712 in-patients, [823 male (48%) and 889 female (52%), mean age 68.34 years (95% CI 67.69-69.00 years)] showing neurological, orthopaedic and cardiological problems, was carried out. The construct and concurrent validity of the RCS-E v13 was confirmed through its correlation to Barthel Index (disability) and Cumulative Illness Rating Scale (comorbidity) and appropriate admission criteria (not yet published), respectively. Furthermore, the factor analysis indicated two different components ("Basic Care or Risk-Equipment" and "Medical-Nursing Needs and Therapy Disciplines") of the RCS-E v13. In conclusion, the Italian RCS-E v13 appears to be a useful tool to assess clinical complexity in the Italian rehab scenario case-mix and its psychometric validation may have an important clinical rehabilitation impact allowing the assessment of the rehabilitation needs considering all three dimensions (disability, comorbidity and clinical complexity) as required by the Guidelines and the inhomogeneity could be reduced.

Subarachnoid hemorrhage and extrapyramidal symptoms: a case report.

INTRODUCTION: Parkinsonism may occur after brain lesions such as subarachnoid hemorrhage (1), hydrocephalus (2,3), slit ventricle (4), or shunt revision (5).Until now, pathogenesis remains unclear. METHOD: Case Report. RESULTS: We described the case of a 53 years Caucasian male with subarachnoid hemorrhage after anterior communicating artery aneurysm rupture, with subsequent complications and early development of bilateral extrapiramidal symptoms. A DatSCAN showed an impairment of the nigro-sytriatal dopaminergic way. Levodopa therapy induced complete symptoms remission. CONCLUSIONS: Patient developed Parkinson Disease responding to Levodopa. Subarachnoid hemorrhage itself, shunt placement and revision, hydrocephalus, slit ventricle: all of these complications occurred and could be possible causes of shear, torsion, and ischemia of the nigrostriatal projection fibres.