Genitourinary syndrome of menopause: Evaluation of symptoms, using a questionnaire, in a research setting, before and after treatment.

BACKGROUND: Genitourinary syndrome of menopause (GSM) is a common condition, yet there is no defined, objective, and reproducible intervention with which to make a diagnosis. There are many different treatment options available, but without the correct diagnosis, affected women are unable to access the right therapy. This paper reports on the questionnaire arm of the VAN study (VAginal Health - What's Normal?) which aimed to evaluate the performance and acceptability of the methods of assessment of GSM, described below. OBJECTIVES: To determine the value of the Day-to-Day Impact of Vaginal Aging (DIVA) questionnaire: a multidimensional measure of the impact of vaginal symptoms on functioning and well-being in postmenopausal women, in a prospective, observational, feasibility study. METHODS: 60 women were recruited to the study (20 premenopausal, asymptomatic women (control group) and 40 peri- and postmenopausal, symptomatic women). All women had a baseline assessment, using three different interventions, in addition to the DIVA questionnaire and symptomatic women were offered treatment, followed by a second assessment undertaken at 16 weeks, using the same interventions. This paper focusses on the outcomes for the questionnaire and specifically on the paired data sets, before and after treatment. RESULTS: An improvement in the score for all four sections of DIVA (Activities of daily living, Emotions, Sexual Activity, and Feelings about yourself and your body (female embodiment)) was observed, following any treatment. Additional questions were added to DIVA, to assess patient preference in relation to the different diagnostic interventions. These included a speculum examination as part of the clinical assessment, a smear taken from the lateral vaginal wall to assess the vaginal maturation index, both undertaken by a clinician and a self-administered tampon to collect vaginal secretions, to determine the small molecule metabolite profile, using NMR spectroscopy, and to enable analysis of the vaginal microbiome. The medical standard tampon was the preferred intervention, before and after treatment, for women eligible for treatment. CONCLUSION: The VAN study demonstrates that DIVA, a previously tested questionnaire, is an easily accessible intervention, to assess the impact of urogenital symptoms on quality-of-life indicators in women in the United Kingdom with GSM and that women prefer to use a tampon themselves, rather than have a clinician performed vaginal speculum examination or a vaginal smear.

Exploring the potential for a set of UK hormone replacement therapy eligibility guidelines: A suggested proposal on the topic of venous thromboembolism.

OBJECTIVE: To explore the feasibility for a set of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) eligibility guidelines that follow a similar structure and appearance to the UKMEC guidance for contraception. To enable non-specialists to feel confident in safely prescribing HRT and to aid selection of the most appropriate first line treatment. METHODS: A literature review was undertaken with evidence summarised on the topic of venous thromboembolism (VTE) which is an area frequently considered a barrier to prescribing. Medical eligibility tables which separated HRT by type were then produced for a set of VTE-related topics. RESULTS: The literature search confirmed the importance of distinguishing between different types and routes of administration when considering the suitability of HRT. Much of the evidence has been based on older synthetic types of HRT and whilst they still have a role in management, these medications carry different risks to the now more accepted use of body identical types. The search also highlighted the nuances involved, increasing the complexity of forming guidelines, with the need for consideration to be given to an individual's own perception of risks and benefits. CONCLUSION: The demand for HRT has risen in recent years and there is a need for this to be managed effectively, particularly for patients in primary care. The production of this type of guidance will enable the non-specialist to feel confident in safe and evidence-based prescribing. The guidelines are also designed to demonstrate to prescribers which complex patients should be referred onto menopause specialists.

Methods of assessment of urogenital atrophy and the implication of these in estimated prevalence rates: A review of the literature.

BACKGROUND: Urogenital atrophy is caused by lack of estrogen, most commonly due to the menopause. Symptoms frequently experienced include vaginal dryness, itching, burning, sexual difficulties and urinary problems, all of which can have a significant adverse effect on quality of life. Effective treatments are available for women with a confirmed diagnosis. The aim of this review is to determine whether a consistent diagnostic intervention exists, to support an accurate indication of prevalence. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study is a review of the literature. RESULTS: A total of 1469 papers were identified on an initial search, including randomised controlled trials, cross sectional and cohort studies. By adoption of a systematic process, the number of papers in the final review was eight.There is inconsistent use of available assessment methods to diagnose urogenital atrophy in symptomatic women. There are no validated clinical assessment tools. CONCLUSION: Absence of a defined intervention with which to confirm a diagnosis of urogenital atrophy, based on symptoms, influences research outcomes, but more importantly affects access to an accurate diagnosis and treatment, for affected women. This would ideally take place in a primary care setting.

Progesterone from ovulatory menstrual cycles is an important cause of breast cancer.

Many factors, including reproductive hormones, have been linked to a woman's risk of developing breast cancer (BC). We reviewed the literature regarding the relationship between ovulatory menstrual cycles (MCs) and BC risk. Physiological variations in the frequency of MCs and interference with MCs through genetic variations, pathological conditions and or pharmaceutical interventions revealed a strong link between BC risk and the lifetime number of MCs. A substantial reduction in BC risk is observed in situations without MCs. In genetic or transgender situations with normal female breasts and estrogens, but no progesterone (P4), the incidence of BC is very low, suggesting an essential role of P4. During the MC, P4 has a strong proliferative effect on normal breast epithelium, whereas estradiol (E2) has only a minimal effect. The origin of BC has been strongly linked to proliferation associated DNA replication errors, and the repeated stimulation of the breast epithelium by P4 with each MC is likely to impact the epithelial mutational burden. Long-lived cells, such as stem cells, present in the breast epithelium, can carry mutations forward for an extended period of time, and studies show that breast tumors tend to take decades to develop before detection. We therefore postulate that P4 is an important factor in a woman's lifetime risk of developing BC, and that breast tumors arising during hormonal contraception or after menopause, with or without menopausal hormone therapy, are the consequence of the outgrowth of pre-existing neoplastic lesions, eventually stimulated by estrogens and some progestins.

Consensus-led recommendations supporting choice and personalisation of Hormone replacement therapy in menopause care.

OBJECTIVE: Inequity of access and choice to different hormone replacement therapy (HRT) products across the UK has been suggested (Hillman, 2020). While, the cause is not entirely understood, potential contributors include conflicting national guidance, economic deprivation and a local formulary approach. With a diverse and growing population of women reaching and living well beyond the menopause, the impact of this inequity is becoming more pronounced, and challenges the goal of providing personalised care. The study objective is to establish a consensus that supports a greater equity of access and choice of HRT and provision of individualised care. STUDY DESIGN: Modified Delphi study designed by UK HCPs with expertise in menopause care. This group identified 40 consensus statements over four key topics, related to access and choice of different HRT products. An online 4-point Likert scale questionnaire, sent to UK HCPs, was used to assess agreement, with a consensus threshold set at 75%. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: 150 HCP responses between June and September 2021. RESULTS: A total of 137 responses were received. Analysis identified 37/40 statements attaining very high agreement (≥ 90%) and 3/40 statements attaining high agreement (< 90% and ≥75%). Nine recommendations were developed with the intent to inform potential improvements to menopause care in the UK. CONCLUSIONS: The high levels of agreement displayed suggest a desire to change the way menopause care is delivered in the UK. Implementation of the suggested recommendations has the potential to improve equity of access to licensed treatment options, compliant with the NICE recommendation for personalisation of care.