Whole person care: Outcomes from a 5-year care model integrating primary care into a behavioral health clinic.

INTRODUCTION: Integrated mental and physical health care has the potential to improve health outcomes. A behavioral health organization established a reverse integration program site using a co-located model to provide primary care services to patients receiving behavioral health services. We ask whether this model of co-located care was effective in improving a range of physical health outcomes for clients. This program was funded with a grant from the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration Primary and Behavioral Health Care Integration. METHOD: Patients received services in a community mental health setting that embedded primary care services. The population included adult patients with mental illness, substance use disorder (SUD), or co-occurring medical diagnoses in an urban setting. Just under half of the patients identified as non-White, and over one quarter identified as Hispanic. These characteristics demonstrate a medically complex and underserved population. This description and exploratory analysis utilized National Outcome Measures data and clinical health measures from electronic health records. We stratified data by SUD and mental illness diagnoses. We measured changes in health outcomes for this complex population of 532 patients from 2015 to 2019. RESULTS: From enrollment to last visit, patient outcomes improved for blood pressure and cholesterol. Conversely, waist circumference and breath carbon monoxide levels significantly worsened. DISCUSSION: This reverse integration co-location program demonstrates that positive health outcomes can be achieved through evidence-based care, adaptable clinic arrangements, and robust community connections and support. More work is needed to generate positive health outcomes in medically complex patients. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

"I just wanna be another person at school": Disclosing veteran identity on campus and effects on campus engagement.

Objective: To describe how veterans feel about disclosing their military status on campus and impacts on engagement with social and health-related services. Participants: Thirty-one university student veterans who participated in a student veterans' health study. Participants self-identified as White and male (90%) with an average age of 29.5 years and 6.7 years of military service. Methods: Qualitative interviews explored veterans' perceptions of belonging on campus and the impact of veteran identity on educational experiences. Data analysis used an inductive, content-based approach. Results: Themes included: (1) varied feelings around disclosing military service history, with many preferring not to disclose; (2) visibility of resources on campus; and (3) use of resources on campus for social engagement, mental, and physical health. Conclusions: Findings illustrate student veterans' complex experiences, and how feelings about disclosing veteran identity on campus relate to resource use. Campuses should acknowledge and explore this complexity with student veterans' input to ensure that supports meet their needs.

Variations in Risk and Motivations for Substance Use over the Course of Military Service.

BACKGROUND: Epidemiological data identify risk factors related to substance use among military service members to inform prevention and treatment. Less is known about how motivations and risks for substance use vary over a military service career. The study goal was to explore substance use patterns and motivations among a sample of United States undergraduate student veterans in order to identify periods of risk. Methods: Qualitative interviews were conducted (n = 31) between December 2018 and April 2019. Transcripts were coded in ATLAS.ti using thematic content analysis. Results: Interviews revealed complex motivations around substance use and identified key periods of risk. 1) Pre-service: Participants reported using alcohol and marijuana, primarily during social activities. 2) During service: Participants described a culture of heavy alcohol and tobacco use in social contexts, but little use of other substances. Post-deployment was a notable exception, when some reported heavier alcohol use and use of other drugs, including opiates, cocaine, and ecstasy. 3) Post-service: Transitioning out of the military was described as difficult; some participants reported heavier use of substances during this period. Some participants quit smoking after military service, or switched to vaping. Others reported use of alcohol and/or marijuana to calm themselves, relieve stress, and enable sleep. Conclusions: These data indicate that the periods immediately following deployment and transition out of the military may be especially high-risk for heavy substance use and use of a broader range of substances. This highlights the need for tailored interventions and messaging at different points of military service, particularly during periods of greatest risk.