Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Visc Surg ; 157(6): 453-459, 2020 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32247623

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Patients with neurogenic bowel dysfunction (NBD) suffer severe constipation and/or fecal incontinence that are very difficult to treat. Most medication-based and interventional treatments have been unsuccessful. The goal of this study was to assess the medium-term effectiveness of the Malone procedure in all patients with NBD, as an alternative to colostomy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this retrospective single-center study, 23 patients who underwent Malone's surgical treatment were analyzed. The main criteria were the usage of antegrade colonic enemas (ACE) after Malone's procedure at the most recent follow-up and comparison of quality of life scores before and after surgery. RESULTS: The post-procedure mortality was zero, but an overall morbidity of 60% was observed, including minor complications (Clavien 1, 2) in 56%. The median follow-up was 33 months. At the most recent follow-up, the utilization rate of the neo-appendicostomy for ACE was 69.6%; 76.9% of the patients using ACE reported improvement in quality of life scores. Secondary colostomy was performed in 21.7% for functional failure of the Malone procedure. CONCLUSION: The Malone procedure is a reliable technique that can be used in the therapeutic strategy for managing NBD patients with incontinence/constipation refractory to usual treatments. It should be considered as a therapeutic step to take before resorting to colostomy.


Asunto(s)
Estreñimiento/cirugía , Enema/métodos , Incontinencia Fecal/cirugía , Intestino Neurogénico/cirugía , Estreñimiento/fisiopatología , Incontinencia Fecal/fisiopatología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Intestino Neurogénico/fisiopatología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Estudios Retrospectivos
2.
J Visc Surg ; 155(5): 355-363, 2018 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29631948

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The indications for use of biological mesh prostheses are very limited because of their high cost, but include parietal repair in a contaminated setting. Their efficacy has been questioned by several recent studies. We therefore studied the results of all of our patients who received a biological prosthesis, including hernia recurrence and infectious complications. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the outcomes of 68 patients who underwent biological prosthesis placement from 2009 to 2015 in a single center. RESULTS: The site of implantation was on the anterior abdominal wall in 49 (72%) of cases, in the pelvis in 19 (28%). The median follow-up was 19 months. In the early post-operative period, 22 (32.3%) of patients presented with wall abscess; eight (11.7%) underwent surgical revision and seven (10.2%) underwent interventional radiological drainage. In the medium term, 41/56 (73%) had a late complication; 32 (57%) of the patients developed recurrent herniation and 15 (26.7%) of them were re-operated. In addition, nine (16%) of patients developed a late surgical site infection and eight (14.2%) a chronic residual infection. In multivariate analysis, the risk factors for recurrence were parastomal hernia (P=0.007) and a history of recurrent hernia (P=0.002). CONCLUSION: A majority of patients developed recurrent incisional herniation in the medium term. This puts the use of biological prostheses into question. These results need to be compared to those of semi-absorbable prostheses.


Asunto(s)
Pared Abdominal/cirugía , Bioprótesis/efectos adversos , Hernia Ventral/cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Mallas Quirúrgicas/efectos adversos , Absceso/epidemiología , Anciano , Drenaje/métodos , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Herniorrafia/efectos adversos , Herniorrafia/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Hernia Incisional/epidemiología , Hernia Incisional/etiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Recurrencia , Análisis de Regresión , Reoperación/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estomas Quirúrgicos/efectos adversos , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/epidemiología , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
3.
Arch Pediatr ; 23(10): 1067-1070, 2016 Oct.
Artículo en Francés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27642145

RESUMEN

Tracheal injuries are a rare but potentially lethal entity, most particularly in pediatrics. While standardized management allows quick therapeutic decisions in adults, based on the results of the initial bronchoscopy, the use of diagnostic exams remains unclear during childhood. We describe the case of a 6-year-old patient with a posterior tracheal wall injury due to a car accident, which was managed without tracheal endoscopy. Based on our experience and on a literature review, we suggest clarifying the management of tracheal injury in children, defining the place of computerized tomodensitometry and endoscopy in the decision process.


Asunto(s)
Tratamiento Conservador , Tráquea/lesiones , Accidentes de Tránsito , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Niño , Disnea/etiología , Femenino , Humanos , Enfisema Mediastínico/etiología , Rotura , Enfisema Subcutáneo/etiología , Tráquea/diagnóstico por imagen
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA