Barriers to research progress for perioperative care practitioners working in cardiothoracic surgery.

Policy and research literature worldwide support the need to build research capacity and capability among non-medical practitioners within healthcare systems. However, there exists a paucity of evidence on whether practitioners in cardiothoracic surgery are attuned to this and on what barriers or enablers exist. A survey was carried out with non-medical practitioners working in cardiothoracic surgery in the United Kingdom to explore attitudes towards health research and audit, and to identify current challenges and barriers to surgical research and audit as perceived by cardiothoracic nurses and allied health professionals. A total of 160 completed questionnaires were returned. 99% of respondents supported the need for research and believed that evidence-based surgical care improves outcomes for patients. Seventy-two percent reported that their employer motivates them to take part in national research or audit but, only 22% were allocated time to do so within their role; 96% reported their interest in being involved in research and audit, yet only 30% believed they had the skills to undertake research, and 96% reported needing additional training. More work is needed to increase awareness, capacity and capability among cardiothoracic surgery care practitioners, and indeed other specialities to achieve research progress.

The role of the bedside assistant in robot-assisted surgery: A critical synthesis.

INTRODUCTION: Robot-assisted surgery has grown exponentially since its inception and first approval in the United States in the year 2000. The surgeon operating with the assistance of the robot sits remotely to the patient and another practitioner assists at the bedside. The role of the bedside assistant and the training that is required to undertake this role are understudied topics. AIM: To explore the functions, training and professional development of the bedside assistant in robot-assisted surgery and propose the necessary foundations for the safe enactment of the role in the United Kingdom. METHODS: Through critical interpretative synthesis, relevant literature was systematically searched and analysed to inform integration of evidence. RESULTS: Seventy-three studies were retrieved from the literature, across several health care disciplines and surgical specialities. These were critically analysed to inform a theoretically sound account grounded on evidence. CONCLUSION: The role, functions and skills of the bedside assistant in robot-assisted surgery vary across contexts. These were analysed and critically synthetised to produce several keys to the success of bedside assistants in robot-assisted surgery in the context of the United Kingdom and of its national regulations.

The current state of the surgical care team in the United Kingdom: Shall we 'do a time out'?

The reduction of junior doctors' working hours over the last two decades paved the way to non-medical practitioners providing care traditionally discharged by surgeons and other medics. These registered practitioners play a vital role in the care of patients in surgery and work within multi-disciplinary teams comprising surgical care practitioners, advanced clinical practitioners in surgery, and physician associates, with significant experience in nursing or allied health care professional practice. Health Education England and the Royal Colleges of Surgeons have invested considerably in developing the relevant educational frameworks to support and quality assure the training of non-medical practitioners. Notwithstanding, to ascertain whether advanced and extended practice have been developed appropriately, a wide critical stance is needed. This article aims to begin to analyse the status quo of the extended surgical team and of the associated pitfalls and challenges, making conservative comparisons between the roles with the international scene. The objective is to help students, trainees and all involved in surgical care to adopt an informed and critical viewpoint about the extended surgical team in the United Kingdom, in the hope that this can lead to improvement and forward planning in workforce design for the benefit of patients and their communities.

Awareness of Human Factors in the operating theatres during the COVID-19 pandemic.

One of the priorities at our large Operating Theatres Department is to support awareness and basic education of the multi-disciplinary teams in clinical Human Factors, to help build competence and capacity in healthcare towards a resilient system. From May 2019 until February 2020, our Human Factors Champions embarked on a project called Observation of Non-technical Skills and Teamwork in the operating theatres (ONSeT), to monitor and evaluate the benefits of local Human Factors education. In September 2020, six months after the COVID-19 pandemic hit the UK and caused a major disruption of surgical services, we decided to investigate the usefulness of the project and the impact of COVID-19 in the operating theatres, looking through the eyes of the Human Factors Champions. Results pointed to a consensus about ONSeT having helped during the pandemic, with regards to how teams worked and in enabling team leaders to be more responsive. Human Factors Champions found that feedback on performance was received in a non-threatening way and observation of performance became 'second nature'. As organisations need to develop critical thinking, we think that the ONSeT project has helped us build some capacity for this, from the front-line onwards.