ADME properties of CHF6366, a novel bi-functional M3 muscarinic receptor antagonist and ß2 adrenoceptor agonist (MABA) radiolabelled at both functional moieties.

CHF6366, a dual action ß2-receptor agonist and M3-muscarinic receptor antagonist developed for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) was [14C]-radiolabelled on the two different functional moieties of the molecule (either aminobutanolic or carbamate) to characterise its ADME profile following intravenous (IV), intratracheal (IT) and oral (PO) administration.A very low oral bioavailability and a good balance between absorption and lung retention after IT administration were observed, together with a rapid distribution throughout the body and a complete metabolic transformation of the parent drug without relevant gender difference.CHF6366 was observed fully hydrolysed to alcohol (CHF6387) and carboxylic acid (CHF6361) in plasma and urine after IV and IT administration, and mainly unchanged in faeces only after oral administration. An important number of metabolites containing aminobutanolic moiety was excreted via urine, whereas carbamate-containing derivatives were excreted mainly by bile.The major metabolic routes of the alcoholic moiety (CHF6387) included isomerisation (Ma7), conjugation with glucuronic acid and dehydrogenation, while the carboxylic acid moiety (CHF6361) was mainly metabolised through oxidation, glucuronide conjugation and, in both pathways, combinations of those metabolic reactions.No major differences arose also from in vitro metabolism profiles investigated using liver microsomes and hepatocytes of different species.

Inter-compound and Intra-compound Global Sensitivity Analysis of a Physiological Model for Pulmonary Absorption of Inhaled Compounds.

In recent years, global sensitivity analysis (GSA) has gained interest in physiologically based pharmacokinetics (PBPK) modelling and simulation from pharmaceutical industry, regulatory authorities, and academia. With the case study of an in-house PBPK model for inhaled compounds in rats, the aim of this work is to show how GSA can contribute in PBPK model development and daily use. We identified two types of GSA that differ in the aims and, thus, in the parameter variability: inter-compound and intra-compound GSA. The inter-compound GSA aims to understand which are the parameters that mostly influence the variability of the metrics of interest in the whole space of the drugs' properties, and thus, it is useful during the model development. On the other hand, the intra-compound GSA aims to highlight how much the uncertainty associated with the parameters of a given drug impacts the uncertainty in the model prediction and so, it is useful during routine PBPK use. In this work, inter-compound GSA highlighted that dissolution- and formulation-related parameters were mostly important for the prediction of the fraction absorbed, while the permeability is the most important parameter for lung AUC and MRT. Intra-compound GSA highlighted that, for all the considered compounds, the permeability was one of the most important parameters for lung AUC, MRT and plasma MRT, while the extraction ratio and the dose for the plasma AUC. GSA is a crucial instrument for the quality assessment of model-based inference; for this reason, we suggest its use during both PBPK model development and use.

Building in-house PBPK modelling tools for oral drug administration from literature information.

The interest in using physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models as a support to the drug development decision making process has rapidly increased in the last years. These kind of models are examples of the "bottom up" modelling strategy, which progressively integrates into a mechanistic framework different information as soon as they become available along the drug development. For this reason PBPK models can be used with different aims, from the early stages of drug development up to the clinical phases. Different software tools are nowadays available. They can be categorized in "designed software" and "open software". The first ones typically include commercial platforms expressly designed to implement PBPK models, in which the model structure is pre-defined, assumptions are generally not explicitly declared and equations are hidden to the user. Even if the software is validated and routinely used in the pharmaceutical industry, sometimes they do not allow working with the flexibility needed to cope with specific applications/tasks. For this reason, some scientists prefer to define and implement their own PBPK tool in "open" software. This paper shows how to build an in-house PBPK tool from species-related physiological information available in the literature and a limited number of drug specific parameters generally made available by the drug development process. It also reports the results of an evaluation exercise that compares simulated plasma concentration-time profiles and related pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters (i.e., AUC, Cmax and Tmax) with literature and in-house data. This evaluation involved 25 drugs with different physico-chemical properties, intravenously or orally administrated in three different species (i.e., rat, dog and man). The comparison shows that model predictions have a good degree of accuracy, since the average fold error for all the considered PK parameters is close to 1 and only in few cases the fold error is greater than 2. In summary, the paper demonstrates that addressing specific aims when needed is possible by creation of in-house PBPK tools with satisfactory performances and it provides some suggestions how to do that.

Investigation of Lung Pharmacokinetic of the Novel PDE4 Inhibitor CHF6001 in Preclinical Models: Evaluation of the PreciseInhale Technology.

BACKGROUND: Preclinical evaluation of new chemical entities (NCEs) designed to be administered by inhalation route requires lung administration to rodents, especially in the discovery phase. Different administration methods have been used until now, but more efforts are required to obtain controlled and reproducible lung deposition when only small amounts of neat powder material are available. METHODS: The PreciseInhale platform used in the present study enables well-controlled powder aerosol exposures with only small amounts of micronized neat material, providing data on inhalation pharmacokinetic (PK) of NCEs at a very early stage. The DustGun aerosol technology uses compressed air to generate a respirable aerosol from milligram-amounts of powder that is delivered to one animal at a time. The new methodology was used to investigate the inhalation PK and lung retention in the rat of the novel Chiesi PDE4 inhibitor CHF6001 in three exposure models of the PreciseInhale platform: nose-only, intratracheally intubated rat, and the isolated, ventilated, and perfused rat lung. Results were compared with data from two other pulmonary delivery systems commonly used in preclinical studies: liquid instillation and powder insufflation. RESULTS: Administration of micronized CHF6001 using the PreciseInhale system yielded lung exposures in the same range as the other tested devices, but the reproducibility in lung deposition was improved. The initial amount of CHF6001 in lungs at the first sampling time point was close to the predetermined target dose. Tracheal deposition with PreciseInhale (0.36 ± 0.22 µg) was significantly less than with other tested delivery systems: PennCentury (23.7 ± 3.2 µg) and Airjet (25.6 ± 7.2 µg). CONCLUSIONS: The PreciseInhale platform enabled the administration of CHF6001 powder with good accuracy and reproducibility, with low tracheal deposition. The new platform can be used at an early discovery stage to obtain inhalatory PK data for respirable aerosols of neat NCE powder without excipients and with minimal use of dry powder formulation work.

Potent, Metabolically Stable 2-Alkyl-8-(2H-1,2,3-triazol-2-yl)-9H-adenines as Adenosine A2A Receptor Ligands.

Inhibition of adenosine A2A receptors has been shown to elicit a therapeutic response in preclinical animal models of Parkinson's disease (PD). We previously identified the triazolo-9H-purine, ST1535, as a potent A(2A)R antagonist. Studies revealed that ST1535 is extensively hydroxylated at the ω-1 position of the butyl side chain. Here, we describe the synthesis and evaluation of derivatives in which the ω-1 position has been substituted (F, Me, OH) in order to block metabolism. The stability of the compounds was evaluated in human liver microsomes (HLM), and the affinity for A(2A)R was determined. Two compounds, (2-(3,3-dimethylbutyl)-9-methyl-8-(2H-1,2,3-triazol-2-yl)-9H-purin-6-amine (3 b) and 4-(6-amino-9-methyl-8-(2H-1,2,3-triazol-2-yl)-9H-purin-2-yl)-2-methylbutan-2-ol (3 c), exhibited good affinity against A(2A)R (Ki =0.4 nM and 2 nM, respectively) and high in vitro metabolic stability (89.5% and 95.3% recovery, respectively, after incubation with HLM for two hours).

In vitro and in vivo metabolism of CHF 6001, a selective phosphodiesterase (PDE4) inhibitor.

1. The metabolism of CHF 6001, a novel PDE4 inhibitor, was determined in vitro in mouse, rat, dog, monkey and human microsomes and hepatocytes and in vivo in plasma, urine, feces and bile of rats after intravenous and intratracheal administration. 2. The behavior of CHF 6001 in microsomes and hepatocytes changed across species. CYP3A4/5 isoenzymes were identified to be the primary enzymes responsible for the metabolism of CHF 6001 in human liver microsomes. 3. In the rat, CHF 6001 was found extensively metabolized in urine, feces and bile, but not in plasma, where CHF 6001 was the main compound present. The metabolite profiles were different in the four biological matrices from both qualitative and quantitative point of view. 4. CHF 6001 was metabolized through hydrolysis with the formation of the alcohol CHF 5956, loss of a chlorine atom, loss of the N-oxide, hydroxylation, loss of the cyclopropylmethyl group in the alcohol moiety, conjugation with glucuronic acid, glutathione and cysteine-glycine. 5. The major metabolite present in the bile was isolated and characterized by nuclear magnetic resonance analysis. It derived from CHF 6001 through contraction of the pyridine-N-oxide ring to N-hydroxy pyrrole and conjugation with glucuronic acid.