Association between malocclusions and amelogenesis imperfecta genotype and phenotype: A systematic review.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this systematic review (Prospero CRD42022323188) is to investigate whether an association exists in patients with amelogenesis imperfecta (AI) between occlusal characteristics and genotype on the one hand and enamel structural phenotype on the other. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Reports up to May 2023 assessing occlusion of individuals with AI were browsed in a systematic search using Medline, Embase, ISI Web of Science, and the grey literature. Randomised control trials, case control studies, and case series specifying both occlusion, assessed by cephalometric or clinical analysis, and genotype or dental phenotype in patients with AI were included without any age limitation. Two authors independently selected the publications and extracted the data in accordance with the PRISMA statement. The risk of bias was assessed with the Critical Appraisal Checklists from the Johanna Briggs Institute. RESULTS: Twenty-five articles were chosen from the 261 results. Most of the included publications were case series (n=22) and case control studies (n=3). Thirteen studies reported both a genotype (ENAM, FAM83H, FAM20A, DLX3, CNMM4, WDR72) and occlusal diagnostic. The methodological quality of the studies was moderate. All AI phenotypes showed an open bite (OB) rate around 35%, except mixed form. The other malocclusions were not often mentioned. No correlation between occlusal phenotype and genotype or AI phenotype could be identified in patients with AI, as most studies had short occlusal descriptions and small sample sizes. CONCLUSION: OB malocclusions were more frequently reported in AI. This review highlighted the need for a more accurate description of orofacial features associated with AI, to better clarify the role of amelogenesis genes in the regulation of craniofacial morphogenesis and identify patients requiring orthognathic surgery at an early stage.

Association between Dentofacial Features and Bullying from Childhood to Adulthood: A Systematic Review.

Bullying occurs when an individual is repeatedly victimised by negative actions performed by peers. As oral features, like malocclusion and dental structural defects, can promote psychological distress, which is also found in those who are bullied, we aimed to study the association between orofacial conditions and bullying. A systematic review (PROSPERO CRD42022331693), including articles dealing with bullying and dentofacial traits, was performed following the PRISMA chart. The iterative search of eligible publications was carried out on 27 March 2023 on four databases (PubMed, PubPsych, Web of Science and Cochrane Reviews) and in the grey literature. Among the 25 articles included, 4 referred to qualitative studies, which analysed 632 interviews with children, 8 interviews with parents, 292 letters, and 321 Twitter posts. The other 21 were cross-sectional studies, which included 10,026 patients from 7 to 61 years old. Two of the qualitative studies and seven of the cross-sectional studies rated a low risk of bias, according to Joanna Briggs Institute's Critical Appraisal Tools. The majority of studies (88%) reported a relationship between malocclusion or structural defects and exposure to bullying among young adolescents. Structural dental abnormalities and severe malocclusion should be managed, among others, for psychological questions because they crystallise the loss of self-confidence and increase the risk of bullying.

Comparison of student's perceptions between 3D printed models versus series models in paediatric dentistry hands-on session.

INTRODUCTION: Dental education emphasises the acquisition of technical skills. Recent advances in 3D printing technologies have enabled the emergence of new educational tools usable in hands-on work sessions. The possibility to print 3D models from CT scans of patients is now available to dental practitioners. The aim of this study was to develop and evaluate a 3D printed model for paediatric dentistry training and compare it to the reference model used in our faculty. MATERIALS AND METHOD: 3D models were obtained by modifying and printing the CT scan of a young patient using the Voco® Solflex 350 3D® printer and Voco® V-print resin. Thirty-four students were asked to perform a pulpotomy and preparation for a stainless steel paediatric crown on tooth 85 on both the 3D printed model and the industrial model (Frasaco®), and then to answer a questionnaire. The data were analysed using R software. RESULT: Both models obtained high scores. The learning potential and its applicability to clinical practice showed no statistically significant difference. Although the colour and the simulation of the proximal area disturbed the students (P = 0.009), the 3D models were seen as a good idea (P = 0.012). When it came to model design, the students appreciated the simulation of caries on 3D models (P = 0.0001) and considered the use 3D of models as a more realistic experience (P = 0.017). DISCUSSION: Although this study has some limitations (number of participants, choice of the models to be compared), it constitutes the first attempt to compare students' perception of 3D and series models. It shows that 3D technology makes it possible to obtain models of similar quality while offering a more realistic experience. CONCLUSION: There are still many ways in which these models could be improved. For example, modifying the quality of resins could improve the milling sensation, and the design could be improved to achieve better contact points. Nevertheless, these 3D models offer the possibility to give the patient a more central place in the education of future practitioners.