Black women's perspectives on bladder health: Social-ecological and life course contexts.

AIMS: This paper explores Black women's perspectives on bladder health using a social-ecological conceptual framework and life course perspective. METHODS: We conducted a directed content analysis of data from the Study of Habits, Attitudes, Realities, and Experiences (SHARE), a focus group study by the Prevention of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (PLUS) Research Consortium. Analysis was conducted on data from five focus groups and a member-checking session where all participants self-identified as Black or African American. RESULTS: Forty-two participants aged 11-14 or 45+ years reported life course experiences with their bladder. The intersection of race and gender was the lens through which participants viewed bladder health. Participants' accounts of their perspectives on bladder health explicitly and implicitly revealed structural racism as an explanatory overarching theme. Participants described (a) historically-rooted and still pervasive practices of discrimination and segregation, engendering inequitable access to quality medical care and public facilities, (b) institutional barriers to toileting autonomy in educational and occupational settings, promoting unhealthy voiding habits, (c) internalized expectations of Black women's stereotyped role as family caregiver, compromising caregiver health, (d) lack of reliable information on bladder health, leading to unhealthy bladder behaviors, and (e) potentially stress-related comorbid chronic conditions and associated medication use, causing or exacerbating bladder problems. CONCLUSIONS: Bladder health promotion interventions should address social-ecological and life course factors shaping Black women's bladder health, including social and structural barriers to accessing equitable health information and medical care.

Disparities Research for Pelvic Floor Disorders: A Systematic Review and Critique of Literature.

IMPORTANCE: Understanding the status of pelvic floor disorder (PFD) disparities research will allow the opportunity to advance future pelvic floor equity efforts. OBJECTIVES: The aims of the study were to (1) characterize the landscape of PFD disparities literature using the 3 phases of disparities research framework, (2) describe the characteristics of PFD disparities studies, and (3) identify critical knowledge gaps. STUDY DESIGN: We performed a systematic review of peer-reviewed publications addressing disparities in PFDs among U.S. populations from PubMed, Embase, Scopus, or the Cochrane Database indexed between 1997 and 2022. Using the triphasic framework for advancing health disparities research by Kilbourne et al (Am J Public Health. 2006;96(12):2113-21), we categorized the included studies into the detecting phase (identifies and measures disparities in historically marginalized populations), understanding phase (establishes disparity determinants), or reducing phase (conducts interventions to alleviate inequities). All screening, coding, and quality reviews were independently performed by at least 2 authors. We used descriptive analysis and the χ2 test for comparisons. RESULTS: The initial search identified 10,178 studies, of which 123 were included. Of the included studies, 98 (79.7%), 22 (17.9%), and 3 (2.4%) studies were detecting, understanding, and reducing phase research, respectively. The most common disparity category investigated was race and ethnicity (104 studies), and one third of these studies attributed drivers of racial and ethnic differences to structural influences. Publications of detecting phase studies outpaced the growth of understanding and reducing phase research. CONCLUSIONS: Most PFD disparities research focused on identifying historically marginalized populations with inadequate progression to understanding and reducing phases. We recommend progressing PFD disparities research beyond the detecting phase to advance health equity in PFD care.

Pelvic Floor Disorders in Black Women: Prevalence, Clinical Care, and a Strategic Agenda to Prioritize Care.

Pelvic floor disorders are a group of common conditions affecting women of all racial and ethnic groups. These disorders are undertreated in all women, but this is especially magnified in Black people who have been historically marginalized in the United States. This article seeks to highlight the prevalence of pelvic floor disorders in Black women, evaluate the clinical care they receive, examine barriers they face to equitable care, and present a strategic agenda to prioritize the care of Black women with pelvic floor disorders.

Underrepresentation of Non-White Participants in the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Guidelines for Surgical Management of Knee Osteoarthritis.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to examine the racial and ethnic representation in studies included in the 2015 American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Surgical Management of the Knee Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guideline relative to their representation of the United States (US). METHODS: The demographic characteristics reported in articles included in the 2015 American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Surgical Management of the Knee Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guideline were analyzed. The primary outcome of interest was the representation quotient, which is the ratio of the proportion of a racial/ethnic group in the guideline studies relative to their proportion in the US. There were 211 studies included, of which 15 (7%) reported race. There were 35 studies based in the US and 7 of the US-based studies reported race. RESULTS: No US-based studies reported race and ethnicity separately, no studies reported American Indian/Alaska Native participants and no US-based studies reported Asian participants. The representation quotient of US-based studies was 0.66 for Black participants, 0.33 for Hispanic participants, and 1.30 for White participants, which indicates a relative over-representation of White participants compared to national proportions. CONCLUSION: This study illustrated that the evidence base for the surgical management of knee osteoarthritis has been constructed from studies which fail to consider race and ethnicity. Of those US-based studies which do report race or ethnicity, study cohorts do not reflect the US population. These results illustrate a disparity in clinical orthopedic surgical evidence and highlight the need for improved research recruitment strategies.

Leiomyoma Fistulization After Uterine Artery Embolization.

BACKGROUND: Uterine artery embolization (UAE) has been used to treat symptomatic uterine leiomyomas since 1995. This case report describes a rare complication of UAE, with delayed recognition, ultimately requiring definitive hysterectomy. CASE: A 53-year-old women with symptomatic leiomyomas underwent imaging demonstrating an enlarged (16.9×11.3×11.5 cm) uterus with multiple leiomyomas. She underwent UAE and, over the subsequent 3 months, and had five emergency department visits for abdominal pain and dysuria. Pelvic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) 4 months postprocedure showed nodular mural enhancement of the right anterior bladder dome, and cystoscopy demonstrated irregular tissue on the right dome of the bladder. The patient ultimately underwent total laparoscopic hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, partial cystectomy with reconstruction, and omental flap for bladder necrosis and leiomyoma fistulization. CONCLUSION: Bladder necrosis and leiomyoma fistulization are rare complications of UAE that can present with pelvic pain, hematuria, and recurrent bladder stones. Computed tomography and MRI can be useful tools in evaluating for complications, but clinicians should have a low threshold to use cystoscopy to directly visualize potential abnormalities identified on imaging. Patients with complex cases with suspected post-UAE complications warrant referral to tertiary care centers for a multidisciplinary approach.

A Rubric to Center Equity in Obstetrics and Gynecology Research.

The Steering Committee for the Obstetrics & Gynecology special edition titled "Racism in Reproductive Health: Lighting a Path to Health Equity" formed a working group to create an equity rubric. The goal was to provide a tool to help researchers systematically center health equity as they conceptualize, design, analyze, interpret, and evaluate research in obstetrics and gynecology. This commentary reviews the rationale, iterative process, and literature guiding the creation of the equity rubric.

Do gender differences exist in letters of recommendation for reproductive endocrinology and infertility fellowship?

OBJECTIVE(S): To determine if gender differences exist in letters of recommendation (LORs) for reproductive endocrinology and infertility fellowship. DESIGN: Cohort study. SETTING: Academic medical center. PATIENTS: A cohort of applicants to a reproductive endocrinology and infertility fellowship program at a single Midwestern academic institution in a single year. INTERVENTIONS: None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Quantitative measures included linguistics inquiry and word count analysis, with 4 summary variables and 25 word categories, to quantify tone and themes present by gender. Performing qualitative analysis in parallel to linguistic analysis allowed for the exploration of themes not conveyed in quantitative methods alone. Qualitative measures included the frequency of code themes in LOR by applicant gender. RESULTS: There were 272 letters from 72 applicants, 54 (76%) of which were women and 17 (24%) were men. One applicant was excluded because gender information was not specified; 269 letters were included in the quantitative linguistics and qualitative coding analysis. One hundred 10 letters (41%) were written by women and 159 (59%) by men. LOR written for men had a higher mean word count than those written for women (537 vs. 474, P=.04). Linguistics Inquiry and Word Count analysis exhibited more risk words used to describe men applicants (P=.01). When comparing word categories by letter writer gender, women letter writers more frequently used communal, affect, and home word categories whereas men writers more frequently used affiliation-related words. Qualitative analysis revealed that letters for men applicants described leadership, altruism, rapport with patients, and strong endorsements more frequently, whereas women applicants' letters more often mentioned doubt raisers and disclosures of personal life. In addition, letters for women applicants more often described candidates as drama free, not easy to "fluster," and not complainers. Furthermore, letters for women more frequently disclosed parenthood status. CONCLUSIONS: Gender differences exist among both letter writers and applicants. Qualitative analysis revealed that women applicants were more likely to be described with doubt raisers and personal life disclosures, whereas men were more likely to be described by their altruism and with a strong endorsement. Increasing bias awareness and implementing mitigation strategies would improve gender equity in LOR.

Uterine Prolapse.

This JAMA Insights in the Women's Health series discusses diagnosis of uterine prolapse and available surgical and nonsurgical treatment options.

Use of a Computerized Decisional Analysis Tool in Patients With Urgency Urinary Incontinence.

IMPORTANCE: Decision analysis tools (DAT) are shared decision making instruments that include patient input on treatment goals and values that have been shown to decrease decisional regret in women's health care. OBJECTIVE: We describe a novel, computerized DAT for patients with urinary incontinence (UI), and our primary aim was to assess the concordance between treatment fit as determined by the DAT and treatment selected after physician counseling in patients with urgency urinary incontinence and urgency predominant mixed urinary incontinence. STUDY DESIGN: We partnered with a health care startup to develop a computerized DAT incorporating evidence about UI and patient input about treatment goals and personal values. This is a retrospective cohort study examining the concordance of DAT-predicted treatments identified before consultation with the physician and those chosen after counseling. Electronic medical records were reviewed to abstract demographic, clinical data, and treatments chosen at the initial physician consultation. Because it was possible to pursue concurrent treatment options (ie, pelvic floor physical therapy and medications), the first 2 modalities identified in the treatment plan at consultation were abstracted. Descriptive statistics were conducted using SPSS®, we did not adjust for multiple comparisons. RESULTS: Four hundred eighty-nine patients met the inclusion criteria for our study, and 65% of the cohort chose treatment options after counseling that were concordant with their DAT best treatment fit. CONCLUSION: Patients choosing treatment for urgency urinary incontinence and urgency predominant mixed urinary incontinence using a novel, computer-based DAT to prepare for shared decision making with their physicians often choose to proceed with their top DAT-determined treatment fit after counseling.

Accuracy of Bladder Scanner in Measuring Bladder Volumes in Postpartum Women.

IMPORTANCE: Ultrasound bladder scanners may provide a less invasive method to measure postpartum urinary volume, but their accuracy must be validated. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of a bladder scanner in measuring bladder volumes in postpartum women. The secondary objective was to evaluate the effect of obesity on scanner accuracy. STUDY DESIGN: This prospective cohort study included women older than 18 years who gave birth vaginally at term gestation. After delivery, we obtained 3 sequential measurements of the bladder volume using an ultrasound bladder scanner. We then measured true bladder volume by transurethral catheterization. The primary outcome was the absolute difference between the bladder scanner volume and the catheterized volume. A Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare absolute median difference between the bladder scan volume and true catheter volume. Repeated-measures analysis of variance and linear regression were used to evaluate the effect of obesity on the accuracy of the bladder scanner. RESULTS: We enrolled 70 patients (61.4% nulliparous, 38.6% multiparous). One delivery was vacuum-assisted, 4 were forceps-assisted, and 65 were spontaneous vaginal. The median age was 34 years, and median body mass index was 30.5. Median difference between bladder scanner and catheter volume was 42.7 mL (P < 0.001), with the scanner underestimating true volume 82.9% of the time. The scanner was less accurate in patients with a body mass index ≥ 30 (P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The bladder scanner is less accurate than catheterized urine volume. However, the median difference between the bladder scanner and the catheterized volume is 42.7 mL, making it suitable for clinical use. Accuracy deteriorates in obese patients.

Surgical versus nonsurgical treatment selection patterns among Asian American patients with pelvic floor disorders: a matched cohort study.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The objective was to determine if Asian racial identity was associated with the selection of surgical versus nonsurgical treatments for pelvic floor disorders (PFDs). Secondarily, we aimed to determine if there were other demographic or clinical characteristics associated with treatment selection patterns. METHODS: This was a retrospective matched cohort study that examined new patient visits (NPVs) of Asian patients at an academic urogynecology practice in Chicago, IL, USA. We included NPVs with primary diagnoses of anal incontinence, mixed urinary incontinence, stress urinary incontinence, overactive bladder, or pelvic organ prolapse. We identified Asian patients with self-identified racial identity recorded in the electronic medical records. Every Asian patient was age matched to white patients in a 1:3 ratio. The primary outcome was surgical versus nonsurgical treatment selection for their primary PFD diagnosis. Comparison of demographic and clinical variables between the two groups and multivariate logistic regression models were performed. RESULTS: A total of 53 Asian patients and 159 white patients were included in this analysis. Asian patients were less likely to be English speaking (92% vs 100%, p=0.004), endorse history of anxiety (17% vs 43%, p<0.001), and report history of any pelvic surgery (15% vs 34%, p=0.009) than white patients. When controlling for race, age, history of anxiety, depression, prior pelvic surgery, sexual activity, Pelvic Organ Prolapse Distress Inventory, Colorectal-Anal Distress Inventory, and Urinary Distress Inventory scores, Asian racial identity (adjusted odds ratio 0.36 [95% CI 0.14-0.85]) was independently associated with decreased likelihood of choosing surgical treatments for PFDs. CONCLUSIONS: Asian patients with PFDs were less likely than white patients to undergo surgical treatment for their PFDs despite similar demographic and clinical characteristics.

Exploratory mixed methods study on care-seeking behaviors of Asian Americans with pelvic floor symptoms.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The objective was to evaluate whether younger age was associated with noncare-seeking behavior among Asian Americans with pelvic floor symptoms, and secondarily, to explore multilevel factors that may contribute to noncare-seeking behavior in this population. METHODS: We performed a concurrent mixed methods study and heterogeneously sampled Asian Americans with urinary incontinence, urgency-frequency, vaginal bulge, or anal incontinence. We stratified the participants into two groups, care seekers vs noncare seekers. Using Anderson's model as the main framework, we administered validated questionnaires and conducted semi-structured interviews to explore factors associated with care-seeking behaviors. RESULTS: Seventy-eight surveys and 20 interviews were completed and analyzed. Most participants reported urinary leakage (67%), followed by urinary urgency-frequency (50%), anal incontinence (18%), and vaginal bulge (17%). The mean age of the study cohort was 46.1 ± 16.2 years. We found noncare seekers to be younger and with an increased proportion of lifetime spent in the USA than care seekers. When controlling for age, proportion of lifetime spent in the USA, symptom severity, and individual-level resources, both younger age and increased proportion of lifetime spent in USA remained independently associated with noncare-seeking behavior. From qualitative data, we found that noncare seekers often experienced anti-Asian racism across workplace, neighborhoods, and health care settings. Additionally, noncare seekers also reported symptom minimization and decreased self-efficacy when coping with their pelvic floor symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: We found that one's age and proportion of lifetime spent in the USA may affect the extent of exposure to anti-Asian racism that is associated with symptom minimization, increased perceived barrier, and noncare-seeking behavior.

Inequities in Filled Overactive Bladder Medication Prescriptions in the US.

Importance: Anticholinergic medications to treat overactive bladder (OAB) have been associated with increased risk of cognitive decline, whereas ß3-adrenoceptor agonists (hereafter, ß3-agonists) have comparable efficacy and do not carry the same risk. Yet, anticholinergics remain the predominant OAB medication prescribed in the US. Objective: To evaluate whether patient race, ethnicity, and sociodemographic characteristics are associated with receipt of anticholinergic vs ß3-agonist OAB medications. Design, Setting, and Participants: This study is a cross-sectional analysis of the 2019 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey, a representative sample of US households. Participants included individuals with a filled OAB medication prescription. Data analysis was performed from March to August 2022. Exposure: A prescription for medication to treat OAB. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcomes were receipt of a ß3-agonist or an anticholinergic OAB medication. Results: An estimated 2 971 449 individuals (mean age, 66.4 years; 95% CI, 64.8-68.2 years) filled prescriptions for OAB medications in 2019; 2 185 214 (73.5%; 95% CI, 62.6%-84.5%) identified as female, 2 326 901 (78.3%; 95% CI, 66.3%-90.3%) self-identified as non-Hispanic White, 260 685 (8.8%; 95% CI, 5.0%-12.5%) identified as non-Hispanic Black, 167 210 (5.6%; 95% CI, 3.1%-8.2%) identified as Hispanic, 158 507 (5.3%; 95% CI, 2.3%-8.4%) identified as non-Hispanic other race, and 58 147 (2.0%; 95% CI, 0.3%-3.6%) identified as non-Hispanic Asian. A total of 2 229 297 individuals (75.0%) filled an anticholinergic prescription, and 590 255 (19.9%) filled a ß3-agonist prescription, with 151 897 (5.1%) filling prescriptions for both medication classes. ß3-agonists had a median out-of-pocket cost of $45.00 (95% CI, $42.11-$47.89) per prescription compared with $9.78 (95% CI, $9.16-$10.42) for anticholinergics. After controlling for insurance status, individual sociodemographic factors, and medical contraindications, non-Hispanic Black individuals were 54% less likely than non-Hispanic White individuals to fill a prescription for a ß3-agonist vs an anticholinergic medication (adjusted odds ratio, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.22-0.98). In interaction analysis, non-Hispanic Black women had an even lower odds of filing a ß3-agonist prescription (adjusted odds ratio, 0.10; 95% CI, 0.04-0.27). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cross-sectional study of a representative sample of US households, non-Hispanic Black individuals were significantly less likely than non-Hispanic White individuals to have filled a ß3-agonist prescription compared with an anticholinergic OAB prescription. These differences may reflect an inequity in prescribing behaviors promulgating health care disparities. Targeted research should assess the relative contribution of a variety of individual and societal factors.

Development of a tool to assess bladder health knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs (BH-KAB).

INTRODUCTION: Few instruments measure knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs (KAB) related to bladder health. Existing questionnaires have predominantly focused on KAB related to specific conditions such as urinary incontinence, overactive bladder, and other pelvic floor disorders. To address this literature gap, the Prevention of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (PLUS) research consortium developed an instrument that is being administered in the baseline assessment of the PLUS RISE FOR HEALTH longitudinal study. METHODS: The bladder health knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs (BH-KAB) instrument development process consisted of two phases, item development and evaluation. Item development was guided by a conceptual framework, review of existing KAB instruments, and a review of qualitative data from the PLUS consortium Study of Habits, Attitudes, Realities, and Experiences (SHARE). Evaluation comprised three methods to assess content validity and reduce and refine items: q-sort, e-panel survey, and cognitive interviews. RESULTS: The final 18-item BH-KAB instrument assesses self-reported bladder knowledge; perceptions of bladder function, anatomy, and related medical conditions; attitudes toward different patterns of fluid intake, voiding, and nocturia; the potential to prevent or treat urinary tract infections and incontinence; and the impact of pregnancy and pelvic muscle exercises on bladder health. CONCLUSION: The PLUS BH-KAB instrument may be used independently or in conjunction with other KAB instruments for a more comprehensive assessment of women's KAB related to bladder health. The BH-KAB instrument can inform clinical conversations, health education programming, and research examining potential determinants of bladder health, LUTS, and related behavioral habits (e.g., toileting, fluid intake, pelvic muscle exercises).

Gender Differences in Letters of Recommendation for Gynecology Surgical Fellowship Applicants: Analysis of One Program's Recruitment Cycle.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To examine whether there are gender differences in letters of recommendation (LORs) written for residents applying to gynecology surgical fellowships. DESIGN: Retrospective study. SETTING: Single, academic institution. PATIENTS: LORs for applicants to gynecology oncology, urogynecology, and minimally invasive gynecology fellowships during the 2019-2020 application cycle. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We analyzed the linguistic content of the letters for the presence of 4 summary variables and 21 word categories based on previous studies using validated computerized text analysis software. We used multivariable analysis using linear mixed models to compare linguistic characteristics of letters by applicant gender. We performed qualitative content analysis on letters and compared the frequency of code themes by gender. The mixed-method design was planned to allow for analysis of domains not captured in text analysis. Among 680 letters written for 186 applicants, 124 (18.2%) were written for men, and 556 (81.8%) were written for women. There were no differences in the least square mean (standard error) word counts for LORs written for men and women applicants, 465 (20.0) vs 458(9.4) words, p = .74. In multivariable analysis, LORs written for men were found to have higher authentic tone and more risk words (p = .005 and p = .03, respectively). LORs written for women contained more communal (relationship-oriented) words (p = .006). The qualitative analysis demonstrated that ability, interpersonal traits, surgical skills, and research were the most often mentioned themes. Comments about compassion/empathy, leadership potential, teaching, interpersonal skills, and patient rapport were found more often in letters for men. More doubt raisers (words that raise doubt or concern) were present in letters for men, but letters for both genders had similar levels of negative criticism. In contrast, comments on ability, being "drama-free," and self-awareness were found more often in letters for women. CONCLUSION: There were gender differences in LORs written for obstetrics and gynecology surgical subspecialty fellowship applicants indicating the presence of gender bias.

Opportunities to Advance Postpartum Pelvic Floor Care With a Health Equity-based Conceptual Framework.

An essential part of postpartum care includes the evaluation and treatment of pelvic floor disorders (PFDs). Postpartum PFDs are common and occur in over 40% of postpartum women. Despite significant advancements in urogynecology to understand postpartum PFDs and their treatments, there has been a lack of attention to addressing equity in postpartum pelvic floor care. In this article, we address the current scientific understanding of postpartum PFDs while adapting a health equity-based conceptual framework to highlight areas of opportunity in optimizing postpartum pelvic floor care.

Underrepresentation in Pelvic Floor Disorder Patient-Reported Outcomes: Whose Outcomes Are We Measuring?

IMPORTANCE: Patient-reported outcome (PRO) instruments measure the patient's perspective. It is unclear whether commonly used PRO measures were tested in populations that had racial and ethnic distributions comparable with those reported in U.S. census data. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the proportion of non-White race and Hispanic ethnicity participants with their expected proportion based on U.S. census data for PRO instruments with U.S.-based validation studies. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective review of PRO measures considered by the Pelvic Floors Disorders Consortium Working Group on Patient-Reported Outcomes in their 2020 consensus publication. Study and participant information were abstracted from PRO validation studies. Racial and ethnic representation in U.S.-based studies were compared with U.S. census data. The primary outcome was the representation quotient of reported races and ethnicities, calculated as the reported percentage of the study population identifying with a race and/or ethnicity divided by the proportion of the U.S. population identifying with that race and/or ethnicity when the study was published. RESULTS: Forty-five studies with 21,080 total participants were included. Race was reported in 17 of 45 studies (37.8%), and ethnicity was reported in 7 of 45 (15.6%). Most studies did not specify how race and ethnicity information was collected. For U.S.-based studies, the representation quotient of White participants from 1995 to 2019 was 1.15. Indigenous American/Native American/American Indian/Alaska Natives had the lowest representation quotient (0.22). Reporting of ethnicity increased over time (P = 0.001), although there was no significant change in the reporting of race or the representation of various races and ethnicities (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Non-White and Hispanic patients may be underrepresented in U.S.-based validation studies for PRO instruments in pelvic floor disorders.

Postpartum urinary retention after the institution of a universal voiding protocol.

OBJECTIVE: Postpartum urinary retention is a frequently occurring condition for which screening is not typically a standardized part of postpartum care. The aim of this study was to determine the incidence of and risk factors for postpartum urinary retention after the introduction of a universal postpartum voiding protocol. METHODS: This was a single-center retrospective case-control study of women delivering in a 12-month period. Women with a documented diagnosis of postpartum urinary retention per the institution's voiding protocol were classified as cases, and a matched sample of those without urinary retention were controls. Demographic and obstetric characteristics were compared between both groups using univariate and multivariate analyses as a means to identify risk factors for postpartum urinary retention. RESULTS: 8992 women were studied during the time period examined; 195 (2.2%) were identified to have postpartum urinary retention. On multivariate logistic regression analysis, operative vaginal delivery (aOR 2.98 95% CI 1.32-6.70) and second-degree or greater perineal laceration (aOR 2.83 CI 1.59-5.04) were significantly associated with postpartum urinary retention. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of postpartum urinary retention with a postpartum voiding protocol in place was low. Risk factors identified for urinary retention included operative vaginal delivery and second degree or greater perineal laceration. Awareness of these risk factors and implementation of standardized voiding protocols may aid with the early identification and prevention of postpartum urinary retention.

Barriers and Promotors to Health Service Utilization for Pelvic Floor Disorders in the United States: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Qualitative and Quantitative Studies.

IMPORTANCE: We need a systematic approach to understanding health service utilization behavior in women with pelvic floor symptoms in the United States. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of pelvic floor care utilization and identify its barriers and promotors using Andersen's model, which theorizes care-seeking behavior with individual care needs, resources, predispositions, and macrostructures. DESIGN: This was a systematic search of studies on care-seeking patterns in women with symptomatic pelvic floor disorders, which included pelvic organ prolapse, lower urinary tract symptoms, and anal incontinence. We then performed meta-analyses with random-effects models and descriptive analysis to determine utilization rate and the impact of each identified determinant. RESULTS: The pooled utilization rate was 37% (95% confidence interval [CI], 30%-45%). Determinants were identified across all domains except at the macrostructure level. For individual care needs, increased symptom severity or duration and a history of depression (odds ratio [OR], 1.27; 95% CI, 1.07-1.51) were associated with higher utilization. In the resources domain, having social support and established primary/secondary care were promotors, whereas higher income and employed status trended as barriers. Under predispositions, age ≥50 years (OR, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.05-1.60), and pelvic floor awareness were associated with utilization, whereas Asian (OR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.51-0.72) and Black (OR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.55-1.08) women as well as women experiencing fear, misinformation, or normalization of pelvic floor disorders had decreased utilization. CONCLUSIONS: This review identified a low utilization rate for pelvic floor care and revealed multilayered, actionable items affecting care-seeking behavior. It highlights the need for more inclusive and multifaceted approaches in future pelvic floor disparity research and equity interventions.