RESUMEN
PURPOSE: To investigate the effectiveness of phenotype-based search approaches using publicly available online databases. METHODS: We included consecutively solved cases from our exome database. For each case, the combination of Human Phenotype Ontology terms reported by the referring clinician was used to perform a search in three commonly used databases: OMIM (first 300 results), Phenolyzer (first 300 results), and Mendelian (all 100 results). RESULTS: One hundred cases were included (43 females; mean age: 10 years). The actual molecular diagnosis identified through exome sequencing was not included in the search results of any of the queried databases in 33% of cases. In 85% of cases it was not found within the top five search results. When included, its median rank was 61 (range: 1-295), 21 (1-270), and 29 (1-92) in OMIM, Phenolyzer and Mendelian, respectively. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that, in most cases, phenotype-based search approaches using public online databases is ineffective in providing a probable diagnosis for Mendelian conditions. Genotype-first approach through molecular-guided diagnostics with backward phenotyping may be a more appropriate approach for these disorders, unless a specific diagnosis is considered a priori based on highly unique phenotypic features or a specific facial gestalt.