Catheterization laboratory activity before and during COVID-19 spread: A comparative analysis in Piedmont, Italy, by the Italian Society of Interventional Cardiology (GISE).

BACKGROUND: COronaVIrus Disease 19 (COVID-19) led to the reorganization of Cardiology Units in terms of working spaces and healthcare personnel. In this scenario, both outpatient visits and elective interventional cardiology procedures were suspended and/or postponed. We aimed to report the impact of COVID-19 on interventional coronary and structural procedures in Piedmont, Italy. METHODS: The number of coronary angiographies (CAG), percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI), primary PCI (pPCI), transcatheter aortic valve replacements (TAVR) and Mitraclip performed in Piedmont between March 1st and April 20th, 2020 (CoV-time) were collected from each catheterization laboratory and compared to the number of procedures performed the year before in the same months (NoCoV-time). RESULTS: Procedural data from 18 catheterization laboratories were collected. Both coronary (5498 versus 2888: difference: -47.5%; mean 305.4 VS 160.4; p = 0.002) and structural (84 versus 17: difference: -79.8%; mean 4.7 Vs 0.9; p < 0.001) procedures decreased during CoV-time compared to NoCoV-time. In particular, coronary angiographies (1782 versus 3460), PCI (1074 versus 1983), p PCI (271 versus 410), TAVR (11 versus 72) and Mitraclip (6 versus 12) showed a reduction of 48.5%, 45.7%, 33.7%, 84.7% and 50.0%, respectively (all p for comparison <0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Compared to the same time-period in 2019, both coronary and structural interventional procedures during COVID-19 epidemic suffered a dramatic decrease in Piedmont, Italy. Organizational change and structured clinical pathways should be created, together with awareness campaigns.

In-Hospital and Mid-Term Outcomes of ECMO Support During Coronary, Structural, or Combined Percutaneous Cardiac Intervention in High-Risk Patients - A Single-Center Experience.

INTRODUCTION: Evidence regarding the impact of prophylactic implantation of Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) during coronary or structural procedures is limited. The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the in-hospital and medium term outcomes of ECMO support in complex percutaneous coronary or structural intervention. METHODS: The present is an observational prospective study including consecutive patients who underwent to prophylactic ECMO implantation for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), structural or combined interventions between July 2018 and July 2020 in Maria Pia Hospital GVM Care & Research, Turin, Italy. Primary endpoints were in-hospital and medium term all-cause death. Secondary endpoints were vascular complication, bleeding and procedural success. RESULTS: 27 patients were included with a mean age of 80 ± 6 years, 10 (37%) being diabetics and 19 (70%) with severe left ventricle dysfunction. Mean Logistic Euroscore was 28.7 ± 18.7. Seven patients (26%) underwent complex coronary revascularization, 7 (26%) combined PCI + TAVI, 5 (19%) combined PCI + Mitraclip, 5 (19%) TAVI alone and finally 3 (11%) combined TAVI + Mitraclip. The procedural success was 96%, with only one in-hospital death due to major vascular complication at the ECMO vascular access. At a mean follow-up of 11 ± 6.8 months 4 deaths were recorded (3 from not cardiovascular causes). CONCLUSIONS: Prophylactic use of ECMO may be beneficial for high risk patients undergoing complex combined coronary/structural percutaneous interventions with good in-hospital and mid-term outcomes in term of safety and procedural success.

[Percutaneous treatment of double valve defect with a modified extracorporeal membrane oxygenation system]. / Trattamento percutaneo di doppio vizio valvolare con sistema di ossigenazione extracorporea a membrana modificato.

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has been developed to provide hemodynamic support in patients with severe cardiac or respiratory failure. In the last few years, its use has become increasingly common in interventional cardiology rooms for high-risk coronary interventions and for transcatheter therapies for valvular disease, which are increasingly complex in subsets of fragile patients at high surgical risk and with multiple comorbidities.Here, we describe the treatment of an extremely critical patient for severe dual valvulopathy, severe impairment of post-infarct systolic function, advanced heart failure with prohibitive operative risk. In a single session, the double valvular volume defect was treated percutaneously, using ECMO with an additional drainage of the left ventricle, performing a transcatheter implantation of two aortic valve prostheses with the valve-in-valve technique and the implantation of two MitraClips with excellent final result.

Safety and Efficacy of Single Versus Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion.

The optimal antiplatelet strategy after left atrial appendage (LAA) occlusion able to protect from device-related thrombosis, paying the lowest price in terms of bleeding increase, is unclear. In a real-world, observational study we performed a head-to-head comparison of single versus dual antiplatelet therapy (SAPT vs DAPT) in patients who underwent LAA occlusion. We included 610 consecutive patients, stratified according to the type of post-procedural antiplatelet therapy (280 on SAPT and 330 on DAPT). Primary outcome measure was the incidence of the net composite end point including Bleeding Academic Research Consortium classification 3-5 bleeding, major adverse cardiovascular events or device-related thrombosis at 1-year follow-up. The use of SAPT compared with DAPT was associated with similar incidence of the primary net composite end point (9.3% vs 12.7% p = 0.22), with an adjusted hazard ratio (HR) of 0.69, 95% confidence interval 0.41 to 1.15; p = 0.15) at multivariate analysis. However, SAPT significantly reduced Bleeding Academic Research Consortium classification 3-5 bleeding (2.9% vs 6.7%, p = 0.038; adjusted HR 0.37, 0.16 to 0.88; p = 0.024). The occurrence of ischemic events (major adverse cardiovascular events or device-related thrombosis) was not significantly different between the 2treatment strategies (7.8% vs 7.4%; adjusted HR 1.34, 0.70 to 2.55; p = 0.38). In patients who underwent LAA occlusion, post-procedural use of SAPT instead of DAPT was associated with reduction of bleeding complications, with no significant increase in the risk of thrombotic events. These hypothesis-generating findings should be confirmed in a specific, randomized study.

[Updated SICI-GISE position paper on institutional and operator requirements for transcatheter aortic valve implantation]. / Update del documento di posizione della Società Italiana di Cardiologia Interventistica (SICI-GISE) sui requisiti minimi per ospedali ed operatori che eseguono procedure di impianto transcatetere di protesi valvolare aortica.

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has revolutionized the management of patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis and has become the standard of care for inoperable patients and the preferred therapy for those at increased surgical risk with peculiar clinical and anatomic features. Technology advances, growing experience and accumulating data prompted the update of the 2011 Italian Society of Interventional Cardiology (SICI-GISE) position paper on institutional and operator requirements to perform TAVI. The main objective of this document is to provide a guidance to assess the potential of institutions and operators to initiate and maintain an efficient TAVI program.

Intracardiac Versus Transesophageal Echocardiographic Guidance for Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion: The LAAO Italian Multicenter Registry.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of intracardiac echocardiography (ICE)-guided versus transesophageal echocardiography (TEE)-guided left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) by the use of Amplatzer Cardiac Plug or Amulet devices included in a large Italian registry. BACKGROUND: TEE is widely used for LAAO procedure guidance. ICE may be a potential alternative imaging modality in LAAO. METHODS: Data from 604 LAAO procedures performed in 16 Italian centers were reviewed. ICE-guided LAAO was performed in 187 patients, whereas TEE was used in 417 patients. Procedural success was defined as LAAO without occurrence of pericardial tamponade, stroke, systemic embolism with end organ damage, major bleeding, and device embolization. Stroke, transient ischemic attack, major bleeding, overall and cardiovascular death were analyzed. RESULTS: CHA2DS2-VASc (congestive heart failure, hypertension, age ≥75 years, diabetes mellitus, prior stroke or transient ischemic attack or thromboembolism, vascular disease, age 65 to 74 years, sex category) and HAS-BLED (hypertension, abnormal renal and liver function, stroke, bleeding, labile international normalized ratio, elderly, drugs or alcohol) scores were similar between the ICE and TEE groups. TEE implied lower procedural (delta 12 min) and fluoroscopy time (delta 5 min) when compared with ICE. Procedural success was similarly high (≥94%) between the TEE and ICE groups with a complication rate of 6.5% for TEE versus 4.2% for ICE (odds ratio: 1.468; 95% confidence interval: 0.681 to 3.166; p = 0.327). At median follow-up of 451 days (interquartile range: 162 to 899 days), the rate of cerebral ischemic events was similar between TEE-guided and ICE-guided procedures. CONCLUSIONS: ICE-guided LAAO by means of Amplatzer devices may represent a second alternative imaging modality after an appropriate learning curve and bearing in mind that pre-procedural computed tomography imaging is mandatory. When comparing ICE with TEE, TEE remains the gold standard.

Left atrial appendage closure using AMPLATZER™ devices: A large, multicenter, Italian registry.

BACKGROUND: Left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) has been proven to be effective for stroke prophylaxis in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). We aim to assess the safety and efficacy of LAAO by AMPLATZER™ devices in a large, multicenter, single-nation cohort of NVAF patients at high-risk of stroke and bleeding. METHODS: From December 2008 to April 2015 613 NVAF patients (75.1±8.0years, 62.5% male) underwent LAAO in 15 Italian centers by AMPLATZER™ devices. There were no restrictions on any personal/institutional protocols with respect to indications, pre-procedural planning, device implantation, drug therapy and follow-up. All the baseline characteristics, imaging, procedural and follow-up data were collected in a single dataset. RESULTS: AMPLATZER™ devices were successfully implanted in 95.4% of cases. Major complications occurred during 38 procedures (6.2%) and included more frequently major bleeding (3.3%) and pericardial tamponade (2.0%). At a mean follow-up of 20months, the overall annual rates of stroke and thromboembolic events, including those periprocedural, was 1.67% and 2.90%, respectively, consisting in a reduction in the rate of stroke and TIA of 66% compared with the risk-based expectation. Among the 218 patients undergoing transesophageal echocardiography at 6months of follow-up, device thrombosis was present in 1.8% of the patients whilst a significant or mild to moderate peri-device leak was found in 0.5% and 11.9% of cases, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In this large, multicenter, single-nation study, LAAO with the AMPLATZER™ devices showed high procedural success, early safety and mid-term efficacy for the prevention of NVAF-related thromboembolism.

Patterns and trends of transcatheter aortic valve implantation in Italy: insights from RISPEVA.

AIMS: Clinical trials have shown that transcatheter aortic valve implantation for aortic stenosis compares favorably to surgical replacement in high-risk patients and is superior to medical therapy in those at prohibitive risk. There is uncertainty however on patterns and trends in transcatheter aortic valve implantation, especially focusing on Italy. METHODS: The RISPEVA study is a prospective Italian registry including 21 institutions. Patients have been enrolled since late 2012, and data collection includes several baseline, procedural, in-hospital, and follow-up details. For the present analysis on patterns and trends, we focused on patients enrolled between 2012 and 2015, and as primary variable on the prevalence of high versus prohibitive surgical risk, limiting our scope to procedural outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 1157 patients were included. The temporal breakdown was 376 (33%) patients enrolled in 2013, 408 (35%) in 2014, and 373 (32%) in 2015. Several patient features differed over time, including risk score, peripheral artery disease, end-stage pulmonary disease, and prior valvuloplasty (all P < 0.05). Several procedural features differed significantly over time, including sheath size, use of general anesthesia, Prostar closure device, predilation, antiembolic device, new TAVI device, and multiple prostheses (all P < 0.05). No significant temporal differences were found for major clinical outcomes, whereas the occurrence of moderate or severe postprocedural regurgitation and pacemaker dependency decreased over the years (both P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: According to the RISPEVA results, the Italian uptake of TAVI is steady, with evident trends toward less invasive approaches and fitter patients.

PPARγ in coronary atherosclerosis: in vivo expression pattern and correlations with hyperlipidemic status and statin treatment.

OBJECTIVE: Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ (PPARγ) is involved in regulation of macrophage inflammation and in atherosclerosis. Herein we investigate the influence of statin treatment on PPARγ expression in coronary artery disease. METHOD: PPARγ expression was investigated in coronary atherosclerotic atherectomies (N=48) and arteries (N=12) from patients with stable or unstable coronary syndromes or undergoing cardiac transplantation for end-stage ischemic cardiomyopathy, respectively, by immunohistochemistry. Plaque components and tissue factor immunoreactivity were also investigated. Atherectomies were obtained from de novo culprit lesions of hypercholesterolemic (16 statin-treated and 16 untreated) and normolipidemic (N=16) patients. Furthermore, PPARγ expression was evaluated in patients peripheral blood monocytes and in monocytic U937 cells after atorvastatin incubation, by Western blot analysis. RESULT: PPARγ expression was higher in coronary plaques and peripheral blood monocytes of statin-treated patients, and it significantly increased in monocytes after 24h atorvastatin incubation (p<0.05). Intra-plaque macrophage content, atheroma, neoangiogenesis and hemorrhage, and circulating CRP levels were lower in statin-treated than untreated hypercholesterolemic patients and comparable with normolipidemic subjects. PPARγ immunoreactivity was localized to neointima and media, its distribution pattern being different from that of tissue factor. CONCLUSION: PPARγ expression was enhanced in statin-treated patients with different distribution and behavior as compared to atheroma, macrophage content, tissue factor immunoreactivity and serum CRP. In vitro studies showed increased PPARγ expression in monocytes after atorvastatin incubation. These findings provide further evidence as to the protective role of statins in coronary artery disease and their influence on PPARγ expression in coronary plaques and on the inflammatory status of patients.

In vivo coronary plaque histology in patients with stable and acute coronary syndromes: relationships with hyperlipidemic status and statin treatment.

OBJECTIVES: Aim of the study was to investigate whether maintained moderate statin treatment influence atheroma, macrophage content, neoangiogenesis and/or haemorrhage in coronary plaques from patients with non-fatal coronary syndromes. METHODS: A total of 48 patients underwent elective directional coronary atherectomy on "de novo" culprit lesions; 16 patients had non-treated hypercholesterolemia, 16 patients received maintained moderate statin treatment for hypercholesterolemia and 16 had no lipoprotein abnormalities. These three patients groups were matched for age and clinical diagnosis of stable angina (SA) or unstable angina/non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (UA/NSTEMI). Atherectomy specimens were stained with antibodies against macrophages, endothelial cells and glycophorin A. Results of histology and immunohistochemistry were morphometrically analyzed by using computer-assisted image analysis. RESULTS: Atheroma and fibrous tissue, neoangiogenesis, macrophage and haemorrhage (i.e., glycophorin A) differed between the three groups (P<0.05). Statin-treated group showed significantly decreased atheroma (P=0.016), fibrous tissue (P=0.42), macrophage content (P=0.012), neoangiogenesis (P=0.00048) and haemorrhage (P=0.0092) as compared with the non-treated hyperlipidemic group. CONCLUSIONS: The present findings show that maintained moderate statin treatment may contribute to plaque stabilization in non-fatal coronary syndromes by decreasing intraplaque neoangiogenesis and haemorrhage, lipid burden and macrophage content, and, on the other hand, by increasing plaque collagenization.