Blueprint for community emergency department pediatric simulation.

Background: Gaps in quality of pediatric emergency care have been noted in community emergency departments (CEDs), where >85% of children receive care. In situ simulation provides opportunities for hands-on experiences and can help close these gaps. We aimed to develop, implement, and evaluate an innovative, replicable, and scalable pediatric in situ simulation-based CED curriculum, under the leadership of a local colleague, through collaborative approach with a regional academic medical center (AMC). Methods: Kern's model was used as follows: problem identification and general needs assessment-pediatric readiness assessment and discussions with CED physician and nursing leadership; targeted needs assessment-review of recent pediatric transfer cases; goals and objectives-enhance pediatric knowledge and skills of interprofessional teams and detect latent safety threats; educational strategies-codeveloped by CED and AMC, included prelearning using podcasts and videos, simulation and facilitated debriefing, resource sharing after simulations; implementation-3-h simulation sessions facilitated in person by the CED team and remotely by AMC (leadership required participation and paid staff); and evaluation and feedback-retrospective pre-post survey, Simulation Effectiveness Tool-Modified (SET-M), Net Promoter Score (NPS), and review/feedback meetings. Results: Based on needs assessment, the selected cases included newborn resuscitation, seizure, asthma, and tetrahydrocannabinol ingestion causing altered mental sensorium in a child. Twenty-four 3-h simulation sessions were conducted over 1 year. A total of 168 participants completed the sessions, while 75 participants (54.7% nurses, 22.7% physicians, and others) completed feedback surveys. Seventy-six percent of participants reported completing presimulation education material. Participants reported improved skills at appropriately evaluating a critically ill newborn and critically ill infant/toddler and improved teamwork during the care of a pediatric patient. The majority agreed that simulation was effective in teaching pediatric resuscitation. The NPS was 84% (excellent). Conclusions: A locally facilitated CED in situ simulation curriculum was successfully developed and implemented under local leadership, with remote collaboration by AMC. The curriculum was well received and effective.

Building Relationships: Advanced Practice Providers and Fellows in Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine.

OBJECTIVE: Advanced practice providers (APPs) are a critical component of health care teams, especially in the neonatal intensive care unit. At times, APPs and neonatal-perinatal medicine (NPM) fellows may experience tension in their professional relationship. They may perceive the other's performance and abilities differently. We hypothesized that satisfaction with the APP-NPM fellow interprofessional relationship would be associated with higher perception of APP competence by NPM fellows. STUDY DESIGN: We surveyed 274 medical providers: NPM fellows (24.8%), NPM program directors (24.5%), and APPs (50.7%). APPs were defined as neonatal nurse practitioners, pediatric nurse practitioners, physician assistants, or neonatal hospitalists. We obtained demographic data, information about sources of conflict in the APP-NPM fellow relationship, level of satisfaction with the relationship, and targeted interventions for improvement. NPM fellow perception of APP competence as well as APP self-assessed competence were elicited. Statistical analyses were performed with chi-square tests and Fisher's exact tests. RESULTS: Overall, APPs and NPM fellows were generally satisfied with their relationship. All groups reported APP competence as equivalent to a third-year NPM fellow. NPM fellow perception of APP competence increased with year of fellow training. Higher perceived APP competence by NPM fellows correlated with higher relationship satisfaction scores. Difficulties with teamwork, communication and respect were associated with lower satisfaction within the APP-NPM fellow relationship. CONCLUSION: The professional working dynamic between these two groups is viewed positively by all. Satisfaction with the APP-NPM fellow relationship correlated with higher perception of APP competence by NPM fellows. Targeted interventions that increase NPM fellow perception of APP competence and ameliorate the difficulties encountered in the APP-NPM fellow relationship may improve this interprofessional relationship. KEY POINTS: · Advanced practice providers and NPM fellows may have similar responsibilities leading to challenges.. · NPM fellows with higher perceived competence of APPs had higher satisfaction with their relationship.. · Training APPs to teach, creating interprofessional education, and routine debrief sessions may help..

Assessing Barriers to Utilization of Premedication for Neonatal Intubation Based on the Theoretical Domains Framework.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to identify barriers and facilitators of premedication utilization for nonemergent neonatal intubations (NIs) in a level IV neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). STUDY DESIGN: Between November 2018 and January 2019, multidisciplinary providers at a level IV NICU were invited to participate in an anonymous, electronic survey based on Theoretical Domains Framework to identify influences on utilization of evidence-based recommendations for NI premedication. RESULTS: Of 186 surveys distributed, 84 (45%) providers responded. Most agreed with premedication use in the following domains: professional role/identity (86%), emotions (79%), skills (72%), optimism (71%), and memory, attention, and decision process (71%). Domains with less agreement include social influences (42%), knowledge (57%), intention (60%), belief about capabilities (63%), and behavior regulation (64%). Additional barriers include environmental context and resources, and beliefs about consequences. CONCLUSION: Several factors influence premedication use for nonemergent NI and may serve as facilitators and/or barriers. Efforts to address barriers should incorporate a multidisciplinary approach to improve patient outcomes and decrease procedure-related pain. KEY POINTS: · Premedication for NIs can optimize conditions and decrease rates of tracheal intubation adverse events but there is significant international and institutional variation for premedication use for NI.. · Guided by implementation science methods, the Theoretical Domains Framework was utilized to construct a novel assessment tool to determine potential barriers to and facilitators of the use of premedication for NI.. · Several factors influence premedication for nonemergent NI..

How Good is Good Enough?: Current-Day Pediatric Residency Program Directors' Challenges in Assessing and Achieving Resident Procedural Competency.

OBJECTIVE: Significant gaps exist in the pediatric resident (PR) procedural experience. Graduating PRs are not achieving competency in the 13 ACGME recommended procedures. It is unclear why PR are not able to achieve competency, or how existing gaps may be addressed. METHODS: We performed in-depth one-on-one semistructured interviews with 12 pediatric residency program directors (PPDs). The interviews were audio-recorded, and transcribed verbatim. Coding of the data using conventional content analysis led to generation of categories, which were validated through consensus development. RESULTS: We identified 4 main categories, including (1) programs struggle to ensure adequate training in procedural skills for PRs, with various barriers reported; (2) programs develop individualized strategies to address challenges in procedural skills training, and multiple options are necessary; (3) PPDs face challenges defining procedural competency and standardizing expectations; and (4) expectations for PR procedural training may require modification based upon current practice environments. Solutions include simulation, procedural boot camps, and procedural/subspecialty electives. CONCLUSIONS: Numerous methods to combat challenges in PR procedural training have been identified by participating PPDs, including simulation, tailoring electives, and developing institutional guidelines. However, accreditation bodies may need to update procedural expectations based on individual resident career goals and realities of current day practice.

Comparison of a dichotomous versus trichotomous checklist for neonatal intubation.

BACKGROUND: To compare validity evidence for dichotomous and trichotomous versions of a neonatal intubation (NI) procedural skills checklist. METHODS: NI skills checklists were developed utilizing an existing framework. Experts were trained on scoring using dichotomous and trichotomous checklists, and rated recordings of 23 providers performing simulated NI. Videolaryngoscope recordings of glottic exposure were evaluated using Cormack-Lehane (CL) and Percent of Glottic Opening scales. Internal consistency and reliability of both checklists were analyzed, and correlations between checklist scores, airway visualization, entrustable professional activities (EPA), and global skills assessment (GSA) were calculated. RESULTS: During rater training, raters gave significantly higher scores on better provider performance in standardized videos (both p < 0.001). When utilized to evaluate study participants' simulated NI attempts, both dichotomous and trichotomous checklist scores demonstrated very good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha 0.868 and 0.840, respectively). Inter-rater reliability was higher for dichotomous than trichotomous checklists [Fleiss kappa of 0.642 and 0.576, respectively (p < 0.001)]. Sum checklist scores were significantly different among providers in different disciplines (p < 0.001, dichotomous and trichotomous). Sum dichotomous checklist scores correlated more strongly than trichotomous scores with GSA and CL grades. Sum dichotomous and trichotomous checklist scores correlated similarly well with EPA. CONCLUSIONS: Neither dichotomous or trichotomous checklist was superior in discriminating provider NI skill when compared to GSA, EPA, or airway visualization assessment. Sum scores from dichotomous checklists may provide sufficient information to assess procedural competence, but trichotomous checklists may permit more granular feedback to learners and educators. The checklist selected may vary with assessment needs.

Changes, Challenges, and Variations in Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine Fellowship: A View from the Program Directors.

OBJECTIVE: Neonatal-perinatal medicine (NPM) fellowship programs in the United States support >800 learners annually. Understanding variations in the programmatic structure, challenges, and needs is essential to optimize the educational environment and ensure the specialty's future. STUDY DESIGN: NPM fellowship program directors (PDs) and associate program directors (APDs) were invited to complete an electronic survey on their program administration, recruitment, clinical training, assessment methods, scholarly program, and career pathways. Each participant identified individual programmatic strengths, challenges, opportunities, and threats to the field. RESULTS: Representatives from 59 NPM fellowships provided data (response rate 59/96 = 61%). In total, 30% of PDs received less than the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education -recommended protected time for administrative duties, and 44% of APDs received no protected time. Fellow clinical service assignments varied widely from 13 to 18 months and 90 to 175 call nights over 3 years. Recruitment practices varied across programs; 59% of respondents raised concerns over the pipeline of applicants. Conflicts between fellows and advanced practice providers were identified by 61% of responders. Programs varied in their scholarly offerings, with 44% of NPM fellowships interested in adding broader research opportunities. CONCLUSIONS: NPM fellowship leaders identified a need for improved programmatic support, enhanced measures to assess competency, opportunities to strengthen scholarly programs, shared curricular resources, and strategies to balance education with clinical demands. PDs and APDs identified threats to the future of NPM training programs including the diminishing pipeline of applicants into neonatology, challenges with clinical exposure and competence, inadequate support for the educational mission, issues supporting high-quality scholarship, and fewer graduates pursuing physician-investigator pathways. National organizations and academic institutions should take action to address these challenges so that fellowships can optimally prepare graduates to meet their patients' needs. KEY POINTS: · Numerous challenges exist for current program directors in NPM including balancing clinical work with scholarly activities, accurately assessing competency, optimizing the culture of the learning environment, and ensuring that fellows are adequately prepared for a range of postgraduate positions.. · Significant variation exists across NPM fellowship programs in clinical service/calls assigned over 3 years of fellowship training, as well as opportunities to pursue scholarly activities across a variety of areas.. · Challenges exist related to ensuring an adequate number of future applicants into the specialty, including those from backgrounds traditionally underrepresented in medicine, as well as those seeking to pursue careers as physician-investigators..

Pivot and Persist: A Technical Report on Adapting an Existing Multi-Institutional Bootcamp to a Hybrid Platform.

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has disrupted most in-person simulation training, including established simulation-based medical bootcamps. These sessions are important for the preparation of new trainees to think critically about common clinical scenarios, practice technical skills, and optimize leadership, teamwork, and communication. Having the opportunity to hone these skills in a safe environment is instrumental for the development of trainees' confidence and professional identity formation, and may contribute to patient safety. When the annual New England/Mid-Atlantic regional first-year neonatology fellows' bootcamp was jeopardized by COVID restrictions, we implemented a novel approach to adapt the existing in-person format and curriculum for large-scale hybrid delivery. The resultant two-day session was well-received by both participants and facilitators. Important lessons from this experience, including adaptions to the curriculum, schedule, simulation interface and hybrid platform, are relevant to educators seeking to conduct large-scale virtual simulation-based educational sessions.

Neonatal Cardiac Emergencies: A Multidisciplinary Simulation Curriculum for Neonatology and Pediatric Cardiology Fellows.

Introduction: Although care for neonates with cardiac disease is frequently provided by neonatologists and pediatric cardiologists, training in the multidisciplinary management of neonatal cardiac emergencies is not often included in fellowship training. We created a multidisciplinary simulation curriculum to address the skills needed for neonatal cardiac care. Methods: Neonatology and pediatric cardiology fellows participated in 1-hour simulations on 3 different days. They managed a neonate with: (1) cyanosis, (2) cardiogenic shock, and (3) an unstable arrhythmia. Using both remote consultation and bedside evaluation, the participants diagnosed and jointly established a management plan for the infant. During the debrief, facilitators reviewed the clinical decisions and multidisciplinary management skills of the participants. Participants completed pre- and postparticipation surveys to evaluate the curriculum's effect on their confidence in the management of neonatal cardiac disease. Results: Thirty-three paired survey responses from 20 participants (11 neonatology and 9 pediatric cardiology) reported a mean overall satisfaction score of 4.6 (SD = 0.7) based on a 5-point Likert scale. Postparticipation confidence scores improved significantly in: (1) the recognition of the signs of congenital heart disease (pre = 4.1, post = 4.5, p = .01), (2) differentiation of cardiac cyanosis from noncardiac cyanosis (pre = 3.9, post = 4.2, p = .05), and (3) confidence in discussing cardiac concerns with consultants (pre = 3.3, post = 4.1, p = .02). Discussion: This multidisciplinary simulation improved fellows' confidence in the management of neonates with cardiac disease and provided an opportunity to practice team work, remote consultation, and cross-disciplinary communication.

Stress as tool or toxin: physiologic markers and subjective report in neonatal simulation.

BACKGROUND: Cognitive appraisal of stress can influence performance. Increased awareness could facilitate titration to optimal stress levels. This study's primary aim was to investigate whether physiologic variables change with increasingly stressful simulations. Secondary aims include effect of stress on procedural competency and whether individuals recognize their experienced stress. METHODS: This was a single-center, mixed-method, simulation-based study. Participants completed three scenarios requiring resuscitation under increasingly stressful conditions. Wearable biometric devices recorded physiologic parameters. Subjects completed surveys assessing knowledge and perceived stress. Intubation success or failure was noted. Heart rate variability (HRV) analysis was used as a proxy for stress. RESULTS: Twelve participants completed the study. Survey analysis revealed progressive amplification of endorsement of affective states associated with stress. Median low frequency (LF)/high frequency (HF) ratio from scenario 1 (median = 2.29, IQR = 1.97, 3.91) was significantly lower than scenario 2 (median = 4.7, IQR = 2.32, 8.35, p = 0.04) and scenario 3 (median = 4.63, IQR = 2.2, 7.43, p = 0.04). Changes in HRV were noted during all scenarios irrespective of subjective self-assessment of stress. Procedural proficiency suffered during more stressful scenarios. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates alterations in subjective assessment and objective physiologic data in simulations with increasing stress. HRV is useful as a proxy for stress response and does not always correlate with perception.

Impact of telemedicine on neonatal resuscitation in the emergency department: a simulation-based randomised trial.

Background: The delivery and initial resuscitation of a newborn infant are required but rarely practised skills in emergency medicine. Deliveries in the emergency department are high-risk events and deviations from best practices are associated with poor outcomes. Introduction: Telemedicine can provide emergency medicine providers real-time access to a Neonatal Resuscitation Program (NRP)-trained paediatric specialist. We hypothesised that adherence to NRP guidelines would be higher for participants with access to a remotely located NRP-trained paediatric specialist via telemedicine compared with participants without access. Materials and methods: Prospective single-centre randomised trial. Emergency Medicine residents were randomised into a telemedicine or standard care group. The participants resuscitated a simulated, apnoeic and bradycardic neonate. In the telemedicine group a remote paediatric specialist participated in the resuscitation. Simulations were video recorded and assessed for adherence to guidelines using four critical actions. The secondary outcome of task load was measured through participants' completion of the NASA Task Load Index (NASA-TLX) and reviewers completed a detailed NRP checklist. Results: Twelve participants were included. The use of telemedicine was associated with significantly improved adherence to three of the four critical actions reflecting NRP guidelines as well as a significant improvement in the overall score (p<0.001). On the NASA-TLX, no significant difference was seen in overall subjective workload assessment, but of the subscore components, frustration was statistically significantly greater in the control group (p<0.001). Conclusions: In this study, telemedicine improved adherence to NRP guidelines. Future work is needed to replicate these findings in the clinical environment.

Perceptions of Neonatal Palliative Care: Similarities and Differences between Medical and Nursing Staff in a Level IV Neonatal Intensive Care Unit.

Background: A significant number of newborns are affected by life-limiting or life-threatening conditions. Despite this prevalence, there are inconsistencies in attitudes toward, and delivery of, neonatal palliative care. Implementing neonatal palliative care practice requires a multidisciplinary, collaborative effort. Objective: To examine institutional and individual barriers to and facilitators of neonatal palliative care from both medical and nursing perspectives. Design/Setting/Subjects: A prospective cross-sectional study design was used to collect data using the Neonatal Palliative Care Attitude Scale (NiPCAS) survey from medical providers and nurses in a 64-bed level IV neonatal intensive care unit in the United States. The response rate was 67%. Measurements: The NiPCAS survey included 26 attitudinal questions on a Likert scale. The instrument included three subscales: organization, resources, and clinician, in addition to other questions. Results: Six facilitators to neonatal palliative care were identified: (1) support of palliative care by the health care team, (2) support of palliative care by medical and nursing practice, (3) agreement that palliative care is as important as curative care, (4) parental involvement in decision making, (5) recognition of the importance of palliative care education, and (6) prioritizing pain relief. Three barriers to neonatal palliative care were highlighted: (1) a physical environment that is not conducive to providing palliative care, (2) technological obligations and parental demands, and (3) the societal belief that babies should not die. In addition, there were differences between medical and nursing staffs' attitudes on several topics. Conclusions: Several facilitators and barriers of neonatal palliative care were identified. There were similarities and differences in perceptions of neonatal palliative care between medical and nursing staff. Future work should be done to strengthen facilitators and to mitigate barriers.

Neonatal Intubation Competency Assessment Tool: Development and Validation.

BACKGROUND: Neonatal tracheal intubation (NTI) is an important clinical skill. Suboptimal performance is associated with patient harm. Simulation training can improve NTI performance. Improving performance requires an objective assessment of competency. Competency assessment tools need strong evidence of validity. We hypothesized that an NTI competency assessment tool with multisource validity evidence could be developed and be used for formative and summative assessment during simulation-based training. METHODS: An NTI assessment tool was developed based on a literature review. The tool was refined through 2 rounds of a modified Delphi process involving 12 subject-matter experts. The final tool included a 22-item checklist, a global skills assessment, and an entrustable professional activity (EPA) level. The validity of the checklist was assessed by having 4 blinded reviewers score 23 videos of health care providers intubating a neonatal simulator. RESULTS: The checklist items had good internal consistency (overall α = 0.79). Checklist scores were greater for providers at greater training levels and with more NTI experience. Checklist scores correlated with global skills assessment (ρ = 0.85; P < .05), EPA levels (ρ = 0.87; P < .05), percent glottic exposure (r = 0.59; P < .05), and Cormack-Lehane scores (ρ = 0.95; P < .05). Checklist scores reliably predicted EPA levels. CONCLUSIONS: We developed an NTI competency assessment tool with multisource validity evidence. The tool was able to discriminate NTI performance based on experience. The tool can be used during simulation-based NTI training to provide formative and summative assessment and can aid with entrustment decisions.

Reducing Unplanned Extubations Across a Children's Hospital Using Quality Improvement Methods.

INTRODUCTION: Children who require an endotracheal (ET) tube for care during critical illness are at risk of unplanned extubations (UE), or the unintended dislodgement or removal of an ET tube that can lead to significant patient harm. A proposed national benchmark is 1 UE per 100 ventilator days. We aimed to reduce the rate of UEs in our intensive care units (ICUs) from 1.20 per 100 ventilator days to below the national benchmark within 2 years. METHODS: We identified several key drivers including ET securement standardization, safety culture, and strategies for high-risk situations. We employed quality improvement methodologies including apparent cause analysis and plan-do-study-act cycles to improve our processes and outcomes. RESULTS: Over 2 years, we reduced the rate of UEs hospital-wide by 75% from 1.2 to 0.3 per 100 ventilator days. We eliminated UEs in the pediatric ICU during the study period, while the UE rate in the neonatal ICU also decreased from 1.2 to 0.3 per 100 ventilator days. CONCLUSION: We demonstrated that by using quality improvement methodology, we successfully reduced our rate of UE by 75% to a level well below the proposed national benchmark.

MRI Differences Associated with Intrauterine Growth Restriction in Preterm Infants.

BACKGROUND: Preterm infants are at risk for neurodevelopmental impairment. Intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) further increases this risk. Brain imaging studies are often utilized at or near term-equivalent age to determine later prognosis. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association between intrauterine growth and regional brain volume on MRI scans performed in preterm infants at or near term-equivalent age. METHODS: This is a retrospective case-control study of 24 infants born at gestational age ≤30 weeks and cared for in a large, inner-city, academic neonatal intensive-care unit from 2012 to 2013. Each IUGR infant was matched with 1-2 appropriate for gestational age (AGA) infants who served as controls. Predischarge MRI scans routinely obtained at ≥36 weeks' adjusted age were analyzed for regional brain volumetric differences. We examined the association between IUGR and thalamic, basal ganglion, and cerebellar brain volumes in these preterm infants. RESULTS: Compared to AGA infants, IUGR infants had a smaller thalamus (7.88 vs. 5.87 mL, p = 0.001) and basal ganglion (8.87 vs. 6.92 mL, p = 0.002) volumes. There was no difference in cerebellar volumes between the two study groups. Linear regression analyses revealed similar trends in the associations between IUGR and brain volumes after adjusting for sex, gestational age at birth, and postconceptual age and weight at MRI. CONCLUSIONS: Thalamus and basal ganglion volumes are reduced in growth-restricted preterm infants. These differences may preferentially impact neurodevelopmental outcomes. Further research is needed to explore these relationships.

Shoulder Dystocia and Neonatal Resuscitation: An Integrated Obstetrics and Neonatology Simulation Case for Medical Students.

INTRODUCTION: The new model in medical education of longitudinal clinical clerkships can be complemented by high-technology simulation, which provides a safe space for learners to consolidate clinical knowledge and practice decision-making skills, teamwork, and communication. We developed an interdisciplinary training intervention including a simulation case and structured debriefing to link clinical content between pediatrics and obstetrics at a major academic medical center. METHODS: In this case, a 38-year-old female at 38 weeks gestation presents with onset of labor complicated by shoulder dystocia. After the appropriate maneuvers, a depressed neonate is delivered and requires resuscitation. Major equipment needed includes a high- or low-technology birthing mannequin and an infant mannequin. RESULTS: Fifty-four third-year medical students participated in this simulation-based intervention at the completion of their integrated pediatrics and obstetrics clerkship. Ninety-one percent of students agreed that the shoulder dystocia simulation was designed appropriately for their learning level and enhanced their ability to handle a risky delivery. Ninety-four percent agreed that the neonatal resuscitation simulation was designed appropriately for their learning level, and 89% reported an enhanced ability to handle a similar situation in the clinic following the intervention. The average overall ratings were 4.24 (SD = 0.61) and 4.06 (SD = 0.89) on a 5-point scale (1 = poor, 5 = excellent) for the obstetrics and pediatrics simulations, respectively. DISCUSSION: The integrated obstetrics and pediatrics scenario is feasible to run and clinically accurate. Two distinct areas of medicine in the third-year curriculum are logically incorporated into one cohesive simulation-based training intervention that students found positive and realistic.

Cost-effective and low-technology options for simulation and training in neonatology.

The purpose of this review is to explore low-cost options for simulation and training in neonatology. Numerous cost-effective options exist for simulation and training in neonatology. Lower cost options are available for teaching clinical skills and procedural training in neonatal intubation, chest tube insertion, and pericardiocentesis, among others. Cost-effective, low-cost options for simulation-based education can be developed and shared in order to optimize the neonatal simulation training experience.

CRIB scores as a tool for assessing risk for the development of pulmonary hypertension in extremely preterm infants with bronchopulmonary dysplasia.

OBJECTIVE: Bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) increases the risk for developing pulmonary hypertension (PH). However, the risk factors associated with BPD-associated PH remain unclear. Our primary aim was to determine perinatal risk factors associated with the development of PH in infants with BPD. STUDY DESIGN: We retrospectively reviewed medical records of 303 infants born at ≤ 28 weeks' gestation. Infants were categorized as having no, mild, moderate, or severe BPD. PH was diagnosed by echocardiogram. Data were analyzed using Fisher exact test, two-sample t-test, and multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: The incidence of PH in our cohort was 12%. Infants with PH had lower birth weights and gestational ages (p < 0.001). After controlling for confounding variables, severe BPD (p < 0.001), and higher Clinical Risk Index for Babies (CRIB) scores (p = 0.04) were associated with the development of PH. CONCLUSION: Severe BPD increases the risk for developing PH. Higher CRIB scores correlate with PH development in infants with BPD. We speculate that CRIB scores may allow for early categorization of preterm infants with a higher likelihood of developing PH.

Screening for Critical Congenital Heart Disease in Newborns.

CCHD affects more than 25% of neonates born with congenital heart disease. Patients with CCHD require timely intervention in the form of surgery or cardiac catheterization to survive. These interventions may improve survival and outcomes for these patients. There is strong evidence that performing newborn pulse oximetry screening after the first 24 hours of life may help to detect more than 1200 neonates in the United States each year with CCHD. Pulse oximetry screening for CCHD has been demonstrated to be reasonable to implement and seems to be cost-effective. There is evidence that asymptomatic patients with CCHD can be diagnosed before clinical presentation or cardiovascular collapse with this screening. Pulse oximeter screening has been endorsed by several national organizations as a valuable newborn screening tool. Implementation of pulse oximetry screening programs in a standardized manner with strong communication among all involved parties will likely improve outcomes as well. As we move forward, we as clinicians should work to have a centralized system of reporting positive CCHD results, prompt patient evaluation, and good follow-up for the families of those neonates with positive screening results. Achieving these objectives will likely help us to achieve the goal of improving outcomes of the most critical neonates with CCHD.